Develop Bugs

Best kernel for latest fresh?

Alright, so I'm coming from cm 6 and I was using snap with it. But what I'm wondering, is what is the best kernel for fresh.
Thanks.

derik123derik123 said:
Alright, so I'm coming from cm 6 and I was using snap with it. But what I'm wondering, is what is the best kernel for fresh.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running King's latest...#8 I think. Getting 53fps, 1250 Quadrant score with stock 998mhz speed. Seems good so far.

If you want great battery and dont care about the fps cap, stick with the latest stock kernel thats built right into fresh.

best kernel for lastest fresh?
I am using the kernal that came with the rom and it seems to work just fine. i thought the claims on battery life might be over rated but can say that with moderate use i got 37 hours from 100% to 15%. Might try kings again but not sure if that would hurt that battery life.

damanrob said:
I am using the kernal that came with the rom and it seems to work just fine. i thought the claims on battery life might be over rated but can say that with moderate use i got 37 hours from 100% to 15%. Might try kings again but not sure if that would hurt that battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I promise you that the claims of improved battery life for the new HTC kernel are not overstated at all. In fact... there are no words to describe how much of an improvement it actually is. The theory follows that the other kernels will be re-optimized based on the new HTC kernel.

As above, stock gets the best battery life. If you need the OC/FPS/etc you can try King's #8 (I had stability issues, personally) or #6 (worked like a charm). Currently I'm using the netarchy 4.1.9.1 beta. Battery life could be better IMO, but feels really snappy. LP looks too good @ >50 FPS for me to stick with stock.

edufur said:
I promise you that the claims of improved battery life for the new HTC kernel are not overstated at all. In fact... there are no words to describe how much of an improvement it actually is. The theory follows that the other kernels will be re-optimized based on the new HTC kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been running Fresh 3.2 with the built in kernel, but I've also been using SetCPU with a very low performance, battery friendly profile.
My question is whether I should be using SetCPU at all anymore, since I heard that this new kernel already supports throttling the CPU back when not in demand. I've been excited to test out how it effects my battery myself, but if someone has the answer, it would save me a week.

dom085 said:
I have been running Fresh 3.2 with the built in kernel, but I've also been using SetCPU with a very low performance, battery friendly profile.
My question is whether I should be using SetCPU at all anymore, since I heard that this new kernel already supports throttling the CPU back when not in demand. I've been excited to test out how it effects my battery myself, but if someone has the answer, it would save me a week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if the stock kernel does scale down the voltage to the CPU, I think you would still need setCPU if you want to OC. However, the stock kernel probably does not support OCing. However, I think setCPU could still be beneficial for keeping the CPU running at minimum when the phone is in sleep mode. Then again, that feature could also be incorporated into the new HTC kernel for all we know.
Like someone else mentioned, Kings BFS #8 gave me stability issues, but #6 works fantastic in terms of performance and stability; not to mention, everything works on my phone as it should. I got 2 generic batteries and a charger from eBay for dirt cheap, so battery life if of little concern to me.

Is there a kernel for fresh 3.2 with cifs support?

Whats the best rom + kernel for battery?

I havent found a thread that actually answers this question straight forward. Please dont say search the forum because i have. I just need something to make the best out of my phones battery because i need to go ALONG time without plugging in my phone. Hope someone has an answer for me. Thanks

twolfekc said:
I havent found a thread that actually answers this question straight forward. Please dont say search the forum because i have. I just need something to make the best out of my phones battery because i need to go ALONG time without plugging in my phone. Hope someone has an answer for me. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have had exceptional battery life using BEASTMod.
Just my opinion

they are all good imo, im currently using gingersnap rom, has the faux kernel and i get over 20 hours of some what heavy use, and so it went with juggernaut, beast mod, and bombardier.
but the faux kernel has proved to be smoother and more efficient imo, perhaps slightly better battery.
hope i could help

I like Juggernaut + Bullet.
I am trying to make the most of my battery by:
-underclocking to 384-16xx
-turning on Battery Saver
-running Juice Defender
Anyone know how to undervolt on Bullet?
I am a heavy battery user. I use my phone all day constantly on Netflix (through Wifi) and listening to music with web surfing. I get about 16 hours on it everyday and come home with 4%-30%. It is very odd on why my battery percentage is such a big range. Screen is on like half the day. I really can not complain about this battery.

