Develop Bugs

One X, One S, Transformer Prime, Galaxy Note Benchmarks

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So will you guys buy One S or One X?

jerrylzy said:
View attachment 979783
So will you guys buy One S or One X?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One X. There's more to life than meaningless benchmark numbers; the One X's feature set is far more complete, especially due to the vastly better screen.

There are numerous threads on this already. And this is the one x section. So I assume those in this section will get the one x.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/2/2919202/htc-one-x-review
PLUS THE ONE S SCORES HIGHER IN SOME BENCHS BECAUSE IT'S RUNNING IN MUCH LOWER RESOLUTION, QUARTER THE AMOUNT OF PIXELS
both chips trade blows, s4 has the edge in single threading and T3 has the edge in multi-threading and GPU @720p
gettting tired of this job...
Doesn't take a genius to realise the One X main selling point is actually that devine screen and size equally the One S pentile and QHD is a major hurdle
screen is what sold iPhone4, SGSII and Galaxy Nexus

My benchmark results for the One X in the attached graphs,
very short:
Quadrant: 4951, 13 259 CPU (!)
Nena Mark 1: 58.2
Nena Mark 2: 47.8
AnTuTu: 11609, great read and write speed of the memory card!
The values ​​differ significantly from the results of most of the testers from the net, especially the one that assign the One S would perform better ... They either have tested a "Monday Device", or have i a super-device? Test it yourself
Sorry for the big pics...Upload from my phone

The inside gossip, is that the One X is far from optimised yet, and it WILL get faster after firmware updates. They are still maximising utilisation of the quad-cores. It is quite possible the One S will always beat the X for single threading tests.

hamdir said:
PLUS THE ONE S SCORES HIGHER IN SOME BENCHS BECAUSE IT'S RUNNING IN MUCH LOWER RESOLUTION, QUARTER THE AMOUNT OF PIXELS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you wanna yell, don't yell false stuff, its half the amount.

Yeah I'm getting 4900 for quadrants scores too
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

One S: 540*960= 518400
One X: 720*1280= 921600
The one s is rendering 44% less pixels. How did you guys get 2x or 4x the pixels on the one x?
GLbench Egypt 2.1 shows at the same resolution the one x is only about 10% faster. You won't really notice the difference.The Adreno 225 often gets bashed as a hugely inferior GPU but it practice, its actually pretty decent.
Some benchmarks where one s leads are not skewed by resolution. Linpack is resolution independent. While in Vellamo only the flinger tests (where both are pegged at 60fps) are resolution dependent.

nativestranger said:
One S: 540*960= 518400
One X: 720*1280= 921600
The one s is rendering 44% less pixels. How did you guys get 2x or 4x the pixels on the one x?
GLbench Egypt 2.1 shows at the same resolution the one x is only about 10% faster. You won't really notice the difference.The Adreno 225 often gets bashed as a hugely inferior GPU but it practice, its actually pretty decent.
Some benchmarks where one s leads are not skewed by resolution. Linpack is resolution independent. While in Vellamo only the flinger tests (where both are pegged at 60fps) are resolution dependent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu has never let me down for benching, as it supports true multi-core testing.
Vellamo is irrelavant, it was made by Qualcomm (Snapdragon) - so, its results are biased & flawed.

[SPECS] Motorola Droid Turbo 2 Specifications

Hey all
This thread is for general discussions on the specifications and design features of the Motorola Droid Turbo 2. On the surface, this looks like a good device, how do owners rate it?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specifications:
Display - AMOLED, 5.4 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (~540 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810
CPU - Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & Quad-core 2 GHz Cortex-A57
GPU - Adreno 430
RAM - 3 GB
Memory - 32/64 GB, microSD
Camera - 21 MP, 5248 x 3936, phase detection autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP, LED Flash
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot, Bluetooth v4.1
Battery - 3760 mAh
Dimensions - 149.9 x 78 x 9.2 mm
Weight - 170.1 g
Color Availability - Black/Soft-Grip, Black/Pebble Leather, Gray/Ballistic Nylon, Winter White/Soft-Grip

Display: 4/5 - i dont have or see many of the problems people have complained about regading this. My display is crisp, sharp and bright. My only small complaint is that it can be prone to scratches from what I hear. With a user-replaceable front, this isnt a huge deal
Performance: 5/5 - This phone is fast, snappy and is a joy to use and scroll thru menus. No lag at all
Battery: 4/5 - Coming from a droid maxx, I am getting about a day and a half on this with moderate usage. On my maxx I was easily able to get 2. With turbo charging though this is not a problem or issue
Customizability: 1/5 - Since there is no root nor does there seem to be ANY dev interest in the DT2, this gets rated very very low. Only reason I gave 1 point is because I am able to disable MOST vzw bloat.
Feel: 4/5 - Coming from the Maxx, this is definitely a larger and lighter phone. I perfer my devices a bit on the heavy side as it feels sturdier to me. However, I am getting used to the size and feel. I just wish I could use it comfortably with one hand.

