LTE in nyc - T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II

Anyone knows when tmobile will turn on lte in the nyc area??????

beedotcity said:
Anyone knows when tmobile will turn on lte in the nyc area??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer is the same anywhere... When they get damn good and ready!

beedotcity said:
Anyone knows when tmobile will turn on lte in the nyc area??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you really think we need mroe threads like this, mods please close, people should get infractions for this crap

It may be far away as I started to spot LTE in couple of areas with Sony Xperia Ion.

beedotcity said:
Anyone knows when tmobile will turn on lte in the nyc area??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the rush? 25 down and 3 up is perfectly fine for me at the moment. No need to rush. Well at least that's what im getting in NYC
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app

jghidalgo307 said:
Thats the rush? 25 down and 3 up is perfectly fine for me at the moment. No need to rush. Well at least that's what im getting in NYC
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!

ionic7 said:
Do you really think we need mroe threads like this, mods please close, people should get infractions for this crap
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Infractions? That's a pretty heavy-handed approach beyond simply closing threads.
jghidalgo307 said:
Thats the rush? 25 down and 3 up is perfectly fine for me at the moment. No need to rush. Well at least that's what im getting in NYC
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well he may not be getting 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up consistently (those numbers are admittedly rare for me) if at all and/or is just a bit eager to experience LTE. I know I'm a bit curious to experience LTE myself although I can wait. Where in NYC are you getting those numbers? I rarely see 20 Mbps down here in Queens.

Well he may not be getting 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up consistently (those numbers are admittedly rare for me) if at all and/or is just a bit eager to experience LTE. I know I'm a bit curious to experience LTE myself although I can wait. Where in NYC are you getting those numbers? I rarely see 20 Mbps down here in Queens.[/QUOTE]
Actually in queens too loll and to be exact I get those numbers constantly near LGCC. I work in lower Manhattan and experience the same speed. Have you played with your modem?
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app

jghidalgo307 said:
Well he may not be getting 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up consistently (those numbers are admittedly rare for me) if at all and/or is just a bit eager to experience LTE. I know I'm a bit curious to experience LTE myself although I can wait. Where in NYC are you getting those numbers? I rarely see 20 Mbps down here in Queens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in queens too. getting 15-20 down / 2-6 up here. can't wait for lte

Launching on 11/17/13 in nyc. Target date tentative subject to change
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2

bones718 said:
in queens too. getting 15-20 down / 2-6 up here. can't wait for lte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a recent Sprint to T-Mobile switch, I really do not see the huge need for LTE. On Sprint, things were horrible. It was very rare occasion when speeds went up more than 700kbps. Latency was horrible too. Had a ton of timeouts even on simple text pages. Google Maps took forever to come back with results. With T-mobile, in NYC, I am frequently seeing 20+mbps speeds. I would say average is about 17mbps. I can do all things I could never do on Sprint now, like watch Netflix, Youtube, stream Pandora and such.
So, am I really itching for LTE? nope. I mean, it would be nice to have, but am I counting the days? No. On Sprint, LTE is viewed as a great savior from slow internet speeds. On T-Mobile, internet speeds are already amazing.
So, let me ask you this. Why can't you wait for LTE? What is it going to give you that HSPA+ won't? It's a honest question, I am really curious. And please, something other than "2x current speed"

Meanee said:
As a recent Sprint to T-Mobile switch, I really do not see the huge need for LTE. On Sprint, things were horrible. It was very rare occasion when speeds went up more than 700kbps. Latency was horrible too. Had a ton of timeouts even on simple text pages. Google Maps took forever to come back with results. With T-mobile, in NYC, I am frequently seeing 20+mbps speeds. I would say average is about 17mbps. I can do all things I could never do on Sprint now, like watch Netflix, Youtube, stream Pandora and such.
So, am I really itching for LTE? nope. I mean, it would be nice to have, but am I counting the days? No. On Sprint, LTE is viewed as a great savior from slow internet speeds. On T-Mobile, internet speeds are already amazing.
So, let me ask you this. Why can't you wait for LTE? What is it going to give you that HSPA+ won't? It's a honest question, I am really curious. And please, something other than "2x current speed"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They won't feel isolated amongst the likes of Verizon
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2

