Snapdragon or Exynos - Samsung Galaxy S10+ Guides, News, & Discussion

Anandtech has published in depth testing and review for the S10 Plus Snapdragon and Exynos variants. Overall the Snapdragon variant was given the nod however it was good to read Samsung has addressed some of the overheating and battery drain associated with the prior year Exynos equipped devices. Interesting read, worth a look.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14072/the-samsung-galaxy-s10plus-review/17

https://youtu.be/gqA8snRcD3U
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Big fan of Andrei's work.

Exynos s10+ battery is just out of this world.
Almost 6 hours of SOT at 50%...

There is already a thread on this topic:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/s10-plus/how-to/snapdragon-855-vs-exynos-9820-benchmarks-t3911124
Please continue the discussion there.
Thread closed.

Related

Note 7 advice

Hello all,
I am quite interested in this phone cause I am searching for a Nexus 6 successor and I depend on wireless charging. Sadly there are no high end smartphones which will deliver this feature anymore.
Therefore I have two questions:
1. At this time there are two threee custom ROMs for the exynos variant and no for the snapdragon. Will that change?
2. How likely there will be an AOSP ROM and what version (snapdragon or exynos) will suffer most from bugs then?
koboltzz said:
Hello all,
I am quite interested in this phone cause I am searching for a Nexus 6 successor and I depend on wireless charging. Sadly there are no high end smartphones which will deliver this feature anymore.
Therefore I have two questions:
1. At this time there are two threee custom ROMs for the exynos variant and no for the snapdragon. Will that change?
2. How likely there will be an AOSP ROM and what version (snapdragon or exynos) will suffer most from bugs then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fairly certain the note 7 has wireless charging buddy.
zanderswigan said:
Fairly certain the note 7 has wireless charging buddy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, that is the reason I am asking two questions about ROM development and advice about choosing snapdragon or exynos
Ah I'm sorry I misunderstood. I can't speak for the snapdragon but I have the exynos and it's awesome. Excellent battery life and no heat issues. Sure I have read that the exynos is better for rooting but haven't looked into it in depth as I'm happy on stock for a while. I'm sure someone will be able to help soon.
get an exynos, more development

S9 vs Note8

Hi everybody,
It's black Friday and i want to change my phone.
I can find the note8 and the S9 at the same price. Both in Exynos variant.
S9 has treble, note8 better battery. Which one should i get ?
Thanks
Znuf said:
Hi everybody,
It's black Friday and i want to change my phone.
I can find the note8 and the S9 at the same price. Both in Exynos variant.
S9 has treble, note8 better battery. Which one should i get ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Note 8 because the S9 with the 9810 performs like a slightly better Exynos 8895 with worse efficiency. Although the Note 8 has no project treble. If you get the Note 8 you would have to rely on Lineage.
Read this article about the Exynos 9810 and the s9:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12520/the-galaxy-s9-review/8
I would say import the G9600 which is the the Snapdragon s9 which has a boot loader which can be unlocked although the development is dead but at least you can get TWRP and flash a GSI and get project treble.
Or get the Exynos s9+ bigger battery and it performs like a slightly better Note 8 with about the same battery life/SOT.
I would stay far away from the regular s9 because a lot of people are reporting bad battery life because of the Exynos 9810. Either pay a bit more and get the s9+ with the Exy 9810 or get the Note 8 and rely on Lineage. Btw I have the s9+ Exynos.
Thanks ??? awesome details!!! Thanks a lot for all this informations.
All plus variant are too expensive here.
Note 8 has no stereo speaker too :/
I found a MI mix2s for 350$ I think I'll go with this.

Mi 9 vs Galaxy S10+ Speed Test

The Snapdragon 855 is solid, done really well against the Exynos 9820. I wonder how it would have been with the Exynos variant.
Mod edit: Link removed
Holy Pink Salmon hue (on the S10+)
Thread closed. Please take a moment to review the forum rules.

