Due to several reasons I have stopped the deployment of the "monthly Update.Zip packages" !
Thanks for your understanding.
This thread will be used for the unified tegra-3.18 kernel only.
Twelve:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_12_v211213.zip
Eleven:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_11_v201218.zip
Ten:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_10_v201010.zip
Pie:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_p_v200310.zip
Oreo:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_o_v200310.zip
Changes/Features:
- Upstream to kernel version 3.18.140
- Various patches and security updates
- Added Wireguard support
- Added/Enabled various file systems (exFat, NTFS, Network Filesystems .. etc.)
- Changed kernel config to enable/improve support for varioius services (tethering .. etc.)
- Added "fix cpu frequency limitation"
- etc.
Installation:
1. Boot into TWRP
2. Install the Kernel Update.Zip file
3. Reboot into system .. no need for SuperSU / Magisk !
The package contains an Image.fit kernel binary only - and no ramdisk part !
This way the kernel should run on all available Android Oreo/Pie/Ten ROMs for the dragon device.
And there is no need for a new SuperSu/Magisk installation afterwards, unlike to "full boot.img" installation.
Sources:
https://github.com/followmsi/android_kernel_tegra
https://github.com/followmsi/lazyflasher/tree/followmsi-dragon
https://github.com/followmsi/AnyKernel2/tree/dragon
Download:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18cqluw7lp1S720QdV0p-OtHfY9MNpSwn
Big thanks to @NYCHitman1 (Dirty Unicorn), @cheep5k8 (xceed), @Vartom and updateing from Team Mokee for the nice kernel sources !
Big thanks to @osm0sis (Anykernel2) and @jcadduono (lazyflasher) for the nice tools !
Enjoy
flashed your system image
devices does not boot
flashed back to stock
boots
edit: further details
every boot just dumps me into recovery.
dmitrygr said:
flashed your system image
devices does not boot
flashed back to stock
boots
edit: further details
every boot just dumps me into recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for feedback .. no good news.
Sorry, I can not reproduce your problem.
Tested the system_vendor udapte.zip several times on my Pixel C.
No problem so far ...
You flashed the complete .zip via TWRP ?
What was your previous firmware level ?
Did you upgrade bootloader as well ?
What kernel do you have in use ?
EDIT:
Which Version of TWRP ?
Pls use xceed version for now.
The NYChitman1 version seems to have problems.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/pix...ock-bootloader-install-custom-t3307183/page14
followmsi said:
The NYChitman1 version seems to have problems.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/pix...ock-bootloader-install-custom-t3307183/page14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the latest one I released because I didn't put the proper flag in place -- the previous one works perfectly fine as indicated by myself and others.
Also, I find it interesting that you've created a development thread while you aren't actually developing anything.
Thanks for the update.
Still like to test your version.
Ok, the version from here is recommended .. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=66557703&postcount=101
In the one from yesterday you fixed vendor image flashing via TWRP.. sounds nice.
When do you re-release this version ?
You may open a new thread for your TWRP releases ..
Thanks a lot for all your work!
New kernel released ... pls test
Update.ZIP_Nexus_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_v160519_followmsi.zip
There are lot of changes in compare to latest stock kernel .. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+log/chromeos-3.18/
Cheers
followmsi said:
New kernel released ... pls test
Update.ZIP_Nexus_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_v160519_followmsi.zip
There are lot of changes in compare to latest stock kernel .. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+log/chromeos-3.18/
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks for your work The kernel is for stock / AOSP roms? Running Dirty Unicorns and I think it´s not compatible :/
redukt said:
Many thanks for your work The kernel is for stock / AOSP roms? Running Dirty Unicorns and I think it´s not compatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are so many fixes since MXC89F kernel .. which was commited on Arpil 5th .. even it's the May release. Ok, was tagged on May, 4th.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/MXC89F
Last changes .. 6 weeks ..
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...+log/9c052efad6e651d33334b84c8f1feaf8945e8e7a
I am running the new kernel on latest M stock release .. MXC89F.
No problems so far .. really stable.
The kernel should run on all stock M releases for PixelC.
Used latest stock ramdisk to build the kernel .. maybe the dirty unicorn ramdisk is different.
But the actual kernel should work as well ..it's a dragon kernel.
Repack DU ramdisk with my kernel and it will most probably work as well .. maybe even with the same ramdisk, without repacking. Needs to be tested ..
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers
Any chance of getting a port of multirom? Let me know if there's any interest, and what I can do to help.
nic. said:
Any chance of getting a port of multirom? Let me know if there's any interest, and what I can do to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good .. have it running on Nexus 7 flo .. really like it.
MultiROM for PixelC would be really nice .. the chromeos is part is maybe tricky.
But like SuperSU .. automatic chromeos image unpack and repack, if required at all.
It seems Tassadar is not around anymore .. not sure if he will come back.
Some new guys have taken over .. they just made a new update release for TWRP and MultiROM..
Works fine
Are you able to port it to Pixel C ?
Thanks
followmsi said:
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bootloop
Restored my Nandroid and device is up
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/
followmsi said:
Sounds good .. have it running on Nexus 7 flo .. really like it.
