Related
Hi,
LGE open 3.4.0 kernel for I_BOARD (i_series, ijb_series), 325_BOARD (batman series), 120_BOARD (cayman series).
LG-F100L (batman_lgu_kr), LG-F100S (batman_skt_kr), LG-F120S (cayman_skt_kr) have same kernel source and there's i series source and config.
But it does not have CAF capability.
Please modify this kernel source.
LGE Opensource site, search f100l or f100s and download JB source.
Yes, we know about it. Its not easy but we can adapt it for our device.
I am started port P930 features to F120S sources, but need a lot time for it.
When it will boot, I will upload kernel to Github for fixing drivers together.
Help me too!!!
miroslav_mm said:
Yes, we know about it. Its not easy but we can adapt it for our device.
I am started port P930 features to F120S sources, but need a lot time for it.
When it will boot, I will upload kernel to Github for fixing drivers together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you make it for F100S too? I have download the kernel source of F100S but i don't understand how to build it to compatible with CM rom. I was read many guide to build cm kernel but i confused where must i start to buil. Maybe i'm not develop....:laugh::laugh::laugh:
If, like me, you despaired of CM ever releasing another "stable" version of CM-11, your wait is over.
I found out they had FINALLY done another M-SNAPSHOT code freeze, so I synced the source and built one of my own.
http://d-h.st/aihU
Link to Kernel source (if you feel you need it)
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_hlte
-blaine
Frankenbiker said:
If, like me, you despaired of CM ever releasing another "stable" version of CM-11, your wait is over.
I found out they had FINALLY done another M-SNAPSHOT code freeze, so I synced the source and built one of my own.
Link removed. Apparently we can't post links to builds any more without a full kernel code dump in the post.
If anyone is actually interested, PM me and I'll send you the link.
-blaine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This has been the case for as long as XDA has been GPL compliant. Any distribution of a binary (meaning kernel boot,img) that is not unmodified manufacturer's stock requires a link to kernel source, not a code dump. Anyone building CM from source should have no issues getting the link to source code and including it.
Frankenbiker said:
If, like me, you despaired of CM ever releasing another "stable" version of CM-11, your wait is over.
I found out they had FINALLY done another M-SNAPSHOT code freeze, so I synced the source and built one of my own.
http://d-h.st/aihU
Link to Kernel source (if you feel you need it)
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_msm8974-common
-blaine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no kernel source in that link. Please post proper kernel source.
Edit: Thank you for updating the link to kernel source
SlimRoms is a custom android operating system. The main goal is to offer users a slimmed down but still feature rich alternative to other android operating systems.
The entire SlimTeam work together to bring you this tailor-made beauty straight from Android Open Source Project (AOSP) source code.
All of the sources can be publicly viewed through GitHub and you can stop by the public Gerrit to submit patches of any type.
Important links:
slimroms.org - The official webpage where you find everything you need to know about SlimRoms.
Downloads - Download the rom for S6 from here
Kernel Source - The source of your device's kernel.
Get in touch! - Contact SlimRoms at these places if you have questions, requests or feedback.
Google+
Twitter
Facebook
Thanks!
The entire team who helped with the device tree to make this device get CM. Hats off guys. Really appreciate your hard work.
For dual boot, kindly follow this link.
If you have any other queries, kindly see this link for any issues other users face before posting here.
Working and Not working:
Everything as in CM
/* Supported devices */
Galaxy S6 International (SM-G920F/I, zerofltexx)
Galaxy S6 SK (SM-G920S, zeroflteskt)
Galaxy S6 KT (SM-G920K, zerofltektt)
Disclaimer: SlimRoms are not responsible for any damages to your device.
XDA:DevDB Information
SlimRom 6.0 for Galaxy S6 , ROM for the Samsung Galaxy S6
Contributors
a2441918
ROM OS Version: 6.0.x Marshmallow
Version Information
Status: Testing
Current Beta Version: 0.2
Beta Release Date: 2015-12-21
Created 2015-12-16
Last Updated 2015-12-23
No offense but you're the 3rd one to release a rom that has the exact same source as the original CM13 thread, and all others have been shutted down. You should invest your time helping the main branch fixing their stuff instead of dividing everybody. Releasing a ROM that is exactly the same with a different name is a total lack of respect to those who really worked hard to make this happen, plus your sources are not even public :/
virulentt said:
No offense but you're the 3rd one to release a rom that has the exact same source as the original CM13 thread, and all others have been shutted down. You should invest your time helping the main branch fixing their stuff instead of dividing everybody. Releasing a ROM that is exactly the same with a different name is a total lack of respect to those who really worked hard to make this happen, plus your sources are not even public :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no sources. I have published the link to the kernel source. Every Rom is based off CM tree and it is not the same. Its SLIM.
a2441918 said:
I have no sources. I have published the link to the kernel source. Every Rom is based off CM tree and it is not the same. Its SLIM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure it's an XDA rule to publish the source of every rom/kernel. Otherwise it could contain malware/keylogger or could be fake. I took a look at SLIM's github and i didn't see anything related to the S6.