Device Inventory Manufacturer Not Specified

My apologies if this has been addressed in the past but I did search and search quite a bit, not only on major search engines but XDA as well and could not find any mention of this.
For the device inventory settings, when adding a device I've noticed many of the newer devices linked to their respective forums have the Manufacturer input as Not Specified
Yet the older device forums appear to consistently have that correctly filled with whichever company manufactured them.
For the Motorola forums this is pretty evident as nearly all of the newer releases have an unspecified manufacturer, my guess is the XDA forum migration may be the reason that process fell apart.
It's clearly no top of the list issue given the more pressing things needing to be addressed but since I found no way for users to submit or edit this tiny bit of device detail, I presume it's left either to forum moderators or XDA admins.
Anyway, please excuse my obsessive compulsion for maintaining complete and accurate lists.
This for instance?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do notice this too
It's happened to me before seeing some devices saying not Specified
It doesn't say it for every single device but does say it for some devices
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Precisely this. And it's even more baffling to see as in your screenshot both the S21 and FE have it populated correctly but not the S21+ and Ultra? All but one came out the same month this year so there goes my assumption that it was a forum migration issue. It seems more likely due to whomever creates the device forum at the time isn't filling out that particular text field on the form. I'm completely clueless on that end of things.
woodman said:
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is fixable for sure. I remember handling a report that a user had made regarding the same issue with another device forum and Mike took care of it for me.
mario0318 said:
My apologies if this has been addressed in the past but I did search and search quite a bit, not only on major search engines but XDA as well and could not find any mention of this.
For the device inventory settings, when adding a device I've noticed many of the newer devices linked to their respective forums have the Manufacturer input as Not Specified
Yet the older device forums appear to consistently have that correctly filled with whichever company manufactured them.
For the Motorola forums this is pretty evident as nearly all of the newer releases have an unspecified manufacturer, my guess is the XDA forum migration may be the reason that process fell apart.
It's clearly no top of the list issue given the more pressing things needing to be addressed but since I found no way for users to submit or edit this tiny bit of device detail, I presume it's left either to forum moderators or XDA admins.
Anyway, please excuse my obsessive compulsion for maintaining complete and accurate lists.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it's not normally me who adds the graphic or manufacturer, but I can add any manufacturers you find are missing.
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Yes, it's not normally me who adds the graphic or manufacturer, but I can add any manufacturers you find are missing.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks Mike, could we use this thread to request such issues when us xda members come across them? Or another thread?
woodman said:
Ok thanks Mike, could we use this thread to request such issues when us xda members come across them? Or another thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but best to give me a "mention" or I'll miss it.
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Sure, but best to give me a "mention" or I'll miss it.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! Thanks, we will do this in this thread.
@mario0318 or any other members, I guess you/we should feel free to report here and mention Mike in case you come across some other "not specified" devices regarding the manufacturer.
@MikeChannon
Here is my first pass, OnePlus and Samsung.
My first "not specified" list:
Spoiler: List
OnePlus 9R
The OnePlus 9R is a 6.55" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G chipset is paired with 8/12GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 48+16+5+2MP and the selfie camera is 16MP. The battery has a 4500mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
OnePlus 9
The OnePlus 9 series features three different devices including the OnePlus 9, OnePlus 9 Pro, and OnePlus 9R. The OnePlus 9 is a 6.55" phone with a 2400x1080p 120Hz display. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset is paired with 8/12GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 48+50+2MP...
forum.xda-developers.com
OnePlus X
The OnePlus X is a compact handset with a budget-friendly price. It's OnePlus' third handset, featuring a 5.0" 1080p AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 801 CPU with 3GB of RAM, and the ability to use two SIMs, or one SIM plus a microSD card. The camera is 13MP sensor with f/2.2 aperture, and the front...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Intercept
The Samsung Intercept is a 3.2" phone with a 240x400p resolution display. The main camera is 3.15MP and the battery has a 1500mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy SL i9003
The Samsung Galaxy SL i9003 is a 4.0" phone with a 480x800p resolution display. The TI OMAP 3630 chipset is paired with 4GB of RAM and 16GB of storage. The main camera is 5MP and the selfie camera is VGA. The battery has a 1650mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660
The Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660 is a 3.2" phone with a 320x480p resolution display. The Qualcomm QCT MSM7227-1 Turbo Snapdragon S1 chipset is paired with 158MP and RAM and 278MB of storage. The main camera is 3.15MP and there is no selfie camera. The battery has a 1350mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos i9082
The Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos i9082 is a 5.01" phone with a 480x800p resolution display. The Broadcom BCM23550 chipset is paired with 1GB of RAM and 8/16GB of storage. The main camera is 5MP and the selfie camera is VGA. The battery has a 2100mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A32 4G