MultiROM for PixelC would be really nice .. the chromeos is part is maybe tricky.
But like SuperSU .. automatic chromeos image unpack and repack, if required at all.
It seems Tassadar is not around anymore .. not sure if he will come back.
Some new guys have taken over .. they just made a new update release for TWRP and MultiROM..
Works fine
Are you able to port it to Pixel C ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am wanting to dig into the Linux4Tegra side of this, and was hoping that some of the work for multirom could or had been done. I don't know anything about the chromeos bootloader. Looking into it, Chrubuntu might be a viable path for this. I feel like this device is gimped with Android.
redukt said:
Bootloop
Restored my Nandroid and device is up
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the test ..
Restore DU boot.img and you are back to normal ..yep
I will unpack the DU boot.img and have short look .. just to check it.
nic. said:
I am wanting to dig into the Linux4Tegra side of this, and was hoping that some of the work for multirom could or had been done. I don't know anything about the chromeos bootloader. Looking into it, Chrubuntu might be a viable path for this. I feel like this device is gimped with Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a lot of work .. but if you have the right people involved ..
Maybe xceed or nychitman will know better how to "manage" the bootloader ..
As I know, until today, "nobody" knows how to remove the 30 second warning time beep sound ****.
Right now I am happy to "manage" the layer above .. boot.img and recovery.img
redukt said:
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
followmsi said:
There are so many fixes since MXC89F kernel .. which was commited on Arpil 5th .. even it's the May release. Ok, was tagged on May, 4th.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/MXC89F
Last changes .. 6 weeks ..
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...+log/9c052efad6e651d33334b84c8f1feaf8945e8e7a
I am running the new kernel on latest M stock release .. MXC89F.
No problems so far .. really stable.
The kernel should run on all stock M releases for PixelC.
Used latest stock ramdisk to build the kernel .. maybe the dirty unicorn ramdisk is different.
But the actual kernel should work as well ..it's a dragon kernel.
Repack DU ramdisk with my kernel and it will most probably work as well .. maybe even with the same ramdisk, without repacking. Needs to be tested ..
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had been keeping up with the chromeos-3.18 branch upstream, but I realized that a majority of the commits do not even apply to Dragon -- so it wasn't all that worthwhile to have in the majority of cases. With that said, I decided to go back to the MXC89F source until the next batch of source is released in June.
NYCHitman1 said:
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well my bad...DU is AOSP based. I get mixed up with all several custom roms on my devices :silly:
NYCHitman1 said:
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
I had been keeping up with the chromeos-3.18 branch upstream, but I realized that a majority of the commits do not even apply to Dragon -- so it wasn't all that worthwhile to have in the majority of cases. With that said, I decided to go back to the MXC89F source until the next batch of source is released in June.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right .. there also many fixed not relevant for dragon at all.
But it´s a fresh kernel .. upstream
I was so free .. and made a new DU kernel now .. used your ramdisk and my fresh chomeos-3.18 build from today.
@redukt, please test this kernel again .. on DU
Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks .. still bootloop ?
redukt said:
Well my bad...DU is AOSP based. I get mixed up with all several custom roms on my devices :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please test this one ... Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks !
followmsi said:
Please test this one ... Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
!!! Device is booting!!!
Meh... forget to install SU lol.... Will have a look in kernel auditor
Many thanks
edit: I have to flash the latest supersu (beta v2.74-2) to get root again. Will test your kernel til the next DU weeklie as dd. I´ll have a look at the frequency overview and kept stock settings / governor. System runs fluid with no hickups or so. Great work!
Looks also very interessting ..stabilize-smaug-7897.B-chromeos-3.18
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...kernel/+/stabilize-smaug-7897.B-chromeos-3.18
Will see .. today they released the 3rd N preview ... maybe it´s time for some N testing.
As I understand correct .. using N ramdisk and the same kernel from today should work on N as well.
We will see ...
Cheers
Related
if cm11 out i will buy one
Sent from my Moto G using Tapatalk
I'm currently working on unofficial build CM10.2.
Kernel is done
device tree is done
vendor setup is done
Android sources currently downloading
testing not yet.
Riyal said:
I'm currently working on unofficial build CM10.2.
Kernel is done
device tree is done
vendor setup is done
Android sources currently downloading
testing not yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not CM11, but still very exciting =)
TheQwertiest said:
Not CM11, but still very exciting =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try cm11 once i get cm10 running. Thing is we don't have official android 4.4 roms yet I don't have any sources for 4.4 binaries and kernel
Riyal said:
I will try cm11 once i get cm10 running. Thing is we don't have official android 4.4 roms yet I don't have any sources for 4.4 binaries and kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We wait for CM11!
Xperia V, T doesn't have official 4.4 ROM too, but they have CM11.
Also, I think it's possibile developing CM11 or other CM11 based (KitKat) AOSP ROM.
Unfortunatelly I can't develop it...
I just will use it :fingers-crossed:
u guyz are lucky...u have munjeni wid u now. just be patient.. his hardwork brought cm11 novathor devices... which were abondoned on ics.
two reason i see z1compact as my next phone is that i dont like large phones and master munjeni has z1c also...
