Disscussion thread for new sgy projects - Galaxy Y GT-S5360 General

Many people who are insterested in making new projects but dont know where to disscuss can gather here
EVERYONE IS ALLOWED THIS IS JUST NOT FOR ME BUT FOR ALL
This thread is for ROMS,Kernels,tools,apps,mods,scriptsetc and etc and also for people who have interest in starting a project and getting doubts cleared
RULES:
RULES FOR FOOLS.GATHER,DISSCUSS,START A PROJECT,HELP,GET HELP,DO GOOD
PRESS THANKS IF HELPED

No need of this thead!
gurram prashanth said:
Just wanted to quote!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
General thread is for all the Discussion matters. No need to open new placeholder thread!
Our device has got seperate thread called:
Galaxy Y GT-S5360 General
Discussion about the Samsung Galaxy Y GT-S5360 (general chat, tips & tricks, etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this thread, all the projects discussion will be messed up!

every project/new custom rom have its own discussion thread, i think this should be have title as "GENERAL DISSCUSION"

gothed said:
every project/new custom rom have its own discussion thread, i think this should be have title as "GENERAL DISSCUSION"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread should not have been created!
We already have a whole branch i.e. General branch. This thrread only messes up discussions and is useless!

Related

Official [stock] rom__sgy

http://hotfile.com/dl/142698856/9ff520c/S5360DDLA1_S5360ODDLA1_ODD.rar.html
New User :thumbdown::thumbup:
mig102 said:
http://hotfile.com/dl/142698856/9ff520c/S5360DDLA1_S5360ODDLA1_ODD.rar.html
New User :thumbdown::thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1465800
Read the RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mig102 said:
http://hotfile.com/dl/142698856/9ff520c/S5360DDLA1_S5360ODDLA1_ODD.rar.html
New User :thumbdown::thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the Rules A Thausand Times!!!!
By the way what is the purpose of this post? Are you developing anything at all?
u mean sm1 who cnt devlop anythng. he cant post anythng ??? :thumbdown::thumbdown:
~new user~
mig102 said:
u mean sm1 who cnt devlop anythng. he cant post anythng ??? :thumbdown::thumbdown:
~new user~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are copy pasting from another topic.. Android development is a section for creativity, knowledge and skill.. Not for stealing /copying and posting someone else work..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
mig102 said:
u mean sm1 who cnt devlop anythng. he cant post anythng ??? :thumbdown::thumbdown:
~new user~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THE DEVELOPMENT SECTION IS FOR DEVELOPMENT ONLY. If you are posting something that others may use regarding development such as a new ROM, kernel, guide, mod, recovery, or tool, it will be posted there. If in doubt, just post in the general section. Our moderator will move the post if it should be in the development section. Please do not post questions/concerns in the Android Development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can post if that post is neccessary
First Learn What is :
Genral Section
Accessories Section
Development Section
Themes and Apps Section
Next Learn The Rules(Its in my siggy Rules3x)
Be warned, IGNORANCE TO THE RULES IS NOT AN EXCUSE! NEW USER OR OLD!
Enjoy Your Stay in XDA
Moved to General.
Please post in the correct section. As said above, it is not really development since it has already been posted and was not a themed/built rom.
thanks
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA

[Q] Why does Anzu not get official CM9 nightlies?

