A Request to "Maclaw" | Porting CM 9 of Galaxy Ace to Motorola Fire XT - About xda-developers.com

Hi there.. ,
I am a new member so posting my PM content composed for "Maclaw" here in form of a request thread.
--
I need your kind help in porting your "CyanogenMod 9.0.0 Release for Samsung Galaxy Ace" <<TO>> Motorola Fire XT (Also known as Motorola Fire XT XT530, Motorola XT531, Motorola SPICE XT) as the hardware for both of these phones is very much identical.
Many owners of fire XT have already rooted their phone successfully . (just waiting or a custom ROM support )
As per your post here the release is beta "5" mode (CyanogenMod 9.0.0-RC0-GT-S5830-GalaxyICS-KANG-beta5).
Many members across XDA are looking forward to have a custom ROM for this smartphone. Please help me/us; the stock gingerbread sucks.
I am ready to help you but as I actually don't own the phone till now* (buying soon) BUT others who do own it will get back to you.
I think that as the hardware specs are nearly identical then in that case we shouldn't face any serious problems while porting it to motorola fire xt.
Waiting for a positive reply,
--
Thanks & Regards,
sky770

Unfortunately the project is called GALAXYics, It's to port ics to the low-end Samsung Galaxy phones. That is why mikegapinski's project for lg-gt540 is not in Galaxyics (it's built on it though)
But who knows I might have misunderstood it completely, but for now it's probably not gonna happen, sorry

iok1 said:
Unfortunately the project is called GALAXYics, It's to port ics to the low-end Samsung Galaxy phones. That is why mikegapinski's project for lg-gt540 is not in Galaxyics (it's built on it though)
But who knows I might have misunderstood it completely, but for now it's probably not gonna happen, sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for replying
Well.. was wishing if some dev. could help us out. (owners of Moto fire xt)

sky770 said:
Thanks for replying
Well.. was wishing if some dev. could help us out. (owners of Moto fire xt)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is not really porting the OS itself. It is finding a way to boot it on our phones that poses the challenge. Motorola uses secure boot and does not allow unlocking the boot loader.
I tried overcoming this problem by faking signatures, but ended up bricking the phone.
After some reading, I found out that all modern motorola phones have the same problem. Devs were able to load clockwork mod without touching the stock recovery or interfering with secure boot. This was done by a process called boot strapping (or 2nd-init). This requires a more skilled person than me.
Once we get clockwork mod on our Fire XT, porting ICS to our phone would be a piece of cake especially building upon the work of Maclaw for the ace.

7amdoun said:
The problem is not really porting the OS itself. It is finding a way to boot it on our phones that poses the challenge. Motorola uses secure boot and does not allow unlocking the boot loader.
I tried overcoming this problem by faking signatures, but ended up bricking the phone.
After some reading, I found out that all modern motorola phones have the same problem. Devs were able to load clockwork mod without touching the stock recovery or interfering with secure boot. This was done by a process called boot strapping (or 2nd-init). This requires a more skilled person than me.
Once we get clockwork mod on our Fire XT, porting ICS to our phone would be a piece of cake especially building upon the work of Maclaw for the ace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then how come there's a lot of development of other motorola phones such as Defy?

cddddddddddddddddddddd c...

now this probably wont work on your phone. but on ours we managed to use 'boot hijacking' to load a recovery on stock. this just edited the chargemon and if we spammed back it loaded a recovery. we then flashed gb and froyo on the stock kernel till thelaser hacked the bootloader
Sent from my U20i using xda premium

Related

About the bootloader [Again]