I am trying to figure out the best setting on tuner pro for dewizzed 2.0. I am only getting like 6 to 8 hours on my phone. When I've seen others get close to 24 with light to moderate use. The rom is Dewizzed 2.0, and I know the some people have the same rom while using tuner pro. I would ask the dev in the devolpment section, but I don't have permissions to do so. Also Hello everyone in xda. I am a long time visitor since the G1 days. I made this account a long time ago, but recently got tired of touchwiz, and decided to give it the boot lol.

Oreo13 said:
I am trying to figure out the best setting on tuner pro for dewizzed 2.0. I am only getting like 6 to 8 hours on my phone. When I've seen others get close to 24 with light to moderate use. The rom is Dewizzed 2.0, and I know the some people have the same rom while using tuner pro. I would ask the dev in the devolpment section, but I don't have permissions to do so. Also Hello everyone in xda. I am a long time visitor since the G1 days. I made this account a long time ago, but recently got tired of touchwiz, and decided to give it the boot lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Dewizzed 2.0 with Synergy kernel and using System Tuner Pro, 1.62max 384min, 384max and 192min with screen off and am not UV because Synergy is already UV. Getting well over 21 hours of use, light to moderate usage,
Sounds like you have a app that is using a lot of battery.

adclem said:
I am running Dewizzed 2.0 with Synergy kernel and using System Tuner Pro, 1.62max 384min, 384max and 192min with screen off and am not UV because Synergy is already UV. Getting well over 21 hours of use, light to moderate usage,
Sounds like you have a app that is using a lot of battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I was looking into Synergy, but I heard there was a noticeable lag with that kernel. Could be wrong though. I really do appreciate your help. Lol. If I'm correct I believe you are a mod here.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Oreo13 said:
Thanks I was looking into Synergy, but I heard there was a noticeable lag with that kernel. Could be wrong though. I really do appreciate your help. Lol. If I'm correct I believe you are a mod here.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed a bit of lag when I first flashed Beast Mod w/Synergy. Try this before you flash, it worked for me and my phone is buttery smooth. Boot into recovery wipe cache 3 times, wipe dalvik 3 times. Then go into advanced, then mounts and storage. Format system. Flash synergy, then fix permissions. Reboot, enjoy. Also Im running zepplinrox's V6 supercharger script. That helps out with smoothness too!

Use faux kernel with fauxclock app. Max 1.5 min 384 then max 384 min 384 with screen off

seanyuan62 said:
Use faux kernel with fauxclock app. Max 1.5 min 384 then max 384 min 384 with screen off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can i use this for the GT I9000? [Galaxy S1]

EskDroid said:
Can i use this for the GT I9000? [Galaxy S1]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you can't.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

well the best thing to do for any rom is under volt and min the cpu speed i think ginger snap is good for both kernel and rom

Best battery, bombardier 3.0+synergy V.10 for extra battery life I use juice defender, 1day and change with moderate usage.
Welcome to the DARKSIDE

Is stock ROM less battery drain??

Which rom is the best [for battery life] between these one??
- cyanogenmod
- miui
- stock ics
All with the ultima kernel from riyal.

xperiap said:
Which rom is the best [for battery life] between these one??
- cyanogenmod
- miui
- stock ics
All with the ultima kernel from riyal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me its KA21 with Arcknight 3.3 Stock Kernel.
Really smooth, better battery than i experienced stockwise...

try ICS_anzu_KTG tuned_V1.41: governor interactiv

actually battery drain more depends on the kernels..for best battery life stock kernel is the best

Guys note that lad has Pro not Arc. Stock is usually the worst, or better - default gauge for custom ROMs. I've been watching cyanogenmod discussion for a while, usually users feedback on battery life varied from version to version; for tweaked versions can be said that battery life is the same as in stock while the performance is 20% better. I don't know about MIUI.
(Out of your question, the best for battery life are Ultima ROM and Buttermilk ROM which are optimized for battery life and battery life is notably better there; with Buttermilk and low usage you can do as much as 4 days without charging - worth for outdoor trips. Ultima ROM when idle eats like 0,6% per hour.)