We can use CM11 from Z1 since Z1 CM11 on Z1C is working but there is no display available since CM kernel on MSM8974 need some changes related to the Z1C display Bad news is we can not use stock kernel since gralloc, copybit ..etc is not working than. I started working on CM kernel but hmmm CM kernel and stock kernel is a lot diferent so hard work is needed If we get CM kernel working we will get CM11 working with no big modifications
Edit:
Compared now stock Sony kernel source code from Z1 and stock ekrnel source code from Z1C, there is absolutly no diferencie, only one line is diferent in defconfig, line is CONFIG_MACH_SONY_*****_ROW, source is totaly identic. I'm confused now since have no idea why CM kernel working on Z1 but no on Z1C. Maybe I have downloaded wrong kernel for Z1 ??? I have downloaded https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_sony_msm8974 branch cm-11.0 . Maybe these kernel not working on Z1 too ???
Can't wait to try CM
kernel config from boot.img
munjeni said:
Compared now stock Sony kernel source code from Z1 and stock ekrnel source code from Z1C, there is absolutly no diferencie, only one line is diferent in defconfig, line is CONFIG_MACH_SONY_*****_ROW, source is totaly identic. I'm confused now since have no idea why CM kernel working on Z1 but no on Z1C. Maybe I have downloaded wrong kernel for Z1 ??? I have downloaded{removed} branch cm-11.0 . Maybe these kernel not working on Z1 too ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
I am not sure if this is helpfull, but I'll give it a try: You are right - there is absolut no difference between the two kernel configurations, beside that one line. Since there are already nightlies available for the Z1(honami) I thought there might some helpfull informations inside that nightly. Of course there was a boot.img inside the nightly and I found that script to extract the kernel.config from that boot.img. Using the extract-ikconfig from my xperia z(yuga) kernel located in ./kernel/sony/apq8064/scripts/extract-ikconfig.
If the extracted config is reliable, there are indeed many differences.
I attached the extracted config. Maybe you remove the Lines starting with # and the blank lines for a better compare.
Let me know if I can help in some way.
Kind Regards
I don't know whats going on or why CM kernel is working on Z1 and not on Z1C but I think these fails on Z1C is related to the baseband and bootloader? Just asking, DO NOT FLASH THEM!!!
And another thing is maybe dtbs is a thing related to the fail since I can see some things in dmesg related to the pingpong command in mdss_mdp_intf_cmd.
Error log -> http://pastebin.com/9zgcWd4a
Thanks to the developers who are trying to make CM11 working on this phone. I will buy this phone if CM11 is available
@munjeni
Guys I have compiled a CM10.2 kernel here. Who's willing to try it against Z1's CM10.2 ROM?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2461282
I'll provide the source if it works.
Riyal said:
@munjeni
Guys I have compiled a CM10.2 kernel here. Who's willing to try it against Z1's CM10.2 ROM?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2461282
I'll provide the source if it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try! You no need to install, simple boot them without installing! On next reboot your phone will boot normaly! So boot these image temporary by command:
fastboot boot boot.img
Nope, doesn't seem to boot :/
munjeni said:
You can try! You no need to install, simple boot them without installing! On next reboot your phone will boot normaly! So boot these image temporary by command:
fastboot boot boot.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but I just relocked my bootloader yesterday. I won't be unlocking it till I get more time in development.
crytic said:
Nope, doesn't seem to boot :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird then... The patch I applied to port z1 kernel to z1 compact made a fully working stock kernel. But when I applied it to CM kernel it doesn't even boot. Can you by chance get a copy of /proc/last_kmesg and upload it somewhere or here?
* daemon not running. starting it now on port 5037 *
* daemon started successfully *
~ # ←[6nuname -r
uname -r
3.4.0cyanogenmod-g77098c0-dirty
~ # ←[6n
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
munjeni said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woot! There it goes Now I don't have to port CM haha!
Sweet, with or without display?
crytic said:
Sweet, with or without display?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With! Investigating between commits on git since using old working commits, need to find which commit broke display init. There is ~100 commits between but I will try every 20.th When commits get located than will try to fix upstream kernel . There is a lot of work but thats a only way by now.
munjeni said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
munjeni said:
With! Investigating between commits on git since using old working commits, need to find which commit broke display init. There is ~100 commits between but I will try every 20.th When commits get located than will try to fix upstream kernel . There is a lot of work but thats a only way by now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
git bisect to the rescue Well, if you need any help, just drop me a line!