The Samsung Galaxy A32 4G is a 6.4" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Mediatek Helio G80 chipset is paired with 4/6/8GB of RAM and 64/128GB of storage. The main camera is 64+8+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 20MP. the battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
The Samsung Galaxy A72 5G is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The 8GB of RAM is paired with 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 64+12+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 32MP.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A72 4G
The Samsung Galaxy A72 4G is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G chipset is paired with 6/8GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 64+8+12+2MP and the selfie camera is 32MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy F62 / M62
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Exynos 9825 chipset is paired with 6/8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The main camera is 64+12+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 32MP. The battery has a 7000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A12
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a 6.5" phone with a 720x1600p resolution display. The Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 chipset is paired with 3/4/6GB of RAM and 32/64/128GB of storage. The main camera is 48+5+2+2MP and the selfie camera is 8MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy M02s
The Samsung Galaxy M02s is a 6.5" phone with a 720x1600p resolution display. The Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 chipset is paired with 3/4GB of RAM and 32/64GB of storage. The main camera is 13+2+2MP and the selfie camera is 5MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a 5.7" QHD Super AMOLED display, with Gorilla Glass 5 protection, and curved edges, similar to those found on the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, and offers 4GB of RAM, 64GB onboard storage and microSD expansion up to 256GB. It has a 3500mAh...
forum.xda-developers.com
Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a 5.7" QHD Super AMOLED display, with Gorilla Glass 5 protection. The display features curved edges, similar to the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, and offers 4GB of RAM, 64GB internal storage and microSD expansion up to 256GB. The battery...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a rugged and robust version of the 2016 flagship Samsung Galaxy S7, with some improved hardware specifications. It features the same 5.1" QHD Super AMOLED display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 chipset, 32GB internal storage and 4GB of RAM, along with a microSD slot. On...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a dual-curved screen, similar to the Galaxy S7 Edge, at 5.7" and QHD resolution with Gorilla Glass 5 protection. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, or the Exynos 8890, and offers 4GB of RAM with a standard 64GB with microSD expansion up to 256GB. The battery...
forum.xda-developers.com
Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 was released in February 2016. It features a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, which has an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. Under the hood, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either...
forum.xda-developers.com
T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, which features an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. ON the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU...
forum.xda-developers.com
AT&T Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 comes with a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, with an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. On the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU (both...
forum.xda-developers.com
Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, with an "always on" feature, used to display a clock and notifications. On the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU (both...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy J7
The Samsung Galaxy J7 is a mid-range Android smartphone. It features a 5.5" 720p Super AMOLED display. Under the hood sits a 1.5Ghz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 processor, 1.5GB of RAM and 16GB internal storage, which can be expanded with a microSD slot. The Samsung Galaxy J7 has a 13MP...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy E Series
The Samsung Galaxy E Series comprises the Samsung Galaxy E5 and Samsung Galaxy E7. Both mid-range devices were released in February 2015. The Galaxy E5 has a 5" 720p Super AMOLED display, 1.2GHz quad-core processor, 1.5GB RAM, 8MP rear camera and 5MP rear camera. The E7 has a 5.5" 720p Super...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830, S5830i, Ace II
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3, much like its predecessors, comes in three sizes, 7", 8" and 10". The 7" is powered by an Exonys 1.2GHz dual core processor, the 8" is powered by the Samsung Exonys 1.5GHz dual core processor and the 10.1" powered by a 1.6GHz dual core Atom processor. They run on 1GB...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Apollo (Galaxy 3 i5800)
The Samsung Galaxy Apollo, otherwise knows as the Samsung Galaxy 3, is a budget smartphone released in the summer of 2010. It has a 3.2" TFT LCD touchscreen, with a 240x400 display resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Apollo won bronze at the CNET Asia Reader's Choice Award for Best Entry-Level...
forum.xda-developers.com
Thanks!!
Thank you, guys. Here I thought this thread would wind up buried with little to no action... Damn glad I was wrong! Special tip o' the hat to @woodman for directing this issue to the appropriate person, and @MikeChannon for your swift response.
Alright, on to the list. These will be primarily Motorola devices. Is it enough to simply list the device as on the list or would it be easier to have a link to it? There is at least some comfort in that these are mostly huge lists now and won't be a common or frequent task, I'd hope.
Moto G Power
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-power-2021.12069/
Moto G Stylus
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-stylus-2021.12073/
Moto G Play
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-play-2021.12067/
Moto G10
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g10.12105/
Moto G30
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g30.12107/
Moto G40