I had almost lost hope of getting unlocked bootloader when I saw a new hope with the launch of Galaxy S III.
How many of you know, the Verizon version of this device is locked with the bootloader, while others appear to be unlocked. Even knowing how bad this is, this may be an opportunity for many of the models with locked bootloader have a chance.
What I mean is that, like the S III, we have some defy's around the world with unlocked bootloader (most of them in china so observe here for the XDA). Would I be so foolish to believe that with a device such as the S III target, there is a possibility of unlocking the bootloader by developers? And this means of release could somehow help with the release of the Defy and many other devices with locked bootloader?
Yesterday, motorola mobility rep. posted this on their Google+ page
Motorola ATRIX HD at AT&T will have a locked bootloader to meet requirements; our goal is still to provide a way to unlock the bootloaders on our devices to those who wish to do so, more details will be shared as soon as we can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The question is, what that really means.
popcorp said:
Yesterday, motorola mobility rep. posted this on their Google+ page
The question is, what that really means.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably another lie from them.
Sent from my ICS Defy
NITRO_100 said:
Probably another lie from them.
Sent from my ICS Defy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not doubt. Motorola has a terrible historical. But i really enjoy the Defy and wouldn't like to have to change my device to update kernel/android. I'm really wanting to play the fool to believe in fairy tales at the time :laugh:
I want to believe in this fairy tale this time.
I have a RAZR and just got the official ICS on it. I like my defy more than my razr. I wish I could put ICS on here.
iolinux333 said:
I wish I could put ICS on here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? Why not try ICS CM9 from devs Quarx and Epsylon3? Or even better, wait a few days and flash CM10 Jelly Bean...
OT: time to spam their Bootloader discussion forum again:
http://community.developer.motorola...ader-discussion-board/td-p/22108?pubid=987654
Martijn1971 said:
Huh? Why not try ICS CM9 from devs Quarx and Epsylon3? Or even better, wait a few days and flash CM10 Jelly Bean...
OT: time to spam their Bootloader discussion forum again:
http://community.developer.motorola...ader-discussion-board/td-p/22108?pubid=987654
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Martijn, you know...you can try Quarx end Epsylon3 ROMs. I'm doing this right now, and since we got the dualboot, i'm testing a lot of ROMs. But we have a great problem, our kernel. On Jelly Bean android will receive great improvement on the sdk and with the system, like App stack navigation or Network service. Much of the improvement are done on the system, but some of then could request new implements from the kernel. A example could be the use of the NFC ( Near Field Communications ). It's on the kernel how to initialize on care some IRQ from the hardware. You could build a module to load how to care with NFC from the Android OS, but if it would build on kernel (like it could be from new linux kernels). And things like Dynamic writeback throttling, performance on reading or size limit from file systems
Take a look on this: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1
Much things i can do on CM7, using kernel 2.6, like the wiimote, so why this would be news on kernel 3.1? 'Cause there, isn't the OS that is caring the NFC or the wiimotes, but the kernel. A such difference is a example that could make a new version of the Android flow better on our device. And things like this we just get with a bootloader opened.
Quarx end Epsylon3 are doing a great, a extraordinary work! I salute them! But as the Android evolves, they work get even more hard if all that could be on kernel, they have to do with patches or modules on the OS. Praying for a open bootloader isn't just to ensure that we gonna have updates until or device could run it and be moneymaking for the developers, but is a way to ensure that this work will be more easy (and probably faster) to the developers too.
Kazid said:
Martijn, you know...you can try Quarx end Epsylon3 ROMs. I'm doing this right now, and since we got the dualboot, i'm testing a lot of ROMs. But we have a great problem, our kernel. On Jelly Bean android will receive great improvement on the sdk and with the system, like App stack navigation or Network service. Much of the improvement are done on the system, but some of then could request new implements from the kernel. A example could be the use of the NFC ( Near Field Communications ). It's on the kernel how to initialize on care some IRQ from the hardware. You could build a module to load how to care with NFC from the Android OS, but if it would build on kernel (like it could be from new linux kernels). And things like Dynamic writeback throttling, performance on reading or size limit from file systems
Take a look on this: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1
Much things i can do on CM7, using kernel 2.6, like the wiimote, so why this would be news on kernel 3.1? 'Cause there, isn't the OS that is caring the NFC or the wiimotes, but the kernel. A such difference is a example that could make a new version of the Android flow better on our device. And things like this we just get with a bootloader opened.
Quarx end Epsylon3 are doing a great, a extraordinary work! I salute them! But as the Android evolves, they work get even more hard if all that could be on kernel, they have to do with patches or modules on the OS. Praying for a open bootloader isn't just to ensure that we gonna have updates until or device could run it and be moneymaking for the developers, but is a way to ensure that this work will be more easy (and probably faster) to the developers too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Opening the bootloader is not the only way to load a new kernel. Kexec was designed exactly for that. It's possible on android -- kholk have got that to work on RAZR already. There were some problem on defy, but I think it is not impossible to fix.
I may be wrong, but can we use the kexec to solve the actual problem with CM10? It won't work for Radio but we can use it for USB/Audio?
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
t0n0n said:
I may be wrong, but can we use the kexec to solve the actual problem with CM10? It won't work for Radio but we can use it for USB/Audio?
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as what I've read, the radio is burnt completely if we try kexec.
S3nt fr0m my D3fy/w1u1 GB st4BL3
nidhish91 said:
As far as what I've read, the radio is burnt completely if we try kexec.
S3nt fr0m my D3fy/w1u1 GB st4BL3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it gets not burnt... it just crashes, panics and in consequence the defy(+) reboots.
nidhish91 said:
As far as what I've read, the radio is burnt completely if we try kexec.
S3nt fr0m my D3fy/w1u1 GB st4BL3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thought we could exclude the Radio and use just USB/Audio =/
Didn't they used "burn" just as a expression?
Our Kernel can load modules, can't it reload them? We use a module called mod2 who kicks in after to add to the first module? Or to override the first one. It's a lot like kexec but with the modules, not the kernel.
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Kazid said:
I had almost lost hope of getting unlocked bootloader when I saw a new hope with the launch of Galaxy S III.
How many of you know, the Verizon version of this device is locked with the bootloader, while others appear to be unlocked. Even knowing how bad this is, this may be an opportunity for many of the models with locked bootloader have a chance.
What I mean is that, like the S III, we have some defy's around the world with unlocked bootloader (most of them in china so observe here for the XDA). Would I be so foolish to believe that with a device such as the S III target, there is a possibility of unlocking the bootloader by developers? And this means of release could somehow help with the release of the Defy and many other devices with locked bootloader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
t0n0n said:
I may be wrong, but can we use the kexec to solve the actual problem with CM10? It won't work for Radio but we can use it for USB/Audio?
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember something called "Project Cheesecake" and "Operation MOSH" from like, a year ago.
Petitions did not save our Defy from a locked bootloader.
Samsung's different. Nearly all Samsung devices have unlocked BL. Nearly all Motorola devices have locked BL.
They tried using oem fastboot on the Defy but it didn't work so well I don't think.
droid_<3er said:
I remember something called "Project Cheesecake" and "Operation MOSH" from like, a year ago.
Petitions did not save our Defy from a locked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the thread for cheesecake.