Hallo i watch all this roms... They are all 4.2.2. In the sort time adroid L its out... And i have the big question when we have one real update ??? I have this phone 9 months until now i live in eu
gkm8123 said:
Hallo i watch all this roms... They are all 4.2.2. In the sort time adroid L its out... And i have the big question when we have one real update ??? I have this phone 9 months until now i live in eu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
100% agree but unfortunately duo to mate 2 is out they have no plan to update mate1 to 4.3 or 4.4:crying:
i really think ham is good phablet and deserve better support from manufacturer.
mazi_v said:
100% agree but unfortunately duo to mate 2 is out they have no plan to update mate1 to 4.3 or 4.4:crying:
i really think ham is good phablet and deserve better support from manufacturer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This kind of support let me turn away from Huawei. A pitty. But i want decent support. A phone schould get 2 year regular updates. Thats wat a customer deserves
Well you'll have to dive deeply into it to do the job of building a custom Android ROM. I just downloaded the kernel sources from the official JB (4.1) release, but I'm not sure how far I can get with that. Some experienced devs here posted that they would need Huawei's sources for KitKat to build a KitKat ROM, but I also have an Ascend P1 and I'm running a custom KitKat CyanogenMod build from the forums here although Huawei only released ICS (4.0) Kernel sources. I will have a try with a custom cross compiling toolchain of mine that I use for my Radxa Rock, but it's quite generic. I'll let you know how far I could get if at all.
Cheers!
The kernel build was successful, but I've simply used Google's latest toolchain (arm-linux-androideabi-4.6-android-4.4.4_r1). I'm now syncing the most recent Android repo, that will take some time. I will try to set everything up to start compiling tomorrow morning or something...
Just in case you want to build the kernel yourself as well: There is an indentation issue in one of Huawei's Makefiles for the touchscreen, you'll see an error message about it if you run the first make according to the README_kernel.txt. You can just add tabs and your file should look like this:
[drivers/huawei/device/touchscreen_Mate/Makefile]
Code:
[COLOR="DarkOrange"]#
# Makefile for the touchscreen drivers.
#
# Each configuration option enables a list of files.
obj-y += synaptics_i2c_rmi.o
obj-y += rmi_dev_6.o
obj-y += rmi_f54_6.o
obj-y += rmi_fw_update_6.o
all:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) clean[/COLOR]
CyReVolt said:
The kernel build was successful, but I've simply used Google's latest toolchain (arm-linux-androideabi-4.6-android-4.4.4_r1). I'm now syncing the most recent Android repo, that will take some time. I will try to set everything up to start compiling tomorrow morning or something...
Just in case you want to build the kernel yourself as well: There is an indentation issue in one of Huawei's Makefiles for the touchscreen, you'll see an error message about it if you run the first make according to the README_kernel.txt. You can just add tabs and your file should look like this:
[drivers/huawei/device/touchscreen_Mate/Makefile]
Code:
[COLOR="DarkOrange"]#
# Makefile for the touchscreen drivers.
#
# Each configuration option enables a list of files.
obj-y += synaptics_i2c_rmi.o
obj-y += rmi_dev_6.o
obj-y += rmi_f54_6.o
obj-y += rmi_fw_update_6.o
all:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) clean[/COLOR]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A kitkat kernel that would make you in my opinion almost immortal for Mate users
henk_j said:
A kitkat kernel that would make you in my opinion almost immortal for Mate users
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll see, I'm still learning about the stuff, but the chances look quite fair. I've set up the rest of the environment and the build is running now. But I guess it will take some more hours. I usually need about 3.5 hours to build chrome, firefox or libreoffice. AOSP should be similar. I'll see how far it got today evening/night. But for now it looks good, I'm running with -j4 as recommended. ^^
CyReVolt said:
We'll see, I'm still learning about the stuff, but the chances look quite fair. I've set up the rest of the environment and the build is running now. But I guess it will take some more hours. I usually need about 3.5 hours to build chrome, firefox or libreoffice. AOSP should be similar. I'll see how far it got today evening/night. But for now it looks good, I'm running with -j4 as recommended. ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you have more cores processor why dont increase the thread value so that build process will complete more quickly
svvv said:
if you have more cores processor why dont increase the thread value so that build process will complete more quickly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 2 cores, so 4 is quite fine. The next option would have been 16.
Take your time! we need more developers
Any news ?
Really appreciate the works here.
so many had forgotten Mate 1 and P6 since 2 & 7 came out...
For me the first editions are always the best although the the 2nd might have little differences or improvements (but always have flaws or bugs more than the 1st editions)..
so very much grateful and thanks for devs that spent their time looking at mate 1 and p6...
Will donate if theres any need for it..count on me for that..
[email protected]
gkm8123 said:
Any news ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come on, I'm writing every couple of hours...
Well, the news is: v8 failed in some point. I've just resynced the AOSP repo to start over. ^^ I'll let you know how it went today evening. I also have a job, you know.
CyReVolt said:
Come on, I'm writing every couple of hours...
Well, the news is: v8 failed in some point. I've just resynced the AOSP repo to start over. ^^ I'll let you know how it went today evening. I also have a job, you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok no problem, thank so much for your help
Well, the newer patches didn't resolve the issue so I decided to try the normal user build (I tried a full debug build first). For now it looks very promising. I'm not sure if I can figure out how to to fix the issue I had, so if this one fails at the same point (although as far as I understood it was one of the debug parts so it shouldn't), it might get a little harder. We'll see ^^
thank you mate.. i mean CyReVolt.
i hope ur doing ok with ur job also,, and really hope u give us a good news..
cumanisengdoang said:
thank you mate.. i mean CyReVolt.
i hope ur doing ok with ur job also,, and really hope u give us a good news..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, np... actually, it failed again due to the same problem, and I quickly figured out the cause (I already had suspected that): I'm on a strongly hardened Linux system, and the
Code:
mksnapshot
tool was killed due to NX protection (see http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened/PaX_Quickstart#Understanding_PaX). So if you're running a PaX protected kernel or similar you might run into the same issue. Duh... -.-
It's up and running again, so let's wait for a result!
