[Q] CM7 developement - Galaxy Y GT-S5360 General

hey guys, the last months i've seen almost 4 topics about developing (such as Maroc&Razor, Motafoca, Androhacker etc...) why doesn't anyone of those combine and form 1 single team. I think it will be much better than 4 seperate teams.

And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.

raolemo said:
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. if people having options they will try rather then using one......

I agree with OP.. unity is the strength here.. they would hv developed it faster if they worked together.. although there can be major clashes over the the concepts.. as some strongly support some issue some don't at all!
But the point is for the sake of the dev.. they might consider sharing what they hv achieved so far.. like so far the one by razor083 is very much working.. but with lot of bugs.. if they try they can make it work! instead they r building it again separately! They should only do dat if there is nothing to be done on this port by razor083!! in dat case they should proceed from source again! but atlst they should take a look at it!!

Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA

Chucrute said:
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really from source?
he said
This is a port of CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC0, a community-based custom Android ROM based Gingerbread 2.3.7, for the Samsung Galaxy Y phone. The current development status inicial - most hardware is not working correctly !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now im confused

nope.. it is from the source.. He also said "Its from source
I built it"..

No 3G, no Wifi, and no audio. Now thats not something I would flash. Waiting for a stable bug free version with crossed fingers. xP

OP is right: We (developers/themers/porters) should work together to make a fully working cm7 and cm9. Not all the bad roms which all get discontinued.... PM me if you want me to work with you!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy s III baby

Related

Development of CyanogenMod 9 for Galaxy Y (Android 4.0.3)

Are there any Devs who are developing CyanogenMod 9 becaus I am looking xda threads from a November but till now i have not found any one found developing CyanogenMod 9 for Galaxy Y.
We need ICS and CyanogenMod 9 together for galaxy Y.
Galaxy Y has better specs than Galaxy Mini or Pop.
The same time to port unofficial CyanogenMid in Galaxy Mini or Pop is just going to pass. I have read that the kernels are developed for Galaxy Y just the porting time is left. Please if there is any Dev port ICS and CyanogenMod to Galaxy Y
Tough luck. Looks like everyone's busy for the custom kernel. Ports will be of later priority. Even the CM7 hasn't been ported yet.
dude custom kernel will help in the development of cm9 or 7 whatever thats why the devs are focusing on custom kernel
cheers !!7
<post deleted>
Guys, lets be calm and civil
PG101 said:
Guys, lets be calm and civil
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the clean up
Guys. We dont have even working CM7, so dont look forward to CM9...
gamemaniak said:
Guys. We dont have even working CM7, so dont look forward to CM9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you referring to this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23955256#post23955256
You are right Buddy
Now kernels are there which can be overclocked up to 900 MHz
See my blog post on my website
FreshNewsArea.com
Galaxy Y is stable till 900 MHz but it becomes unstable after it.
Unofficial cyanogenmod 7.2 RC1 has bee ported from galaxy ace to galaxy y.................................merrock has posted it in android developement section of galaxy y.................it has many bugs .....it will be fixed in RC2 release...
Right
Now we have CyanogenMod 7.2 available
camera and some more things not working
hskharkunwar said:
Right
Now we have CyanogenMod 7.2 available
camera and some more things not working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most important even the gsm network is not working but still this is a huge step in the developement of our beloved sgy cheerss....
yeah,
i would say, just make a group and do work on currunt cyanogen 7 to make it stable,
by this way, we can get 9 also.
its better if someone make saperate thrd for developing it, and i am ready to be a volunteer for feedback.
vivekkalady has fixed many bugs
1)camera (not completely)
2)gsm signal
3)audio
4)1% battry bug fixed
5)packet data works
press thanks if i have helped you
here
its not only the processor and ram has to decide a phones capability,but also th emanufacturer and performance ofthe gpu , as you can see not all games are optimised for y's gpu and the manufacturer doesnt sees to be havin the idea of releasing drivers for ics while drivers for adreno 200gpu for ics are released a month back. but there are some very good roms for galaxy , in my opinion creed v2.5 seemsto be the best ,you can get that from here
IT TOOK ME A LONG TIME TO FIND THIS AND I DONT THINK YOU WOULD BE REQUIRING EVEN A FRACTION OF IT TO CLICK THAT THANKS BUTTON,WOULD YOU MIND SPENDING THAT FOR ME.
Let the bugs of cm7 be fixed first.. Then hope for cm9
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA App
And gsm is fixed... Camera too.. And sound is also.fixed... !!
Press thanks if I was helpful
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA App
Misleading title,
Every one is asking for CM... what the main features it has, which aren't in GB and other available custom roms... Sorry for noob ques but didn't find ans any where so asked here....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA App
muqarrer said:
Every one is asking for CM... what the main features it has, which aren't in GB and other available custom roms... Sorry for noob ques but didn't find ans any where so asked here....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here ya go... google is your friend..
cyanogenmod.com/about
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk

CM7 port is possible

Hello all,
I just wanted to let you know my experience from some minutes ago.
I successfully boot up CM7 ported to my device.
Everyone is free to do so, but be careful what you do.
I used the kitchen to cook it, so thanks to dsixda for his work.
And also to arco68 and cowithgun whose kernel I was using.
Last but not least KezraPlanes for his Rom I was using as base and for comparison.
Sadly, this is just a quick and dirty port so no downloadlink.
Also there have to be still many bugs and things not working, cause of the cm rom I used.
To state some:
GPS (does not lock)
Audio (both input and output, will be tough)
Camcorder (because of audio)
Storage-related (external SD not working, internal with no USB storage, vold misconfigured)
USB tethering/MTP (will require some programming)
Host access point (similar to USB tethering)
Buttons force feedback
Contacts on SIM card
This was stated by YardE in his thread, about the CM-Rom I used for the Port. So, also credtis to him and the fellow developer.
I just made it for the fun of it and to show some pics, here you have:
Welcome to the club the community awaits you n to those assisting you.
Take your time....
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
CM7 for our phone? Sounds great I think that will be very useful.
Sent from my GT-I8150
lightwars said:
Sadly, this is just a quick and dirty port so no downloadlink.
Also there have to be still many bugs and things not working, cause of the cm rom I used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks alot for your work, any extra ROM is a gain for the Community.
I have one question and according to your profile you are from the same Country(Germany) and have the same Provider(simyo). Does your data connection work ? Does this ROM has also this "funny SIM card issue". The good thing about this ROM we will have the drivers for Gingerbread isn't ?
greets
THE-E
Yeap according to arco68 all the drivers are available....I think
Should not be a problem it is just a question of time n effort plus patience.......Just the beginning..you are one brave soul
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
lightwars said:
Also there have to be still many bugs and things not working, cause of the cm rom I used.
To state some:
Light sensor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just one remark, SGW doesn't have light sensor, only proximity sensor.
Sent from rooted GT-I8150 2.3.6 ~ Tapatalk 2.0.1
_jis_ said:
Just one remark, SGW doesn't have light sensor, only proximity sensor.
Sent from rooted GT-I8150 2.3.6 ~ Tapatalk 2.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,you are right.I just copied it.
It is edited now.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I8150
Great move. Thanks
Sent from my novo7_ELF using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
great!
keep up the good work.
more rom = more choices for the community
cheers!
Any news of this? CM7 seems like a good choice in the short run.
Dude....any updates ?
o O From My Ancora o O
I hope there is dev who willing to port CM7 to our galaxy W
i know it's out of date
But CM7 itself still cool
still have a lot of customization
and i want to make some wp clone with it
Okay,okay.To sum some things up.
After my try to port a ROM via the kitchen I had downloaded the sources and try to compile a build.
Sadly I cannot spend so much time in playing around with the code and try things out.
So far I overcome some problems while compiling. - crazy story here-
In the End no boot up and I noticed the small system size, which is definitely to tiny for all the libs.
To say so: still a way to go.
Maybe Arco have time to guide a little bit or someone else will supporting me, like KezraPlanes,...
Gesendet von meinem GT-I8150
Very good news.. good luck so... i would help you if i could
I used to have in my other galaxy
Sent from my GT-I8150 using XDA
May i know which ROM that u used as a porting?
(Q) Porting Rom
Is there anyone out there brave enough to port CM7 and AOSP 2.3.7 from S Plus to our device?
take a look at this thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1639421
BloodRaven2011 said:
May i know which ROM that u used as a porting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the late reply, I didn't found enough time to. Because I wanted to dig out the links. Here you are, that's the one I used:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22969855&postcount=394
But also done it with this AOSP ROM:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25752734&postcount=1
And the first Rom, YardE ROM from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22424496&postcount=1