Does any owner of the Turbo 2/X Force know if this device has front color LED notification that gives different color for different apps?
TIA.

None for the Turbo 2. Just the Moto display. Now it would be nice if you could change the color of Moto Display.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I came from a LG G3 and so far the phone has been an upgrade! Screen is about the same. 0.1in is not noticeably smaller. Screen seems always brighter than my G3. Brightness all the way down is bright for laying in bed at night.
Performance is great. I feel if root is an option it'll only get better. Debloating it will be huge for performance upgrades. But the hardware is certainly there.
Battery so far has been great. Typically 30% when going to bed, when on the G3 I'd have 30% aroind 5pm. So I'd have to charge at least once before bed. With the turbo 2 it'll last all day.
No root, and maybe none is saddening. Biggest fit at first was the dpi, which I changed, but some apps parts are broken and it sucks. No big deal but it just looks worse. With root I'll be much happier with this device, but I can't blame the device.
Feels good as a device. It's sturdy and doesn't feel like it'll break easy. Especially with the shatterproof screen. I am using a UAG case and its sort of bulky, but no big deal.
Overall, I enjoy this phone and do not regret trading it. An upgrade to marshmallow or root will be huge for the future of this device. But that's all software and not hardware.

elvee68 said:
None for the Turbo 2. Just the Moto display. Now it would be nice if you could change the color of Moto Display.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply.
I was hoping these 2 would have color front LED.

ZOPO Hero 2 /5.5' 1 GB 16 GB/ MT6737 TWRP

ZOPO HERO 2 or Color F2
Display: 5.5 inch 1280 x 720 HD IPS Screen
CPU: MTK6737 Quad Core , ARM ,Cortex-A53
GPU: Mali-T720MP1 , 550 MHz
System: Android 6.0
1GB RAM
16GB ROM.
TF card up to 64GB
Camera:
Back 8MP GC 8024
Front 2 MP GC 2365
Battery
2300mAh probably in reality 1750mAh
OTA: Yes
OTG : Yes
Bluetooth: 4.0
4G
2xSIM MICRO& Nano, SD card. Nicely placed so you do not have to remove the battery
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Place reserved for review & root files
TWRP 3.0.2 by Jemmini attached.
Hands on impressions
It is a nice phone as far as build quality is concerned. and there it ends.
CPU MT6737.
But a small battery of 2300mAh =1750mAh makes it difficult to use with ease.
Even with energy efficient MT6737CPU. it is weak performance of the battery.
CPU is clocked at 1.25MHz so it drains the battery.
Not very nice photos from the rear camera GC8024 sensor, 8MP. Photos with quit natural colors but a lot of noise and not sharp.
Generally nice with metal frame.
A bit greyish display typical for 60USD range.
Performance
The quad-core processor MediaTek MT6737 clocked at 1.3 GHz, has a Mali-T720 GPU and is at 1GB RAM associated. The 64-bit processor would should in any event on paper be better than MT6580. In practice it is the opposite. The framework is not running truly fluid, longer holding up times one should regularly acknowledge and when different applications running out of sight, the ZOPO Color F2 is truly moderate. Zopo Hero 2 / Color F2 is in this way appropriate for close to standard errands.
The touch screen is not accurate enough for high-speed recorder, the camera normal shooting unsuitable and the GPS a total failure.
-----------------------
Please hit the THANKS button, if I helped you

TWRP file added to the first post
-----------------------
Please hit the THANKS button, if I helped you

With only 1Gb ram is really a crap device..
i understand the price range, but honestly 2Gb ram and decent battery are the minumim requirements to have a good chance to sell some units..

megthebest said:
With only 1Gb ram is really a crap device..
i understand the price range, but honestly 2Gb ram and decent battery are the minumim requirements to have a good chance to sell some units..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree as far as the battery is concerned. If 1GB was the only bad point than most devices like new Oukitel units and others in economy range 50-70 USD we should call crap.
But they sell some units anyway.
The battery and camera are the worst features in ZOPO Hero2 or F2 IMHO
--------------
hit thank you if i helped you