While waiting you can try the Android kernel I have attached. Don't ask me how to do that. I have no clue. This is just for fun. And for you!
Considering work: It was actually quite funny today because I had to work on a Mac and OSX feels just horrible to me. My boss asked me to take a glance at Xcode and especially the new beta and Swift. I'm so glad to be back at my Linux machine now.
CyReVolt said:
Well you'll have to dive deeply into it to do the job of building a custom Android ROM. I just downloaded the kernel sources from the official JB (4.1) release, but I'm not sure how far I can get with that. Some experienced devs here posted that they would need Huawei's sources for KitKat to build a KitKat ROM, but I also have an Ascend P1 and I'm running a custom KitKat CyanogenMod build from the forums here although Huawei only released ICS (4.0) Kernel sources. I will have a try with a custom cross compiling toolchain of mine that I use for my Radxa Rock, but it's quite generic. I'll let you know how far I could get if at all.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main problem is not the kernel. We can build a kitkat rom with the 3.0.8 kernel , but we have no source for display part , audio part. We have to use the prebuilt hwcomposer , grallloc etc. . These prebuilt libs are compatible only with the android version of the stock rom they are coming from and with the kernel they are patched for.
With sources of display driver we can patch the kernel and the driver to work on KK . Like I did JB on ZTE V11,V71,V55 tablet with 2.6.35 kernel , but that device was QC based device with available display driver sources. (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1629630)
I have compiled a 4.3 rom for mate , but I am stuck at display. There are changed routines in framework which are not working with 4.2's display drivers . One solution can be to get these sources , or to change the framework to work with the 4.2' display driver.
The Mate is my first non QC chipset based device , but also the last too. This is my fourth device from Huawei and until now I was satisfied , they simply do not care Mate customers. The release of the KK for Mate is just a few hours job , but they wont do it.
joe.stone said:
The main problem is not the kernel. We can build a kitkat rom with the 3.0.8 kernel , but we have no source for display part , audio part. We have to use the prebuilt hwcomposer , grallloc etc. . These prebuilt libs are compatible only with the android version of the stock rom they are coming from and with the kernel they are patched for.
With sources of display driver we can patch the kernel and the driver to work on KK . Like I did JB on ZTE V11,V71,V55 tablet with 2.6.35 kernel , but that device was QC based device with available display driver sources. (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1629630)
I have compiled a 4.3 rom for mate , but I am stuck at display. There are changed routines in framework which are not working with 4.2's display drivers . One solution can be to get these sources , or to change the framework to work with the 4.2' display driver.
The Mate is my first non QC chipset based device , but also the last too. This is my fourth device from Huawei and until now I was satisfied , they simply do not care Mate customers. The release of the KK for Mate is just a few hours job , but they wont do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats why we have to get some sense into their heads thats trough they're Wallet. The only way tot make them do this strangely by hurting them where it counts.
Alright, I'm getting the point now... so I did some research.
The GPU is a Vivante GC4000, so might this help https://github.com/laanwj/etna_viv ?
I wouldn't mind the sound at first. I would love to work on this somehow.
Can you point out which files I should look at? I know a bit about the ARM/Thumb ISA, so I'd try to reverse engineer a little to either adjust the pre-built drivers or the framework using them. =) I don't give up very quickly, you know! Finally, I'd just contact Huawei and talk straight to them. Thanks in advance for all your efforts.
Cheers
CyReVolt
Hello! I'll be posting pure AOSP builds whenever there are new versions of android released (providing I have the time).
If you choose to use these builds, please ensure you have unlocked your bootloader and have custom recovery installed. I have also noticed that TWRP seems a little wonky at this point, so in order for me to flash it correctly, I had to wipe, then restart recovery, then flash. Hope that's not the case for everyone else.
3/18/15
Added ability to change DPI.
3/15/15
No longer messes with recovery at all. Bluetooth working, data does not force encrypt.
3/13/15
Android 5.1.0_r1 (LMY47D)
This release will wipe your recovery. If anyone needs this changed let me know and I will build another.
1/3/2015
Android 5.0.2_r1 (LRX22G)
Data is now encryptable, meaning your unencrypted data should stick going forward.
Included my own build of stock kernel with Linaro 4.9.3 toolchain.
Fixed bluetooth (thanks Lollipopalooza/Craig)
No longer need to re-flash recovery.
12/6/2014
Android 5.0.1_r1 (LRX22C)
You will need to install separate gapps
You will need to re-flash your custom recovery after you install (you all let me know if I should change this or not, I think I will on future builds)
I am not responsible for anything that happens to your device or to you, yourself while flashing this.