It's really annoing, because a lot of devices such Sensation or Galaxy S II get official CM9 nightlies almost everyday and Anzu not. LT15/18i gets only unofficial releases. Is Anzu going to get some CM9 official nigtlies? I am waiting for them! Anyone who knows the answer?
HM...
It was said already 100 times but questions belongs to Q & A Section...
Why you write [Q] and post it to developement
jader13254 said:
It was said already 100 times but questions belongs to Q & A Section...
Why you write [Q] and post it to developement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly - I haven't written [Q], I just confirmed that thread is a question by a tick.
Secondly - I haven't posted this on Q&A section because of noobs here. On Android Development there aren't such people and anyway CM is connected to development, isn't it?
im also irritated by it, but you have to follow the rules and move this to the questions and answers sections, otherwise it will be deleted.
maxio1998 said:
Firstly - I haven't written [Q], I just confirmed that thread is a question by a tick.
Secondly - I haven't posted this on Q&A section because of noobs here. On Android Development there aren't such people and anyway CM is connected to development, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is named Q&A, not N(oob)&A.
So questions go there. Period.
If you did not create something, you have absolutely no place posting a thread in Development.
It is quite ironic that you do not comprehend that simple rule, yet you are quick to judge your fellow members calling them "noobs".
On your question, FXP is the maintainer of CM for the Xperia phones and you can get latest CM builds updated every week from their threads in Development.
Question answered, thread closed.
Next time, think extra carefully about where to post.
Thanks!
iR¡[email protected]!* via Tapatalk 2

* Why Carbon Rom Thread shows Closed Status??? *

@Tarun93 Why Carbon Rom Thread shows Closed Status??? I am directing my friends towards this thread and they can't find a download link also! what's going on?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-1s/development/rom-carbon-rom-4-4-4-t2905543
Edit: @zelendel . Sorry to disturb you again, I got the answer. Now please remove this thread.
rajag33 said:
@Tarun93 Why Carbon Rom Thread shows Closed Status??? I am directing my friends towards this thread and they can't find a download link also! what's going on???
http://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-1s/development/rom-carbon-rom-4-4-4-t2905543
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was closed due to lack of kernel source which is required by the GPL and our rules.
Whatever you say! We will be with you!
zelendel said:
It was closed due to lack of kernel source which is required by the GPL and our rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are always with you dear XDA [ @zelendel ] . Whatever you say!
I think this decision will teach a lesson to xiaomi!

Liquidsmooth rom?

Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Benholder90 said:
Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
purian23 said:
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i dont actually know why i did that dont really know where to ask i suppose. Sorry for being stupid
rhystagram said:
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!

TWRP-3.2.2-0 Pixel XL

twrp-3.2.2-0 on Android 8.1.0 Oreo or Android Development Preview DP4. Is it better than twrp 3.2.1-2?
Wrong section
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Akomack said:
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
The last "Dees_Troy" thread, I saw, was for twrp-3.2.1-2. After, reading several threads with comments about twrp-3.2.2-0.
I thought it would be nice to have a thread for it so all the members could go to one thread for twrp-3.2.2-0 information. I respect your right to disagree. Further, if Dees_Troy opens a thread for it or updates his thread to twrp-3.2.2-0. I will ask the moderators to close this thread.
*Delete
Akomack said:
Similar to your question on the Magisk thread not being updated, the TWRP thread doesn't need a new title every time an update is pushed. @Dees_Troy is the lead dev of TWRP, so regardless whether or not the title or OP of the thread had been updated, I would still consider that one to be the 'official' thread for TWRP.
I highly doubt he's going to spend the time going through the dozens of device specific threads just to update the title/OP.
I don't want to start a pissing match, but to have multiple threads about the same thing is bonkers and only serves to muddy up the thread list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
No, not similar to my "question on the Magisk thread" I asked if the thread was "relevant". Why? No one was using it. I know who Dees_Troy is, I think he can speak for himself. He doesn't need a mouth piece. So, since you don't want to start a "pissing match." Keep your 'tude' to yourself and stop posting.
Further, Dees_Troy took the time to update his thread to twrp-3.2.1-2.
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
bkkzak said:
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, you have to remove pin, or password and it works.
Wrong section...
liam_davenport said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong section
Homeboy76 said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
stebomurkn420 said:
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right. Moderator please move this to the "Pixel XL Questions and Answers forum."
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah you're right. How do I get it there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
stebomurkn420 said:
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! Sounds great! As far as twrp 3.2.2-0 goes, I haven't flashed it yet, I've heard nothing but positive feedback so far though.
Just so much win.
Phalanx7621 said:
Just so much win.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thread closed by request.

Categories

Resources