rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2604459
zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u will install for ex. cm11 u will be forced to use cm11 kernel aswell, so changing kernel to stock on any custom 4.2+ is impossibru i think
i need best rom about battery life thank's
I install many ROM's and stopped at AOSP
Android Open Source Project (AOSP) [4.4.2]
Beatiful ROM. Very clean & smooth.
Resurrection Remix: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2688432
is smooth sailing, with max CPU freq. of 600MHz, and abyssplug governor, as well as deepest sleep state 5, you should get very good battery life. With moderate use (no games, just 2D apps and music), mine lasts 22 hours.
Cyanogenmod 10.2
I'm using Cyanogenmod 10.2 works very well. Only thing is some videos wont play with the default player but play fine with MXPlayer. Not sure why videos wont play or wont show in thumbnail in gallery, otherwise fine. Thinking of getting CM11.
zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi im new here i been coming to this site for a few weeks now i just got signed up and cant post in the dev section of ace 2 yet so i need to get my posts up the best rom i have used is cm11 by maclaw its light has good ram usage and good battery life i know this thead is proberly quit old but as i say i need to get my posts up and dont wanna post useless replys :good:
I like 10.2 by tc. Tried out cm11 by tc didn't like it. Didn't like the dialer you can't change lock screen wallpaper I wasn't getting caller images in notifications and it felt slower. Gone back to CM10.2. Probably try again when they've finished it.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
For my cm11 is the best rom as the performance is well and there aren't bug
zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try zwiliew's kernel.
it has good governors
Is CM 11 working well? i'm on CM 10.2 and in my opinion runs great, but sometimes has problems with memory management.
The 2 best roms are CM10.1 (2013-12-13) and Omni rom 4.4
Both are fast, smooth and stable. Omni has the best battery like since it has less features. CM10.1 has a Low in call bug soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo =p
If you're and Instagram user and you upload videos omni and other 4.4 roms won't do but CM10.1 will do
Related
Hello to everyone. I'm on XZX2, but i think that it is very slow, not laggy, but slow. I tried both of cm 9 and cm10, but never cm 10.1
My questions are:
1) What bugs are in CM10 and what bugs are in CM10.1? (Like HDMI, 1080p video recording, FM Radio..)
2) I can use nova kernel 1.6 with cm10, but Can I use its with CM 10.1?
3) I love cm10.1's camera app, what rom (FXP, Cyano, Opensemc...) do you suggest to me?
Thank you all.
Stefano [ITA]
ps: i know that in the end of March/April will roll out Jelly bean, but i want to try 4.2.2 also..
Go and try, make a backup before... U got nothing to lose.. I am on cm10.1 open semc 04.. I think it is the best rom...
dds111 said:
Go and try, make a backup before... U got nothing to lose.. I am on cm10.1 open semc 04.. I think it is the best rom...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U do know there's been 3 more updates since that version? :-S
Sent from my 4.2.2 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Ben36 said:
U do know there's been 3 more updates since that version? :-S
Sent from my 4.2.2 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of corse! I tried them all.. And i get back to 0.4.. it ist the smoothest of them all... I use nova launcher and every other update just isnt smooth enough for me when scrolling through screens... I would like to say that to rayman but i am not able to post in devs section...
stibuz95 said:
Hello to everyone. I'm on XZX2, but i think that it is very slow, not laggy, but slow. I tried both of cm 9 and cm10, but never cm 10.1
My questions are:
1) What bugs are in CM10 and what bugs are in CM10.1? (Like HDMI, 1080p video recording, FM Radio..)
2) I can use nova kernel 1.6 with cm10, but Can I use its with CM 10.1?
3) I love cm10.1's camera app, what rom (FXP, Cyano, Opensemc...) do you suggest to me?
Thank you all.
