Question Source Code - Google Pixel 6 Pro

When do you think Google will release source for 6 Pro kernel and binary blobs? Eager too see which developers support this phone. Hoping to see Proton AOSP ROM.

@Nekromantik
I've changed the prefix of your thread from "Development" to "Question" as the thread didn't qualify for the first one. Please do not change it back and review the in the forum sticked guidances prior to your next posting. Thanks for your cooperation.
Regards
Oswald Boelcke
Senior Moderator

Nekromantik said:
When do you think Google will release source for 6 Pro kernel and binary blobs? Eager too see which developers support this phone. Hoping to see Proton AOSP ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Factory images usually come 2-5 days after people start receiving their phones. Source is usually a week or so. But it's Google, anything is possible. They still can't sell a phone online correctly.

Yeh, hopefully soon... like tomorrow!

Related

HTC 2.6.32 kernel source?

Ok so in all the leak excitement going around I missed this. Was the official 2.6.32 kernel source released by HTC or do we in some way have this source?
Q&A is over there ----------->
And no, the source has not been released. They, legally, have 30 days after OFFICIAL release of the software to open source it.
cosine83 said:
Q&A is over there ----------->
And no, the source has not been released. They, legally, have 30 days after OFFICIAL release of the software to open source it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I knew somebody was going to say something about Q&A. This is a dev question therefore it belongs in the dev forums. Besides,
<------------------------ Douchebags over there
I think legally it's supposed to be released immediately. The GPL says nothing about 30 days
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
cosine83 said:
And no, the source has not been released. They, legally, have 30 days after OFFICIAL release of the software to open source it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone else who's never actually read the GPL.
lol Guys, let's just ignore the GPL. HTC does. I'm serious. There's no sense in arguing over the GPL because it doesn't matter to HTC. My question was answered. I saw some FroYo kernels for Sense 2.2 and was just wondering if it was 2.6.29 or 2.6.32. Question answered. Thread over. Thanks again.
chuckhriczko said:
lol Guys, let's just ignore the GPL. HTC does. I'm serious. There's no sense in arguing over the GPL because it doesn't matter to HTC. My question was answered. I saw some FroYo kernels for Sense 2.2 and was just wondering if it was 2.6.29 or 2.6.32. Question answered. Thread over. Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought those roms weren't using the right kernal source (hence 3mp camera, etc).
DanBergundy said:
I thought those roms weren't using the right kernal source (hence 3mp camera, etc).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are using an older leaked kernel. The latest OTA officially isn't out yet (which you already know) and that means the latest kernel and it's source is yet to be released. Once the New official OTA Froyo comes out, the newer kernel source will come after that, and then they will have everything working 100%. Now, they may get everything working beforehand, but I'm just saying at the very latest that is when everything will be working.
I already emailed HTC about releasing the source by the way. Here's the response:
Thank you for taking the time to contact us in regards to the source code for the newest update to the Evo 4G. Although the update is not officially available until August 3rd, HTC will typically publish on developer.htc.com the Kernel open source code for recently released devices and software as soon as possible. HTC will normally publish this within 90 to 120 days. This time frame is within the requirements of the open source community. Thank you for your patience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know where this "requirements of the open source community" comes from though.
saipoob said:
I already emailed HTC about releasing the source by the way. Here's the response:
I don't know where this "requirements of the open source community" comes from though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means before the open source community gets too pissy. So long as they release within that timeframe, any legal action would it be pursued immediately after release of the build without source wouldn't have gotten anywhere before any issues were entirely mitigated by the release of the source.
chuckhriczko said:
Ok so in all the leak excitement going around I missed this. Was the official 2.6.32 kernel source released by HTC or do we in some way have this source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like a question...is phrased like a question...Hell, it even has punctuation like a question. I'm going with a question that should be in Q&A.
kyleblakepeters said:
Looks like a question...is phrased like a question...Hell, it even has punctuation like a question. I'm going with a question that should be in Q&A.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ This ^
Whether or not the question has to do with the development or not, it's still a question... Now, if the question has to do with something specific IN the Development forum, then it belongs in that specific thread, NOT in a new post.
If you were posting a link or actual source for this, then it would be development material. But there is no material, no link, no anything, it's just a question.
This forum is for developers to post roms, source codes, modifications and other things of that nature.
The Q&A Forum is basically for ANY AND ALL questions that do not pertain to a specific thread already listed here.
It's not rocket science.
Unknownforce said:
^ This ^
Whether or not the question has to do with the development or not, it's still a question... Now, if the question has to do with something specific IN the Development forum, then it belongs in that specific thread, NOT in a new post.
If you were posting a link or actual source for this, then it would be development material. But there is no material, no link, no anything, it's just a question.
This forum is for developers to post roms, source codes, modifications and other things of that nature.
The Q&A Forum is basically for ANY AND ALL questions that do not pertain to a specific thread already listed here.
It's not rocket science.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone is earning his junior moderator badge!!!!!!!
Yall do realize that all this bashing just makes u look like pricks who cares where its posted that's not our job now please everybody go back to yalls jobs and let's the mods do there's please....
bcnice20 said:
Yall do realize that all this bashing just makes u look like pricks who cares where its posted that's not our job now please everybody go back to yalls jobs and let's the mods do there's please....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saying "yalls" makes you look stupid. Just saying.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
DanBergundy said:
Saying "yalls" makes you look stupid. Just saying.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes because "y'all" isnt common vernacular anywhere in the world, right??
Negrito said:
yes because "y'all" isnt common vernacular anywhere in the world, right??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is murder. Must be okay.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
yes, murder is in most english speaking vernacular. I fail to see your point.
Maybe we should make a new section for the threads like this. I'm voting for "Mindless Bickering" as the new thread name!! ;-P OK please don't flame me no offense to anybody i've been up for 30 hours and am all wigged out on coffee and reases peanut butter cups ..... cracking myself up ....
Can everyone just shut up and move on? Please? Quit bumping this thread up with your stupidity.
That includes you.

