Galaxy nexus CPU clock speeds 1.65Ghz! - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

just wondering what you guys are getting for clock speeds on your galaxy nexus, im successfully running 1.65 Ghz using franco's #18.2, stable and random reboot free, i would love to hear yours

What are your uv settings?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Weird I'm having trouble uploading from my app. But its 1450 mV for 1.65 and 1.6 1400 mV for 1500. i haven't done any undervolting yet, i dont want to mess with the stability, mainly because im happy my phone even runs on 1.65.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

"Today, we put to rest our dear friend, Battery. He will be missed, even though he was rarely there when we needed him most."
*Shovels dirt into the grave*

I myself not so concern about battery life loss from CPU OC as long as the screen is still consuming 50% of it everyday...

meh, i have a extended battery, get decent battery life and have an extra, so im not worried. and its not like im at a constant 1.6, im happy with it so far gonna use it for a few days and see how it goes

who cares about battery life when you have a massive e-peens!

Literally just got into rooting and theming with my first android (gnex). Rooted and installed aokp b25 with nova launcher and loving it!
Is there noob guide to over clocking? Or a go to app or anything?
Maybe a tutorial? lol

Google can be your best friend. thats how i did it

s2d4 said:
you have a massive e-peens!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guilty as charged.

s2d4 said:
who cares about battery life when you have a massive e-peens!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But....Quadrants must rule!
To the person who said they don't care when the screen takes 50%....
That makes no sense on why not to care about battery loss from overclocking.
Less == less, no matter what is draining it.

Dylerium said:
Google can be your best friend. thats how i did it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats how I rooted my phone and installed my rom. All googling, literally had no idea how to root or install a rom. Didn't even know any of the terminology.
Overclocking seems to be a bit more risky. I've tried googling a tutorial/beginners guide would be amazing.
What kernel are you guys using and where can I find it?

im using franco's #18.2 kernel you can find it in the cdma developer section

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Does anyone find it amusing his CPU score is lower than a stock Galaxy Nexus and instead his i/o score is inflated?

adrynalyne said:
Does anyone find it amusing his CPU score is lower than a stock Galaxy Nexus and instead his i/o score is inflated?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
generous use of of loading quadrant into ramdisk?

i noticed this too, i was gonna ask but i figured since all phones are different, it didnt really matter, but who the hell am i to say, your the expert...

I don't play the benchmark game, but ignoring your i/o score, your CPU score which an overclock would address is lower than stock 1.2ghz.

s2d4 said:
generous use of of loading quadrant intobramdisk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf is bramdisk?... i honestly dont know why my phones like that, i just dl'd and benched... i have a feeling i might have to upload a video for you guys... hahah

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Related

Quadrant Scores:

lets post scores and what we are running to get their to help compare the different options available now for our Droid Incredible 2's
1649 gingerbread (.3.) for another week or so
CM7 Nightly 2. Stock kernel, not overlocked:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cm7 overlocked to 1497
30 minutes or so later...and yes my crappy digital cameras clock is wrong
Cyanogen 1.8ghz
Underclocked and still better than stock. Runs great at 768mhz. No complaints.
Maximum overclock on stock CM7 kernel (~1.5ghz).
I did some tests with the CM7 Nightly 3. I got some amazing scores:
Stock cpu speed:
1.2GHz:
1.45GHz:
1.6GHz:
1.7 and 1.8GHz gave me lower scores than 1.6GHz, so I guess its safe to say 1.6Ghz is the max stable speed.
can't wait to hit cm7 and push it now !!!
Running miui at 1.49ghtz.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App
Im running cm7 nightly 3 at 1.8 (and tested at 1.6) I am only around 2800 how are y'all getting up to 3500?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.
nimdae said:
Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.
melgibson666 said:
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.
nimdae said:
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I was messing around with the different govenors after reading your post and I noticed a big difference between the power saver and ONdemand. Power saver makes the transitions a little sluggish but I guess that's to be expected for what it's trying to do. lol All in all though the battery life on ondemand is leaps and bounds ahead of the stock ROM I'm running a 1.1ghz clock right now and it is like butter with battery life to boot.
Quad Standard
mine came in at 2924 thats awesome!
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Rom
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App
zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock ROM? Mine wasn't even that low stock. Did you run it more than once?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom
zozor said:
am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn sorry bro I got a 2900 while on the phone lol
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

***Official AnTuTu Benchmark Thread***

Post up your AnTuTu Benchmark scores! Please only post up screenshots for verification purposes.
Thanks to you zedomax! I am running just his kernel, without a custom ROM on top, and I love this thing. It is rock stable at 1.6GHz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this sure looks like, at least for now, I am the highest score on AnTuTu with an E4GT. Am I right?
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
pwnt
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock kernel FTW
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
viperROM (LoStKernel Exp) with 1.6Ghz OC & GPU OC.
Just imagine if we could get the 60fps cap off our phones
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
ahl395 said:
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Sid 6.7 said:
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is an E4GT.
R1ptide said:
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Mine is an E4GT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Sid 6.7 said:
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.
stangdriverdoug said:
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious?
If you are press home and power at the same time
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I got this
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
This is the best I can do...
Samsung Galaxy S II
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Not to bad!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
trying to break 7800
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
lse4 said:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
JoeBruin32 said:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
R1ptide said:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?
edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452

[CDMA] Any ROMs with 4,000+ quadrant scores?

