Ubuntu Touch goes BETA - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

Here : http://ubuntulife.co.za/?p=115
Just wanted to let everybody know ^-^

thx~but still no toro builds....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

good news
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Is it stable now?

"Update: This beta is not a usable build. Its similar to the Developer Preview i.e full of placeholder information. The only noticeable difference is that it seems to be a lot faster. Overall a very disappointing update for Ubuntu Touch."

Hells yeah, can't wait for voice and data to work.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Yeah, it'll be so awesome to be on a platform without apps again, like Android in 2009!

Shouldn't have been labeled a Beta if not even the core apps have been finished yet.
From what the article says, this is just a faster running alpha build.
But what can you expect from Ubuntu these days... ever since they tried more & more to emulate Macs, the OS has seriously gone down the drain.

will it open source?
Sent From My AK Kernel Powered Gnex

evil_penguin said:
Is it stable now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it isn't. It's in beta says the first post on this thread.

Without GSM and data connection, we have to say it's still developer preview only
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

jadephyre said:
Shouldn't have been labeled a Beta if not even the core apps have been finished yet.
From what the article says, this is just a faster running alpha build.
But what can you expect from Ubuntu these days... ever since they tried more & more to emulate Macs, the OS has seriously gone down the drain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100%. A beta gives you all the core functionality without the stability and smoothness of the final product. Not software that can only be 'previewed' on the devices that it was intended for
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

Related

CM 7 for Galaxy Nexus?

I don't know if it may be possible... but is there a way to have a cm7 running on the gn cdma? I'm pretty sure there's not. But maybe there's a small chance there is a way to get it running...I just want to know if there's a cm7 that can run off this phone. I have cm9 nightly running but I want to use gingerbread. .too? Any ideas, thoughts, or a definite answer? Than in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Why would you want that..?! Millions of android users are never going to even see what we've got since yesterday (4.0.4) and you want to go back to gingerbread?
heh I wanted to run 1.0 on my nexus one...
Most likely NO. I cant imagine any developer (unless you want to take a crack at it yourself) that would want to waste their time on trying to make "MS Dos 3.1" run on a Windows 8 device
No. And seriously.... wtf?
Wow...! This is what they call evolution? I can exchange my nexus one for your gnex... Lots of gingerbread rooms!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
CUPCAKE FOR EVERYBODY!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
I just thought it be pretty cool to run cm 7 on the gn...just to have it stable and it being faster I guess.....nit saying going back in evolution and or technology...maybe just for cm7 to run faster off the gn..I had it on my nexus one and nexus s...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
njd15 said:
I just thought it be pretty cool to run cm 7 on the gn...just to have it stable and it being faster I guess.....nit saying going back in evolution and or technology...maybe just for cm7 to run faster off the gn..I had it on my nexus one and nexus s...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faster? .... how? Ice Cream Sandwich is as fast as it can get.
it's awesome to put windows 3.1 on my i5
zephiK said:
Faster? .... how? Ice Cream Sandwich is as fast as it can get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faster as in ics needs a certain amount of memory for it to run properly. But I'm guessing cm7 don't need allll the memory available on gn therefore it would run much faster....just like a windows 7 computer having g now like 8gb of ram available and new processors....and if u install windows xp it will run very smooth and super fast..since that system never saw 8gb of ram in the past on a regular desktop....that's what I meant...but yeah it will never happen anyways
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
njd15 said:
Faster as in ics needs a certain amount of memory for it to run properly. But I'm guessing cm7 don't need allll the memory available on gn therefore it would run much faster....just like a windows 7 computer having g now like 8gb of ram available and new processors....and if u install windows xp it will run very smooth and super fast..since that system never saw 8gb of ram in the past on a regular desktop....that's what I meant...but yeah it will never happen anyways
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing to do with the ram.
Or maybe even symbian! From the 5110 with the original snake.... ya, THAT would be fast!!!
It won't necessarily run smoother as it wouldn't be optimised for running on the GN. Also gingerbread lacks hardware acceleration so that would make things ever so slightly laggier and not to mention possible bugs.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
There is not (that I am aware of) any device that would run smooth at 720p on Gingerbread unless the OEM added a hardware accelerated UI (for example, the Note).
njd15 said:
I don't know if it may be possible... but is there a way to have a cm7 running on the gn cdma? I'm pretty sure there's not. But maybe there's a small chance there is a way to get it running...I just want to know if there's a cm7 that can run off this phone. I have cm9 nightly running but I want to use gingerbread. .too? Any ideas, thoughts, or a definite answer? Than in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another "cool" kid wanting to be cool and probably needs somebody to flash his phone for him.
--------+++--------
iphone. helping computer illiteracy become popular since 2007.
@rbiter said:
Another "cool" kid wanting to be cool and probably needs somebody to flash his phone for him.
--------+++--------
iphone. helping computer illiteracy become popular since 2007.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does that make any sense?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
malikadnanm said:
How does that make any sense?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I dunno, @rbiter has been on a tirade of lame jokes lately.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Just because you may not like an idea doesn't mean that everybody else has to feel the same way. If you're not interested in helping then feel free to ignore the thread, but do NOT reply just to give some smartass answer or harass others.
I think everyone here has been pretty lighthearted with each other so far but this is getting real old real quick.
OP instead of making comments and making fun of your curiosities I will simply explain:
There are no driver binaries for G Nex hardware that work on Gingerbread, and that's the main reason this won't work. Just like you couldn't really build Froyo for the Nexus S. The hardware drivers are typically coded to work with specific versions of Android.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