This TWRP for zopo hero 2 works? I own the device

Doogee Shoot 2 Review

SPECS:
Brand – Doogee
Model – Shoot 2
Device Type – Android Smartphone
CPU – Quad-Core 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Chipset – MediaTek MT6580A
GPU – ARM Mali-400 MP1, 2-Cores
Camera -5 Megapixels with LED and AF Rear Camera | 5 Megapixel Front camera
Memory – RAM- 1GB/2GB | ROM 8GB/16GB External Memory Supports Up to 32GB
Display – Screen size 5.0 inches HD Display (1280×720 Pixels)
Battery – Removable 3,360 mAh Lithium-Ion
SIM – Dual SIM (Micro + Micro)
Sensors -Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Ambient Light
Color – Black, Gold, Gray
Operating System – Android 7.0 Nougat
I/O Interface – 2 x Micro SIM Card Slot, TF Card Slot, Micro USB v2.0 Port, 3.5mm Audio Out Port, Power Button, Volume Button, Microphone, Speaker
Dimensions – 142.6 x 72.6 x 9.5 mm
Weight – 174 Grams (With Battery)
More Feature – Plastic Body Design, HSUPA 5.76 Mbps Upload, HSDPA 21 Mbps Download, Computer Sync, OTA Sync, Tethering, FM Radio, HotKnot, Noise Cancellation, 2.5D Curved Glass Screen.
REVIEW:
The Doogee Shoot 2 provides customers with a very interesting value proposition, being the cheapest phone on the market with a dual rear facing camera set up., and boasting premium features like fingerprint unlocking.
The box came with a usb cable, a charger with an Asian 220V plug, and of course the phone. I have tonnes of chargers from my old phones, so the Chinese charger wasn't too big of an issue for me.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The phone itself has a pretty hefty feel, weighing in at 178 g. It has a 5" 720p displa, with the 3.5 mm earphone jack and micro usb port on the top. On the bottom of the phone, it has some holes for the sound to come out. The phone has a fingerprint sensitive home button on the bottom bezel, and a power and volume button on the right side of the phone. The SIM and SD card slot is under the back cover. Overall the device has a good design and feels good in the hand.
The phone runs Android 7.0, and the set up in the beginning was a little troublesome. It was kind of slow and restarted on me. Maybe because the variant I had was the 1 GB RAM variant, and that the problem won't happen with the 2 GB RAM variant. But after the initial set up, and especially after the software update, the phone was much snappier. The phone comes with a little bloatware, as expected from pretty much all manufacturers, but overall the phone still was able to mostly retain the stock android feel. The feel was snappy, and there was no lag. For those who don't like the default launcher, of course you can install a 3rd party launcher (I did Nova Launcher), and replace all the 3rd party apps with apps of your choice. The fingerprint sensor did as it was supposed to, and I had no issues unlocking with my fingerprint, being able to unlock in about a second.
Antutu Benchmarks scored it at 22877, which is as fast as a Moto G3 3rd Gen at 23258.
The 5" screen is very bright, and watching YouTube was fine. The speakers are more than adequately loud as well. Definitely the area where Doogee spent the most time on was the camera app that comes included with the phone. It has tonnes of modes and options for camera enthusiasts to play around with, like ISO, exposure, white balance, etc. The app also has a dedicated Bokeh mode to really take advantage of the dual 5 mp camera lenses. It also boasts a 2x optical zoom, just like what the iPhone 7 Plus has. Truly, the dual lens camera is the highlight feature of the phone.
Last but not least is the battery life. It's phenomenal. With the standby intelligent power saving mode on, I can get about 3 days out of it if I don't touch my phone. Even with moderate usage, I can get a day out of it no problem. That's because it has a 3360 mAh battery. Paired with a screen with 720p resolution, that means the Shoot 2 can last much longer on a battery of this size compared with a Samsung S8, with it's 1440p screen.
Overall this is a great entry level phone, designed especially for those who want to snap some great photos without having to fork over hundreds for the higher end phones. Other than the hiccup during the initial set up, there were no issues with the phone at all, and from the time I got the phone and wrote the review, there were 2 OTA updates available for the phone. I look forward to the continued support from Doogee to keep this phone up to date.