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g40.12237/
Moto G60
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g60.12239/
Moto E
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-e-2020.12097/
Moto Z2 Force
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-z2-force.6776/
Moto E3
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-e3.5563/
Moto Droid Maxx
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/motorola-droid-maxx-2.4868/
Moto X Style (Pure Edition)
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-x-style-pure.4365/
A note on that last one, the X Style Pure. its got two listings in the device list, but the one that has the manufacturer info and graphic correctly filled in doesn't link to the device forum, as in it has no live link at all. Yet the other listing which clicks through to the device forum doesn't contain the mfc. info or the graphic.
woodman said:
@MikeChannon
Here is my first pass, OnePlus and Samsung.
My first "not specified" list:
.............................. trunc...............................
Thanks!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mario0318 said:
Thank you, guys. Here I thought this thread would wind up buried with little to no action... Damn glad I was wrong! Special tip o' the hat to @woodman for directing this issue to the appropriate person, and @MikeChannon for your swift response.
Alright, on to the list. These will be primarily Motorola devices. Is it enough to simply list the device as on the list or would it be easier to have a link to it? There is at least some comfort in that these are mostly huge lists now and won't be a common or frequent task, I'd hope.
.................... trunc ................................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully these are added.
Mike
Thanks a lot @MikeChannon !
This is OK for OnePlus
But this one is still not specified for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/samsung-galaxy-s10e.8763/
woodman said:
Thanks a lot @MikeChannon !
This is OK for OnePlus
But this one is still not specified for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/samsung-galaxy-s10e.8763/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it
Mike
{Mod edit: Quoted post has been removed}
Yes. That is what this thread is about.
Hi @MikeChannon,
hopefully this thread still functions as to request changes to the "Device Inventory" and your kind support.
The older "Samsung Galaxy S2" or "SII" (with several XDA forums) can be found two times as 1. "i9100" (add_device_id=61) without "Samsung" as manufacturer and as 2. "Samsung Galaxy S II" (add_device_id=60).
And I stumbled upon a strange error (" Oops! We broke the matrix. Someone call Neo! ") while adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra":
Adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20" via the search device link works. It is "add_device_id=1135", but I want to add "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra". The Ultra seems to be add_device_id=1136 (As device search link "+ Add device to inventory" contains.), which surprisingly does not work.
Could it be that, if a specific device (see "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra" or "Samsung Galaxy S II" above) is not (already) linked to a XDA forum, it will fail to be added to device inventory?
Thank you for your support.
Android_adr said:
Hi @MikeChannon,
hopefully this thread still functions as to request changes to the "Device Inventory" and your kind support.
The older "Samsung Galaxy S2" or "SII" (with several XDA forums) can be found two times as 1. "i9100" (add_device_id=61) without "Samsung" as manufacturer and as 2. "Samsung Galaxy S II" (add_device_id=60).
And I stumbled upon a strange error (" Oops! We broke the matrix. Someone call Neo! ") while adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra":
Adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20" via the search device link works. It is "add_device_id=1135", but I want to add "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra". The Ultra seems to be add_device_id=1136 (As device search link "+ Add device to inventory" contains.), which surprisingly does not work.
Could it be that, if a specific device (see "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra" or "Samsung Galaxy S II" above) is not (already) linked to a XDA forum, it will fail to be added to device inventory?
Thank you for your support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
Well the older devices werte a bit of a nightmare to add to the device inventory as there were so many variations, carriers etc. Not to mention that the device inventory is a custom add-on to our XenForo forum software and as a consequence isn't always easy to work with. For that reason I'm reluctant to change anything with the S2 / SII forums/device inventory.
For the much newer S20 Ultra what happened there is that originally there were separate forums for the S20 /\Ultra and plus versions. As these shared software it was decided to roll the forums together but clearly the device IDs were not merged.
Hopefully you can now add the Ultra version.
Mike
Hi @MikeChannon,
thank you. Yes, I now have just the whole device family (i.e. "Samsung Galaxy S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra") in my inventory. Obviously, I initially didn't catch, that it is less a detailed device specification but a convient link to the related XDA forums.
As a small final cleanup, the single still existing "Samsung Galaxy S20+" would now also need its merger into the above mentioned device family/forum.
Thank you for your longstanding support.
Android_adr said:
Hi @MikeChannon,
thank you. Yes, I now have just the whole device family (i.e. "Samsung Galaxy S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra") in my inventory. Obviously, I initially didn't catch, that it is less a detailed device specification but a convient link to the related XDA forums.
As a small final cleanup, the single still existing "Samsung Galaxy S20+" would now also need its merger into the above mentioned device family/forum.
Thank you for your longstanding support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it's more just a linking to the forum (if we have one) sort of thing. It's certainly not perfect as it does not allow adding devices for which we don't have a forum.
I removed the old broken link to the Samsung Galaxy S20+ so it can be added now but only as the group of: S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra
Mike