Stock rom with stock kernal had the best battery life... but also lags the most.
I recomend arconium ICS with stock kernal for a balaced experiance...!!!

arpith.fbi said:
actually battery drain more depends on the kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how you use your Phone.

XperienceD said:
And how you use your Phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dint get you..

arpith.fbi said:
i dint get you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if you game a lot compared to someone who doesn't then obviously ones battery will last longer than the other, so there's a few factors that can be taken into account in regards to battery life.

XperienceD said:
Well if you game a lot compared to someone who doesn't then obviously ones battery will last longer than the other, so there's a few factors that can be taken into account in regards to battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well my method of testing battery drain(i guess everybody tests the same way) is only on standby..how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2...in exceptional cases battery will drain fast while using 3G in one kernel but lil slow on other kernel..
again my point is kernel is more responsible for battery life of the phone rather than a ROM..

arpith.fbi said:
how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you need to take syncing into account, if yours is on and mine is off on the same kernel then yours may drian a bit quicker than mine, which goes back to my point of how a user uses their Phone. I don't think it's a black and white issue.

XperienceD said:
Then you need to take syncing into account, if yours is on and mine is off on the same kernel then yours may drian a bit quicker than mine, which goes back to my point of how a user uses their Phone. I don't think it's a black and white issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea dude.. i get it..my point was simple..people were talking about best roms for battery life.. i just said kernel plays an important role in deciding that..that was my only point..i wasnt arguing with anyone..and testing of battery drain at standby means with data off,bluetooth off, gps off..hence syncing of account wont come into picture

I'm not arguing, just trying to make a point also.

tigermess said:
(Out of your question, the best for battery life are Ultima ROM and Buttermilk ROM which are optimized for battery life and battery life is notably better there; with Buttermilk and low usage you can do as much as 4 days without charging - worth for outdoor trips. Ultima ROM when idle eats like 0,6% per hour.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As u can see [in my signature] im using ultima KERNEL. Is there also a ROM [for ICS}?? And is it possible to downgrade like on the iPhone??
arpith.fbi said:
well my method of testing battery drain(i guess everybody tests the same way) is only on standby..how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2...in exceptional cases battery will drain fast while using 3G in one kernel but lil slow on other kernel..
again my point is kernel is more responsible for battery life of the phone rather than a ROM..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, do u think my kernel is better for battery?
Srry for these annoying questions that are thousands of but I just wanna have enough when im not at home

xperiap said:
As u can see [in my signature] im using ultima KERNEL. Is there also a ROM [for ICS}?? And is it possible to downgrade like on the iPhone??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know and sorry, the last two ROMs I was refering to are GB. However, Riyal is working on Ultima ICS ROM and it already exists in alpha version! See this post with download link Hopefully the ROM will have similar advantages as has GB Ultima ROM over GB stock ROM, which means better battery life, better wi-fi reception, improved camera and so on.

tigermess said:
....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, and is it also possible to DOWNGRADE from ICS to GB??
I did that when I had iPhone 4.

im using cm7.2 latest release alvays, i also have an app set cpu and i set my governor to scary, min freq 145 mhz, and max 1024, and im using profiles for apps that im using most of time (underclock cpu while using that apps)
with that i have at least 40% better battery life
and, yes, u can downgrade using flashtool
LINK:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000012

So far Arcknight kernel has quite the reputation for good battery life. IMO, for roms i find CM9 from FreeXperia project quite awesome but then there's an issue with the battery stats and brightness for now so wait for the next release i guess. for GB try arconium 8.2. still mostly its based on kernel and also the governor.