Meanee said:
As a recent Sprint to T-Mobile switch, I really do not see the huge need for LTE. On Sprint, things were horrible. It was very rare occasion when speeds went up more than 700kbps. Latency was horrible too. Had a ton of timeouts even on simple text pages. Google Maps took forever to come back with results. With T-mobile, in NYC, I am frequently seeing 20+mbps speeds. I would say average is about 17mbps. I can do all things I could never do on Sprint now, like watch Netflix, Youtube, stream Pandora and such.
So, am I really itching for LTE? nope. I mean, it would be nice to have, but am I counting the days? No. On Sprint, LTE is viewed as a great savior from slow internet speeds. On T-Mobile, internet speeds are already amazing.
So, let me ask you this. Why can't you wait for LTE? What is it going to give you that HSPA+ won't? It's a honest question, I am really curious. And please, something other than "2x current speed"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as multiplayer online gaming on our handsets will get more advanced, gameplay could use the lte connection. i was never a phone gamer, but nowadays i see myself gaming alot. waiting for more real time multiplayer shooters and racers to come out.

bones718 said:
in queens too. getting 15-20 down / 2-6 up here. can't wait for lte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2-6mbps up, eh? Show me a single screenshot of HSPA+ speedtest when you see more than 5mbps up. Or even more than 4mbps up!
thanks.

bones718 said:
as multiplayer online gaming on our handsets will get more advanced, gameplay could use the lte connection. i was never a phone gamer, but nowadays i see myself gaming alot. waiting for more real time multiplayer shooters and racers to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see people play COD3 and WoW on home DSL connections that top out at 5mbps. About 4x slower than HSPA+ speeds that I get now. So as you can see, LTE is not required for gaming.

milan03 said:
2-6mbps up, eh? Show me a single screenshot of HSPA+ speedtest when you see more than 5mbps up. Or even more than 4mbps up!
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
typo. between 2 to 4

milan03 said:
2-6mbps up, eh? Show me a single screenshot of HSPA+ speedtest when you see more than 5mbps up. Or even more than 4mbps up!
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, most of my upload speedtests are in mid 2000 range. Highest one was 3040kbps. According to a quick search, HSPA+ max upload is around 5.7mbps

Meanee said:
I see people play COD3 and WoW on home DSL connections that top out at 5mbps. About 4x slower than HSPA+ speeds that I get now. So as you can see, LTE is not required for gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not required, but latency would probably be better.

Meanee said:
I see people play COD3 and WoW on home DSL connections that top out at 5mbps. About 4x slower than HSPA+ speeds that I get now. So as you can see, LTE is not required for gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speed isn't that important for most games. What does matter is latency, which is significantly lower on LTE, apparently.

ttabbal said:
Speed isn't that important for most games. What does matter is latency, which is significantly lower on LTE, apparently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of my speedtest pings are between 20 and 30ms. In comparison, business cable connection ping to 8.8.8.8 in the office has an average of 35ms. My home FiOS connection gets me 20-25.

