Related
Hello, can someone please link me latest nightly build for the TMO SII, I'm assuming there is one and for some reason I'm having a very difficult time finding it..
Hammett11 said:
Hello, can someone please link me latest nightly build for the TMO SII, I'm assuming there is one and for some reason I'm having a very difficult time finding it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no nightly builds of CM yet. We only have a self-kang of CM7 by Slayher or CM7 Hybrid by RoyalKnight6190.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
skadude66 said:
There are no nightly builds of CM yet. We only have a self-kang of CM7 by Slayher or CM7 Hybrid by RoyalKnight6190.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, thank you. Can you offer an opinion on which you like better?
CM7 by Slayher is actually really good. I use it. However, since it is not really a full release it does have bugs. But over all, fantastic for an alpha.
CM7 Hybrid by RoyalKnight6190 is yet another great alpha build (however he has had more work on it). It is faster...but since Netflix does not work, I do not use it.
Also note...there is only one kernel for all the CM7 alphas.
But, for the most part. CM7 is being pushed back for CM9. Just have patience.
Hammett11 said:
Okay, thank you. Can you offer an opinion on which you like better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are both of the ROMs that ZombieUsr described, and we can also flash Skyrocket ROMs. They have the exact same bugs as ours, but there might be additional tweaks.
There is also a CM7 kernel that Da_G made for the Skyrocket, but Auto-Rotation is broken when you flash it to the T989 (disable it and you SHOULD be fine).
ZombieUsr said:
CM7 by Slayher is actually really good. I use it. However, since it is not really a full release it does have bugs. But over all, fantastic for an alpha.
CM7 Hybrid by RoyalKnight6190 is yet another great alpha build (however he has had more work on it). It is faster...but since Netflix does not work, I do not use it.
Also note...there is only one kernel for all the CM7 alphas.
But, for the most part. CM7 is being pushed back for CM9. Just have patience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alrighty. Thank you.
hey guys,
my ORD fueled mind just wanted to know if anyone out there is working on an AOSP
Rom, maybe an AOKP or CM9 kang.
i think i speak on almost everyones behalf when i say work on these will be highly appreciated and donated to
abhijit1289 said:
hey guys,
my ORD fueled mind just wanted to know if anyone out there is working on an AOSP
Rom, maybe an AOKP or CM9 kang.
i think i speak on almost everyones behalf when i say work on these will be highly appreciated and donated to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want AOSP then get a Galaxy Nexus. The best thing about this phone is Sense 4.0
dr9722 said:
If you want AOSP then get a Galaxy Nexus. The best thing about this phone is Sense 4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In your (and my) opinion but not in everyone's... some people love the iconic design but would like to see it house ICS as google intended it. I hope we see a pure ASOP rom.
abhijit1289 I would say its almost guaranteed that some one will release an ASOP / CM9 rom for this device it will just take longer than Sense rom's due to drivers etc
dr9722 said:
If you want AOSP then get a Galaxy Nexus. The best thing about this phone is Sense 4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NOT!
i hoped for sense to be better now, but i still don't like it.
i hope there will be cm9 soon, or i die
and no, i don't like the galaxy nexus. i want this phone. this phone on a AOSP ROM! x)
dr9722 said:
If you want AOSP then get a Galaxy Nexus. The best thing about this phone is Sense 4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That isn't correct. I would also like a AOSP rom but I wouldn't buy the Galaxy Nexus because of it's already outdated.
I see no reason why Sense 4.0 would prevent AOSP roms.
HTC-Gunge said:
In your (and my) opinion but not in everyone's... some people love the iconic design but would like to see it house ICS as google intended it. I hope we see a pure ASOP rom.
abhijit1289 I would say its almost guaranteed that some one will release an ASOP / CM9 rom for this device it will just take longer than Sense rom's due to drivers etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Imagine the benchmark scores on an aosp Rom......mmmmm
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
We should set a bounty that way whoever is going to port it will get motivated..I guess I'm 1st $25
DISCUSSION'S THREAD AOSP
Here goes all the discussions about AOSP/ICS by GalaxyICS team
What is AOSP?
