Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 vs Xiaomi Pocophone F1 - Speed Test - Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Guides, News, & Discussion

I did a speed test with these phones to see which one is faster, even though both devices are running on the Snapdragon 845 and 6GB of RAM, there's still a little difference, here are the results:
Bootup Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Finger Print Unlock Speed - Both Phones
Camera Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
The Verge Website Render Speed - Pocophone F1 Wins
Engadget Website Render Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Netflix Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
YouTube Launch Speed - Both Phones
Amazon Launch Speed - Both Phones
IMDB Launch Speed - Pocophone F1 Wins
Mario Run Launch Speed - Pocophone F1 Wins
Temple Run Launch Speed - Pocophone F1 Wins
Sky Force Reloaded Launch Speed - Pocophone F1 Wins
Geekbench CPU Benchmark
Mi Mix 3 Single-Core 2396 Multi-Core 8767
Pocophone F1 Single-Core 2436 Multi-Core 8402
Geekbench Compute Benchmark
Mi Mix 3 Renderscript Score 13380
Pocophone F1 Renderscript Score 13286
If you want to see the test itself on video, link is below, otherwise the results are what is written above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mMRvkoEpTo

mix 3 is heavily downclock due to how small battery capacity it has but when it needs to run graphic hungry game it can draw quite a lot of power. If u want more detail I recommend see this link.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-Mi-Mix-3-Smartphone-Review.372371.0.html#toc-battery-runtime-small-battery-good-runtimes

Related

Doogee F7 Pro powerful performance, AnTuTu score higher than HUAWEI Mate 8

Recently, LG and Samsung, released their flagship New LG G5 and Galaxy S7 / S7 edge, and announced that Antutu score are respectively more than 130000 and 110000, the price is about 700 dollars. Doogee also released its flagship product on MWC 2016. Doogee F7 F7pro, consist of 5.7 inches 2K screen, equipped with MTK latest deca-core X20 processor, 8.0 super front pixel camera, 21 pixel rear camera, combinations of built-in 4GB RAM + 32GB ROM memory , and another choice of 4GB RAM + 64GB ROM memory, running Android 6.0 system. Due to such a configuration , F7 pro Antutu score is up to 93476, while the price is only about $ 200. All in all, this’s conform to Doogee marketing strategy: to create a high-performance, cost-effective mobile phone.
Such a high score can not be separated from such a powerful Deca-core Heli X20. X20 2X2.5GHZ A7 core + 4x2.0GHZ A53 core + 4X1.4GHz core component. F7/F7 pro support Intelligent deployment, it is full of vitality when running large programs to achieve maximum performance. No need to close intelligent core to reduce power consumption. Modem consumes 70% of X10, multimedia consumes 60% of X10 .
Big RAM
Such a powerful F7/F7 pro, its CPU is not only low power consumption, performance improvement also obviously, which greatly enhances UI and gaming performance. GPU performance increase to 140% of X10's, GPU power consumption is 60% of X10. 2016 new hot game, Iron Tanks , got the most of comments is that it is always getting stuck, while playing on F7pro realized no stuck, run freely.
The general phones are 4G network LTE Cat-4, while high-profile F7/ F7 pro support LTE Cat-6 2x20 carrier aggregation 4.5G network. Download speed is more than 2 times the ordinary 4G network, up to 200 mbps per second, downloading a movie in just three minutes, browsing multiple pictures page in just 0.5 seconds. On the whole, doogee F7 has not only the top of the hardware configuration, but also the latest Android 6.0 system, so that it reaches Antutu score of more than 90000 making sense.
Thread closed.
There is an existing thread already: http://forum.xda-developers.com/gen...gee-f7-claims-mtk6797-helio-x20-deca-t3273544
Nathan
Forum Moderator