Do you think we will receive the next version of android?

Whether it will be vers. 4.3 or 5.0, do you think GSM galaxy nexus will get it?
Personally I think it will. Simply becaus even if Google decides to release the new version of android in combination with a new device, it won't be a new phone. ( Maybe a new nexus 7, but not a new flagship phone )
Nexus S didn't receive android 4.2 not because it's CPU couldn't handle it, but because Google wanted customers to focus on the nexus 4.
I think we will be good for the next 100 years
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
1) The nexus s didn't receive the update due to storage issues in the sector partitioned for OS. There is workarounds to this but it requires wiping devices and Google just can't do that to the mass public.
2) The galaxy nexus is only 12 months old, Google promises support for 18 months and likely even longer.
3) The galaxy nexus has a faster CPU then the nexus s and a similar GPU but the galaxy nexus has 1gb of space partitioned for OS.
4) Based on the above facts I can say with great certainty that we Galaxy Nexus owners will be receiving the next OS update.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Seems unlikely to me
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Does a bear sh** in the woods?
msavic6 said:
1) The nexus s didn't receive the update due to storage issues in the sector partitioned for OS. There is workarounds to this but it requires wiping devices and Google just can't do that to the mass public.
2) The galaxy nexus is only 12 months old, Google promises support for 18 months and likely even longer.
3) The galaxy nexus has a faster CPU then the nexus s and a similar GPU but the galaxy nexus has 1gb of space partitioned for OS.
4) Based on the above facts I can say with great certainty that we Galaxy Nexus owners will be receiving the next OS update.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much space is partitioned for the OS on the galaxy nexus? And on a 8gb nexus 4?
As from what I read on the galaxy nexus it has 1gb for the OS. Nexus 4, I personally don't care about since I won't be getting one and therefore have no clue.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Well I certainly hope so. 4.2.1 sucks major scrotum.
gideonMorrison said:
Well I certainly hope so. 4.2.1 sucks major scrotum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why?? 4.2 is just 4.1 but with more stuff added.. Any bugs that 4.2.1 has, will be solved with 4.2.2
If you are experiencing lags and slow system, maybe its time for a healthy factory reset
polonordo said:
Why?? 4.2 is just 4.1 but with more stuff added.. Any bugs that 4.2.1 has, will be solved with 4.2.2
If you are experiencing lags and slow system, maybe its time for a healthy factory reset
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm dude ? i guess ur not a power user ! cus u can instantly know when ur using the gallery browsing through ur pics ! try to scroll fast as possible when a pic is opened ( even after they;re cached ) the 4.2+ gallery just isnt fast enough and shows u a black pic and takes bout a second to load up ! while the 4.1.2 was flawless ! go as fast as u like it loads up instantly ! this is just one aspect ! there are many more problems faced by others ! specially SOD's,I personally never had them. but others have ! .. oh well m on xylon 15 stable release with purity ak kernel 007 and it makes my device a bit more faster than the stock 4.2.1 but not as how 4.1.2 was ! plus i miss those crazyass realtime video cam face effects !
Nexus S recieved 3 updates. After 1.5 year stopped supporting it. Gnex has received 3 major updates. Its 1 year old and 3 months...
So i believe it is time to say goodbye to Google pure AOSP support and based on developers for the new updates
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'am confident that google would release the next version for GneX, there's non reason to leave it back, while for the NexS was explained why the official development was stopped! I only hope they put more attention in the development stage because 4.2 has a lot of silly bug that a good JUnit coverage could have found before the release (aka december bug, but why not mentioning the camera).
I am sure, we will definitely get the update! GNexus has a good hardware!
hopefully next 3 months, a major revamped ver, instead of something like buggy Android 4.2
Yes I think we will definitely get at least 1 more major release.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
kagouro said:
Nexus S recieved 3 updates. After 1.5 year stopped supporting it. Gnex has received 3 major updates. Its 1 year old and 3 months...
So i believe it is time to say goodbye to Google pure AOSP support and based on developers for the new updates
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, the gnex has only received 2 major updates: 4.0.4 to 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 to 4.2. I think that most people would agree that the 4.0.2 - 4.0.4 were minor updates, as were the 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 and the 4.2 to 4.2.1 updates.
As others have said, if be very surprised if the gnex doesn't get at least one more major update.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Unfortunately the next update will likely be small in nature.
Then huge change will come in November with next Nexus phone.
063_XOBX said:
Unfortunately the next update will likely be small in nature.
Then huge change will come in November with next Nexus phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and thats the day the gnex gets the hatchet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
negrobembon said:
and thats the day the gnex gets the hatchet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you people need to have what some call "faith".
I definitely hope so, I don't plan on changing my Gnex unless some awesome Nexus gets released this year. I love the hw and it just way better than LG
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