[S][DEV-ONLY]HTC Sense

This isn't another one of those 'can somebody port Sense' threads.​
Please note that this thread is for developer-oriented discussion. If you don't have anything to say to help development, please refrain from posting here.
Also note that ideas are welcome. Just check if the idea you're about to post has already been posted by somebody else.
Right now, it's just multiple people working on this. No team, just individuals.
As of the last edit of this post, there has been little to no progress:
I'm constantly working on builds. The current, and the only goal I'll be striving towards as of now is using a T-Mo HTC One X ROM in combination with RaymanFX's CM10.1 RC2 build.
XDA RC @abcdjdj has reported that he has fixed a lot of errors in his build, and is now stuck at the bootanimation. If you can help him in any way, here is what's wrong with his build. He's using FXP's CM9 as a base and a 4.0 HTC One X with Sense 4 ROM as a port.
The OP will constantly be updated with any progress anyone makes.
We're currently using this XDA thread to help us port the ROM.
--------------------------------
​Here's everything I have to share on my build:
PORT: HTC One X, T-Mobile Edition| Android 4.2.2
BASE: Sony Xperia S, nozomi | Android 4.2.2
------------------------
ITesters needed. If you can work through adb commands and can provide me with logcats, please leave a post about it in the thread.
And finally, a note to anyone that may be cursing me for working so very slow (because I admit, this is very slow):
Please understand that all this isn't easy for me. I have painfully slow internet, making each download at least one hour, and thus a pain. My time on this project is limited every day, so progress is slow.
Reserved.
someone755 said:
Okay, so this is the work that has already been done and some of the mysteries that puzzle me right now:
I've edited the CM9 kernel's ramdisk, like stated in the tutorial I'm using (see post 1). As of now, the kernel itself is broken and even if the ROM was complete, not even the booting would work. (Well, booting works as far as showing the boot logo (the green FXP one) goes. But the LED notification light for entering recovery doesn't light. Bootloop over and over...)
Many of the lib files intended to be copied from one lib folder to the other are missing on our Nozomis... My question is, what are the consequences...?
My main issue here is that the zip won't flash. The recovery (no matter which I choose) just returns an 'ERROR' and refuses to flash the file...
Another question would be how to repack an .elf kernel into a boot.img. Because now, I'm trying with letting the CM9 kernel in the zip (since it is an .img) and then flash the modified .elf kernel that I repacked with Flashtool. Inefficient, but at least there's a way.
So currently, the priority list would be:
1.Get zip to flash
2.Fix kernel
...Not necessarily in that order. We could fix the kernel first, but there isn't much gain to it if the ROM zip can't even be flashed to test if it truly works...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro, it may be possible to get Sense on our devices. Even I have been working on getting Sense booted on our device. My status:-
PORTED FROM - HTC ONE X
BASE - FXP 215 CM9
STATUS - Gets past kernel and even loads bootanimation. Fixed many errors in the logcat. Gets stuck at bootanimation and even displays a message saying that System is not responding, would you like to close it.
I couldn't manage to fix any more errors in the logcat so I gave up but you have rekindled my spirit to get Sense booting on out device. I will upload my rom soon along with the logcat.
Cheers,
abcdjdj
Wow, you actually got the thing to boot?
The only question is how did you manage that based off of a tegra CPU? Would be very interested in seeing that...
On a not-so-very related note, your port was of ICS and Sense 4 , correct?
Am I the only one around here that favors old software?
someone755 said:
Wow, you actually got the thing to boot?
The only question is how did you manage that based off of a tegra CPU? Would be very interested in seeing that...
On a not-so-very related note, your port was of ICS and Sense 4 , correct?