Related

4g and 3g Super Slow... Charlotte NC

I'm so tired of sprint.. I live in Uptown Charlotte NC and on 4g getting 1.90mbps dwl. and 0.20 uploading. and OMG!!! 3g is only 0.32 dwl. and 0.18 up. It's ridiculous anybody have a solution or any input in this major situation?
A'reo said:
I'm so tired of sprint.. I live in Uptown Charlotte NC and on 4g getting 1.90mbps dwl. and 0.20 uploading. and OMG!!! 3g is only 0.32 dwl. and 0.18 up. It's ridiculous anybody have a solution or any input in this major situation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a common problem and there are many threads on this subject. Sprint is supposedly upgrading their network and this should improve within the next few months depending on where you live and what areas get upgraded first. My 3G speeds suck big time, and my 4G speeds vary depending in which tower I connect to. At my mom's house, 4G is great. In my house, 4G is horrible. At work, 4G is in between the two.
Thanks for letting me know that.. But ill give them until next year to upgrade their towers.
A'reo said:
I'm so tired of sprint.. I live in Uptown Charlotte NC and on 4g getting 1.90mbps dwl. and 0.20 uploading. and OMG!!! 3g is only 0.32 dwl. and 0.18 up. It's ridiculous anybody have a solution or any input in this major situation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in Winston Salem and my experience is the opposite of yours. 4G is blazing fast and my 3G is fast, too. I have noticed that in Orlando, my hometown, both are faster than here, but I attribute that to the not so hilly terrain. The only gripe I have with Sprint is its voice feature. Inside my home, 3G and 4G are good, but I have to switch to roaming only, using the Roam Control app to talk.
Posting & replying via the XDA Premium app
dougjamal said:
I live in Winston Salem and my experience is the opposite of yours. 4G is blazing fast and my 3G is fast, too. I have noticed that in Orlando, my hometown, both are faster than here, but I attribute that to the not so hilly terrain. The only gripe I have with Sprint is its voice feature. Inside my home, 3G and 4G are good, but I have to switch to roaming only, using the Roam Control app to talk.
Posting & replying via the XDA Premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's really interesting i mean the fact that you have it blazing fast in Winston Salem but they can't get it right here lol.
Have you tried the 3g speed fix? I'm in charlotte, I get better speeds than that, but not great. I've been on CM7 variants for a long time now, but I used to get better with Sense ROMs. I'm going to switch to Mik 4.6 and give that a shot for a bit. I usually get anywhere from 500kbps - 1.8mbps, although the last time I got higher than 1mbps was a while ago. I don't mess with 4g since I'm never in coverage other than in the car to and from work.
A'reo said:
That's really interesting i mean the fact that you have it blazing fast in Winston Salem but they can't get it right here lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(Laughing)....I hear ya.....I moved here almost a year ago and after living almost all of my life in Orlando, Winston is a bit of a shock to me....lol.
Posting & replying via the XDA Premium app
blame it on at&t making all those tmobile customers jump ship to sprint and bogging down our network lol... mine sucks ballz!!!
jstalford said:
Have you tried the 3g speed fix? I'm in charlotte, I get better speeds than that, but not great. I've been on CM7 variants for a long time now, but I used to get better with Sense ROMs. I'm going to switch to Mik 4.6 and give that a shot for a bit. I usually get anywhere from 500kbps - 1.8mbps, although the last time I got higher than 1mbps was a while ago. I don't mess with 4g since I'm never in coverage other than in the car to and from work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"I'll look into that but please keep me updated on how that Mik 4.6 works"
dougjamal said:
(Laughing)....I hear ya.....I moved here almost a year ago and after living almost all of my life in Orlando, Winston is a bit of a shock to me....lol.
Posting & replying via the XDA Premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Lol cool.. But i really hope they fix it soon because if not then i will most likley move somewhere. Because i like sprint but they need better service."
Visionikz03 said:
blame it on at&t making all those tmobile customers jump ship to sprint and bogging down our network lol... mine sucks ballz!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Lol but i hope they fix their network soon because if they don't like i said before i would move to get better service."
I live in Waxhaw, and I just got 1.8mbps down. This **** drives me crazy, speeds are up and down all the time. I'll go weeks without getting over 300k and then randomly get faster, but it always goes back.
I'm still on Destroyer and these are some of the fastest dl speeds I've gotten on AOSP (3g) in a looooooong time, so I think I'm going to stick with it for a while and see what happens.
jstalford said:
I live in Waxhaw, and I just got 1.8mbps down. This **** drives me crazy, speeds are up and down all the time. I'll go weeks without getting over 300k and then randomly get faster, but it always goes back.
I'm still on Destroyer and these are some of the fastest dl speeds I've gotten on AOSP (3g) in a looooooong time, so I think I'm going to stick with it for a while and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't hate Sprint but they need more reliable service and add more towers... because they need it.
HTC Evo "Rooted"
WiMax is a joke, shouldn't even be called 4g.
Tmobile's network ****s on Sprints, too bad att is buying them out otherwise I would be switching.
r916 said:
WiMax is a joke, shouldn't even be called 4g.
Tmobile's network ****s on Sprints, too bad att is buying them out otherwise I would be switching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet it is.. and that really is to bad i was considering them.. but i had verizon before my switch and im going back to them

Slow Network Speeds?