Mi Max 3 vs Mi Max 2

- comes with Android 8.1 + Treble suppport
- more LTE network bands, faster network modem : X12 vs X9
- dual 4G/VoLTE support : on both SIMs slot vs on single SIM slot
- larger display in almost same body size and weight : 6.99" vs 6.4"
- better display color range : 84% NTSC vs 72% NTSC
- CPU is 1.6x faster, GPU is 1.4x faster, uses faster RAM : LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
- better ISP and DSP for better camera post-processing & low-powered tasks
- dedicated secondary rear camera sensor for depth mode
- Electronic image stabilization : Gyro-EIS vs no EIS
- faster camera focussing speed : dual pixel PDAF vs PDAF
- larger aperture size : f/1.9 vs f/2.2
- larger pixel size : 1.25um vs 1.4um
- higher resolution front camera : 8MP vs 5MP
- newer bluetooth version : v5.0 vs v4.2
- slightly larger battery capacity 5500mAh vs 5300mAh
- slightly faster charging speed in 1 hour : 71% vs 68%
- faster reverse-charging speed : 1A/5V vs 0.5A/5V
those are just technical differences. speaker, camera, battery and screen comparisons are needed for people like me who wanna know if the phone is worth upgrading
The experience in Mi Max 2 is better, because there more Custom Roms or Customizations Kernels for Mi Max 2, and Mi Max 2 dont has problems with ARB.
In my opinion Mi Max 2 is the better!!
Mi Max 2 is better, because there more Custom Roms
yes mi max 2 the best
I own both and have the latest Havoc on my MM2..
I wouldn't trade by xiaomi.eu MM3 for anything... Well not until the MM4 comes out.
GEoMaNTiK said:
I own both and have the latest Havoc on my MM2..
I wouldn't trade by xiaomi.eu MM3 for anything... Well not until the MM4 comes out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree.
I use in my MM2 Miui 10 Debloate v2 by HardRoch83 and complete debloate with XiaomiADBFastbootTools.
This works fine.
I am decide, if Xiaomi apply ARB in MM4, i dont buy!

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 vs Huawei Mate 20 Pro - Speed Test

I did a speed test with these phones to see which one is faster, and I was actually surprised with the results:
Bootup Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Finger Print Unlock Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Camera Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
The Verge Website Render Speed - Mate 20 Pro Wins
Engadget Website Render Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Netflix Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
YouTube Launch Speed - Both Phones
Amazon Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
IMDB Launch Speed - Mate 20 Pro Wins
Mario Run Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Temple Run Launch Speed - Mi Mix 3 Wins
Sky Force Reloaded Launch Speed - Mate 20 Pro Wins
Geekbench CPU Benchmark
Mate 20 Pro Single-Core 3328 Multi-Core 9876
Mi Mix 3 Single-Core 2410 Multi-Core 8821
Geekbench Compute Benchmark
Mate 20 Pro Renderscript Score 6373
Mi Mix 3 Renderscript Score 13620
I didn't expect the Mi Mix 3 to win most of these tests, what a shocker. I'm loving the screen on this device, looks so futuristic.
If you want to see the test itself on video, link is below, otherwise the results are what is written above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tpGwsB0vdE

Gaming Performance of MPM2

I think compare to the realme 2 pro and Honor 8X the Max Pro M2 performs well when it comes to gaming. One of my friends has an honor 8x but while gaming it lags at times while gaming but while playing on my Max pro M2 I don't feel any lag......Share your thoughts on the gaming performance of Max Pro M2.
If you are rooted then you can use GPU Turbo Magisk module... To improve GPU performance.... This tweak seems to be similar to GPU Turbo present in Honor phones...
In 15k it's beast in this category except honor play so... chill
I'm a heavy gamer usually pubg,A9 no issue s at all:good:
p_paira said:
In 15k it's beast in this category except honor play so... chill
I'm a heavy gamer usually pubg,A9 no issue s at all:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just a suggestion for rooted users. Since this thread is about gaming ...

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs S9 Plus - Speed Test

I did a speed test with these phones to see which one is faster, there's a significant difference and it looks like based on these results the S10 Plus is definitely worth upgrading to, here are the results:
Bootup Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Finger Print Unlock Speed - Both Phones
Camera Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
The Verge Website Render Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Engadget Website Render Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Netflix Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
YouTube Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Amazon Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
IMDB Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Mario Run Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Temple Run Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Sky Force Reloaded Launch Speed - Galaxy S10 Plus Wins
Geekbench CPU Benchmark
Galaxy S10 Plus Single-Core 4538 Multi-Core 10370
Galaxy S9 Plus Single-Core 1970 Multi-Core 6834
Geekbench Compute Benchmark
Galaxy S10 Plus Renderscript Score 10184
Galaxy S9 Plus Renderscript Score 9362
If you want to see the test itself on video, link is below, otherwise the results are what is written above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1t3OxaznAg
Great results for our S10+ badboys! ? Kudos
galaxys said:
Great results for our S10+ badboys! ? Kudos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, I'm really surprised at how much of an improvement it is.
SnapDragon Wins!
Kzarka said:
SnapDragon Wins!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both devices in the test were using Exynos.
I'm coming from a S7edge and the difference is SO HUGE. Some of my longer load time games are starting in like 10% the time

Categories

Resources