Related
Seriously! Who is the brainiac behind this? I'd like to know... Main forum page has nice new banner on top. GREAT! but when you have drop down boxes like SEARCH, than UNFOLD you do not COVER them with a banner!
Doesn't anyone TEST stuff when they put it on the site? Do you just copy paste a banner URL and job is done?
Just block them. I block as many adds as I can because my bandwidth sux. The page still comes up good afterwards.
why not just have the banner above the menu bar? is it that hard?
I don't want to block banners, it's a flash banner anyway. I don't even mind one banner. What I do mind is the fact that whoever put this there is clearly not doing their job right. FIX IT!
I love how I can post a complaint here but no mods a. answer, b. do anything about it. Great job, just great.
joannaex said:
Seriously! Who is the brainiac behind this? I'd like to know... Main forum page has nice new banner on top. GREAT! but when you have drop down boxes like SEARCH, than UNFOLD you do not COVER them with a banner!
Doesn't anyone TEST stuff when they put it on the site? Do you just copy paste a banner URL and job is done?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's a problem on your end because my menus and such (Quick Links and Search) open up OVER the banner, not under it... What browser are you using? I'm using Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista.
Here on Server 2003 and FF some banners are under, some are over.
Indeed. There doesn't seem to be a good responsive way to discuss forum problems.
Would be nice to get this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=290327
fixed also.
I'm sure the people that run this site have better things to do then fix compatibility issues with banners and advertisments. To tell you the truth I used to run a forum like this. It's not an issue of the code being wrong it's how it's interpreted by your browser. I just installed FireFox to see, and sure enough the menus show up UNDER the banner. That's not the site's fault, that's the browser's fault for rendering it wrong. If it works fine in another browser then use that. Sometimes there is a middle ground, but unfortunatly vBulletin only offers certain types of code and has constraints. Also I'm sure no one wants to pay money to switch to phpbb or invision powerboard. These board/forums softwares have issues to themselves.
However, I agree about the page layout there in ivorh's post, that can be fixed by some simple code changes, but it's not that big of a deal. The PDA list view could be fixed as well I suppose. Meh. I come here to get information, not spending 10 hours wondering why the banners aren't working along with the menus lol. I'm not saying you don't have valid points, but I think you need something better to get fustrated about.
there's a thread on the moderators forum about both issues, but the admins are busy with other things now... we'll try to get things fixed, just have a bit of patience
joannaex said:
Seriously! Who is the brainiac behind this? I'd like to know... Main forum page has nice new banner on top. GREAT! but when you have drop down boxes like SEARCH, than UNFOLD you do not COVER them with a banner!
Doesn't anyone TEST stuff when they put it on the site? Do you just copy paste a banner URL and job is done?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
joannaex said:
I love how I can post a complaint here but no mods a. answer, b. do anything about it. Great job, just great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe if you had posted respectfully, someone might have responded.
As Pof said, the moderators are pulling their own hair out (a la Britney) about it on the Moderators' forum, but the admins have to get it fixed, not the worthless underling Mods.
Frankly, I never noticed the problem - I use an ad blocker by default. I probably shouldn't recommend that solution, but it's better then nothing.
V
pof said:
there's a thread on the moderators forum about both issues, but the admins are busy with other things now... we'll try to get things fixed, just have a bit of patience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cheers pof that's good to hear.... I expect if the admins are too busy and they made their version of vbulletin available in some form someone would have provided a patch for them by now.
Just wondering is there anything like app-store in xda-dev? because this site have a huge number of application and it would be nice if we can search the apps easily.
~sorry for my bad English
Welcome to forums
Have a read on the main page please.
All great devs here give their work for free and if you like their work you can always donate!, same to XDA!
That´s the way we do things here.
No selling.
Sharing and helping
looks like I didn't make myself clear.
What I mean is application-store-like interface so that the developers' works can be presented in a nicer way rather than hundreds pages of thread. It's purpose is to make a better and proper catalog for their works and not for commercializing their works.
something like this should be enough I think:
http://portableapps.com/apps
*must learn to express myself in English >.<
reckon said:
looks like I didn't make myself clear.
What I mean is application-store-like interface so that the developers' works can be presented in a nicer way rather than hundreds pages of thread. It's purpose is to make a better and proper catalog for their works and not for commercializing their works.
something like this should be enough I think:
http://portableapps.com/apps
*must learn to express myself in English >.<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first post made plenty of sense .
Some users have created their own, CRCinAu's Device Update is one such app, but there's no official one. There might be some more, new app's pop up everyday and I don't have time to watch them all .