[DEV][WIP] AOSP Jelly Bean 4.1 by MacławStudios

Hi!
This topic is about real JB development for Gio.
This topic is only for developing at this moment!
Please, keep this topic clear! I'll answer only for questions about developing or AOSP for Gio. About others, please write to me at PM!
IF YOU WANT TO USE MY WORK, YOUR WORK MUST TO BE OPEN SOURCE TOO!!!!!
Team working directly on ROM:
Macław
marcin1147
Special thanks:
Squadzone
bagnz0r
tom3q
Thanks for all donators. Thanks to you we can provide frequent updates without any problems!
The Doors rulez. Didn't ya know that ?
placeholder3
placeholder4
1. gr8 work
2. i'll hope u get almost all fully working xD
3. and if jellyb sources are aviable,
make a build for that
sry that i used the word jellyb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.3
Cool Man to Hear Maclaw Good Luck!!!
Awesome! The first pure Aosp on the Gio and it's ICS!
DQiB said:
1. gr8 work
2. i'll hope u get almost all fully working xD
3. and if jellyb sources are aviable,
make a build for that
sry that i used the word jellyb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JB is cause why we boosted our work on aosp
Wysyłane z mojego GT-S5830 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
thats awesome maclaw
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.3
http://maclaw.pl/?p=119
Sorry, but... what is AOSP??
Macław said:
Hi!
-------------->8------------------
IF YOU WANT TO USE MY WORK, YOUR WORK MUST TO BE OPEN SOURCE TOO!!!!!
-------------->8------------------
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw, wonderfull job!!! but...
No offense.. But where are sources?
I can't find GioRIL source for CM9 (I asked you on your website before) so I made one myself (based on SpicaRIL from Criminal, all credits go to him) and published on github.
I have a 4.0.4 running, greatest part of source is AOSP. It has also CM9 sources in it because of enhanced hardware support. I didn't publish yet, still testing for several days now for bugs (well, only encountered same ones as on Galaxy ICS). It is based on the device part you guys published and I wonder if GalaxyICS team is allowing me to use ir
So I hope you can publish them all, I am very willing to test and contribute where I can. In my opinion that is the basic behind opensource and development
Again, great work! Keep it up!
Only GioRIL is unpublished (forgotten about it), and IDK how did you made it from SpicaRIL, really strange... Also SpicaRIL is made by tom3q, Criminal only fix some things to make it working on ICS at Spica.
And why everyone must to attack me when I'm making something?
And our AOSP is not using CM sources, everything is patched to work armv6.
Sources will be published if it'll work without minor problems, testing right now.
mackief said:
Sorry, but... what is AOSP??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP=Android Open Source Project OMG
safariking said:
AOSP=Android Open Source Project OMG
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now he should ask what is OMG
Origonal mighty game
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium
Macław said:
Now he should ask what is OMG
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
EDIT:
In case:
OMG is O My God
Hi,
Great Work. You guys are amazing!
I have a question: Is preview working on AOSP for GIO?
Thanks.
Greetings,
androlivei said:
Hi,
Great Work. You guys are amazing!
I have a question: Is preview working on AOSP for GIO?
Thanks.
Greetings,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, as it's still Android 4.0
Macław said:
Only GioRIL is unpublished (forgotten about it), and IDK how did you made it from SpicaRIL, really strange... Also SpicaRIL is made by tom3q, Criminal only fix some things to make it working on ICS at Spica.
And why everyone must to attack me when I'm making something?
And our AOSP is not using CM sources, everything is patched to work armv6.
Sources will be published if it'll work without minor problems, testing right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I took it from Criminal, thats why I give him credits
See this commit for how to make it work.
Like I said, no offense it is no attack, I will never do so. I just admire your and rest of the teams work. About the RIL, look back to your answer to my question on your website, I am sure you typed something different from what you meant.