Am I the only one around here that favors old software?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not fully booting but I think close to booting. I followed the guide mentioned by you in the OP and one by one eliminated all errors that I could eliminate. I had been working on Sense for around a month during my school holidays but now I am not getting any free time. And yes it is Sense 4 (Android 4.0.4).
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
But isn't the Tegra3 completely different than our FUJI board?
Especially the graphics, those must be out of control on your ROM...
If I were you, I'd at least take the AT&T version of the HOX.
Oh yeah, I forgot to ask: is it the same if I try and port from a MSM8260 board (the same as the Xperia) and the later S4 Qualcomm versions (used in the Xperia T, AT&T One X etc.)? Because porting from a CDMA phone (HTC Rezound) seems to make the work harder...
Thankfully, my summer holidays have just begun, so I have plenty of free time (that's also the reason I started my project).
P.S.
Yeah, maybe that's exactly what I should do. Ditch the CDMA phone and start with the Snapdragon S4 One X!
I would prefer Sense 3.x, but oh well, at least Sense4 is also Sense
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/sense-4-ported-to-sony-xperia-devices/
I just found this. It's not even that old...
Anyways, I've been thinking if the devs of this would be able to help us.
This development stuff gets boring pretty quick when you do it for the 10th time
@samuel2706, could you give these guys a little hand?
But he's a HTC Dev... Wouldn't we need something more like a nexus or better yet a Xperia developer?
someone755 said:
But he's a HTC Dev... Wouldn't we need something more like a nexus or better yet a Xperia developer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,, maybe, but he also could give a little help. Can't he?
Sent From my LT26i using Tapatalk 4
Contact the guy who did this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2184706
Well, I thought I'd make this thread so that devs could help each other to actually work together and create a working Sense ROM. So naturally, all help is welcome from anyone.
Anyways, I'm on my way to finishing yet another try, this time with the AT&T One X. Fingers crossed that it at least makes it to the bootanimation.
EDIT: I see that the easiest way to get Gapps is with including the default /data folder from the original HTC ROM (with vending, youtube etc.). But I have to add that to the updater-script. So, I want to ask, is /dev/block/mmcblk0p14 the data partition on the Nozomi?
What's happening?
samuel2706 said:
What's happening?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I am porting [or trying to port] Sense 4 from HTC One X to Xperia S. I used FXP 214 CM9 as a base. I followed this guide - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2245786
Then I fixed as many errors as I could by checking the logcat and got it till the Bootanimation. But now I need help to get it to boot. So, I have attached the logcat from my latest build.
Thanks for your help,
abcdjdj
Maybe copying a few more files could help. Maybe act like your xperia is a HTC device? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1222746
Could be worth a try and play with this copying a bit...
Seems to be failing at dalvik; very strange, it doesn't show any major errors on first glance however I'll take a longer look at when I can, however I can link you to this thread that may help you in the meantime Porting
What about this one? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2276871
Nice and automated, but the question is, will it work?
I'm trying it with the HOX, just need to wait for it to copy to the phone...
All this seems like a big race -- who will get it working first? Hyped!
Kinda makes me wish I still had my xperia S I could have given this a real good go at; but instead I have a galaxy s4, so it's going to be mostly logcats and such I can help with, I don't like blind building things; made that mistake before.
A blind build is better than no build. Unless it makes bricks...
Thanks a lot for helping out.
Though I'll never understand how a pro HTC dev can go to Sony and then Samsung. ;P
I just hope THIS time my kernel will boot... Cause if it doesn't ... [censored]...
EDIT: Okay, [censored] is happening... Why can't I make this zip flash? I've done it a million times, but all I get is ERROR... ;-;
unfotunatly, i'm not a dev. but i really like the idea. specially if considering porting htc one sense version to our nozomi. i think it would fit like a glove