Marchello1 said:
im using cm7.2 latest release alvays, i also have an app set cpu and i set my governor to scary, min freq 145 mhz, and max 1024, and im using profiles for apps that im using most of time (underclock cpu while using that apps)
with that i have at least 40% better battery life
and, yes, u can downgrade using flashtool
LINK:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000012
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey friend, how do you do that? I dont ahve that option.
I remember i had on my other phone.
Im running the newest version. Should I change my device??

What option are you referring to?

[Q] Best HOX kernel for battery life (smooth ui no gaming)

What is the best kernel for getting the best battery life? I have tried many and the most screen time I am able to achieve is 3-4 hours. This is better than most users but I am sure that getting 5 hours could be done with a kernel that has proper power savings. The phone is overpowered and ramps up its cpu for simple tasks like sending whatsapps. Also is there a kernel/rom combo for achieving the best battery life that work great together? So far the best for me was the Renovate 3.0 rom running a stock kernel reaching 4 hours of screen time. I am currently running maXimus 2.2 with faux 006m and getting around 3 and a half hours of screen time.
Thanks,

unome1233 said:
What is the best kernel for getting the best battery life? I have tried many and the most screen time I am able to achieve is 3-4 hours. This is better than most users but I am sure that getting 5 hours could be done with a kernel that has proper power savings. The phone is overpowered and ramps up its cpu for simple tasks like sending whatsapps. Also is there a kernel/rom combo for achieving the best battery life that work great together? So far the best for me was the Renovate 3.0 rom running a stock kernel reaching 4 hours of screen time. I am currently running maXimus 2.2 with faux 006m and getting around 3 and a half hours of screen time.
Thanks,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried Franco kernel?
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ARHD 8.0.0

Tingelholm said:
Have you tried Franco kernel?
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ARHD 8.0.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and even purchased his app to see if turning off cores and under clocking would help. His kernel has some serious wifi issues so I could not keep it. But also the cores would turn on even when they are set not to. Seems that it is not perfected yet.

unome1233 said:
Yes and even purchased his app to see if turning off cores and under clocking would help. His kernel has some serious wifi issues so I could not keep it. But also the cores would turn on even when they are set not to. Seems that it is not perfected yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wifi issues you say? have you tried updating the radio?

mmk92 said:
wifi issues you say? have you tried updating the radio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I have the newest version. Baseband 2.1204.127.19

i diint want to open a new thread neither i want to hijack this thread. my questions is somewhat similar to the opening post with only few changes. i like to play games in this awesome screen. i use wifi for an hour or so. i need 12 hrs of battery life with around 30mins of light gaming (temple run/stick cricket/fruit ninja etc) what romand kernel should i use which would give me optimum battery life? currently i am on ARHD8.1 with stock kernel.

Try n3ocort3x's kernels. He's developing his kernels for the most battery life without compromising the ui smoothness and performance. Does pretty well on sticking your custom underclocked values and does a great job on undervolting.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

wtfshouldidonow said:
Try n3ocort3x's kernels. He's developing his kernels for the most battery life without compromising the ui smoothness and performance. Does pretty well on sticking your custom underclocked values and does a great job on undervolting.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw this but it says 1.29 base for stock rom. I am running the 2.15 leak. Maybe I will put a JB build using his kernel repacked for one.

2.3.6 or 4.0 ROM for the best battery life? (Wonder)

I used rebel rom and it's great (2-4 days).Even if overuse it it lasts 35-40 hours.But it's touch sensitivity sucks. (for example : When i touch the screen to go to another part of the menu it seems like i'm trying to run an application.I mean it looks like it's highlighted)
So what are suggestions for good battery life and touch sensitivity? (except rebel rom)

burak9393 said:
I used rebel rom and it's great (2-4 days).Even if overuse it it lasts 35-40 hours.But it's touch sensitivity sucks. (for example : When i touch the screen to go to another part of the menu it seems like i'm trying to run an application.I mean it looks like it's highlighted)
So what are suggestions for good battery life and touch sensitivity? (except rebel rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I never got 2-4 days with any ROM. Stock ROM (2.3.6) usually lasted full day and a half of use and I had to charge it accordingly. With CM10 I get pretty much the same battery life I got from STOCK rom. (Of course I am using Deep Sleep Battery Saver and Greenify). But I am not a heavy gamer (dont play games at all, may sudoku once in a while )
So they are the same to me.. But feature wise, I prefer CM10 of course..

