Develop Bugs

AnTuTu Benchmark results

This is what I got
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App

Tried your app:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Antutu benchmark results
Looks like the real samsung s2(9100) is almost on top.. What phone is sc-o2c?
Tmo Galaxy S2

The SC-02C is the Japanese version of the Galaxy S2, pretty similar to the international version, just with added 1seg receiver, and identical in peformance.
Would you mind doing a GLBenchmark test? Nenamark2? Electopia?

Im bout to post nenamark2
Tmo Galaxy S2

seems like there's no escaping it so might as well stick all the benchmark scores here and at least have them organized by app

I already posted them as a new topic sorry.
Tmo Galaxy S2

Here is mine.......

it's my

here are mines

I got a total score of 5583...

gdmlaz said:
here are mines
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How?
What's your set up?

Juggernaut V2, Synergy v0.02, interactive governor 1.83ghz

just completed

Juggernaut 2.0, bullet 1.8. I'm pleased.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Oops
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Here's mine. Juggernaut 3.7 1.8mHz with bullet 2.7 kernel = 6838. Beastmod is 100 less at the same frequency. With cm7 and synergy kernel at same frequency, I get 7111. Wow. Cm9 will probably be better. It may help the thread if we all use the same frequency. That way we can see which ROM and kernel produce the best results at that clock speed. All my tests were with the performance governer and min/max at 1.8GHz. All tests were done after a fresh reboot and all apps killed in memory.

these are mine
Running stock 2.3.5 and bullet 2.9

For some reason.... I get better results without OC my kernel to 1.83 weird.

I got around 6300~ Jugg 3.7 stock

Quadrant updated for multiple cores and ICS

Topics says it all. You should learn not to put much weight into these benchmarks, but the new update should give a clearer picture of our devices performance.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Thanks for the heads up!

Thanks. It's just like a dyno for cars. Just numbers.

Already a thread here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1495834

This is really strange. I have a similar setup as yours and get 3570.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1350 max, francokernel. i used onDemand however in order to run the test.

franco 16.2 and AOKP 22
1350 ondemand ~2600

AOKP 23 with Trinity, 1350 max/min, performance - 3570 odd
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

chainfire only works if you have it enabled. Do you have a per-app profile for Quadrant? I get 3200ish with 700-1200 francoTurtle. I wasn't really expecting that much.

The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Running CM9 with morfic's 1350 any kernel, got 3517
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

could you try with min 700mhz?

Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.

If you're curious as to how your results compare with stock (4.0.2):
A pitiful 1849

I got 2000 how do you get your I/O up? Mines bad/:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

1350/700
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

italia0101 said:
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran a lot of test and figured out the having "force gpu rendering" checked will increase your 2d score on quadrant.
I get 900-1000 with it enabled
I get 200-300 with it not checked.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

ericth18 said:
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we know how much garbage that phone was.
Goes to show you benchmarks are a joke.

Using CM9 with morfics 1536 any kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Great, finally a proper way to compare our e-penises. Let's hope people still realize Quadrant scores are not a good way to compare roms... (or maybe I'm just saying this because my scores are rather low )

I need help my screen is acting weired

I just installed aokp n when i'm on the home screen, the phone screen starts to go blinking with weired dotted lines
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Screen artifacts. What kernel are you using?

I'm using fraco kernel, should u just go back to the stock kernel that came with the rom?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

igotdez said:
I'm using fraco kernel, should u just go back to the stock kernel that came with the rom?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're using Franco's nightly. Try the 384 instead of the 512. Or install milestone 3
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

D3TH METAL said:
If you're using Franco's nightly. Try the 384 instead of the 512. Or install milestone 3
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I'll give it a try. Thanks for the suggestions. I'm just glad it isn't hardware related because i just bought the nexus.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

igotdez said:
I'm using fraco kernel, should u just go back to the stock kernel that came with the rom?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the 384mhz gpu version, your phone can't handle the 512mhz version.
It'll be fine with 384.

nodstuff said:
Use the 384mhz gpu version, your phone can't handle the 512mhz version.
It'll be fine with 384.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just install milestone 3 kernel. The problem stop but thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

igotdez said:
I just install milestone 3 kernel. The problem stop but thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The milestone versions are stock gpu, 307mhz, the nightlies have two versions, 384 and 512mhz.
You should be able to run the 384mhz nightlies without artifacts.
The faster gpu gives a performance boost but its not a huge difference.