[WIP][ROM][Verizon] CM10.1 for LG G2 (Verizon) looking for help!!

Howdy folks
I'd like to thank:
Dan Rosenberg (djrbliss) for Loki (the exploit that allows for custom boot images)
Dees_Troy (for TWRP)
Everybody who has contributed to the CyanogenMod Project
xiaolu for github tools used for unpacking and repacking boot images
I picked up my brand new LG G2 on Friday and I've been hard at work to get CM10.1 booting on it ever since yesterday; but a few hours ago I got my first boot -> http://imgur.com/a/1sZz2
I'm using a few proprietary files that I'd like to not use in the future (more than just the Adreno blobs)
But I'm looking to get a team together to get this working 100%
I will post device and vendor source as soon as I get back from cleaning gutters at my dad's house
What works:
Literally nothing, Android won't boot unless you have the necessary EGL libraries, so I just threw those in because I knew it would boot, and nothing else just to get a bare-bones (but booting) ROM. You can navigate throughout UI fine though (it's very smooth believe it or not).
I'll also upload a proof-of-concept build for those willing to see what CM10.1 will look like on our G2s. I'm currently unable to flash a zip in TWRP recovery, so I have to boot into recovery, wipe data, boot into fastboot, flash a system.img and a boot.img and reboot
If I were any person who likes to ROM but will like to remain stock until there's a stable ROM, I'd add a random "#" to any empty line in the file /system/build.prop which will throw off the sha1sum checker when the recovery goes to install an OTA update (this will block all OTAs from ever installing, thus keeping the current boot image exploit viable and it won't be patched up as the OTA won't be able to install. (root is required)
Edit: kernel, device and vendor sources are up!
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_device_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_kernel_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_vendor_lge_g2
10/17/13:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46554268&postcount=271
10/12/13: alpha
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46407049&postcount=138
10/3/13: Super alpha
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46147336&postcount=74
I would love to help, but I admit I don't know much about Android development. I've got an AT&T G2 and I know C# and a bit of C++, so I'm sure I can figure out C. I think it's awesome that you're working on CM, if I can help out somehow I'd love to!
Not trying to be a **** because I can't wait for CM on this device, but why 10.1? Why not just go ahead to CM 10.2 and Android 4.3?
bose301s said:
Not trying to be a **** because I can't wait for CM on this device, but why 10.1? Why not just go ahead to CM 10.2 and Android 4.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because our kernel, etc., are all set up for Android 4.2.2. Meaning, it is easier to get 4.2.2 running, and then move forward to get 10.2.
JackpotClavin: We already have a "few" devs prepping a device tree, though it still misses the proprietary blob references. You should take a look at them, all the device trees are on Github, under TeamLGOG.
fonix232 said:
Because our kernel, etc., are all set up for Android 4.2.2. Meaning, it is easier to get 4.2.2 running, and then move forward to get 10.2.
JackpotClavin: We already have a "few" devs prepping a device tree, though it still misses the proprietary blob references. You should take a look at them, all the device trees are on Github, under TeamLGOG.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, that is what I was thinking but I have never done any dev work or anything so I figured I would ask.
I cant help but I sure want to thank you folks for trying to get this up and running. This phone is an absolute BEAST! Coming from the gnex I'm excited about the G2's potential.
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk 4
Thanks!
I just wanted to thank you very very much for working on this! I knew this was going to be a well developed phone and I bet before 4 months we will have a good amount of choice as far as roms go. Thanks again!
I've been trying to port beanstalk to the G2 but I need the same information you are trying for. I need device trees to sync with. I can PM you with what info I've came up with So far if you are interested.?
Edit: tress are up! Great work
Sent from my LG-D800 using xda app-developers app
If you lived in my town I'd probably help by cleaning the gutters for you hehe. Thanks for your work!
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
I am definitely willing to help in any way I can.
I am willing to beta test and report bugs, dont know much about development but I want CM i have been using it forever...
grandmasterlarry said:
I am willing to beta test and report bugs, dont know much about development but I want CM i have been using it forever...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same goes for me, I have the Korean version.
