Seems stupid to ask, but please help me.
I've bought an Xperia Arc from a retail store in Hongkong (not SE Store). I updated my Arc from 2.3.2 to 2.3.3 using SEUS. I checked Imei at numberingplans website, it's real. But since the ram was only around 297mb, I started to worry.
System information: (using Quadrant Standard on Android Market)
Device
Model: LT15i
Board: unknown
Brand: SEMC
Fingerprint: SEMC/ LT15i...
CPu
Name: ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v71)
Current freq.:246.76 MHz
Max freg.: 1024 MHz
Min freq.: 122.88 MHz
Cores: 1
Architecture: 7
Revision: 2
Serial #: 000000000000000
Memory
Total: 343456 kB
Free: 9616 kB
Inactive: 127704 kB
gpu (Open GL)
Vendor: Qualcomm
Renderer: Adreno 205
Version: OpenGL ES-CM 1.1
..............
Does your Xperia Arc have the same information or not?
And my Arc is real or fake?
Sorry for my bad English.
Ths!!
Looks like a geniune SE device to me. The reason you see less memory (which is normal) is because ram is shared with the video graphics.
welcome to Arc world!
don't worry your unit is fine, i think the one you saw was free RAM or i should say used RAM, check it again at fone settings. The actual total available for Arc is 380MB, it's the same for all unit.
As for ROM, should be around 320MB.
And you were able to update at SEUS so it's definitely genuine unit.
it's a fine device to have, plus custom ROM is almost surely going to be released anytime soon, thanks to the hardworking devs
I'm looking to buy 8.4 inch tablet. From what I read, both are very good tablet. The difference of price here is about 70 AUD.
I don't really care about AMOLED vs LCD- both are fine.
I'll most probably run it on custom ROM. Tab Pro already has official CM support and established community. I'm not sure about Tab S, it's is too early to tell at this stage. I also notice Tab S is slightly thinner and lighter. Tab S runs on 3GB ram compared to 2GB of Tab Pro.
Probably you guys can give an opinion whether the price difference is worth it. Is there any other factor that makes one better than the other?
You have pretty much listed the differences, so it's just a matter of if you wish to save the $70.
Fingerprint scanner, thinner, lighter, AMOLED screen, extra Gb of Ram are the main differences.
If you plan to consume media, like watch TV/Movies/YouTube etc than the AMOLED screen is likely better for battery life, but if you mainly surf the web, than the LCD screen uses less battery.
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
The Tab S is currently getting a user made Exynos 5 version of CM11.
Good luck with you decision.
Freakstyler said:
You have pretty much listed the differences, so it's just a matter of if you wish to save the $70.
Fingerprint scanner, thinner, lighter, AMOLED screen, extra Gb of Ram are the main differences.
If you plan to consume media, like watch TV/Movies/YouTube etc than the AMOLED screen is likely better for battery life, but if you mainly surf the web, than the LCD screen uses less battery.
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
The Tab S is currently getting a user made Exynos 5 version of CM11.
Good luck with you decision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one can I make phone calls from the tablet itself? I know I will need the 4G version. But I heard a rumor that one of these you can use as an actual cell phone without sidesync
both got LTE version and can make call... how do i know? i owned both.
edan1979 said:
both got LTE version and can make call... how do i know? i owned both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if both have 1x antenna since United states (where I am) uses 1x to make voice calls. This is good info I will do more research.
Freakstyler said:
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know how can I tell the difference (before I buy) between those two version? Do they have different version code? All I know is the one officially supported is the WiFi version
Does the Tab S 8.4 suffer from the same wifi singal issue as the Pro 8.4? If you hold the bottom left of tablet in portrait mode or bottom right in landscape mode, wifi signal drops down very low and may even disconnect.
I just got a Tab Pro 8.4 and it does this, there is a thread in that forum where many others have the same exact issues. If Tab S solves this problem that along may make it worth it.
Raistlin1 said:
Does the Tab S 8.4 suffer from the same wifi singal issue as the Pro 8.4? If you hold the bottom left of tablet in portrait mode or bottom right in landscape mode, wifi signal drops down very low and may even disconnect.
I just got a Tab Pro 8.4 and it does this, there is a thread in that forum where many others have the same exact issues. If Tab S solves this problem that along may make it worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the pro 8.4 for a short while and I can confirm that the tab s 8.4 does not suffer with the same wifi problem. They have relocated the wifi antennae to a different part of the tab s.
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
to me its simple. if i were a person that gets a new tablet every 6 months to 1 year then i get the whatever but if i am a person that is closer to 2+ years then i get the best i can afford at the time.
fletch33 said:
to me its simple. if i were a person that gets a new tablet every 6 months to 1 year then i get the whatever but if i am a person that is closer to 2+ years then i get the best i can afford at the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Only LTE version of tab pro has the qualcomm SOC.