I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free
There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.
ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.
I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.
Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.
Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support
I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!
I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD
Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Wtf..

Just got my new note 2 the other day. Yesterday every quadrant benchmark I was getting 6200 and now tonight every time I'm getting 5800, something 5500. So wtf?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
U probably installed some apps that are slowing it down. Try clearing cache and run test again.
Sent from the TermiNOTEr 2!
no 2 devices are identical, same thing goes for just about everything you buy even cars. Some cars and phones have a average, but then there are those that are factory freaks and put up numbers that make people doubt there own devices, and of course the opposite it true too, some dont meet up to the average.
You cant trust benchmarks anyways. Mine just put up 5782, do i care? no, why? because i feel no lag ever. It is plenty fast and the difference in quadrant wouldnt make much of a difference anyways. Also quadrant can be all over the place and vary 500-1000 points between each test.
I'm having issues connecting to my wifi. Do you think that could be slowing it down? No joke yesterday I was getting 6000 and up every time. I haven't installed any new apps or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
Here's my antutu score. I think it's a way better benchmark than quadrant. Quadrant is always different and antutu is usually the same.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
you will get lower score when cpu is hot.try running quadrant when u awake phone up after 30min or more.u should get more then 6000
If your phone is running day to day stuff the same, then I wouldn't stress about losing a few hundred points on quadrant.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
mintu123 said:
you will get lower score when cpu is hot.try running quadrant when u awake phone up after 30min or more.u should get more then 6000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're so right. I just woke up and my phone has been asleep all night. I ran quadrant 5x and every time it scored 6,000-6,200
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
I have never run a single benchmark on any of my phones. And by looking at this thread, I'm very thankful for that
Chadly said:
Just got my new note 2 the other day. Yesterday every quadrant benchmark I was getting 6200 and now tonight every time I'm getting 5800, something 5500. So wtf?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a reply to a similar query in another thread a few days ago. You must make sure you have the "Power saving" toggle set to OFF if you want to maximize any benchmark results (especially CPU/GPU benchmarks). It is highly likely you have activated the Power saving mode since you first ran the "faster" Quadrant test. The difference in results you are seeing is almost exactly what you would expect with the performance changes caused by having Power saving mode active.
Settings->Power saving (make sure toggle is OFF)
The best thing to do is not worry about benchmarks so much. Possibly use it as a gauge on whether you got a performance increase if you did something to the phone, but even then, I've had phones run lower quadrants on a certain ROM, but still be overall smoother/better.

Post your benchmarks here!

Title Says It All!
Remember: Be sure to tell what ROM you are running, and also the benchmark you used.
Stock rooted, Quadrant benchmark.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent From My Rooted, S-OFF'd Blackberry Curve using the iOS XDA Application for Android.
BenchMark
Whiplashh said:
Title Says It All!
Remember: Be sure to tell what ROM you are running, and also the benchmark you used.
Stock rooted, Quadrant benchmark.
View attachment 1822508
Sent From My Rooted, S-OFF'd Blackberry Curve using the iOS XDA Application for Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint GS3 XTREMEPERIA Z VERSION #1 freshly flashed 10496 with AnTuTu Benchmark
This post is bound to be deleted.. We already have literally like 10 benchmark threads XD
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
My setup:
CleanBean v2.1 / master chef's magnificent kernel spr-02212013_0046 / CrossBreeder 3.15.13_v2
I have about 15 apps downloaded from the market. I did install the volume.db mod, sound 50% increase mod but no hosts modifications (besides whatever crossbreeder comes with). Stock SD card that came with my Evo 3D. ondemand gov w/ cfq scheduler.
I ran Quadrant 2 times, got roughly the same score +/- 50 , nothing drastic.
ReapersDeath said:
This post is bound to be deleted.. We already have literally like 10 benchmark threads XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most defiantly going to the graveyard.. not to mention, benchmarks prove nothing. Real world performance is what truly shows how good your phone is.
milky1112 said:
Most defiantly going to the graveyard.. not to mention, benchmarks prove nothing. Real world performance is what truly shows how good your phone is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says the people with low benchmarks
glcK23 said:
My setup:
CleanBean v2.1 / master chef's magnificent kernel spr-02212013_0046 / CrossBreeder 3.15.13_v2
I have about 15 apps downloaded from the market. I did install the volume.db mod, sound 50% increase mod but no hosts modifications (besides whatever crossbreeder comes with). Stock SD card that came with my Evo 3D. ondemand gov w/ cfq scheduler.
I ran Quadrant 2 times, got roughly the same score +/- 50 , nothing drastic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did you get that kernel?
should give us a delete button...
benmatlock said:
should give us a delete button...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wasnt active till you posted again...
Sent From My Rooted, S-OFF'd Blackberry Curve using the iOS XDA Application for Android.
Whiplashh said:
It wasnt active till you posted again...
Sent From My Rooted, S-OFF'd Blackberry Curve using the iOS XDA Application for Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
glcK23 said:
Says the people with low benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, My Bench is 6096, no over clock.. The Peoples Rom..
Again, it's just an app... Real world is what counts..

Categories

Resources