[discussion] aosp and cm

why dont u people try to build an AOSP rom instead ofa CM....coz probably cm is sumthing that is modifications made to AOSP....and even the touchwiz ui is modified AOSP so if we can have a AOSP build itll probably be easier for us to build these roms..
...if sum one is ready to help me learn about building roms from source ill sure try making CM's and AOKP and paranoid and what not
is better but its based on AOSP.....its like imagine AOSP as a stock rom and CM as a custom rom...wait why imagine..its actually like that....so the basic idea is to improve performance...where CM show up...but whats the base CM uses??...its AOSP....so if we have a perfect AOSP which is obv possible...coz Samsung wouldn't be able to build TouchWiz withouta base...for obv reasons...so why not try building an AOSP first and then continuing with CM
do u even know whatcha sayin?
tl;dr
Here's some math:
No sources = no base
No base = no sources
No sources = no cm
No cm = no aosp
So unless you try to find a way to make those proprietary sources available then I'd suggest doing some research.
Also even if you tried you'll fail, we have the best devs for sgy working hard for that goal and we're honestly not making good progress. Well except for percy and his cm9 and psycho's cm7 but still a long way from "stable as stock".
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Naman...we haven't tried making AOSP yet so we cant just confirm this and it cant be that it was made for nexus only coz its an open source project so they must have probably kept in mind that many dev's will try to have it on different devices ..... the Gingerbread that our SGY uses is nothing but a custom rom of the aosp which we call as stock....
for obv reasons...samsung would not have made their own android os right...they have used google sources....the point is...the time dev's have spent on making CM if would have been focused on AOSP we might just have a build close enough to psycho's work!
and what ive learned or i might be wrong in this that psycho used aosp's sources for the fixes....Maybe wrong about this...i just read it somewhere here!.....and as our device has the largest community of awesome dev's why not we try the AOSP thing out??
we cant just conclude without trying...can we??......some months back people were like we wont have a CM....we have a working CM7 and CM9 which are working pretty fine except for the driver bugs....same way,we might just end up having an AOSP...
another hope to Young GT-S6310. need a great developers to make it true
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you should see this. www.cyanogenmod.org/about
And also about android opensource project. Google gives aosp source to all manufacturers as part of aosp allience/programme which they further modify. And first phone running android was not nexus to say that they don't give damn about other devices. And the number of devices running CM is still very low.
Like I said, a friend told me about it.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
If we get a set of experienced Devs who want to help out we might get aosp
Also if stock is like a custom aosp
That means our phone must support AOSP!!
Only need some experience Devs :sly:
As i said its all about aosp....just need sum1 to teach me these sources and setup stuff....i would like to start working on it as soon as possible!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
SSSidGGG said:
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
prototype-U said:
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know...thats the reason ive been looking around google for sumthing that could get me some help .........its hard i guess ill have to take percy's help :?
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Veru funny dude! ( --..-- )
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really bro?._.
Sent from my SGY using XDA
I am new here.......
Don't be rude and hit thanks
Device : Samsung Galaxy Y
ROM : Hyperion 8 pre gm alsa build 0.2
KERNEL : Savie's
I say start saving money for a new phone.
prototype-U said:
I say start saving money for a new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
SaketJoshi said:
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man.. they are just stock based roms.. everyone is upgrading these days, android 4.3 has been released and you are still on 2.3.6. Which makes you guys really outdated..
Kernel? yeah there are huge number of kernels here but if you notice that most of em have same features See other phones like nexus 4. They have whats called "real" kernel development.
Pico which is 1k more expensive is 100 times better than this phone and you also know it. Why not buy that? I sold my Y for 3.5k and another 3k can buy you a arm7 phone. Which wont get outdated for another year atleast..

Now that Proxuser has left...