Orphee said:
Only LTE version of tab pro has the qualcomm SOC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the non lte version of tab pro and mine had qualcomm soc.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree and that is why i said "best i can afford" not most expensive.
i own the 10.1 Pro and 10.5 S because i bought the Pro when it came out and then m,ade the mistake of playing around with the Tab S. not surfe about the 8.4 but the overall feel, smoothness of OS, (big one here) USB port on side and not bottom, and 3GB ram made it a no brainer to move up to S and glad i did. so with 10.1 to 10.5 i dont regret the extra cash at all.
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does T705 (LTE version of tab s 8.4) have qualcom soc?
device info (samsung tab s 8.4 T705)
CCJ22 said:
Does T705 (LTE version of tab s 8.4) have qualcom soc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this are the following info of my tab s 8.4 lte (T705)
Device information for samsung (SM-T705)
GENERAL INFORMATION
MANUFACTURER
samsung
MODEL
SM-T705
IMEI NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PRODUCT
klimtltexx
HARDWARE INFORMATION
BOARD
universal5420
HARDWARE
universal5420
CPU_ABI
armeabi-v7a
CPU_ABI2
armeabi
ADVANCED CPU INFO
abi: armeabi-v7a
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l)
processor : 0
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 1
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 2
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 3
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x2
CPU part : 0xc0f
CPU revision : 3
Hardware : UNIVERSAL5420
Revision : 000a
Serial : 8c0f11b13204db12
STORAGE
External storage : 3,409MB / 11,834MB
OTHER INFO
Finger print : samsung/klimtltexx/klimtlte:4.4.2/KOT49H/T705XXU1ANF8:user/release-keys
Host : SWDD5909
Tags : release-keys
SOFTWARE INFORMATION
ANDROID VERSION NAME
KITKAT
ANDROID VERSION CODE
4.4.2
API LEVEL
19
BOOTLOADER
T705XXU1ANF8
ID
KOT49H
BUILD NUMBER
KOT49H.T705XXU1ANF8
NO OF INSTALLED APPS
355
NETWORK INFORMATION
NETWORK OPERATOR
I TIM
SIM OPERATOR
NETWORK TYPE
LTE
PHONE NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxx
SIM SERIAL NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DISPLAY INFORMATION
SCREEN CLASS
X Large
SCREEN HEIGHT
2560 pixels
SCREEN WIDTH
1600 pixels
RESOLUTION
2560 * 1600
DENSITY CLASS
XHDPI
DENSITY (DPI)
320 dpi
BATTERY INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
Li-ion
VOLTAGE
3755
TEMPERATURE
35° c
HEALTH
Good
CHARGING STATUS
Discharging
LAST CHARGING SOURCE
Usb
LEVEL
64
SENSORS INFORMATION
SENSORS
BMI055 Accelerometer Sensor
Type: TYPE_ACCELEROMETER
Vendor: Bosch Sensortec
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 0.25
BMI055 Gyroscope Sensor
Type: TYPE_GYROSCOPE
Vendor: Bosch Sensortec
Version: 1
Resolution: 2.663161E-4
Max Range: 8.726646
Power: 6.1
AK09911C Magnetic field Sensor
Type: TYPE_MAGNETIC_FIELD
Vendor: Asahi Kasei Microdevices
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.06
Max Range: 2000.0
Power: 6.0
AK09911C Uncalibrated Magnetic field Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Asahi Kasei Microdevices
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.06
Max Range: 2000.0
Power: 6.0
TMD3782 Proximity Sensor
Type: TYPE_PROXIMITY
Vendor: AMS, Inc.
Version: 1
Resolution: 8.0
Max Range: 8.0
Power: 0.75
TMD3782 Light Sensor
Type: TYPE_LIGHT
Vendor: AMS, Inc.
Version: 1
Resolution: 1.0
Max Range: 65535.0
Power: 0.75
SX9500 Grip Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: SEMTECH
Version: 1
Resolution: 5.0
Max Range: 5.0
Power: 0.75
Screen Orientation Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 2
Resolution: 0.0
Max Range: 255.0
Power: 0.0
Rotation Vector Sensor
Type: TYPE_ROTATION_VECTOR
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 5.9604645E-8
Max Range: 1.0
Power: 12.35
Gravity Sensor
Type: TYPE_GRAVITY
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 12.35
Linear Acceleration Sensor
Type: TYPE_LINEAR_ACCELERATION
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 12.35
Game Rotation Vector Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 3
Resolution: 5.9604645E-8
Max Range: 1.0
Power: 6.35
Uncalibrated Gyroscope Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 1
Resolution: 2.663161E-4
Max Range: 8.726646
Power: 12.35
Orientation Sensor
Type: TYPE_ORIENTATION
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.00390625
Max Range: 360.0
Power: 12.35
Ah so ARMv7 / Exynos
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as for the support and my own development... yeah i love tab pro... lots of dev for it... in term of that device in general... it worth the money pay... it dont have that much different from tab s... and tab s... well this one... i got LTE exynos version but the screen blow me up since i miss my good old superamoled 7.7. sooner or later someone will take challenge to port cm or whatever to it... since i am more tw person so i dont really care... but tab s do feel better at hand... and i mostly bringing tab s with me.