AOSP= Android Open Source Project
AOSP is the clean Android without any modifications from Samsung, Sony, LG or something other ....
Made By:
•Macław
•bagnz0r
•marcin1147
Special Thanks to:
•Squadzone
•tom3q
DISCLAIMER
REMEMBER FLASHING CUSTOM ROM'S VOID YOUR WARRANTY
REMEMBER WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE!
Can you tell me what is the difference between AOSP and AOKP?
Also best of luck and thanks for developing for the Gio
puckshock said:
Can you tell me what is the difference between AOSP and AOKP?
Also best of luck and thanks for developing for the Gio
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not developed this i only maked a disscusion thread
puckshock said:
Can you tell me what is the difference between AOSP and AOKP?
Also best of luck and thanks for developing for the Gio
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP is clean system. It's just how you would remove CM9 and there left only system - Android 4.0
AOKP is like CM9, almost the same, but it is more customizable than CM
wojtek267 said:
AOSP is clean system. It's just how you would remove CM9 and there left only system - Android 4.0
AOKP is like CM9, almost the same, but it is more customizable than CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know AOKP is android open kang project.but which mean "KANG"?i dont understand
angel_boulevard said:
i know AOKP is android open kang project.but which mean "KANG"?i dont understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure what does it mean, but I think it might mean 'unofficial' or it means that rom is built from sources. I don't know. Correct me
In-topic: A KANG project means to take somebody else's work and put it to good use. From the word gank(ed).
Off-Topic: safariking I sent you a PM with the problems in your ROM you might want to fix in V8.
Regards
Can you change themes in AOSP with Theme Chooser? If not, then this ROM will quickly become very boring imo. Tbh, I'm looking forward to AOKP more than anything if CM9 will be abandoned.
I think the ICS theme is just fine, probably why I've stuck to CM7.2 Miracle Edition for so long.
But in all honesty I'm tired of GingerBread and just want a functional ICS with full hardware acceleration. That means no cheating with a half-***ed camera app and the ability to watch HQ YouTube videos and regular videos, period.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
What is the best ICS ROM for our galaxy w?
I've got a dilemma between flashing CM9, RemICS, Paranoidandroid and MIUI.
Can anyone give me a detail suggestions?
reddvilzz said:
What is the best ICS ROM for our galaxy w?
I've got a dilemma between flashing CM9, RemICS, Paranoidandroid and MIUI.
Can anyone give me a detail suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which of them is best is matter of preference. Each person will appreciate something different about any ROM, so the best advice is try all of them and pick which is best for you. At present they are all based on Arco's CM9, and I prefer that.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
2g11 said:
Which of them is best is matter of preference. Each person will appreciate something different about any ROM, so the best advice is try all of them and pick which is best for you. At present they are all based on Arco's CM9, and I prefer that.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, okay.. I prefer to choose a ROM that's not much of bugs, could you suggest me which ROM?
Because when I read each of ICS ROM thread comment's it's confusing me to choose which is almost stable ROM because of the bugs
By the way thanks for answering
wrong section dude! you should ask in general section. not in development. btw, all others ICS rom will be updated according to arco cm9
I would pick CM9, its since the others just use CM9 as a base while the others are great I find using the pure CM9 much better.
No bugs? Go back to gingerbread. No ICS can give you that yet. Please do know that ICS development for Galaxy Wonder is still on alpha stage. And also post appropriately. This is development section.
Sorry I'm new on creating thread
And I don't mean with no bug, I said with not plenty of bugs
Okay thanks for the answers guys, just asking, sorry for posting in a wrong section
Just Another★Gamer said:
I would pick CM9, its since the others just use CM9 as a base while the others are great I find using the pure CM9 much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah. pure CM9 is better. I have once tried Paranoid, it was pretty good too. it is more customizable than pure CM9 (I think you knew it). Im currently using CM9 build 6 which is pretty stable. the other ROM are based on CM9 build 5 anyway. so, you know the rule, build 6 is better than build 5 (literally), but in some case, it upside down. just flash any ROM. you will find your own answer.