[Q] Best way to advertise custom forks of a kernel

I am developing some enhancements against another Linux Kernel that is already on the forums. The Kernel itself doesn't seem to have a dedicated thread as it's normally distributed as part of a specific ROM. I believe most of my enhancements would be useful to other users of this ROM, but I am having difficulty getting in touch with the developer. I'm not interested in maintaining a complete fork with my own branding and name, but if I publish anything without the developers consent I would like to make it somewhat obvious that it's not the official kernel by the developer. I'm not sure the best way to advertise it though. I could create a new thread for the kernel in the same forum as the ROM and mention in the title it's a fork of the Ursa Minor kernel, or I could just post my update.zip for the kernel in the Andromeda3 thread which is the ROM it goes with. Should I first post a question on their thread about their wishes?
Since I tend to use North Winds as my organization, I've been prefixing nw1 onto version strings where appropriate, but keeping the branding as Ursa Minor in general since it's still 95% the same.
I'm not 100% sure of what your asking? You want to branch off a current developers kernel with your own modifications?
have you tried PMing the dev to ask if they're ok with it?
Basically, I'm curious what the best way to be respectful and publish my enhanced version of his kernel. I have sent the developer several PMs, but the last response I got was on the 13th when I was having trouble building his kernel. Three days later I published my first enhancement in source code form on github.com and sent another PM to the dev. Now I've added several more enhancements and I'd like to publish it, but I haven't seen any response from the dev since my help request on the 13th.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Well it appears that since kernels are covered under the GPL, you are free to publish your work as long as you credit the original developer in your post. So feel free to post a new thread with your work
Hope that helps

What do you members of XDA miss on XDA?