Dude you dont get it. According to XDA you should publish a source for the kernel and I did. Go ahead with the link I posted and it will direct you to the kernel source. It is not necessary that the kernel should belong to Slim.
I see no official source on your GitHub. Is this just a rebrand of CM 13 for S6?
Nevermind keep it coming
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
bio4554 said:
I see no official source on your GitHub. Is this just a rebrand of CM 13 for S6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, I used Slim rom sources and this device kernel and vendor tree and built the rom. There is no need for sources in my github. And Slim and CM are different. I am not just rebranding. I am building this from source.
a2441918 said:
Dude, I used Slim rom sources and this device kernel and vendor tree and built the rom. There is no need for sources in my github. And Slim and CM are different. I am not just rebranding. I am building this from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's like steeling the bigmac sauce's receipe to make your own burger restaurant, but saying that you use a different bread.
Omg whats the issue with you guys? I gave credit for the developers, linked to the kernel tree of the actual developer and now what is that you people need?
a2441918 said:
Omg whats the issue with you guys? I gave credit for the developers, linked to the kernel tree of the actual developer and now what is that you people need?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...yanogenmod-13-galaxy-s6-t3269984/post64321767
Having a second ROM with same issues doesn't help at all. Why wouldn't you wait for it to be stable instead of releasing another alpha rom?
virulentt said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...yanogenmod-13-galaxy-s6-t3269984/post64321767
Having a second ROM with same issues doesn't help at all. Why wouldn't you wait for it to be stable instead of releasing another alpha rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could have pointed that out in the first post itself rather than us spamming this thread. I will remove the download link and keep this thread closed for now.
virulentt said:
I'm pretty sure it's an XDA rule to publish the source of every rom/kernel. Otherwise it could contain malware/keylogger or could be fake. I took a look at SLIM's github and i didn't see anything related to the S6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only source required to be posted by GPLv2 and XDA requirements is kernel source. Also Slim and CM both have posted open permissions to build.
New build up. See OP for download link.
Download Link is dead for me.
a2441918 said:
New build up. See OP for download link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ripv2 said:
Download Link is dead for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try it out now mate.
Up and reachable Ill give it a shot!
a2441918 said:
Try it out now mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any changelog ? and is this usable for edge version ? or it has same screen issue ?
bigbossclk said:
Any changelog ? and is this usable for edge version ? or it has same screen issue ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess its usable. But a different build for S6 Edge is in the works.
Doesnt Boot on my 920f latest recovery clean install with and without gapps. Never finnishing Boot animation.
Hello,
As some people heard, i really try to get Android Wear 2.0 for our beloved SmartWatch 3.
And it's possible, sources, device trees, all exist to build a working own compiled Android Wear 2.0.
So this thread tells about the current process of the port
PROGRESS
Code:
Repo synced
First build finished (not buildable yet due no blobs included
GAPPS Porting in progress
Fixed to 99% the device tree
Updating Blobs to M1D64T in progress
Using own Device tree
SOURCES
Device Tree for tetra:
https://github.com/Sony-SmartWatch-3-OSS/android_device_tree_tetra_eng_prerelease
Device Kernel for tetra (unmodified):
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/bcm/+/android-wear-6.0.1_r0.99
(we can use MM kernel on Nougat too, maybe some patches needed but that's okay)
Prebuilts/Blobs for tetra:
https://github.com/Sony-SmartWatch-3-OSS/vendor_prebuilts_tetra
For Discussions go to this thread please: https://forum.xda-developers.com/smartwatch-3/general/companion-thread-android-wear-2-0-t3565693
If you want to help me on this project, write to me via telegram: https://t.me/PDesire
I need that so much any ETA ?
By the way keep up the good work !
Nice to see someone is working on this :victory:
Sent from my Sony Xperia Z5 using XDA Labs
Thanks for your job.
Enviado desde mi Redmi Note 3 mediante Tapatalk
great!!! thanks
Dear PDesire,,
My support can be only moral..... :crying:
And I hoping good news soon from you
Thx again for your great hard work :good:
thankx you great hard work and good luck my friend
I checked out your device tree. It looks like it's based off an Open Devices tree. I don't think we need the following lines
Code:
include device/sony/common-headers/KernelHeaders.mk
-include device/sony/common-kernel/KernelConfig.mk
in BoardConfig.mk.