Newer cm builds not as smooth.

I've noticed that newer builds towards the end of the month are not as smooth as ones from say the 21st. Its almost as if the gpu is is performing worse. Its not kernel related. Ran the same kernel on both and even copies the old trebuchet.apk from the old build. Tried cm10 kang by winner00 and euroskanks jellybro build. Same thing on both. The older builds from mid month have no such issue. I can confirm this on two different galaxy nexus. Ran Franco 248 384 GPU on both. Its very noticeable if you start closing the app drawer before it finishes scrolling or finishes the over scroll effect. It used to be smooth. Now it gets choppy like it would in ICS.
Let's try to find out which change on the gerrit is responsible.
I am pretty sure it was merged somewhere between the 21st and the 30th.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Small update: the quadrant scores on 3d and 2d were also significantly lower on the new builds even on the same kernel. Almost 20% on the 3d. CPU, memory, and io were all roughly about the same.
2591 for 3d on build 8-21 on Franco 248 384 GPU
2250 for 3d on build 9-03 on Franco 248 384 GPU
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

iSaint said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DAT ASS
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

These are all nightly bro. There far from a RC. Its the price we pay for a daily update. There's always stable cm9 if you want something stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

DroidDavi said:
These are all nightly bro. There far from a RC. Its the price we pay for a daily update. There's always stable cm9 if you want something stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. Its been like this for a week now. I was hoping to track down which change was merged that is responsible for the drop in performance that way we can figure out why it decreased performance. The difference in performance is noticeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

3DMark is on Google Play now!

One of the best computer benchmark app 3DMark is now available on Google Play:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application
Here is my scores:
(Faux123 Kernel 12tbu, Ondemand 1.7GHz mpdecision ON, GPU 487mhz, -137,5UV)
Ice Storm score: 8779
Graphics Score: 12826
Physics score: 4172
Graphics test 1: 55.9 FPS
Graphics test 2: 55.6 FPS
Physics test: 13.2 FPS
Demo: 60.5 FPS
Galaxy S4 (Exynos) and HTC One Scores:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How is yours?

Sent from my Nexus 4

Overall score was 10058 for normal Ice Storm demo
4.2.2
Franco Kernel
Paranoid Android - latest version
no overlocks/undervolts.

[nexus⁴] [carbon1.6] [matr1x8] [twrp]

Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:

CrazySpartan said:
Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What so sorcery is this ?? I'm also stock everything, and rooted but scored only 9996 ?? any idea . Are you using some sort of app to increase performance ??

Mahalsk said:
What so sorcery is this ?? I'm also stock everything, and rooted but scored only 9996 ?? any idea . Are you using some sort of app to increase performance ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not using any app to increase performance. :angel:

R: 3DMark is on Google Play now!
My score is 10269
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2

Ice Storm Extreme on Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:

CrazySpartan said:
Not using any app to increase performance. :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok second try I did a bit of an experiment and put the phone into the fridge for the test, killed all apps, set to airplane mod and vualla 11374 . :cyclops:
This is also stock rooted

XenonHD at 1.5ghz

One hell of a tool for computers. I've used it since its first versions.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

Stock Paranoid Rom.

Stock 4.2.2
"Head&Pepsi"

Only got 4000 on my note 2
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

Reading the Anandtech 3DMark performance review, it's awesome to see the N4 doing so well compared to the other devices.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6875/3dmark-for-android-performance-preview

Seems like the Nexus 4 is on the top charts across 3Dmark. Adreno 320 is still the fastest. Even the Snapdragon 600 uses Adreno 320.

My latest score with Faux Enhanced Stock

Oh yeah, 12017, i'm flying on top with Matr1x Gpu OC & Rootbox
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

Sidneymac said:
Only got 4000 on my note 2
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause it has the Mali and a9s.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app