Hi all members of XDA,
whilst we as RC's do our very best to keep XDA as organized as possible by giving you all kind of solutions, like the Q&A/T Template project, the Index project and the Ask Away help project etc etc, these were all RC initiated projects. Although all of these projects were started with the best intentions, I realize now that we never asked what you as users wanted to keep XDA organized. By starting this thread, I want to ask you all, members of XDA, to ventilate your opinions what's missing on XDA and what you really want to accomplish your needs. I could start a poll for that, but I do not feel the need for that at this very moment. I always can start a poll after most wanted needs posted, but for now I only want to know what's living in our community and what is needed in your opinions that is missing at this very moment. Really hope that you will react on this post as much as possible, so I can see what you really need/miss . All reactions will be answered by me (or, hopefully, fellow RC's) and, based on your reactions, I will start a new thread regarding your wishes, based on the most mentioned issue. If there are more important issues, there will be started of course more threads to cope with these "issues".
Everbody, from junior member, member, senior member and also RC's/RD's, are invited to react.
kindest regards and hoping for a lot of reactions, kuzibri
Hi Kuzibri, nice initiative.
This is only minor but every time I log in I have to scroll right down to the bottom to change the theme to XDA 2013.
Does anyone else find this annoying? I'd rather the option be up top somewhere.
Secondly I think the q&a templates a good idea but no one makes them anymore. The ones that we do have get used and divert thousands of questions from dev threads. The only reason the project died is because the admins implemented an auto generated q&a bot thread to all threads in development sections. Meaning that when someone with less than 10 posts replied to a dev thread, his post got moved to a newly created q&a thread with no OP. That was a bad idea IMO, it led to a lot of useless threads being auto generated. Only humans should create threads.
But since devdb have a q&a thread link, maybe we should utilise it again and make it useful for everyone by actually opening and maintaining these q&a threads with faq's and stuff.
Art Vanderlay said:
Hi Kuzibri, nice initiative.
This is only minor but every time I log in I have to scroll right down to the bottom to change the theme to XDA 2013.
Does anyone else find this annoying? I'd rather the option be up top somewhere.
Secondly I think the q&a templates a good idea but no one makes them anymore. The ones that we do have get used and divert thousands of questions from dev threads. The only reason the project died is because the admins implemented an auto generated q&a bot thread to all threads in development sections. Meaning that when someone with less than 10 posts replied to a dev thread, his post got moved to a newly created q&a thread with no OP. That was a bad idea IMO, it led to a lot of useless threads being auto generated. Only humans should create threads.
But since devdb have a q&a thread link, maybe we should utilise it again and make it useful for everyone by actually opening and maintaining these q&a threads with faq's and stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Art,
Which XDA theme are you using now? I use XDA 2013 beta - 1024.
Regarding the q&a bot threads, I already had many discussions with higher ranked people, like @svetius, regarding the fact that these bot's had no OP, but never got a satisfied answer, also not what you are suggesting now, so IMHO this is a dead end street, unfortunately. I fully agree with you that only humans can start a thread, but I'm afraid that we cannot change that anymore on the bot threads. Although well intended in the beginning, they became indeed a real disaster, which led to the unfortunate end/death of real the Q&A/T Template project, of which I still think that it's a very important addition to XDA. :crying:
kindest regards, kuzibri
kuzibri said:
Hi Art,
Which XDA theme are you using now? I use XDA 2013 beta - 1024.
Regarding the q&a bot threads, I already had many discussions with higher ranked people, like @svetius, regarding the fact that these bot's had no OP, but never got a satisfied answer, also not what you are suggesting now, so IMHO this is a dead end street, unfortunately. I fully agree with you that only humans can start a thread, but I'm afraid that we cannot change that anymore on the bot threads. Although well intended in the beginning, they became indeed a real disaster, which led to the unfortunate end/death of real the Q&A/T Template project, of which I still think that it's a very important addition to XDA. :crying:
kindest regards, kuzibri
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using XDA 2013 beta.
About the q&a bot threads, what we can do is take ownership of the existing ones and add an OP and other important details to make them worthwhile.
@xanthrax took over one of the bot threads and did a really good job with it http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/help/qa-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-bacon-10-28-t2923210
If a human made q&a thread exists for a ROM then maybe the admins can bring back the feature that moves the under 10 posters there whenever they reply to dev thread.
Or at least give devs that option if they want it.
Art Vanderlay said:
I'm using XDA 2013 beta.
About the q&a bot threads, what we can do is take ownership of the existing ones and add an OP and other important details to make them worthwhile.
@xanthrax took over one of the bot threads and did a really good job with it http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/help/qa-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-bacon-10-28-t2923210
If a human made q&a thread exists for a ROM then maybe the admins can bring back the feature that moves the under 10 posters there whenever they reply to dev thread.