Can anyone make cyanogenmod for ZTE V880H ? Same HW for other two ZTE phones
*ZTE V880H
*ZTE V965
*ZTE U819
Latest Stock roms:
ZTE V880H
(Latest build 2014-08-06) Android 4.2.1 DIS-IND-TB18D-P188F03V1.0.0
ZTE V965
(Older 2013-04-09)Android 4.2.1
ZTE U819
(Oldest 2014-01-26)Android 4.1 U819V1.0.0B04
H/W configuration:
Soc: Mediatek MT6589
processor: Quad core 1.2 Ghz
Display: IPS 4.5“ FWVGA(480*854), 16M color
camera: 5MP AF CMOS(RAW/YUV) & 0.3M FF(Front)
RAM: 512MB
Internal Memory: 4GB
Battery: 2000 MAh
I think One cyanogenmod for ZTE V880H can be used in other two models.
V880H is popular model in India and Russia.
V965 & U819 are popular model in China.
I just have this new phone and I really love it, but it comes with Android 4.2.2 (not compatible with the notifications from my Fitbit Charge HR) and also the new app versions.
I have found some opensource things in the Sharp Developers page (In Japanese)
I just want to get at least Lollipop in this beast, see specs below:
Dimensions: 70 x 132 x 9.9 mm, Weight: 147 g
SoC: Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974AA
CPU: Krait 400, 2200 MHz
GPU: Qualcomm Adreno 330, 450 MHz
RAM: 2 GB, 800 MHz
Storage: 32 GB
Display: 5.2 in, S-CG-Silicon LCD, 1080 x 1920 pixels, 24 bit
Battery: 2600 mAh, Li-Ion
OS: Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean.
Sharp Aquos Xx 302SH is also known as Sharp W-072.
Somebody can help root, mod, unlock, and unleash the potential of this phone? as I said, Im willing to donate to pay the invested time!
I also have read about some sellers of this phone who have unlocked the LTE bands, is that possible? maybe QSPT?
Thanks in advance!!!
(A member since the Cingular HTC's)
I also hope there is a great developer who makes costum rom for this phone. Thank you in advance.
I hope so...
I'm Indonesian
Hello
Samsung Galaxy S9 G960X
Model: G960X Live Demo Unit
Compatible variant: G960F
Android: 8.0.0 Oreo
Display: Super AMOLED 5.8 "
Battery: 3,000 mAh
Processor: Exynos 9810
Ram memory: 4 GB
Storage: 64 GB
Rear Camera: 12 MP, F / 1.5
Front Camera: 8mpx F / 1.6
Iris scanner: Yes
fingerprint reader: Yes
Facial recognition: Yes
Calls: No
Bixby: No
Samsung account: No
Recovery & Root: Yes
Unlock OEM: Yes ...?
Solution: Changing Plate
:good:
SebastianSNRLYT said:
Hello
Samsung Galaxy S9 G960X
Model: G960X Live Demo Unit
Compatible variant: G960F
Android: 8.0.0 Oreo
Display: Super AMOLED 5.8 "
Battery: 3,000 mAh
Processor: Exynos 9810
Ram memory: 4 GB
Storage: 64 GB
Rear Camera: 12 MP, F / 1.5
Front Camera: 8mpx F / 1.6
Iris scanner: Yes
fingerprint reader: Yes
Facial recognition: Yes
Calls: No
Bixby: No
Samsung account: No
Recovery & Root: Yes
Unlock OEM: Yes ...?
Solution: Changing Plate
:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do u mean by changing plate?
HEY i have Samsung Galaxy S9 G960X Live Demo and i flashed this Firmware SM-G960F (OS VERSION 9 )
https://cdn3.imggmi.com/uploads/2019/3/7/569e0f4498a5feecfc363fe870ddcb9c-full.jpg
it's flashed successfully but now i'm stuck on samsung logo
any help please ?
SebastianSNRLYT said:
Hello
Samsung Galaxy S9 G960X
Model: G960X Live Demo Unit
Compatible variant: G960F
Android: 8.0.0 Oreo
Display: Super AMOLED 5.8 "
Battery: 3,000 mAh
Processor: Exynos 9810
Ram memory: 4 GB
Storage: 64 GB
Rear Camera: 12 MP, F / 1.5
Front Camera: 8mpx F / 1.6
Iris scanner: Yes
fingerprint reader: Yes
Facial recognition: Yes
Calls: No
Bixby: No
Samsung account: No
Recovery & Root: Yes
Unlock OEM: Yes ...?
Solution: Changing Plate
:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you explain further the "changing plate" solution.
Thanks.
teh S9 demo units we had were 100% operational including cellular. I was shocked to find that out, but it is true. Im not sure if Samsung was relying on the knowledge that previous demo units were unable to make calls on their own or what, but the S9s and Note 9s we got at our entire regions retail stores were all live and 100% functional. I worked for a retail store based out of bentonville, ar that specialized in wholesale and mass quantities items. The kind of place where if you want to buy a box of kleenex, you have to buy 37 others with it. (hint: its not walmart)