General OnePlus 11R

Don't see XDA dedicated forum for it.
They added IR Blaster, interesting. And a smidgen more screen size? and like 1.5K resolution (no LPTO screen). Charger 100W.
Yes, it's budget. Last year's Snapdragon (so no 5G band Aggregation), and stays at UFS 3.1, LPPDR 4 (so you won't see lower temps & 30% less power used like regular 11).
Fold coming later this year.
Hhmmm...
Xda forum for 11R will be small like the one for 10R.
10R 150w for a buget phone is Great ! i use it for more than 6 months.
On Giztop 11R is 499$ Usa for 12/256 Gb. With OxygenOS is you want.
horsecharles said:
(so no 5G band Aggregation)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X65 supports 5G aggregation. The X65 was the first modem I would have recommended for someone looking to keep a phone for awhile.
5G Spectrum: mmWave-sub6 aggregation, sub-6 carrier aggregation (FDD-TDD, FDD-FDD, TDD-TDD), FDD-TDD support for uplink-CA, Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/documents/prod_brief_qcom_x65.pdf
It is fully 3GPP Release 16 compatible as well which means that it can support any commercially-available 5G band (but may require a firmware update so I wouldn't bet on OnePlus adding bands beyond what their sales info states).
If you aren't gaming (there are massive advances in the 8 Gen 2 in this regard) and you are okay with the possibility of having to charge your phone each day (or more than once a day when using 5G heavily), it's definitely worth considering.
EDIT: Actually, it's using the 8 PLUS Gen 1... I have no qualms recommending a device using that chip to anyone who doesn't care about what the X70 modem adds (not much) or who doesn't want the absolute best performance and is willing to pay for it.
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2: tests and benchmarks
We put Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 against Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and...
nanoreview.net
horsecharles said:
Don't see XDA dedicated forum for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually there's the one:
OnePlus 11R (Ace 2)
The OnePlus 11R (Ace 2) is a 6.74" device, with a 120Hz 1240x2772 AMOLED display. It's powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is paired with either 256/12GB, 256/16GB or 512/16GB of internal storage and RAM. It features a 50/8/2MP main camera setup, with a 16MP selfie camera. The...
forum.xda-developers.com

Categories

Resources