Stefano [ITA]
ps: i know that in the end of March/April will roll out Jelly bean, but i want to try 4.2.2 also..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1)FXP's CM10 have no bug in it's latest stable ROM ,OpenSEMC's CM10.1 have some problem with FM Radio.(but it doesn't matter
2)You can't use nova kernel on CM10.1
3)All 4.2 ROM's camera are the same(Slim, CM10.1 ,PAC).
If you want a ROM that very stable, try FXP's CM10
If you want a ROM that high customation, try PAC (19 based on CM10(4.1.x) ,20 or 21 based on CM10.1(4.2.x)
If you want a ROM that daily use, try Slim Rom or OpenSEMC's CM10.1
sorry for my poor english :<
The main problem on cm 10.1 is HDMI and Fm radio is Not working perfectly.Most of the cm 10.1 rom is not battery user friendly.But as I think and as I have got battery is good on cm 10.Both of the rom are not yet stable.Many times rebooting by itself.Networking problem on both cm10 and cm10.1
tania247260 said:
The main problem on cm 10.1 is HDMI and Fm radio is Not working perfectly.Most of the cm 10.1 rom is not battery user friendly.But as I think and as I have got battery is good on cm 10.Both of the rom are not yet stable.Many times rebooting by itself.Networking problem on both cm10 and cm10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use opnensemc beta 3 rom on my xperia s and I use Beta 2 fix kernel.Battery life is almost 35 hours with moderate use
tania247260 said:
I use opnensemc beta 3 rom on my xperia s and I use Beta 2 fix kernel.Battery life is almost 35 hours with moderate use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does anyone of you have issue with the mobile data network? I can't seem to get it working, but everything else looks/works quite nice on latest OpenSEMC.
SpearThruster said:
Does anyone of you have issue with the mobile data network? I can't seem to get it working, but everything else looks/works quite nice on latest OpenSEMC.
I do not find such problem but sometime after rebooting hard to get mobile network.Then I switched off phone and on it again and try to get data by clicking mobile data search
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does anyone knows if anyone of those ROMS has camera support? I mean fullHD 1080p video and 12mp photos? And if there is support for 3.4 kernel ?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
In general, the main bugs are related to network, sometimes it disconnects itself and have to disable and reenable data traffic. Moreover, 1080p and FM Radio is not working in most of cases, but in general, CM10-10.1 ROMs are very stable.
Hey guys. I just got a Nitro HD and have got TRWP installed.
I've tried pac-man 4.3, and now AOKP 4.2.2
I've noticed these two jelly bean roms, run great, and have meh battery life.
Whenever I launch a game however, and close the game, my phone will be running at 20-30fps really crappily.
Could someone suggest a good rom that won't do this? I just want to play my darn hill climb game
Also I could use recommendation for the best baseband to use? Currently on V10f baseband.
My battery life is terrible and when I downgraded to 4.2 I put Wind Kernel on and it doesn't seem to help, nor show voltage control. What apps works?
Also my Camera doesn't work at all. I always get "Cannot connect to camera"
If someone could help me out, I've be very grateful. I miss my S3 now D:
From my experience of su640 it's always bad experience with custom ROMs if they are not on lg stock.
For me best bet was always lg 4.1.2
Sent from my LG-E975 using Tapatalk 4
atifsh said:
From my experience of su640 it's always bad experience with custom ROMs if they are not on lg stock.
For me best bet was always lg 4.1.2
Sent from my LG-E975 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know there was an official 4.1.2. In Canada, the P930 stopped at 4.04.
For a custom rom and good battery life, try Avatar with Wind 2.5 kernel and PurePerformance. I set my governors to Smatassv2 for CPU and Noop for i/o.
I can't comment on the gaming abilities of this rom since I don't game.
4.3 was just released for this rom this month, so there are no really optimized kernels. If you want a more stable rom look for builds on 4.2 branch (cm 10.2) . And like audit13 said windkernel is the best to install as well.
Nz
notzippy said:
4.3 was just released for this rom this month, so there are no really optimized kernels. If you want a more stable rom look for builds on 4.2 branch (cm 10.2) . And like audit13 said windkernel is the best to install as well.