Or at least give devs that option so they want it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will have a thorough look into that, cause I still think that the Q&A/T template thread is a very good way to organize XDA.
kindest regards, kuzbri
Delete
Art Vanderlay said:
Delete
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi my friend,
send a PM to @svetius, with BCC to you, about the Bot Threads and giving them a "face".
kindest regards, kuzibri
kuzibri said:
Hi my friend,
send a PM to @svetius, with BCC to you, about the Bot Threads and giving them a "face".
kindest regards, kuzibri
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no new bot threads have been created for months
Sent from my KFFOWI using XDA Labs
sd_shadow said:
no new bot threads have been created for months
Sent from my KFFOWI using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know my friend and most of them are useless and senseless. That's why I think we should restart the Q&A/T project. I know we have to approach dev's to join this project, but when we are able to convince, certainly the dev's linked to devdb, that this is a dead end street, we stand a good chance. Only restriction IMO is the willingness of other RC's help to restart this project again. Will you join Art and me? IMO this is the only way to prove that it was not a good idea by XDA to start these bot threads with no personal OP. I'm still willing to create a lot of Q&A/T threads as possible when we can dev's prove that this is the way to keep their original dev thread as clean as possible and XDA as organized as possible.
kindest regards, kuzibri
Q&A/T Template project
Hi,
already send a PM to a non-devdb related dev to join our Q&A/T project. Let's see what happens:fingers-crossed:.
kindest regards, kuzibri
Art Vanderlay said:
I'm using XDA 2013 beta.
About the q&a bot threads, what we can do is take ownership of the existing ones and add an OP and other important details to make them worthwhile.
@xanthrax took over one of the bot threads and did a really good job with it http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/help/qa-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-bacon-10-28-t2923210
If a human made q&a thread exists for a ROM then maybe the admins can bring back the feature that moves the under 10 posters there whenever they reply to dev thread.
Or at least give devs that option if they want it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly sure the limitation of no posting in dev threads for members with under 10 posts has been lifted. That's why no new Bot threads, and I don't think devDB threads can restrict their posting anymore either. Again, that's why no new Bot threads.
I think.
Darth said:
I'm fairly sure the limitation of no posting in dev threads for members with under 10 posts has been lifted. That's why no new Bot threads, and I don't think devDB threads can restrict their posting anymore either. Again, that's why no new Bot threads.
I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
about a month ago or so, I saw posts from under 10 members, saying other wise
Sent from my XT1080 using XDA Labs
sd_shadow said:
about a month ago or so, I saw posts from under 10 members, saying other wise
Sent from my XT1080 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... I could be mistaken.
Darth said:
Hmm... I could be mistaken.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you are right.
Svetius explained it to me via PM.
Trafalgar Square said:
No, you are right.
Svetius explained it to me via PM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has the 10 post rule been scrapped?
Art Vanderlay said:
Has the 10 post rule been scrapped?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure about this but DevDB Q&A bots are gone.
Art Vanderlay said:
Has the 10 post rule been scrapped?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
I've been a member of XDA since January of 2008, before 99% of the moderators had even heard of it, and before Android was released. Since then, the community has literally tumbled down to such a disappointing low. There's absolutely no incentive for developers to stick around anymore, and some of the members show such blatant disrespect for those who try to help them. Absolutely no one tries to learn how to do something as simple as learning how to use ADB. Another gripe I have with XDA is titles such as Recognized Contributor. Requiring a minimum post amount is quite a poor metric for contributions to the community. We should be judged based on content rather than quantity of low-quality/redundant posts.
For example, I applied for Recognized Contributor just because, with no real intention of actually getting it, after releasing a bootloader unlock for three Samsung devices along with another well-recognized and skilled developer, in addition to supporting the users who chose to utilize it. Before that, 95% of my posts are simply assisting members with accurate/relevant information or explaining various aspects of Android and hardware. I was denied because of post count.
This community used to be about learning and teaching, but the attitude and general reception of that ideology is long since past. The general attitude now is to self-serve and receive instant gratification. Look at people like Dan Rosenberg @djrbliss and ask them why they left. Incredibly talented developers and researchers used to thrive in this community and now are expected to spoon-feed everyone. There has definitely been a paradigm shift and it's definitely sad to see. I miss the early days of Android and even back when this site was dedicated to WM5/6 on XDA devices. Competent users no longer contribute to this community and I really don't blame them. It's all about scripts and one-click tools and completely missing the point of XDA-DEVELOPERS
I know @Surge1223 would echo this sentiment, but to be honest, I highly doubt any change in the foreseeable future. In a couple years, I envision XDA as a wasteland of Root Bounty threads and people complaining about Xposed not working.