thearif said:
Well I never got 2-4 days with any ROM. Stock ROM (2.3.6) usually lasted full day and a half of use and I had to charge it accordingly. With CM10 I get pretty much the same battery life I got from STOCK rom. (Of course I am using Deep Sleep Battery Saver and Greenify). But I am not a heavy gamer (dont play games at all, may sudoku once in a while )
So they are the same to me.. But feature wise, I prefer CM10 of course..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Stock Samsung ROM also for me only lasted 1, 1/2 up to 2 days. Now I´m Using Arcos CM9 RC2 and have to recharge it somwhere between 3 and 5 days. (depending on my usage)
I found Arcos 2.6.35 Kernel to be the most stable and battery friendly Kernel unlike the new 3.0 Kernel, where people are still reporting stability issues and some of us are having a high battery drain issue. So if you decide to try Arcos latest CM9 or CM10 and will get about the same battery life or worse than Samsungs Stock ROM, I would suggest to try CM9 RC2.
By using Arcos surces I even compiled my own 2.6.35 Kernel by just adding OC features and software Voltage control. With this Kernel I´m even able to run my phone at Extreme Undervolting settings rock solid.
There are even other custom Kernels you can use with RC2 or RC3, but for me they all didn´t run stable even at stock voltages due to all the tweaks in there. My SGW doesn´t like the additional tweaks. Especially the memory tweaks, though for others they seem to run stable.
That´s why I´m using now my own Kernel with OC and UV options but leaving the rest untouched. By undervolting the CPU it doesn´t last longer than I would keep the phone the whole time in DeepSleep, but it reduces the battery drain significantly when in use.

Wow 3 to 5 days is amazing. But I don't think I can give up CM10 . One and a half day is good enough for me. I had stability issues with CM9 RC5 and 6 with kernel 3 but those issues are not there in CM10 alphas I tried. I am on alpha 7 now and everything is in great working order.
And for a smartphone one and a half day is acceptable for my standards.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

honeyx said:
The Stock Samsung ROM also for me only lasted 1, 1/2 up to 2 days. Now I´m Using Arcos CM9 RC2 and have to recharge it somwhere between 3 and 5 days. (depending on my usage)
I found Arcos 2.6.35 Kernel to be the most stable and battery friendly Kernel unlike the new 3.0 Kernel, where people are still reporting stability issues and some of us are having a high battery drain issue. So if you decide to try Arcos latest CM9 or CM10 and will get about the same battery life or worse than Samsungs Stock ROM, I would suggest to try CM9 RC2.
By using Arcos surces I even compiled my own 2.6.35 Kernel by just adding OC features and software Voltage control. With this Kernel I´m even able to run my phone at Extreme Undervolting settings rock solid.
There are even other custom Kernels you can use with RC2 or RC3, but for me they all didn´t run stable even at stock voltages due to all the tweaks in there. My SGW doesn´t like the additional tweaks. Especially the memory tweaks, though for others they seem to run stable.
That´s why I´m using now my own Kernel with OC and UV options but leaving the rest untouched. By undervolting the CPU it doesn´t last longer than I would keep the phone the whole time in DeepSleep, but it reduces the battery drain significantly when in use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would do this community a favour if you could present your modified rom to all people here

thearif said:
Wow 3 to 5 days is amazing. But I don't think I can give up CM10 . One and a half day is good enough for me. I had stability issues with CM9 RC5 and 6 with kernel 3 but those issues are not there in CM10 alphas I tried. I am on alpha 7 now and everything is in great working order.
And for a smartphone one and a half day is acceptable for my standards.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slimbean 4.1.2 may last more than 5 days too but the old version with 2.6 kernel