I hate tech support calls, I have no patience for those calls because I'm above them technically in so many ways (not to sound conceited, but I work in IT for a living, and I'm high up the chain).
What type of network speed is this thing supposed to get on Sprint? On average, I'm not getting any faster than 5mbit.
I'm lucky if I ever get over 1mbit here in Orange County. Usually get 0.5mbps here. Only in off hours do I ever go over that, so I know it's not even my reception. Just their crap network. Freaking sprint...
agentfazexx said:
I hate tech support calls, I have no patience for those calls because I'm above them technically in so many ways (not to sound conceited, but I work in IT for a living, and I'm high up the chain).
What type of network speed is this thing supposed to get on Sprint? On average, I'm not getting any faster than 5mbit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on your area. I don't have 4g and my 3g sucks as well. I get around 200-400 kbps. Luckily I use my wifi.
Sent From My Evo Killer!!!
musclehead84 said:
Depends on your area. I don't have 4g and my 3g sucks as well. I get around 200-400 kbps. Luckily I use my wifi.
Sent From My Evo Killer!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm right outside Baltimore. 4G bounces up and down all the time, it's pretty bad.
I don't have 4G in my area, but my 3G speeds are posted in my sig. Anywhere from 1.5 to 2.3 usually.
05GT said:
I don't have 4G in my area, but my 3G speeds are posted in my sig. Anywhere from 1.5 to 2.3 usually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that's what I get on 4G a lot of times.
The problem seems to be at home, at work is pretty quick. At home I'm getting 2mbit. How do I approach Sprint support with this issue? I am tired of the stupid "turn your phone on and off" troubleshooting.
I think your fighting a losing battle because its probably not the phone as much as it is the network. Guess we will find out what the plans are at the big event coming up
Not sure if this will work for you but i went here and it actually boosted my 3g by over 400+ kbps. now i normally pull about 1.5 Mbps
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1283229
ilostmypistons said:
I think your fighting a losing battle because its probably not the phone as much as it is the network. Guess we will find out what the plans are at the big event coming up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What event?
The only event I know of is when they announce that they're carrying the iPhone.
agentfazexx said:
The only event I know of is when they announce that they're carrying the iPhone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They announce their network plans today at 930 eastern time.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
craigbailey1986 said:
They announce their network plans today at 930 eastern time.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah nice. Where can I read about it? I'm at work at the moment.
agentfazexx said:
Ah nice. Where can I read about it? I'm at work at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure tech blogs will post articles post event. I believe Eric Zeman (of phonescoop.com) is at the event -- I think he'll probably provide live coverage here:
https://mobile.twitter.com/phonescooper
geekaren said:
I'm sure tech blogs will post articles post event. I believe Eric Zeman (of phonescoop.com) is at the event -- I think he'll probably provide live coverage here:
https://mobile.twitter.com/phonescooper
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice. Let's hope they actually fix their 4G coverage and increase speeds. This phone can handle some insane speeds, faster than my 35/35 Fios connection.
Well I finally got tech support after my cell service dropping over and over again, and they're saying my phone is having issues. 4G stays connected but instead of bars, I get a circle with a line through it, and it says "searching for service." This HAS to be a Sprint issue...

HSPA+ in NYC very slow?