Latest DL Links will be in post #2.
XDA:DevDB Information
Pure AOSP Flounder, ROM for the Nexus 9
Contributors
gchild320
ROM OS Version: 5.0.x Lollipop
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Stable
Created 2014-12-06
Last Updated 2015-01-03
Downloads
3/18/15
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934543409
3/15/15
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934541983
3/13/15
5.1 - https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934540786
1/3/14
Flounder Android 5.0.2_r1 build LRX22G https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95864024717074545
Future FAQ if necessary (let's hope not).
Thank you!!!!
Will test it tomorow
I hope cm12 will build on arm64 soon
Just a few questions. What gapps do you recommend? What twrp ? There is the mainline version and the one @USBhost did. Thanks for the ROM!! Really appreciate seeing this show up.
mpmilestogo said:
Just a few questions. What gapps do you recommend? What twrp ? There is the mainline version and the one @USBhost did. Thanks for the ROM!! Really appreciate seeing this show up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't realize that there were two versions of twrp...I used the one from twrp website.
gchild320 said:
I didn't realize that there were two versions of twrp...I used the one from twrp website.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep
https://s.basketbuild.com/devs/USBhost/Nexus 9/recovery
I fixed some things
in it
Factory reset will not encrypt data
fixed the device name
look bit better
custom built FIRE-ICE kernel for recovery
USBhost said:
Yep
https://s.basketbuild.com/devs/USBhost/Nexus 9/recovery
I fixed some things
in it
Factory reset will not encrypt data
fixed the device name
look bit better
custom built FIRE-ICE kernel for recovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hell yes checking this out tomorrow.
build
Awesome !!!! Been waiting for this. How did u build? Last week since their are little options for roms decided to build one on my own and i did a repo sync to Google source but when i did lunch flounder wasn't listed in the build options ?
Flounder still isn't listed just lunch it anyway
Made a video running the ROM. Works very well!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVQW-PMepn0
Hello,
can anyone provide a minimal gapps pack? I would like to avoid too much bloatware
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
This maybe what you are looking for.
Hiro Nakamura said:
Hello,
can anyone provide a minimal gapps pack? I would like to avoid too much bloatware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
belair56 said:
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
This maybe what you are looking for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Hiro Nakamura said:
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I understand the apps themselves need to be optimized for 64 internally. These are all Google apps so they are if Google did so. As you update from the play store you don't choose if you're running 64bit or not.
As always I can be wrong.
Hiro Nakamura said:
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is actually a great question.
Adaptive brightness doesn't work. Other than that everything seems to be working.
Edit: Okay so I used an app to look at which sensors were working and which ones weren't... The proximity sensor is not working at all.
omvir said:
Adaptive brightness doesn't work. Other than that everything seems to be working.
Edit: Okay so I used an app to look at which sensors were working and which ones weren't... The proximity sensor is not working at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adaptive brightness is working flawlessly. Maybe you had a bad download or flash.
gchild320 said:
Flounder still isn't listed just lunch it anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use USBhost's version of TWRP. I tried to flash the rom following directions in OP. It wouldn't flash. First it said for flounder and this device is flounder. Also said something about updater binary. I got this with the other rom also. I tried un-mounting and mounting system, but I still got the error messages. Any ideas?
jlokos said:
I use USBhost's version of TWRP. I tried to flash the rom following directions in OP. It wouldn't flash. First it said for flounder and this device is flounder. Also said something about updater binary. I got this with the other rom also. I tried un-mounting and mounting system, but I still got the error messages. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I manually changed it to work with official twrp... Not sure why twrp is calling it volantis instead of flounder but that's why. Also, to get anything to flash in twrp at the moment, I have to reboot recovery after wiping. Hope this helps.
Decided to start fresh here's my work
I will be back up soon for those who keep asking to donate
PayPal.me/samandjoe52 [email protected] all donations will help rebuild my system
My Links for roms
http://androiddevelopers.proboards.com
Alternate link but plz consider using afh link first so I can monitor downloads.
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1ujJ2dac56Llwqlf0bd-N8bd9L4ONgkMV
Twrp 3.2.0
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1pDh9y5lrdVFQuXXkQEC1zoDlF1vnpygG
Vendor img updated monthly
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=11Tw8IOqCALXnbwJQX9pIv7GI7PzKi1uJ
Razorloves gapps all credit goes to him
https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=890129502657594387
My teammate build for sailfish thought I'd share
https://plus.google.com/114289258975611350933/posts/TqtMryz4HQ8
Titan du and rr unofficial back up
Mine again
Thanks man!
Du updated still March rr next last rr then doing a different rom things will be slow untill I can afford to replace machine
April updates have been released I'll update once du sources are pushed
Any testers available
So xenon had a big update but still March vendor that's why I'm releasing for testing purposes. It's on my afh. I won't be building as much until I can afford a new machine. I'm almost there. Anyways plz test and leave feedback if ur still on March vendor build will be up in a few minutes
Do answer the big question. Du will be updated april 6 maybe ?