Does CyanogenMod get rid of features like KnockON? I have grown accustomed to it and don't know if I could do without it (my device sits in a vehicle dock a lot of the time where the buttons on the back are 100% inaccessible unless I disconnect the charger, remove phone from dock/holder and find the buttons on the back.)
Is KnockON a Snapdragon 800 feature, or an LG UI feature (I think so, as it doesn't seem to work except in the notif bar, the stock browser, and the stock lock screen)? Can it be added to the AOSP/CM code perhaps?
mrbig012 said:
Does CyanogenMod get rid of features like KnockON? I have grown accustomed to it and don't know if I could do without it (my device sits in a vehicle dock a lot of the time where the buttons on the back are 100% inaccessible unless I disconnect the charger, remove phone from dock/holder and find the buttons on the back.)
Is KnockON a Snapdragon 800 feature, or an LG UI feature (I think so, as it doesn't seem to work except in the notif bar, the stock browser, and the stock lock screen)? Can it be added to the AOSP/CM code perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG UI feature. I'm fairly sure it will be ported to an AOSP/CM10/LGUI hybrid ROM at some point. I believe part of the issue that devs are running into is that a lot of the custom LG software appears to be tied together.
Can you guys keep us updated on your progress, this is a make or break thing for me with this phone, CM is just so much better than any stock ROM that I don't know if I can deal with a phone that has no prospect of official support.
JackpotClavin said:
Howdy folks
I'd like to thank:
Dan Rosenberg (djrbliss) for Loki (the exploit that allows for custom boot images)
Dees_Troy (for TWRP)
Everybody who has contributed to the CyanogenMod Project
xiaolu for github tools used for unpacking and repacking boot images
I picked up my brand new LG G2 on Friday and I've been hard at work to get CM10.1 booting on it ever since yesterday; but a few hours ago I got my first boot -> http://imgur.com/a/1sZz2
I'm using a few proprietary files that I'd like to not use in the future (more than just the Adreno blobs)
But I'm looking to get a team together to get this working 100%
I will post device and vendor source as soon as I get back from cleaning gutters at my dad's house
What works:
Literally nothing, Android won't boot unless you have the necessary EGL libraries, so I just threw those in because I knew it would boot, and nothing else just to get a bare-bones (but booting) ROM. You can navigate throughout UI fine though (it's very smooth believe it or not).
I'll also upload a proof-of-concept build for those willing to see what CM10.1 will look like on our G2s. I'm currently unable to flash a zip in TWRP recovery, so I have to boot into recovery, wipe data, boot into fastboot, flash a system.img and a boot.img and reboot
If I were any person who likes to ROM but will like to remain stock until there's a stable ROM, I'd add a random "#" to any empty line in the file /system/build.prop which will throw off the sha1sum checker when the recovery goes to install an OTA update (this will block all OTAs from ever installing, thus keeping the current boot image exploit viable and it won't be patched up as the OTA won't be able to install. (root is required)
Edit: device and vendor sources are up!
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_device_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_vendor_lge_g2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are we going to try getting mobile network and wifi working first? Is adb working?
droid_<3er said:
Are we going to try getting mobile network and wifi working first? Is adb working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First is audio. It's proving to be a big problem. I can't get anything working using either prebuilt binaries from stock, or building from source
JackpotClavin said:
First is audio. It's proving to be a big problem. I can't get anything working using either prebuilt binaries from stock, or building from source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am NOT a developer, but this could help perhaps?
http://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/content/wm5110-linux-driver-released
Not sure if it really is open source or only available as binaries, but the WM5110 is the audio SoC in this phone... I am probably not helping.
Additionally, I think the S4 uses this SoC as well. It's a pretty new part but is gaining a lot of momentum.
Edit: My god that WM5110 is a hell of a part... quad-core, 600 MIPS... dayum!
Glad to hear an update, even if it's about issues. Seeing that there are people actively working on this to make it happen makes me much happier and less worried about keeping this phone vs. returning it tomorrow or Friday to see how the Nexus 5 plays out etc.
Have any of you tried talking to Ricardo Cerqueira? He is in fact the primary maintainer for all LG Devices with regards to Cyanogenmod. I am sure he is planning on supporting this device in the near future, I just don't know when. It will probably be when the device is more readily available since it was pretty much just released.