ryanbg said:
I've been a member of XDA since January of 2008, before 99% of the moderators had even heard of it, and before Android was released. Since then, the community has literally tumbled down to such a disappointing low. There's absolutely no incentive for developers to stick around anymore, and some of the members show such blatant disrespect for those who try to help them. Absolutely no one tries to learn how to do something as simple as learning how to use ADB. Another gripe I have with XDA is titles such as Recognized Contributor. Requiring a minimum post amount is quite a poor metric for contributions to the community. We should be judged based on content rather than quantity of low-quality/redundant posts.
For example, I applied for Recognized Contributor just because, after releasing a bootloader unlock for three Samsung devices along with another well-recognized and skilled developer, in addition to supporting the users who chose to utilize it. Before that, 95% of my posts are simply assisting members with accurate/relevant information or explaining various aspects of Android and hardware. I was denied because of post count.
This community used to be about learning and teaching, but the attitude and general reception of that ideology is long since past. The general attitude now is to self-serve and receive instant gratification. Look at people like Dan Rosenberg @djrbliss and ask them why they left. Incredibly talented developers and researchers used to thrive in this community and now are expected to spoon-feed everyone. There has definitely been a paradigm shift and it's definitely sad to see. I miss the early days of Android and even back when this site was dedicated to WM5/6 on XDA devices. Competent users no longer contribute to this community and I really don't blame them. It's all about scripts and one-click tools and completely missing the point of XDA-DEVELOPERS
I know @Surge1223 would echo this sentiment, but to be honest, I doubt I see any change every coming at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with this 100 percent. Also IMHO the post rule should be raised to 100 posts before posts in development. If they can contribute have them message the OP and if the OP thinks they can contribute then lift the limit for said user on said thread. I cannot tell you how many threads I just don't even bother reading after seeing a couple posts than are just as easily answered by googling questions.
Often even new R&D threads are just placeholders where people hope a "dev" will come chime in and then they can piggy back off of that. The whole culture has changed and its horrible and sad to see this. Also there is very little structure or general polling of those that drive the ideas and development this site thrives on. I definitely get the feeling the site is moving more towards generating traffic and less towards being a content driven site.
Sadly I think a lot of people are on board with the change.
ryanbg said:
I've been a member of XDA since January of 2008, before 99% of the moderators had even heard of it, and before Android was released. Since then, the community has literally tumbled down to such a disappointing low. There's absolutely no incentive for developers to stick around anymore, and some of the members show such blatant disrespect for those who try to help them. Absolutely no one tries to learn how to do something as simple as learning how to use ADB. Another gripe I have with XDA is titles such as Recognized Contributor. Requiring a minimum post amount is quite a poor metric for contributions to the community. We should be judged based on content rather than quantity of low-quality/redundant posts.
For example, I applied for Recognized Contributor just because, after releasing a bootloader unlock for three Samsung devices along with another well-recognized and skilled developer, in addition to supporting the users who chose to utilize it. Before that, 95% of my posts are simply assisting members with accurate/relevant information or explaining various aspects of Android and hardware. I was denied because of post count.
This community used to be about learning and teaching, but the attitude and general reception of that ideology is long since past. The general attitude now is to self-serve and receive instant gratification. Look at people like Dan Rosenberg @djrbliss and ask them why they left. Incredibly talented developers and researchers used to thrive in this community and now are expected to spoon-feed everyone. There has definitely been a paradigm shift and it's definitely sad to see. I miss the early days of Android and even back when this site was dedicated to WM5/6 on XDA devices. Competent users no longer contribute to this community and I really don't blame them. It's all about scripts and one-click tools and completely missing the point of XDA-DEVELOPERS
I know @Surge1223 would echo this sentiment, but to be honest, I doubt I see any change every coming at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I understand your disappointment and frustration. Since we both joined XDA in 2008, XDA has grown to such a very large community that it needs very clear rules to be maintaned/managed as best as possible. Therefore it is for XDA not possible anymore to keep every member satisfied. Of course a lot has changed, sometimes leading to better results and sometimes not, but that's the reality. Besides that, the amount of different devices has grown enourmously, making the work of Mods, Admins and even higher not easier. I still see and know a lot of competent users who are willing to contribute to this community. I also know a lot of Mods and Admins with the best intentions to make XDA better. In summary: the purpose of this thread is to get/receive new ideas how to make XDA better organized in the future and/or add features to XDA that are now missing. That's my mission.
kindest regards, kuzibri