Nice
Du is ready should be up in a few minutes April vendor guys April vendor only have fun
I wanna thank @petiolarissean and mr willis for their donation and i also wanna thank my good friend @Gordietm for guidance and support thank u guys. Also wanna thank dinesh and @Zehlek for always willing to test stuff thank u guys so much and everyone else @NepoRood and @bamafan39 for ur help.
joe_pacino said:
I wanna thank @petiolarissean and mr willis for their donation and i also wanna thank my good friend @Gordietm for guidance and support thank u guys. Also wanna thank dinesh and @Zehlek for always willing to test stuff thank u guys so much and everyone else @NepoRood and @bamafan39 for ur help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is an honor to be able to test your awesome roms
For those running the latest DU, how is the stability and functionality? Daily Driver?
I'm really missing DU, and haven't made the time to make the switch just yet. Anyone running it with Project Fi?
chowhoundb said:
For those running the latest DU, how is the stability and functionality? Daily Driver?
I'm really missing DU, and haven't made the time to make the switch just yet. Anyone running it with Project Fi?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is perfect, I recommend flashing.
Is their certain steps to flash DU build? I've flashed with and without gapps and Launcher + Gapps FC's both times. I see it's running fine for others so obviously an issue on my end?
liam_davenport said:
Is their certain steps to flash DU build? I've flashed with and without gapps and Launcher + Gapps FC's both times. I see it's running fine for others so obviously an issue on my end?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as any other just flash april vendor i use open nano gapps and clean flash. Fyi u can install april vendor on even march roms. It will work fine
April version running great and substratum works just reboot and enable overlays. I did notice a audio.media f/c when installing viper4android maybe i did it wrong though as i never use it and i also installed other mods from magisk as well otherwise no issues
April vendor i use https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JKippRKyittsur0r9eptMR3sw9B9z7mO/view?usp=drivesdk
I pulled it personally so i know its workings lol
Steps
Flash rom and twrp. I use twrp still 3.2.0
Reboot to recovery i use hard keys to assure it does so. Once back in recovery flash gapps, vendor image. Mount vendor delete vendor/overlay reboot. Enjoy
Anyone want rr with april patches
joe_pacino said:
April version running great and substratum works just reboot and enable overlays. I did notice a audio.media f/c when installing viper4android maybe i did it wrong though as i never use it and i also installed other mods from magisk as well otherwise no issues
April vendor i use https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JKippRKyittsur0r9eptMR3sw9B9z7mO/view?usp=drivesdk
I pulled it personally so i know its workings lol
Steps
Flash rom and twrp. I use twrp still 3.2.0
Reboot to recovery i use hard keys to assure it does so. Once back in recovery flash gapps, vendor image. Mount vendor delete vendor/overlay reboot. Enjoy
Anyone want rr with april patches
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll retry as using latest twrp might be the issues if not will report with logs. Thanks ^^
Edit: Still same issue with FC's I tried to get a log but can't get to settings to enable usb debugging, Thanks anyway will post back if I can get a log
@joe_pacino, i'm good for testing until may, that's when i'll be testing for google
Hi all !
After many years of "xda looting", i'm trying to contribute a little.
I'm a begginer, just learned 3 days ago how to use github ! So be cool guys, not a dev here.
Now i successfully compiled a Kernel, with addition of KCAL for now, but...
I got the Image.gz-dtb and i don't succeed in repacking it in a boot.img, if someone want to try, be my guest. (It's untested obviously, but compilation was without errors/warnings (we are close to stock for now.).
I tried mkboot, anykernel2, lazyflasher.... Always flash error, and i don't have time for the next few days, so if we could put a team together...
Here is the link to my compiled files (arch/arm64/boot) except dto folder. //Update to my Dev folder
Theorically you just have to rename, put it in a stock boot.img, "fastboot boot newboot.img" and test if Kcal is working with ex kernel manager, then more to come (governors, maybe OC, etc.)
Poke @d1ngh, you could help here after your work on twrp ?
Cheers guys, we could have our first custom kernel soon !
----------------------------------------
Source : [url]https://github.com/WiwiWillou/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource.git[/URL]
Defconfig used = defconfig daisy-perf_defconfig (with the kcal=Y addition not commited for now) // branch daisy-o-oss
Thank you very much! That´s what I waited for. Unfortunately 7zip says error: unknown compression method... Perhaps you can repack? Thx.
That is all we need ! A custom kernel thant can handle GSI !
Voodoojonny said:
Thank you very much! That´s what I waited for. Unfortunately 7zip says error: unknown compression method... Perhaps you can repack? Thx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've updated the link, you should see the uncompressed file in folder !
Or direct link : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TvihsIa_XbtC66yaWRZ1EPY5UR6LLD5g/view?usp=drivesdk
Thanks
WiwiPouPou said:
Hi all !
After many years of "xda looting", i'm trying to contribute a little.
I'm a begginer, just learned 3 days ago how to use github ! So be cool guys, not a dev here.
Now i successfully compiled a Kernel, with addition of KCAL for now, but...