Nz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought cm10.1 was based on 4.2.2 and cm10.2 was 4.3.
I use Avatar but the themes don't seem to work with the Wind kernel. Not a big deal for me since I like a very plain and uncluttered interface.
audit13 said:
I thought cm10.1 was based on 4.2.2 and cm10.2 was 4.3.
I use Avatar but the themes don't seem to work with the Wind kernel. Not a big deal for me since I like a very plain and uncluttered interface.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right cm10.1 is 4.2
Nz
Which custom ROM you think is pretty stable, for Android 4.4, guys ?
What would you recommend ?
Thank you
The most stable rom for Gnex (4.4.2)
nex_t said:
Which custom ROM you think is pretty stable, for Android 4.4, guys ?
What would you recommend ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the one by playfulgod http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2525351
nex_t said:
Which custom ROM you think is pretty stable, for Android 4.4, guys ?
What would you recommend ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just tried Gummy and Slimkat yesterday. Gummy was ok, but no real improvement. I had AOKP 4.2.2 before. If anything, the navigation seemed to be more choppy. So I installed Slimkat and it's great! It's really really smooth and polished. No bugs that I've seen yet. It's fast and still has some of the customization that I wanted. Give it a try. Let me know if you try any other ones.
nex_t said:
Which custom ROM you think is pretty stable, for Android 4.4, guys ?
What would you recommend ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
x2 on playfulgod's rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2525351 I have been using the nightley downloads to this rom (ocasionally) and then update to the latest gapps file.
what about the battery life on this ROM ?
Cmetal or omnimetal are great ROMs, I've been on every Cmetal release, with superram kernel, easily get about 3 hours screen time and 10% battery to spare! Been my daily driver for about a month, tried other 4.4 Roms as well, but came back to Cmetal
sent from my GNEX running cMetal 11 Rom
Latest OmniMetal is awesome, great battery life
Could you, please, provide a link with this ROM ?
And by the way, is there a noticeble difference between Android 4.2.2 and 4.4 ?
Thank you
nex_t said:
what about the battery life on this ROM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life in my experience has been around the same as Jelly Bean (others may have a different opinion)
---------- Post added at 11:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:01 AM ----------
nex_t said:
Could you, please, provide a link with this ROM ?
And by the way, is there a noticeble difference between Android 4.2.2 and 4.4 ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2525351
Playfulgods version of cm11 is working great for me!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
nex_t said:
Could you, please, provide a link with this ROM ?
And by the way, is there a noticeble difference between Android 4.2.2 and 4.4 ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HUGE difference
how about a kitkat rom that has a working HD video playback ? most of the roms I tried has problems with HD video playback
I'm referring to the choppy or rubberband effects
Official CM 11 is most stable for me an will always have the best support an regular updates daily to keep it ahead of the rest.
I've tried Omnimetal, cMetal, SlimKat, Beanstalk, and CM11. Without question, Omnimetal is the fastest, it's what im running right now, I have two problems with it, there are very few aesthetic customizations (which includes convenience like quicksettings), and it breaks my wifi, it still works, but the signal is so weak that I have to be in the same room as a router to use it. That being said, I seem to get better service with Verizon running Omni. They're all quality roms, but they all have some bugs. If you want speed go Omni, if you want features, go with Beanstalk or SlimKat.
Been running CM11 nightlies(12/14) with Trinity. No reboots or SOD issues. Bluetooth works, wifi works, good battery. It's about the same as on 4.3 for me.
what about customization ? is like that, also
I tried CM 11 but i don't know how to change the color / size of the soft buttons, battery, clock etc
Any ideas ?
What are the pros and cons in comparison to 4.3 ROMs, like rock-solid Cataclysm 4.3?