I'm seeing very erratic speeds in Manhattan with my new SGS II, but generally I'm in the 2-3 mbps down, 1 mbps up range anywhere I'm inside. Sometimes it is the same outside as well, but occasionally that will spike up to ~16mpbs down outside.
Any other NYC users having similar issues?
Get a new sim at tmobile
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
Since when is 2-3Mbps slow? Really?
Try Sprint 3G/4G or Verizon 3G or AT&T "4G". 100-900Kbps is the norm on Sprint, Verizon and AT&T except AT&T has higher bursts. Verizon LTE is quick but it's already slowed down below 10Mbps here and coverage is not everywhere
heygrl said:
Since when is 2-3Mbps slow? Really?
Try Sprint 3G/4G or Verizon 3G or AT&T "4G". 100-900Kbps is the norm on Sprint, Verizon and AT&T except AT&T has higher bursts. Verizon LTE is quick but it's already slowed down below 10Mbps here and coverage is not everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since it's advertised as HSPA+ 42mbps. Yes, really.
mbernusg said:
Get a new sim at tmobile
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come? Is this sim defective somehow?
ap77 said:
Since it's advertised as HSPA+ 42mbps. Yes, really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No - you're not going to get close to a theoretical max speed. Sorry to break the news to you, but this is Wireless - there are no guarantees.
heygrl said:
No - you're not going to get close to a theoretical max speed. Sorry to break the news to you, but this is Wireless - there are no guarantees.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously I'm not expecting the 42mbps. But they made a big deal about this being the first DC-HSPA+ phone -- it is, in fact, why this phone doesn't have exynos. Sorry to break it to you, but 2-3 mbps is very slow even for HSPA+ 21mbps. This is slower than Sprint's ****ty wimax.
If you're content with 2-3 mpbs, great, I'm happy for you.
ap77 said:
Obviously I'm not expecting the 42mbps. But they made a big deal about this being the first DC-HSPA+ phone -- it is, in fact, why this phone doesn't have exynos. Sorry to break it to you, but 2-3 mbps is very slow even for HSPA+ 21mbps. This is slower than Sprint's ****ty wimax.
If you're content with 2-3 mpbs, great, I'm happy for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not slower than WiMAX here, and if you are seeing a variance in speed it's obvious that you are bouncing between two different cell towers with two different loads or one without Dual Carrier HSPA deployed on it.
2-3Mbps for a network with 1 3G carrier which means all of the bandwidth on that sector is shared with other T-Mobile subscribers is NOT bad. 50-300Kbps/Sprint 3G speed is bad. Verizon 3G at 500-1000Kbps is mediocre but acceptable due to the low ping. 2Mbps is decent, not bad, and OK for a HSPA network.
heygrl said:
It's not slower than WiMAX here, and if you are seeing a variance in speed it's obvious that you are bouncing between two different cell towers with two different loads or one without Dual Carrier HSPA deployed on it.
2-3Mbps for a network with 1 3G carrier which means all of the bandwidth on that sector is shared with other T-Mobile subscribers is NOT bad. 50-300Kbps/Sprint 3G speed is bad. Verizon 3G at 500-1000Kbps is mediocre but acceptable due to the low ping. 2Mbps is decent, not bad, and OK for a HSPA network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still have my Sprint Epic and this service is certainly slower than wimax.
Look, I'm not going to argue with you if you think 2mbps is just fine. I don't. What I'm interested in is whether other users in NYC are getting the same kind of speeds.
ap77 said:
I still have my Sprint Epic and this service is certainly slower than wimax.
Look, I'm not going to argue with you if you think 2mbps is just fine. I don't. What I'm interested in is whether other users in NYC are getting the same kind of speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a speedtest i ran and got the same score 3 times in bloomingdales 59th
Get a new sim bro
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
kennyp987 said:
This is a speedtest i ran and got the same score 3 times in bloomingdales 59th
Get a new sim bro
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 12mbps DL / 0.8mbps UL in Brooklyn last night. Right now I'm downtown and I have 113kbps DL / 381kbps UL.
grabiarz said:
I got 12mbps DL / 0.8mbps UL in Brooklyn last night. Right now I'm downtown and I have 113kbps DL / 381kbps UL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch on the downtown.
ap77 said:
I still have my Sprint Epic and this service is certainly slower than wimax.
Look, I'm not going to argue with you if you think 2mbps is just fine. I don't. What I'm interested in is whether other users in NYC are getting the same kind of speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 2.5GHz network reaches few people. In a market where Clear actually has people using the network the speeds are much lower due to the traffic. NYC is still very much brand new with few WiMAX users, not a valid comparison. Here, it's 1Mbps all day long due to the maturity of the network and the usage
Unless they're on the same tower as you -- they're going to get different speeds, higher and even lower depending on load. Something you can't comprehend. It's not going to be 10+ everywhere. What are you desperately needing 10Mbps at home for anyway? Do you have an unlimited plan with no throttle cap you desperately want to use? I don't get it.
heygrl said:
The 2.5GHz network reaches few people. In a market where Clear actually has people using the network the speeds are much lower due to the traffic. NYC is still very much brand new with few WiMAX users, not a valid comparison. Here, it's 1Mbps all day long due to the maturity of the network and the usage
Unless they're on the same tower as you -- they're going to get different speeds, higher and even lower depending on load. Something you can't comprehend. It's not going to be 10+ everywhere. What are you desperately needing 10Mbps at home for anyway? Do you have an unlimited plan with no throttle cap you desperately want to use? I don't get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For god's sake, will you take your concern trolling elsewhere? "Why do you even need something that fast?" Unbelievable.
heygrl said:
The 2.5GHz network reaches few people. In a market where Clear actually has people using the network the speeds are much lower due to the traffic. NYC is still very much brand new with few WiMAX users, not a valid comparison. Here, it's 1Mbps all day long due to the maturity of the network and the usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meant to add: I don't care at all about how wimax works where you are (Vegas?). Here in NYC, I have pretty uniformly seen lower speeds on TMO than I did on wimax, sometimes substantially so. I'm curious about the speeds that others in NYC with DC-HSPA+ are generally seeing on average. Your entire contribution to this thread has been a giant non-sequitur.
This is what im getting in Delaware .....very nice
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
ap77 said:
Meant to add: I don't care at all about how wimax works where you are (Vegas?). Here in NYC, I have pretty uniformly seen lower speeds on TMO than I did on wimax, sometimes substantially so. I'm curious about the speeds that others in NYC with DC-HSPA+ are generally seeing on average. Your entire contribution to this thread has been a giant non-sequitur.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your babbling about how you aren't getting 16Mbps everywhere. I'm surprised you can even get a WiMAX signal that doesn't cut out all over the place. It matters because you can't comprehend network load or variances.
heygrl said:
Your babbling about how you aren't getting 16Mbps everywhere. I'm surprised you can even get a WiMAX signal that doesn't cut out all over the place. It matters because you can't comprehend network load or variances.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or never at all. I just noticed your sig -- "LTE killer." Right -- killer 2mbps. Obviously dealing with a fanboy troll here. Move along.
ap77 said:
Or never at all. I just noticed your sig -- "LTE killer." Right -- killer 2mbps. Obviously dealing with a fanboy troll here. Move along.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 10 Mbps+ on dual cell HSPA which usually outperforms Verizon LTE in Las Vegas on a regular basis, at a much lower price with better phones to boot. Again, you don't/can't comprehend variances per tower. Grasp that first and you will understand why you don't get 16Mbps *EVERYWHERE*
heygrl said:
I get 10 Mbps+ on dual cell HSPA which usually outperforms Verizon LTE in Las Vegas on a regular basis, at a much lower price with better phones to boot. Again, you don't/can't comprehend variances per tower. Grasp that first and you will understand why you don't get 16Mbps *EVERYWHERE*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you seriously this slow? PLEASE, PLEASE stop trolling this thread.
Again, I don't give a **** about your experience in Vegas. This thread is about NYC. Believe me, 2mbps is beyond a joke compared to VZ's LTE in NYC. And, hey, you got 20mbps+ *everywhere* with VZ LTE here. My mighty 2-3mbps DC-HSPA+ is not match.
Seriously, please just stop. You're killing value with every character in this thread.