CM 7.2

I personally think it would be nice to have this option for our GNex. Anyone else? By far the best CM ROM/Android release and quite polished. Think of the battery saving capabilities and overall performance/smoothness. How hard you guys think it would be to back port an ICS kernel?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
can't you do that? But its nice thought.. Bringing back the old is very bad when cm7.2 user crying for cm10
Sent from Domination Powered TaPaTalK ♥ with my Nexus
Why stop there? How about froyo or eclair?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't it run slower since GB (as far that I know of) doesn't have HW acceleration?
reysonance said:
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't it run slower since GB (as far that I know of) doesn't have HW acceleration?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk about you, but CM 7 ran better on my SII than 10/10.1 does on my Nexus...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Well I never experienced CM7 first hand so I can't really tell , I came to that conclusion since HW acceleration and performance boost was one of the most touted feature back then when ICS Iaunched I figure it was noticeably faster than GB.
reysonance said:
Well I never experienced CM7 first hand so I can't really tell , I came to that conclusion since HW acceleration and performance boost was one of the most touted feature back then when ICS Iaunched I figure it was noticeably faster than GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally, the HW acceleration isn't much of a difference. BUT, all I do for games is Sudoku lol.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
That's it. Tomorrow I'm downgrading my PC to Windows 98 and installing CM 6 on my Nexus. That should disable just about everything currently working.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
yepitsme19 said:
Idk about you, but CM 7 ran better on my SII than 10/10.1 does on my Nexus...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you had the chance to see a G1 running Cupcake lately? That thing blasts away my Nexus in terms of speed opening the app drawer and the apps it has. BUT. Do remember: the older the OS, the less things it has to carry. You can't compare two different OS versions on two different phones. You can only compare the same OS version on two phones or two OS versions on the same phone.
I want donut on gnex which would still out perform iOS 6.1.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
What a pointless thread.
madd0g said:
What a pointless thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-1
There is people with Galaxy Nexus who doesn't like ICS or newer Android version...
I don't like really much Gingerbread but it would be nice if there would be GB for Nexus because then battery life may be better but speed won't be much better and then there is less question threads about older Android versions...
manumanfred said:
I don't like really much Gingerbread but it would be nice if there would be GB for Nexus because then battery life may be better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MAY...
You're talking out of assumptions here. Hell, what if the ported GN **** for GB makes it worse ?
I'm still waiting for a good report on how ICS saves battery vs. the look & feel of overall OS fluidity in JB. And now GB ? Give me break.
Seems that slow news days and lack of new stuff to flash is a killer combo for dumb assumptions without technical explanations or research of work to be invested to get mythical gains.
rmcsc said:
remember: the older the OS, the less things it has to carry. You can't compare two different OS versions on two different phones. You can only compare the same OS version on two phones or two OS versions on the same phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the reason IOS is so fast. It's so basic that the iphone doesn't have to load a lot of stuff like Android devices.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
On my fascinate, comparing cm7.2 to cm10 was like comparing an oven to a microwave. Cm10 was massively faster, smoother, and more stable. It wasn't even kind of close.
---------- Post added at 09:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:47 AM ----------
Or a semi to a Ferrari lol
CM 7.2 (GingerBread acctually) is Windows XP of Android. Its stable and it still takes 50% of Android devices. It would be cool to see how it works on newer devices but its hard to backport it to newer devices so it would be just waste of time
Winesnob said:
That's it. Tomorrow I'm downgrading my PC to Windows 98 and installing CM 6 on my Nexus. That should disable just about everything currently working.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh my god, this comment helped the whole thread! We need more of these unsightly comments
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Wtf!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
bar_rodoy said:
That's the reason IOS is so fast. It's so basic that the iphone doesn't have to load a lot of stuff like Android devices.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That, and iOS doesn't run via a Virtual Machine.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
It's been done http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1594830
:laugh:

Getting Ubuntu Touch out to more users

The unstoppable Sergio Schvezov is working on bug 1201811 right now. Once it's fixed this should put is into a position where users of devices for which we have Ubuntu Touch images (and not just the four devices we supported right from the start) can just use phablet-flash. This doesn't mean that they are "officially supported" or that they're built daily in the Canonical data centre, but that you can make use of the images much more easily.
Over time we still want to build more images in the data centre in a regular fashion. One of the big blockers there has been information about the redistributability of firwmare, blobs and closed kernel modules. If you have information about the licenses any of these, it'd be great if you could help with updating the Touch device pages.
On Thursday, 1st August we are going to hold a Ubuntu Touch Porting Clinic in #ubuntu-touch on irc.freenode.net where you will be able to ask all the questions you have and our local experts can help you with updating your image(s) to the new world order. We hope to see you there!
I'm looking for ubuntu on my Vega, anyone?
Sent from my Lenovo S820_ROW using xda app-developers app
q3trung said:
I'm looking for ubuntu on my Vega, anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices has the list of ports and ports-in-progress.
Thanks
Sent from my Lenovo S820_ROW using xda app-developers app
So will this ever be usable for the Verizon nexus with working 3g and calls/SMS?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Esteway.619 said:
So will this ever be usable for the Verizon nexus with working 3g and calls/SMS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizon uses cdma which we do not yet support.
dholbach said:
Verizon uses cdma which we do not yet support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well hurry please just kidding.
Sent From My Miui Powered Galaxy Nexus
Without adding support for CDMA I suspect this idea with sizzle out rather then take off. Just my two cents. I'm a Verizon user and was super excited to see this... But since CDMA support was announced not to be on the roadmap I've almost forgotten about the project, not a good thing. Good luck
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
kicker22004 said:
Without adding support for CDMA I suspect this idea with sizzle out rather then take off. Just my two cents. I'm a Verizon user and was super excited to see this... But since CDMA support was announced not to be on the roadmap I've almost forgotten about the project, not a good thing. Good luck
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bye now
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I try ubuntu touch for 2 days in my galaxy nexus (maguro) and i think it work quite well but it isn't for daily use yet.
There aren't bugs in that MobileOS (or I haven't found these bugs) but the biggest problem is the laggy (too much laggy because the kernel isn't optimized for UubuntuTouch). I appreciate the canonical's work and I wish I'll able to use this OS daily
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
ScardracS said:
I try ubuntu touch for 2 days in my galaxy nexus (maguro) and i think it work quite well but it isn't for daily use yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I use it as my daily driver. I think it's pretty good for making calls and daily usage but battery time is not as good as with Android (but it's getting better with every update).
There aren't bugs in that MobileOS (or I haven't found these bugs)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found a lot of bugs (can't change brightness, mobile data, etc.).
but the biggest problem is the laggy (too much laggy because the kernel isn't optimized for UubuntuTouch). I appreciate the canonical's work and I wish I'll able to use this OS daily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On my Galaxy Nexus it's more fluid than any Android version. What build have you tested? Since July Ubuntu Touch shouldn't lag anymore.
Deleted
To98 said:
.....
On my Galaxy Nexus it's more fluid than any Android version. What build have you tested? Since July Ubuntu Touch shouldn't lag anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, in this moment it should run perfect ? Without Wi-Fi, Camera, Phone and Audio issues ?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
KekeJr said:
So, in this moment it should run perfect ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has some bugs and it depends on the current build (look at the bug section on launchpad to see what's not working). For me it is nearly perfect.
Without Wi-Fi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sometimes it doesn't load up on boot up.
Camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Video and photo works but you can't do any special effects.
Phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
works.
and Audio issues ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Audio works but you can only mute or have max. volume. You can't change the volume to e. g. fifty percent.
Any news for Sony xperia J?
Sent from my Xperia J using Tapatalk 4