Battery life for me is a lot better on 4.4.2 using cm 11.0 than stock 4.3 or any 4.3 rom ever was, also I no longer get all the lag I used to get with 4.3 an the constant bug report alerts which stock 4.3 used to give me in status bar which I found quite odd.For me kitkat is a vast improvement an 4.3 was a complete failure on googles part, well on my gnex anyway stock 4.3 was terrible.
i like omnimetal ..altho shinyrom and tiny's build of cm11 are both nice too...:good:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
cm9 has the best battery life
dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
for me its cm9 or cm11
For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you
CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32
iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!
Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards
Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...
hey,
listen, i've installed few roms in the last 2 weeks, flashed 2 recoveries version,
this is the roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2588495
and the second which im using now:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2214042
from some reason, I prefer the CM 10.1, he works faster, more over, the CM 11 is not stable as CM 10.1 because it's newer,
When I was on stock rom my battery performance was much better,
My battery in 100% finished totaly after one phonecall or even taking picture with flash light on.
I buoght new battery from ebay, it's shipping right now to me and I hope it will fix the problem.
I have some questions:
1. which rom is better right now? (cm10.1 or cm11)
2. why the battery drains so fast? is that overclocked roms?
3. Do I have to download stock rom for my country? why is that matter? Im from israel and I think that in the stock rom there are apps of the Cellular operator (cellcom) and i hate that, i want clean stock android, I dont want these dirty apps and heavy widgets.
4. which rom is best for the battery performance?
thanks a lot!
NaNoNe said:
hey,
listen, i've installed few roms in the last 2 weeks, flashed 2 recoveries version,
this is the roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2588495
and the second which im using now:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2214042
from some reason, I prefer the CM 10.1, he works faster, more over, the CM 11 is not stable as CM 10.1 because it's newer,
When I was on stock rom' my battery performance was much better,
My battery in 100% finished totaly after one phonecall or even taking picture with flash light on.
I buoght new battery, I think its the battery.
I have some questions:
1. which rom is better right now? (cm10.1 or cm11)
2. why the battery drains so fast? is that overclocked roms?
3. Do I have to download stock rom for my country? why is that matter? Im from israel and I think that is stock rom there are apps of the Cellular operator (cellcom) and i hate that, i want clean stock android, I dont want these dirty apps and heavy widgets.
4. which rom is best for the battery performance?
thanks a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recently used:
Mokee OS 04/11 + KhaN Kernel 2.0 = 100% stable
Paranoid Android 4.3 BETA1 + KhaN Kernel = Just installed a day ago, but seems stable and the fastest KitKat rom yet.
Keep in mind to configure kernel settings for better performance and battery life and disable pocket detection / WLAN notification / auto sync / IMPORTANT: silly google background services using "disable service".
IMO i prefer CM 10.1 because its very fast, and stable, i think Kitkat is not ready yet !!
However im using a 2450 mah battery on CM 10.1 and geting good battery lifee, but if u use the stock batery with 1500 mah, CM 10.1 wont last much , so u need to go with stock or Kitkat
What's the point about KitKat is not ready yet? Performance is better than Jellybean as far as I tried nearly every rom available
Sent from my beloved HTC One S using (most time buggy) Tapatalk
LS.xD said:
What's the point about KitKat is not ready yet? Performance is better than Jellybean as far as I tried nearly every rom available
Sent from my beloved HTC One S using (most time buggy) Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better than JB, lol not really ,u tried Beta 3, its amazing faster
So which rom I should use?
I didn't get a clear answer
NaNoNe said:
So which rom I should use?
I didn't get a clear answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hers a clear answer : go Download CM 11, download KHAN kernel too, remove, unneded system apps (using es file explorer or any other app ), Download Apex Launcher , and u ll get awsome performace and batery life
Xhemal1325 said:
hers a clear answer : go Download CM 11, download KHAN kernel too, remove, unneded system apps (using es file explorer or any other app ), Download Apex Launcher , and u ll get awsome performace and batery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you explain how to do all this actions?