[Q][SGH-i847]¿Dual Boot for daily testing?

Hi!
As far I know there are a lot of roms for this little device. The roms in current development lack camera support or have some other issues. I could live without the camera 99% of the time but i just can't make a back up and flash everytime i need to take a photo or buy another cellphone. I wonder if there is a way to use some other ROM with dual boot in this device. I've found an app and instructions for other devices but this phone it's not supported
PTA:I'm a noob in android development. But i can be a great guinea pig.
Thanks in advance.

SM-T116 rom dilemma!!

Good day XDA!! This is my first ever post or thread on XDA, for about 5 years I have been a spectator to this site, and it has been an essential source for all things us android foondies want and need. But for the past month I have hit a blank when it comes to my new tab3 ve 7.0 sm-t116nq (goyave3g).
It started when I wanted to root it, little to no support for this model was available (at least through the search function) I managed to root through Kingo root on a pc. But now my dilemma is finding/porting rooms for this model. I have no problem with all my Mediatek androids, but I'm in the dark when it comes to samsung. I don't even know where to begin, for other popular Samsung's it's not a problem, obviously because they're popular.
SO, I need some help. I hate this abomination they call touchwiz, I want a vanilla aosp rom for this model, or even better CM or PAC-MAN rom!! I am prepaid to put a lot of time and effort into this. I have extremely limited experience, most of my past successes was actually the success of other xda members (you guys are awesome BTW.) Any info would be apriciated.
So let's revive this tablet and let's start a revolution for budget tablets.
Dudzzz576 said:
Good day XDA!! This is my first ever post or thread on XDA, for about 5 years I have been a spectator to this site, and it has been an essential source for all things us android foondies want and need. But for the past month I have hit a blank when it comes to my new tab3 ve 7.0 sm-t116nq (goyave3g).
It started when I wanted to root it, little to no support for this model was available (at least through the search function) I managed to root through Kingo root on a pc. But now my dilemma is finding/porting rooms for this model. I have no problem with all my Mediatek androids, but I'm in the dark when it comes to samsung. I don't even know where to begin, for other popular Samsung's it's not a problem, obviously because they're popular.
SO, I need some help. I hate this abomination they call touchwiz, I want a vanilla aosp rom for this model, or even better CM or PAC-MAN rom!! I am prepaid to put a lot of time and effort into this. I have extremely limited experience, most of my past successes was actually the success of other xda members (you guys are awesome BTW.) Any info would be apriciated.
So let's revive this tablet and let's start a revolution for budget tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good news,i'm currently developing cm for this tab it might take a while depending on the device itself
Thunderoar said:
good news,i'm currently developing cm for this tab it might take a while depending on the device itself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, such a good news, but tell me, will your cm support sm-t113 too bro?
x3m_zion said:
Oh, such a good news, but tell me, will your cm support sm-t113 too bro?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know, still testing
Thunderoar said:
good news,i'm currently developing cm for this tab it might take a while depending on the device itself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is it going? Any news for us?
danny02 said:
How is it going? Any news for us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i decided to suspend the project because of school though
Estamos presos no Android 4.4.4 =/
Maldito SM-T116BU
But is not there anyone interested in developing a rom with Lollipop for the SM t116? Hardware the device has, a Galaxy J1 mini has almost the same processed and less than 1gb of ram and it runs the Lollipop well
mmacedoc7 said:
But is not there anyone interested in developing a rom with Lollipop for the SM t116? Hardware the device has, a Galaxy J1 mini has almost the same processed and less than 1gb of ram and it runs the Lollipop well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi! you can read here https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-3/development-7/rom-tab-3-lite-sm-t116-goyave-t3537793
pit file
Can anyone help me find pit file for galaxy sm-t116NU??????
OMG, Im also stuck here with SM-T116BU which was officially upgraded to Tab E (somehow) how it happened, i don't know since this was my son's Tab 3v originally.
lately. i have rooted tru inception (nice job for the rooting guys) then tried TWRP 3.1.1.0 but couldnt boot, down ver to TWRP 2.8.7.0 bcos the others are either not TAR for odin or files are missing to boot TWRP recovery.
so far, i have tried CM-13 but failed miserably, perhaps those files are corrupted as well
I enjoyed loading with my "Note3 with touchwiz" DO NOT TRY THIS UNLESS YOU KNOW HOW TO RECOVER, so i tried using the same ROM N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016. installation smoothly with TWRP into TAB E but could NOT make it BOOT.
I guess some files are missing while downloading those as well or those files have been corrupted thru the years.
N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016 not difficult to find but NEED an expert to cook a SM-116 version since this is best "complete" ROM (need kernel) in my Note3 now
I'll keep trying ROM N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016 into THIS TAB E and mixed with SM_116 kernels n I KNOW I MIGHT BRICK THIS SM-116 Tab E, what the HACK so let it be, NO VENTURE NO GAIN hahahaaa
deranche said:
OMG, Im also stuck here with SM-T116BU which was officially upgraded to Tab E (somehow) how it happened, i don't know since this was my son's Tab 3v originally.
lately. i have rooted tru inception (nice job for the rooting guys) then tried TWRP 3.1.1.0 but couldnt boot, down ver to TWRP 2.8.7.0 bcos the others are either not TAR for odin or files are missing to boot TWRP recovery.
so far, i have tried CM-13 but failed miserably, perhaps those files are corrupted as well
I enjoyed loading with my "Note3 with touchwiz" DO NOT TRY THIS UNLESS YOU KNOW HOW TO RECOVER, so i tried using the same ROM N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016. installation smoothly with TWRP into TAB E but could NOT make it BOOT.
I guess some files are missing while downloading those as well or those files have been corrupted thru the years.
N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016 not difficult to find but NEED an expert to cook a SM-116 version since this is best "complete" ROM (need kernel) in my Note3 now
I'll keep trying ROM N9005_TouchWizMM_V4_16-04-2016 into THIS TAB E and mixed with SM_116 kernels n I KNOW I MIGHT BRICK THIS SM-116 Tab E, what the HACK so let it be, NO VENTURE NO GAIN hahahaaa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly are you trying to do?
Well. The TouchWiz works perfectly on my note3 so I'll try to cook a TouchWiz for Sm-t116 from the note3 platform. If u have ready ROM, do send them. Tks in advance !
Ps. Out of town next few days ??
deranche said:
Well. The TouchWiz works perfectly on my note3 so I'll try to cook a TouchWiz for Sm-t116 from the note3 platform. If u have ready ROM, do send them. Tks in advance !
Ps. Out of town next few days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys please give the firmware rom for TVRP on the TAB-3 Lite SM-T116 ! Cause when I for some reason flashed TVPP I realized that there are no custom firmwares for this device , But I need 100% working FI-WI, and cyanogen mod does not fit, cause Wi-Fi doesn't work there!

Categories

Resources