[Review] Doogee MIX - Silver :: 64GB / 6GB RAM

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Doogee MIX - Silver​
DISCLAIMER ::
This is purely my opinion and experience with the device, I am no way affiliated with the manufacturer. I was sent the device for the purpose of a review, so I am not biased in anyway.
SPECS ::
Dimensions:
Width: 76.2mm
Height: 144mm
Thickness: 7.95mm
Weight: 193g
Display:
5.5" AMOLED
Resolution: 720 x 1280 / 320 DPI
Refresh rate: 63.04fps
CPU:
CPU Type: ARM Cortex-A53
Max CPU Frequency: 2.6GHz
Cores: Octa (8)
CPU Bit: 64-bit
GPU:
Type: ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Max GPU Frequency: 1GHz
Resolution: 720 x 1280
Max Display Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Camera
Rear camera (Dual): 16.0MP + 8.0MP
Front camera: 5.0 MP
Cell
Dual SIM card standby: Micro-SIM + Nano-SIM
2G: GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G: WCDMA: 900/2100MHz
4G: FDD:B1/3/7/8/20
THOUGHTS ::
First and foremost let me start off by saying the finish on the silver MIX is stunning, when I first removed it from the box I was taken back... the mirror finish isnt something you come across often and it looks great. I will admit it is a finger print magnet, gorgeous nether the less.. definitely worth the upkeep.
The MIX's price point is definitely targeting the low end market, I've found it being sold generally around the $200 USD mark. Which I think is definitely a fair asking price for the device you receive. Obviously purchasing a device in the low range market your not getting all the bell's and whistles and that's to be expected.. however the Doogee MIX brings alot to the table.
Obviously the design is heavily inspired by the Xiaomi MIX and that's a good thing because the Doogee MIX looks great! The bezel-less screen really give's the device a premium feel. I've had no issues with one hand operation and I think the device is appropriately proportioned.
Now let's move onto the software, the Doogee MIX is running FreeMe OS.. for the most part I've enjoyed this android flavour. The UI is not heavily modified its nice and simple, the default launcher supports themes, little to no bloatware, OTA software updater. Includes everything you could possible want or need out the box. However there are a few minor bugs, I have brought these up to Doogee so I am hoping they will be resolved in a future software patch.. overall it's been a very positive experience, the bugs include the following:
Battery usage disabled in settings.
Battery percentage doesn't change colour according to light / dark text.
Android system webview refuses to update in the playstore.
Few minor translation errors in the settings app.
I'm not the biggest fan of the camera app, I really would like to see the UI revamped.. switching modes is a little clunky. However the camera does take decent photo's, I must say. There is little to no video stabilisation so that could definitely be improved. Overall all for a budget phone, it's pretty good... here's what the camera app looks like:
You can find some images I captured with the MIX below, I think they came out pretty good.. I was impressed.
The dual cameras don't operate as you might think, the secondary camera is used only in "blur" mode.. which as the name suggests blurs out the surrounding background of the image to increase focus on the subject.. I really feel like this was a missed opportunity, I really wish they did something more with the dual cameras. The blur effect can easily be done with software, really doesn't need a second camera to do so.
Ah of coarse the fingerprint scanner, almost forgot to mention this.. the finger print scanner is positioned on the front of the device on the bottom bezel. It doubles as a home button when the device is unlocked. In terms of accuracy its pretty good ! I personally don't use fingerprint scanners, I find them annoying... however it worked good in my tests, very accurate.. could be a little faster tho in my opinion.
Being a developer I naturally immediately requested kernel sources, Unfortunately tho Doogee have yet provided them.. which is a real shame because I have a working TWRP recovery for the device already, however unfortunately touch is not enabled in recovery. The only way to fix this is with kernel sources.. for the time being I have been using a OTG cable with a mouse to navigate TWRP. I really hope to see kernel sources release in the near future.
Overall my experience with the MIX has been positive, it does have a few quirks I must admit.. but considering how cheap the phone is they are easily excused. Performance is pretty dam good, camera is definitely adequate for photos, FreeMe OS is a really clean android flavour. Obviously sacrifices are made when purchasing budget phones... is it fair to compare the Doogee MIX to phones that cost double it's price ? Absolutely not...
CAMERA SAMPLE (CAPTURED BY DOOGEE MIX / UNCOMPRESSED)::
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4 (Blur mode - using both cameras)
MISC PHOTOS (CAPTURED WITH A GALAXY S6 / COMPRESSED BY IMGUR)::
Device in hand
Device in hand (Backside)
Device (Backside)
Device (Front)
Packaging
SCREEN CAPTURES (COMPRESSED BY IMGUR)::
Lockscreen
Default launcher
Quick toggles
CPU-Z - While running PlayStore updates (All cores firing)
CPU-Z - Device info
CPU-Z - Battery
Settings - About
Battery percentage colour bug example / battery usage disabled ?
Android system webview update loop example