Anyone in PA near Poconos with VZW ?

Hey guys at the end of the month me and my friends are going to poconos for few days and I was wondering if anyone living at least close to there tell me how is their service? moslty I care about internet speeds if anyone could provide a speed test.
Even if it's 3G as long as it's stable when we go there the olympics start so I assume I will use at least 4-5 gigs of data , 4G would be a dream come true in that matter.
Thanks!
Note: Last year I was there with AT&T had Galaxy S2 and max I could get was 1 bar (with speeds around 1 mbps)
I stayed at a Pocono resort with my wife in April. I didn't have my Nexus at the time, but my Charge pulled decent 3G coverage. The resort was Cove Haven, which is a fairly rural resort, also. It's technically in Lakeville, though, so I'm not sure if that's close enough for your purposes.
Sorry that the information isn't current and that I can't provide more details. The connection was definitely solid, though.
Hello from the Poconos! I don't have Verizon but my friends and family have it. Consistent 3G and 4G speeds all around the poconos. Scranton and Wilkes-Barre are will see good LTE speeds. Where exactly will you be?
Just for a reference...my buddy was camping and was able to stream the NBA finals perfectly...
lowandbehold said:
Hello from the Poconos! I don't have Verizon but my friends and family have it. Consistent 3G and 4G speeds all around the poconos. Scranton and Wilkes-Barre are will see good LTE speeds. Where exactly will you be?
Just for a reference...my buddy was camping and was able to stream the NBA finals perfectly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sup! I think to be exact it's Albrightsville the Indian Mountain Creek,
I hope there is at least 2 mbps on 3G
patt2k said:
Sup! I think to be exact it's Albrightsville the Indian Mountain Creek,
I hope there is at least 2 mbps on 3G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm...probably not a good sign that I have never heard of Albrightsville.
lowandbehold said:
Hello from the Poconos! I don't have Verizon but my friends and family have it. Consistent 3G and 4G speeds all around the poconos. Scranton and Wilkes-Barre are will see good LTE speeds. Where exactly will you be?
Just for a reference...my buddy was camping and was able to stream the NBA finals perfectly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lowandbehold said:
Hmm...probably not a good sign that I have never heard of Albrightsville.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Albrightsville&state=PA
I checked Verizon Coverage map but those are not trustworthy .. and well our nexus with the radios bleh

(T999) What is your avg. Data speed?