Also, what about the HALs? Asteroid OS used the system.img from a stock build, but we will need to build from source. I do not think it is open source, as it is not available on google git servers.
EDIT: I do not think building from source will work. This is what I found the Google Android building group:
Certain components of Android (and therefore Wear) come from third parties and have licenses which require the source code to be made available (e.g. the Linux kernel). The components made available via the AOSP repositories for releases like Wear are, afaik, the components which have that type of license.
Wear is a release which has taken the same path as Honeycomb. I can understand that for open source fans and people looking to tinker with a working system it’s somewhat disappointing to see, but those are the choices Google has made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like the only way to go forward is to port it from a pre-compiled version for another watch, like they did for the Galaxy Gear devices.
EDIT 2: Refer:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...nce/android-building/R0r9BBn4M3g/-KexIWTCDwAJ
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...nce/android-building/vx0Hcy88Ofs/USxAUaKVAwAJ
These sources are incomplete and only include GPL licensed projects. It is not the complete source, just like google releases preview sources for AOSP preview builds (M, N etc). I suggest you not waste your quota in downloading the source.
drakonizer said:
I checked out your device tree. It looks like it's based off an Open Devices tree. I don't think we need the following lines
Code:
include device/sony/common-headers/KernelHeaders.mk
-include device/sony/common-kernel/KernelConfig.mk
in BoardConfig.mk.
Also, what about the HALs? Asteroid OS used the system.img from a stock build, but we will need to build from source. I do not think it is open source, as it is not available on google git servers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've seen these, and already fixed. Patch comes soon.
Things for WLAN and BT for example are on google repo too and if a library or something is missing we can use it from M1D64T
EDIT: I do not think building from source will work. This is what I found the Google Android building group:
Looks like the only way to go forward is to port it from a pre-compiled version for another watch, like they did for the Galaxy Gear devices.
EDIT 2: Refer:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...nce/android-building/R0r9BBn4M3g/-KexIWTCDwAJ
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...nce/android-building/vx0Hcy88Ofs/USxAUaKVAwAJ
These sources are incomplete and only include GPL licensed projects. It is not the complete source, just like google releases preview sources for AOSP preview builds (M, N etc). I suggest you not waste your quota in downloading the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lel then I can't understand why the build is working xD at least I am building in time and already 14% finished
I know some libs we have to grab from the Marshmallow FW but that shouldn't be a big deal
At least we also need some things from Preview 2 so we can get our AW 2.0 Preview 2 working
So I try my best to grab much from source and if required also from FW, but all in all its possible for our SmartWatch 3 to get Android Wear 2.0
Your PDesire
but there's one thing i don't understand ... why r u using preview 2 instead of a feature complete newer version or the final version?
xpatze85x said:
but there's one thing i don't understand ... why r u using preview 2 instead of a feature complete newer version or the final version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because there aren't any sources of the final version.
@PDesire :
You're the man...keep up a good work ???
Hey @PDesire , any news? I'm sooooo hyped!!!
Thank bro I hope
Thanks for this!
So current status is:
Code:
Repo synced
First Test build stopped to fix things on device tree
Expected in future:
Code:
Blobs dump
Fully fixed Device tree
Creating vendor for tetra
Adding overlays for framework to device tree
Some mix with armv7-a-neon generic
Gapps Dump
Expected in far future:
Code:
Creating an OSS project for tetra (like sonyxperiadev but for tetra)
So guys I will do more tomorrow as I am awake already from Friday 7AM - 3AM Saturday (right now GMT +1) and working on it and I need my sleep xD
So Goodnight guys and I can confirm our dream of Android Wear 2.0 for SmartWatch 3 comes nearer
Your PDesire
PDesire said:
So Goodnight guys and I can confirm our dream of Android Wear 2.0 for SmartWatch 3 comes nearer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I can confirm my donation is coming when a working build is ready, and I suppose others are coming, isn't it guys? ???
Is it possible that this could give us Android pay or will that only work with official AW2?
Sent from my SM-G920F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Neo Cortex said:
Is it possible that this could give us Android pay or will that only work with official AW2?
Sent from my SM-G920F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. That'll only work on an official firmware, unfortunately...
Thank you very much, hope you will finish it without problems~!
Im trying to buid a ROM but I can only find kernel and device sources on Github.
I cant find the vendor sources.
Is there a different way to get them?
@Option58?