Linux; Android 4.4; Nexus 5 Build/KRT10C

Look what I found in one my server logs today...
Linux; Android 4.4; Nexus 5 Build/KRT10C
The originating IP belongs to Google.
How about our phone, will our phone have kitkat? Base on rumours, kitkat will base 3.8 kernel...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4
imam.krismanto said:
How about our phone, will our phone have kitkat? Base on rumours, kitkat will base 3.8 kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.8 kernel is not essential, there are some screenshot where you can see kitkat running with 3.4 kernel. Yeah, we don't have 3.4...
Dany16v said:
3.8 kernel is not essential, there are some screenshot where you can see kitkat running with 3.4 kernel. Yeah, we don't have 3.4...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No 3.4 yet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Dany16v said:
3.8 kernel is not essential, there are some screenshot where you can see kitkat running with 3.4 kernel. Yeah, we don't have 3.4...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.. It mean our Kitkat phone missing ram optimisation..
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4
imam.krismanto said:
How about our phone, will our phone have kitkat? Base on rumours, kitkat will base 3.8 kernel...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it, I only see log entries for nexus 4, 5, 7 and 10 running 4.4 - Though now I am seeing slightly different builds i.e. KRT10F instead KRT10C
Nexus 7 4.4 KRT10F
Nexus 10 4.4 KRT13
Nexus 5 4.4 KRT10F
Nexus 4 (Svelte test mode) 4.4 KRT08C
fooman123 said:
I doubt it, I only see log entries for nexus 4, 5, 7 and 10 running 4.4 - Though now I am seeing slightly different builds i.e. KRT10F instead KRT10C
Nexus 7 4.4 KRT10F
Nexus 10 4.4 KRT13
Nexus 5 4.4 KRT10F
Nexus 4 (Svelte test mode) 4.4 KRT08C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in fact it's not suprise that our GN not receiving 4.4...but still feel a little bit disappointed when knowing that
My two cents...I would be very surprised if we don't get 4.4 officially. It is technically a minor version bump.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
TheMan0790 said:
My two cents...I would be very surprised if we don't get 4.4 officially. It is technically a minor version bump.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
technically it has a new name (K ), so it's a new android version with new APIs
TheMan0790 said:
My two cents...I would be very surprised if we don't get 4.4 officially. It is technically a minor version bump.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...Not as minor as 4.2 -> 4.3. UI drastically changed (not just the launcher) and they decided to make a universally available Launcher called Google Experience, so you see Google is determined to make KitKat a large step forward.
But yeah, based on this point (universal, unified experience) and Google's saying of "making the best experience for everyone", I can say that we're going to get KitKat in one way or another (I don't personally care if Google decides no official release, AOSP is always there). Plus, who said we need 3.4 or even 3.8 kernels to run it (any RELIABLE sources)? Many older devices run JB 4.1 and even 4.2 nicely with 2.6.xx kernels. Many 3.4, 3.8 and even 3.1x features are being backported too.
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM10.2
TheMan0790 said:
My two cents...I would be very surprised if we don't get 4.4 officially. It is technically a minor version bump.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm surprised that you're this delusional, personally I'm planning to rollback to 4.1, the recent versions of android is just too choppy for my liking, ram management is horrible too.
Beamed from my Grouper
Mach3.2 said:
I'm surprised that you're this delusional, personally I'm planning to rollback to 4.1, the recent versions of android is just too choppy for my liking, ram management is horrible too.
Beamed from my Grouper
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I have had nothing but a well-running Nexus on 4.3 for the last little while, so it really sucks to hear you're having problems. I appreciate a discussion here, but starting off a reply by calling someone "delusional" seems a bit rude and harsh, no?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
imam.krismanto said:
How about our phone, will our phone have kitkat? Base on rumours, kitkat will base 3.8 kernel...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look i don't know about Linux Kernel, etc..
But i just saw that the 3.8 is officially discontinued.
3.4 is continued until October 2014.
So i think the next Kernel version for Android will be the 3.10 (long term: until September 2015) not 3.8.
By the way....a Nexus 5 with 3.10 kernel would be pretty nice. But it seem it will be 3.4.
Source
I remember when 3.0 was released (after the 2.6.39), Linus Torvalds said exactly this:
"So what are the big changes? NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. Sure, we have the usual two thirds driver
changes, and a lot of random fixes, but the point is that 3.0 is
*just* about renumbering, we are very much *not* doing a KDE-4 or a
Gnome-3 here. No breakage, no special scary new features, nothing at
all like that. We've been doing time-based releases for many years
now, this is in no way about features. If you want an excuse for the
renumbering, you really should look at the time-based one ("20 years")
instead."
I post that, only to say that sometimes numbers mean nothing..3.4 is a stable kernel, there isn't a big difference that you can see in the daily use with 3.10..really
Lets pray, for kitkat on our phone..!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4
I thought the new nexus an kitkat would have been launched by now, everything has gone quiet now an the hype has gone, iOS7 is keeping me amused for now, the kitkat screenshots look like google got a lot of their inspiration from apple an iOS7, just hope the nexus 5 is as good if not better than iPhone 5s.
They may not have FCC approval since government is shut down
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Government reopen. Let's get going FCC
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
They said that 4.4 will work on devices with 512mb of ram. And they said it will be available for older devices.
I think we'll get the update, even though it will be the last one...
Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk
inihccor said:
They said that 4.4 will work on devices with 512mb of ram. And they said it will be available for older devices.
I think we'll get the update, even though it will be the last one...
Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that all rumors, they (google) didn't say anything about ram usage

Categories

Resources