I got the Image.gz-dtb and i don't succeed in repacking it in a boot.img, if someone want to try, be my guest. (It's untested obviously, but compilation was without errors/warnings (we are close to stock for now.).
I tried mkboot, anykernel2, lazyflasher.... Always flash error, and i don't have time for the next few days, so if we could put a team together...
Here is the link to my compiled files (arch/arm64/boot) except dto folder. //Update to my Dev folder
Theorically you just have to rename, put it in a stock boot.img, "fastboot boot newboot.img" and test if Kcal is working with ex kernel manager, then more to come (governors, maybe OC, etc.)
Poke @d1ngh, you could help here after your work on twrp ?
Cheers guys, we could have our first custom kernel soon !
----------------------------------------
Source : [url]https://github.com/WiwiWillou/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource.git[/URL]
Defconfig used = defconfig daisy-perf_defconfig (with the kcal=Y addition not commited for now) // branch daisy-o-oss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try it with android image kitchen (you first have to get the original bootimage from vendor/factory image, unpack it, exchange your kernel and repack it). recompiled official sources (with UBERTC) and it worked fine like that.
wertus33333 said:
Try it with android image kitchen (you first have to get the original bootimage from vendor/factory image, unpack it, exchange your kernel and repack it). recompiled official sources (with UBERTC) and it worked fine like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried, maybe my image is bad, strange (I originally tried my stock source too, Google 4.9 toolchain, no luck). Can you test with the one in the link please ?
I will have access to my PC only next week...
Thanks a lot for your feedback !
wertus33333 said:
Try it with android image kitchen (you first have to get the original bootimage from vendor/factory image, unpack it, exchange your kernel and repack it). recompiled official sources (with UBERTC) and it worked fine like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please share your build script ? Did you use an alternate defconfig ?
Learning here
EDIT : Which UberTC did you use ?
WiwiPouPou said:
Could you please share your build script ? Did you use an alternate defconfig ?
Learning here
EDIT : Which UberTC did you use ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used the original source code with some small changes (which are now included in official source) to make it compile.
Don't mind about the toolchain for the moment, gcc4.9 is most stable.
I don't have time trying this out atm, busy compiling los 15.1 but if you share exactly how you did it, (terminal log in pastebin and most importantly the exact errors, "doesn't work" doesn't help ) me or someone else might be able to help you (and you don't have to ask next time you get the error.
If you want you can start adjusting the lineage kernel, so i could build with los kernel which could save time towards working custom roms.
I successfully repack. But phone don't boot. (9.11 ROM)
Hello , can you help me with conpiling kernel source code? I tryed a lot of time but same issues , that could find same files.
I successfully repack image of kernel that you publish, but phone don't boot , they reboot in stock kernel(if i write fastboot boot boot.img) and I trying flashing image. They dont boot.
I vary want to create collection of custom kernel's on my device. And of course becouse i vary interested in this sphere, but new this.
Can you describe how you fix issues, or your compiling go without issues.
With best regards. Please help.
artyom5613 said:
Hello , can you help me with conpiling kernel source code? I tryed a lot of time but same issues , that could find same files.
I successfully repack image of kernel that you publish, but phone don't boot , they reboot in stock kernel(if i write fastboot boot boot.img) and I trying flashing image. They dont boot.
I vary want to create collection of custom kernel's on my device. And of course becouse i vary interested in this sphere, but new this.
Can you describe how you fix issues, or your compiling go without issues.
With best regards. Please help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On which roms did you test your kernel?
Voodoojonny said:
On which roms did you test your kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8.1 stock. 9.11
I compile stock kernel , repack him , ans this work fine. Now i need help to add kcal support. Author, can you help?
artyom5613 said:
I compile stock kernel , repack him , ans this work fine. Now i need help to add kcal support. Author, can you help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will, I'm very far from my PC for a few weeks again, I've used some commits :
https://github.com/rama982/android_kernel_xiaomi_msm8953/search?q=kcal&type=Commits
Source for pie is not pushed ?
WiwiPouPou said:
I will, I'm very far from my PC for a few weeks again, I've used some commits :
https://github.com/rama982/android_kernel_xiaomi_msm8953/search?q=kcal&type=Commits
Source for pie is not pushed ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! O try to add kcal with this commits.
Yea, source for pie is not pushed. Xiaomi cant fix 8.1 kernel... Stock compiled kernel issue: wifi don't work...
WiwiPouPou said:
I will, I'm very far from my PC for a few weeks again, I've used some commits :
https://github.com/rama982/android_kernel_xiaomi_msm8953/search?q=kcal&type=Commits
Source for pie is not pushed ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you tell me what version of kernel you use whyle compile kernel? I tryed on new 9.11, but phone dont boot.
Maybe when you compile version be 9.10 or ealier.
becouse ramdisk and kernel image can conflict
I hope this can support settings for "display temperature" so that we dont need app for calibrating warmth or coolness of display
Current state:
Kernel builded.
Kcal included.
Wifi don't work , searching fix
artyom5613 said:
Current state:
Kernel builded.
Kcal included.
Wifi don't work , searching fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kcal is working ?
Strange for WiFi, module not compiled ?