No development ????

Even after samsung released kernel sources still no development started yet
Thank you for that important message. We have not known that.
What a great contribution to the community
Wait for them to start or plan to start the development by yourself.
I reported your post for your rude behaviour

Been looking for the most stable rom [OP5T]

Hi, First of all I'm new to this forum, so i'm not fully known to the rules.
also, if this thread Q is not in the right place please don't go with the bananas on me and move it to the right place. thank you.
I'm here because OnePlus stopped supporting my device and ruined it on the latest OxygenOS version.
I decided its the right time to install a custom rom on my OP5T,
What is the most stable Custom ROM available for OnePlus 5T for daily use? In terms of battery, performance, stability. I don't need anything else.
since the last time I installed a custom rom was more than 3 years ago, I would like to get some information too.
thank you
I like Pixel Extendend
Great battery life
Adir2016 said:
...if this thread Q is not in the right place please don't go with the bananas on me and move it to the right place. thank you.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Adir2016 Your thread was indeed at the wrong location, and it was reported due to the fact that your thread didn't qualify for the development section. I suggest to review the Oneplus device forum rules and the XDA Forum Rules to avoid such issues in future. I've not only moved your thread to the Q&A section but also removed your second post. According to the last bullet of rule no. 5 of the XDA Forum Rules you can bump an unanswered question once every 24 hours but not within two.
I hope you'll find soon what you're looking for.
Stay safe and stay healthy!
Regards
Oswald Boelcke
Forum Moderator
Oswald Boelcke said:
@Adir2016 Your thread was indeed at the wrong location, and it was reported due to the fact that your thread didn't qualify for the development section. I suggest to review the Oneplus device forum rules and the XDA Forum Rules to avoid such issues in future. I've not only moved your thread to the Q&A section but also removed your second post. According to the last bullet of rule no. 5 of the XDA Forum Rules you can bump an unanswered question once every 24 hours but not within two.
I hope you'll find soon what you're looking for.
Stay safe and stay healthy!
Regards
Oswald Boelcke
Forum Moderator
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you.
can you help me with my question about what stable custom roms available for my phone?
exofly said:
I like Pixel Extendend
Great battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, is it stable enough for daily usage? what battery time you get on daily basis? and is it a stable build or nightly? thank you
Adir2016 said:
thank you.
can you help me with my question about what stable custom roms available for my phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Negative, I apologise. I don't own a Oneplus and never have. Just be patient for others to chime in. Please remember XDA is read all over the world, and the members who could assist might currently be sleeping.
Oswald Boelcke said:
Negative, I apologise. I don't own a Oneplus and never have. Just be patient for others to chime in. Please remember XDA is read all over the world, and the members who could assist might currently be sleeping.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you
Adir2016 said:
Hi, is it stable enough for daily usage? what battery time you get on daily basis? and is it a stable build or nightly? thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 weeks since i install.
Absolutely stable, no crash or suddenly restart. Average battery time is 1 day and half (flight mode during the night) with 5h of screen (i usually play games for 1h more or less)
I would love to get some more recommendations for recommended roms, is LineageOS stable enough for everyday us?
Official Lineage 17 is very stable and frequently updated. If you choose to install any Android 10 Rom you can't go wrong depending stability but keep in mind that some of them are or might be soon eol. Resurrection remix or crdroid 6 are very stable and still get regular updates. I recently tried crdroid 7.1 and MSM xtended (both Android 11) and stayed with crdroid. Both are very stable and can absolutely be used as daily drivers.
One factor of stability is the gapps package as well. Had some problems with opengapps under Android 11. Switched to nikgapps
bussi1805 said:
One factor of stability is the gapps package as well. Had some problems with opengapps under Android 11. Switched to nikgapps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Back in the day, about 3 years ago, I could not trust a single custom rom that would give me the "day to day" stability and I eventually I returned to the original rom.
I always did as well. The custom ROMs were ok but I always missed some things that made oxygen os special like the great gesture navigation for example. Back in that time we got regular updates tho. At least in open beta....
bussi1805 said:
I always did as well. The custom ROMs were ok but I always missed some things that made oxygen os special like the great gesture navigation for example. Back in that time we got regular updates tho. At least in open beta....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a stable build from lineageOS? or better roms you recommend that is stable.
I do like to get some help
Adir2016 said:
I do like to get some help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Try out Arrow OS. It's the most stable Android 11 Rom for now. Tested 5 or 6 diff. 11 Roms and this was my favourite.
I build OTA updater and nearly every day a new build.
2. If you like a really rich featured Rom, take Derfest. It's my favourite regarding features and stability. Nice and helpful people there in the community as well.
A question from my side...
I'm looking for a 11 Rom with working "Android Auto". Seems to be a problem finding one. Tested only Arrows in that case for now, but without success. Anybody with experience here?

Categories

Resources