azhiekurosaki said:
yeah. pure CM9 is better. I have once tried Paranoid, it was pretty good too. it is more customizable than pure CM9 (I think you knew it). Im currently using CM9 build 6 which is pretty stable. the other ROM are based on CM9 build 5 anyway. so, you know the rule, build 6 is better than build 5 (literally), but in some case, it upside down. just flash any ROM. you will find your own answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forgive a noob question, but...
what do you guys meanwE with "pure" CM9? Do you mean the CM9 as being developed by arco, or is there another source for CM9 on W?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
pepoluan said:
Forgive a noob question, but...
what do you guys meanwE with "pure" CM9? Do you mean the CM9 as being developed by arco, or is there another source for CM9 on W?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means Arco's CM9. All the other ICS ROMs are modified versions of it.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
^^,
CM9 Build 6.. I just installed it today and its working smooth and fast..:highfive:
UnicoIjo said:
CM9 Build 6.. I just installed it today and its working smooth and fast..:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers mate!
Is your phone's camera working at all under this build?
yup!
itismeonline said:
Is your phone's camera working at all under this build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup.. but a lil' bug on the VGA camera and the settings on the Camera other settings are not functioning.. Arco still great for this kind of development from the Build 1 to 6.. ^^,
just w8 for the next build.. and cheers!:highfive:
Wow! ARCO has a tough job! Kudos to him! We patiently await the results of his hard work.
* * First of all I tried CM9 (Maclaw's version) and I like it very much, but there is a lot of bugs which make it non-stable and not daily use rom.
So, why you guys want to port, create and use something that is not finished, stable and with broken apps and stuff? And plus CM9/10 are not, and probably won't be able on Gio ever.
We don't have official CM7 yet, but CM7 is much more stable then CM9/10.
I just don't understand why would someone use his phone if i.e. bluetooth, camera, and other stuff don't work properly or don't work at all.
Of course, if you can make CM9/10 to work i.e. like CM7 it's ok, but I see a lot of new roms, and they are all based on CM9/10 which means that they are not working properly so again I'm wondering why would someone use it.
This is an open discussion so feel free to express your own thoughts and opinions. :good:
p.s. I'll go to bed now, so I'll read your thought tomorrow. :fingers-crossed:
* *
maybe cuz they dont use their phone as camera, or never use bluetooth.
I havent had cm10 on my gio.
I still stuck to GB.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
I somewhat agree. While it's nice to have the latest bells and whistles on our phones to test out, they will never fully work. I've had my Gio for over a year, about first month of it I used stock. I'd already forgotten what a stable phone looked like and decided yesterday to try a stock based ROM. It's really fast and everything seems to be working flawlessly. It's a shame there aren't more gingerbread/stock based ROMs under active development. I think I'm gonna use it now, but I will check back to JB roms to see how new updates work.
I think because they r different. I m bored with stock n cm 7. I need a change and u 9 that change is good but still a galaxy gio
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Well it depends on everyone how they use their phone but for me Maclaws CM9 RC1 is still the best ROM and optimized for my daily use even though camera doesnt works which isnt a big problem for me cuz I dont use. Yet My battery doesnt last long because of this and i feel that i have -ed my phone features.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium
I'm using cm10 from jellaxy.com everithing are wrking without wifihotspot and camera recorde
Sent from my dmtech725h but have gio too:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
I'm enjoying Jelly Bean (AOKP) on my Samsung Galaxy Gio. I think it's so beautiful that I can't go back to a stock-based ROM. Also, I do really like Google Now, and as that is only working in Jelly Bean, it is an extra reason for me. But yes, I miss a lot of functionality, although I don't use the camera much. Sometimes my phone reacts too late, but I think it's worth it. So I am very happy there are devs for ICS and JB.
Froony said:
I'm enjoying Jelly Bean (AOKP) on my Samsung Galaxy Gio. I think it's so beautiful that I can't go back to a stock-based ROM. Also, I do really like Google Now, and as that is only working in Jelly Bean, it is an extra reason for me. But yes, I miss a lot of functionality, although I don't use the camera much. Sometimes my phone reacts too late, but I think it's worth it. So I am very happy there are devs for ICS and JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree. Jelly Bean (AOKP) is such a great rom. Everything works (for me). I have no complaints so far. Furthermore the smothness of the rom is so great. Everythings works as it should.