5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?

gdonanthony said:
5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 5 days is about the max you can reach. But to reach this your phone need to be all the time in DeepSleep. So no calls, no WiFi, no MobileData, simply nothing. But in that case you also do not need a phone at all.
That´s also why I said somwhere between 3-5 days depending on my habbits.
For me the battery drain drops at night to somwhere between 5-8mA. Sometimes even to 2mA. I doubt the Slimbeam ROM can beat this as it also uses either Arcos 2.6 or 3.0 Kernel.
All the custom ROMs out there are basing on Arcos Kernels and work. Simply said they are still Arcos ROM´s with a modified or a different User Interface. Some are more battery freindly and some are less because of the background processes that are keeping the phone unnecessary active. But regarding DeepSleep the battery drain is depending on Arcos Kernel and how well the DeepSleep mode is tuned in this Kernel.

gdonanthony said:
5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2034647
but use this Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical
if you want more battery life
---------- Post added at 04:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------
honeyx said:
I think 5 days is about the max you can reach. But to reach this your phone need to be all the time in DeepSleep. So no calls, no WiFi, no MobileData, simply nothing. But in that case you also do not need a phone at all.
That´s also why I said somwhere between 3-5 days depending on my habbits.
For me the battery drain drops at night to somwhere between 5-8mA. Sometimes even to 2mA. I doubt the Slimbeam ROM can beat this as it also uses either Arcos 2.6 or 3.0 Kernel.
All the custom ROMs out there are basing on Arcos Kernels and work. Simply said they are still Arcos ROM´s with a modified or a different User Interface. Some are more battery freindly and some are less because of the background processes that are keeping the phone unnecessary active. But regarding DeepSleep the battery drain is depending on Arcos Kernel and how well the DeepSleep mode is tuned in this Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I spent 25 Hrs and most of it was in stand by mode and my battery was 88 % with slimbean rom 2.6 kernel

Ahmed.ragab said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2034647
but use this Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical
if you want more battery life
---------- Post added at 04:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------
I spent 25 Hrs and most of it was in stand by mode and my battery was 88 % with slimbean rom 2.6 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So pretty much the same like with Arcos RC2 and it´s 2.6 Kernel.
This below is another 18 hours later while not just in StandBy all the time, but making calls, checking Mails and a few other things:

hhhmmm ill w8 for the updates for that ROM for now just observing CM10 by arco ... just want to reinstall everything to fix battery drain

honeyx said:
So pretty much the same like with Arcos RC2 and it´s 2.6 Kernel.
This below is another 18 hours later while not just in StandBy all the time, but making calls, checking Mails and a few other things:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even have apps installed? thats awsum battery life. What else besides UV did you perform to obtain this? i didnt even have that battery life with stock

vklexer said:
Do you even have apps installed? thats awsum battery life. What else besides UV did you perform to obtain this? i didnt even have that battery life with stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)

heross said:
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)
View attachment 1842890
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what mockery is this?????!
What is so special about slimbean that others rom dont have? there must be a drawback?

vklexer said:
what mockery is this?????!
What is so special about slimbean that others rom dont have? there must be a drawback?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look to it's size and you will know

the reason i stayed at CM10RC7 is that messaging is awesome
does this slimbean http://www32.zippyshare.com/v/78276962/file.html have the same messaging ? please can someone give a SS of the message interface

gdonanthony said:
please can someone give a SS of the message interface
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean a SS from this screen?

heross said:
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)
View attachment 1842890
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mentioned smartassv2 kernel on K2.6. Where can i get it? i've flashed Slimbean, but i can't undervolt and can't choose any other kernel

You can get the Kernel here. download "kernel-JB-V2-NORMALMEM-2.6.35-06-12-12" and flash in recovery.

Thanks. Btw, is this my imagination or is the camera quality compared to CM9 poor on Slimbean?