Hey guys.
I've recently started getting into building AOSP bases ROMs for our I9190/I9195 devices (sorry I9192 users. Somehow I find it difficult to trust those who have two separate phone numbers).
Anyway- a lot of people seemed to like his Carbon JB ROM, myself included. Would it be worth my time building Carbon JB from source and uploading nightly/ as regular as I can?
Bit of a lame question, but I need to know if anyone would actually be interested before I go setting up a new workspace and initialize the Carbon git.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
First of all I'd like to thank prox for his time and effort, carbon is a nice rom but I prefer pac. That said the more roms the better
Sent from my GT-I9195 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
chaplinb said:
Hey guys.
I've recently started getting into building AOSP bases ROMs for our I9190/I9195 devices (sorry I9192 users. Somehow I find it difficult to trust those who have two separate phone numbers).
Anyway- a lot of people seemed to like his Carbon JB ROM, myself included. Would it be worth my time building Carbon JB from source and uploading nightly/ as regular as I can?
Bit of a lame question, but I need to know if anyone would actually be interested before I go setting up a new workspace and initialize the Carbon git.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would very appreciate it if someone can keep this rom alive.
You can try to build Carbon and Pacman ...that would be awsome
x10isrooted said:
i would very appreciate it if someone can keep this rom alive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Forget PAC ROM, focus on carbon if that's what you want to do. When you're comfortable with it maybe try aokp :sly:
Sent from the dark side of the moon.
Want to know how to boost your devices performance and battery life? See my thread here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495269
im still here, but i dont own this device anymore. but i can make carbon with cyanogenmod's m1. i updated serrano3gxx with latest changes and uploading it right now. serranoltexx coming soon. and i also try to get slimkat branch kk aka Android 4.4 working on s4 mini devices. so lets see i can make it or not
proxuser said:
im still here, but i dont own this device anymore. but i can make carbon with cyanogenmod's m1. i updated serrano3gxx with latest changes and uploading it right now. serranoltexx coming soon. and i also try to get slimkat branch kk aka Android 4.4 working on s4 mini devices. so lets see i can make it or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's all great.
Many thanks.
Where do you put the new roms because the elder threads are all closed now?
And please do a full port of the (new) slim rom.
hansare said:
That's all great.
Many thanks.
Where do you put the new roms because the elder threads are all closed now?
And please do a full port of the (new) slim rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
new roms will be in my d-h account, is visible on carbon thread. just look in folder.
but slimkat build failed because of build errors. i will wait a little that slim team is ready for build. then i will try again.
@proxuser
Sad to see you go man, you really made xda worth while, was really looking forward to your 2.0 ghz kernel, dont know if there will be any developers up for the challange.
Thanx
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
Is the version of carbon with upload date 2013-10-31 going to be the last version?
proxuser said:
and i also try to get slimkat branch kk aka Android 4.4 working on s4 mini devices. so lets see i can make it or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would be a sick way to say goodbye to s4 mini
+1 for new carbon roms
lucky this thread is created in general section...cant post reply on proxuser thread because of new account...
nevertheless, its great to see someone taking the effort to continue developing roms for s4 mini. I thought im gonna be stuck with the latest carbon rom from proxuser until i buy a new phone
chaplinb said:
Hey guys.
I've recently started getting into building AOSP bases ROMs for our I9190/I9195 devices (sorry I9192 users. Somehow I find it difficult to trust those who have two separate phone numbers).
Anyway- a lot of people seemed to like his Carbon JB ROM, myself included. Would it be worth my time building Carbon JB from source and uploading nightly/ as regular as I can?
Bit of a lame question, but I need to know if anyone would actually be interested before I go setting up a new workspace and initialize the Carbon git.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I9192 users are mostly those who have different jobs or working in different country’s that is why they have two sim card and not because they cheat there partner, therefore they need most help and understanding, and if You can try to build Carbon for I9192 than you can prove you can do it all.
carbon built on 3.11.2013
s4 mini i9195 serranoltexx download is ready
i9190 serrano3gxx is uploading now..
i will reopen carbon thread until someone take it from me..
mambaram said:
Hi, I9192 users are mostly those who have different jobs or working in different country’s that is why they have two sim card and not because they cheat there partner, therefore they need most help and understanding, and if You can try to build Carbon for I9192 than you can prove you can do it all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, we have 2 sims for work/personal, most of us, at least. I left my i9000 with cm because I had to carry a dumbphone also for work...
Not about proving something, but more about helping... We with i9192 are very dissapointed that there's no alternative to stock rom
It seems people are interested!
Proxuser seems to have made it clear in this thread that he'll still be giving our devices some dev-attention. Thanks for that, Proxuser.
I9192 Users: I was just kidding about the dual sim malarkey, it'd be great to see your devices getting some attention. I'll compile a Carbon/Pure CM-10.2 ROM for your device soon. I'll need testers, since I don't own the device. I do feel however, that people are gonna start to lose interest in ROMs which aren't based on Android 4.4 or above.
Just to be clear- I'm just a compiler. Proxuser is the one for developer consultation.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
chaplinb said:
I9192 Users: I was just kidding about the dual sim malarkey, it'd be great to see your devices getting some attention. I'll compile a Carbon/Pure CM-10.2 ROM for your device soon. I'll need testers, since I don't own the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm available for dummy testing your i9192 builds
I cooked some stockmod for personnal use but can't wait for real stuff !

Categories

Resources