One satisfied User.
S
please can someone fix all bugs on CM9,CM10c:good:
Thawapricz said:
please can someone fix all bugs on CM9,CM10c:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's pretty hard to do. I mean, if someone can fix all bugs, they'll be fixed already, right...
So, I think it will need a little bit more time to make a bugfree CM9/10.
Cm9 need only videocam fix .. and almost all armv6 had it, just wait...
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
...time to make a bugfree CM9/10. :)[/QUOTE said:
I got my Gio with 2.3.6 (or was it 2.3.7?), a late gingerbread version. it worked so far, but was slow with scrolling and opening apps. when first trying the maclaw cm9 it got a lot smoother, faster. that was a real progress, apart from that the camera was not working and other bugs. also, with rc2 bluetooth got broken again, very annoing.
so i discovered jellaxy and tried all the aokp, cm9, cm10. I dont need the latest features, so cm9 would be ok for me; but cm9 seems not so stable than cm10. aokp seemed nice, but no profiles and no lockscreen app configuration.
of course, with that amount of memory i have to use a swap partition and link2sd, but I think I get the most out of this cheap handy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P
RonninDAMN said:
Well, that's pretty hard to do. I mean, if someone can fix all bugs, they'll be fixed already, right...
So, I think it will need a little bit more time to make a bugfree CM9/10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah right
RonninDAMN said:
* * First of all I tried CM9 (Maclaw's version) and I like it very much, but there is a lot of bugs which make it non-stable and not daily use rom.
So, why you guys want to port, create and use something that is not finished, stable and with broken apps and stuff? And plus CM9/10 are not, and probably won't be able on Gio ever.
We don't have official CM7 yet, but CM7 is much more stable then CM9/10.
I just don't understand why would someone use his phone if i.e. bluetooth, camera, and other stuff don't work properly or don't work at all.
Of course, if you can make CM9/10 to work i.e. like CM7 it's ok, but I see a lot of new roms, and they are all based on CM9/10 which means that they are not working properly so again I'm wondering why would someone use it.
This is an open discussion so feel free to express your own thoughts and opinions. :good:
p.s. I'll go to bed now, so I'll read your thought tomorrow. :fingers-crossed:
* *
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have run maclaws cm9 in 1 month now and i run it becuse i think it is beutifyl
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
I am using cm7.2 now thinking to use ics or jb. But need stable version. Will try aokp.
If it will not work for me i will move back to stock rom.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using Tapatalk 2
Jellybean CM10 by Jellaxy is my daily ROM. Last update is amazing, everything works fine.
CM9 by Jellaxy is also very stable, but I prefer JB.
CM7? Marcin 1147's
Change CPU governor to Smartass2 and Launcher to any other.
crlgio said:
Jellybean CM10 by Jellaxy is my daily ROM. Last update is amazing, everything works fine.
CM9 by Jellaxy is also very stable, but I prefer JB.
CM7? Marcin 1147's
Change CPU governor to Smartass2 and Launcher to any other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but jb hasn't got official adreno libs .. so graphical issue, also it lack of ram and lag a bit, for me the choice is cm9- based, because cm9 is ugly, instead miui,aokp,cna are better
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Biggest problem with JB are the omxlib so use cm9 AOKP and you get a nice ROM with almost everything working.
manpildo said:
It's a shame there aren't more gingerbread/stock based ROMs under active development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. Devs should develop GB roms, because our phones were made to run in GB for some reason (other than company profit) and it's so stable. You can use any GB rom for everyday use because there aren't any problems in modding it.
We have cm7, miui, lewa os and stock samsung gb rom, gb development is complete, now let's go at next step ,ics require same specs of gb, jb requires only some fixes ( adreno lib and omx), so for now ics is like phiexz cm7 at starting, all that is working is working better than stock, the other thing have to be fixed, but as you can know, in ics only camcorder have to be fixed, I wanna just say, wait a month and then i will bet that you will switch to ics
Sent from my GT-5660 using xda-developers app