When using the H+ network? My data connection switches constantly from 3g to H+ at my home. I get like 3-5 MB/s on average. I always have full bars and I live about 20 mins south of Kansas City.
What speed do you get on your S3? When downloading apps and the like I only seem to get like 300kb/s....it feels really slow.
You?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
ShernDog said:
I get like 3-5 MB/s on average.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. It seems like you live in an area with HSPA+ 42 coverage. Where I live, I only get HSPA+ 21 coverage, which is more like 2.5 MB/s. When downloading apps I usually get around that speed as well. The 300kb/s speed you're getting might be due to server congestion, which has little to do with your connection. Only a few times have I had to deal with slow downloads from Google Play.
8-12mb average in Clearwater, FL. 2-3mb up.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T999 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Before the big LTE migration, I would get 10-15, over 20 on a good day. Nowadays I can usually get 5-10, sometimes 15. Rarely see 20 anymore.
This data speed thing is lame. Can't believe they released the T999L after >.<
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
I'm in Birmingham, AL, which I think is HSPA+ 21, and I usually get around 7-11 mbps. Don't think I'm really missing anything by not having LTE.
IMO HSPA+ 21 is good enough for anything I've come across so far (YouTube, downloading apps, web browsing, streaming radio). Unless you're a data-speed freak you're probably not going to notice the difference between HSPA+ and LTE, unless you download large files often.
jim45 said:
IMO HSPA+ 21 is good enough for anything I've come across so far (YouTube, downloading apps, web browsing, streaming radio). Unless you're a data-speed freak you're probably not going to notice the difference between HSPA+ and LTE, unless you download large files often.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The big difference I see between HSPA+ and LTE is latency. There is no comparison. LTE kills it, no waiting for connection and data starting to download. Also very noticeable in high subscriber density environments (Disneyland for instance). LTE handles lots of devices more efficiently than HSPA.
Hastily spouted for your befuddlement
Same area as another poster here.. clearwater/largo, on my T999 I get 5-15 down, 2 up, depending on the time of day... Since I got my S4, I get 29/10 all day every day on LTE, I laugh because my phone is faster than my bright house connection and cheaper... plus, as others have said, latency kills HSPA+, I cant even download stuff without a connection interrupt. I just wish there was some way to switch the S4 to LTE only and still do calling, but Tmobile AFAIK does not support voice over LTE...to bad you cant re-rout the wifi calling over it to fool the phone into thinking its calling over wifi.
NYC here. around 13-20 when I'm outside. Never above 20.
In Jacksonville Fl I average 10-15 download and 2 upload.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
ShernDog said:
When using the H+ network? My data connection switches constantly from 3g to H+ at my home. I get like 3-5 MB/s on average. I always have full bars and I live about 20 mins south of Kansas City.
What speed do you get on your S3? When downloading apps and the like I only seem to get like 300kb/s....it feels really slow.
You?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I Get Different Download Speeds Depending On The Time Of Dat.... Like In My 4th Period Class O Can Get Up To 2/mbps Which Is Cool But At Home I Get 200/kbps so well that's what I Get in Santa Ana California
I would just think that being in a rather large metropolitan area I would be getting better speeds. Wouldn't they want to focus on large centers for better towers? Oh well...I still have a year on my contract. I want to get the next Google nexus that comes out.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
ShernDog said:
I would just think that being in a rather large metropolitan area I would be getting better speeds. Wouldn't they want to focus on large centers for better towers? Oh well...I still have a year on my contract. I want to get the next Google nexus that comes out.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Being In A Large Are Doesn't Mean You Get Faster Internet Speed... Because Of Major Population In A City people Use There Phones Way More and At around the Same Time... But In Little Areas People Don't Use There Pgones Tgat Much And A Different Times ... There Are To Many Variables To This

Categories

Resources