Have a search around, but I think you'd be best either using the MS one, or just browsing the forum's and subscribing to threads like the rest of us .
Dave
reckon said:
looks like I didn't make myself clear.
What I mean is application-store-like interface so that the developers' works can be presented in a nicer way rather than hundreds pages of thread. It's purpose is to make a better and proper catalog for their works and not for commercializing their works.
something like this should be enough I think:
http://portableapps.com/apps
*must learn to express myself in English >.<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got you mate. i understand fully what you mean all the best stuff is on here and the sad thing is joe public dont really know about it. i wont get started on the subject but there was talk about appstores but for some reason they all disappeared.
try here on your mobile
http://www.pocketpcfreeware.mobi/index.php
there is device update
http://www.crc.id.au/deviceupdate/
thx guys, going to look at pocketpcfreeware and device update.
Oh, and will begin to subscribe thread <--- still dunno what it means, but I'll google it anyway.
Nice community!! ^_^
Doc`s FROYO XXJPO with Dena Theme and new setting icons
here is docs froyo rom for xxjpo
integratet dena theme and new setting icons
i tested it and it works for me
http://www.multiupload.com/1LX2N9ZMJN
This is doc s rom 7.6.2 with dena theme in it an new setting icons
For all of the users it is only changed the theme and setting icons all other is the same how docs rom 7.6.2 xxjpo
have fun !!!!!!
photos please...
Poor Doc...
dupel said:
Poor Doc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.. This is insane..
why are you doing this?
kalpik said:
Lol.. This is insane..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doc ought to RIG his code for this NOT to happen.
Why are you reposting someone else's rom whose thread is like 5 links above yours?
What is wrong with you?
Yeah, just release the theme. Entire ROM is insane in the membrain ~P
USE THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK. THIS THEME OR ROM IS IN NO WAY CONNECTED TO DOCS OFFICIAL ROM.
THIS IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED, AND NO SUPPORT WILL BE GIVEN TO USERS OF THIS THREAD. THE END.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
Well maybe it would be nice for beginners not to have to change the theme themselves.
On the other hand, maybe it would be a little bit dangerous for complete nOObs to be messing around with firmwares....
ragin said:
Doc ought to RIG his code for this NOT to happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole point of open source is to share and improve, no?
It's not like he's saying this is his own work - his title even says Doc.
snapper.fishes said:
The whole point of open source is to share and improve, no?
It's not like he's saying this is his own work - his title even says Doc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I agree with the open source comment, but this is very misleading and unclear. There are no credits or any other important information to avoid confusion. For a start the title says DOC...therefore users would automatically think its directly from doc, when this is not the case. And secondly the paste should create a different title and then post the necessary details in the thread.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
pele78 said:
Yes I agree with the open source comment, but this is very misleading and unclear. There are no credits or any other important information to avoid confusion. For a start the title says DOC...therefore users would automatically think its directly from doc, when this is not the case. And secondly the paste should create a different title and then post the necessary details in the thread.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then the poster should edit that asap. I am all for open source - Beauty comes with freedom.
But my main point is... if there is something wrong with this rom along with the title...is the poster going to accept responsibility and provide advice and assistance ? or will the users of this misleading thread rush across and spam for help.. and again who would help ? Cause i damn sure wont because for one..i dont even know what this rom consists of, what is inside, and features and so on..
that is my main argument... the poster should make it clear and not misleading... or its gonna cause problems mainly for users when supposedly phones start getting bricked etc..
where is all the break down of details in the first post... jesus!
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The open source doesn't mean you can fix someone's effort without his permission. Maybe Pepi just want to make this ROM better, but please don't use the product number 7.6.2.1 , it was very easy to let user confusing the vendor of ROM.
please put more info, credit listing and all that in the first post.
also, please ask doc / kalpik and whoever is involved in your "remake" of the rom for permissions before proceeding, it's just good gesture.
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're pointing at me, you don't know what my argument is.. I am all for opensource.. But creating 10000001 same ROMs just by changing theme and keyboards absolutely makes no sense, and serves to just fragment the users/help/issues/support/bugs etc.. Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*..
kalpik said:
If you're pointing at me, you don't know what my argument is.. I am all for opensource.. But creating 10000001 same ROMs just by changing theme and keyboards absolutely makes no sense, and serves to just fragment the users/help/issues/support/bugs etc.. Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry Kalpik. I didn't mean you at all. My apologies if I caused any bad feelings.
I am just annoyed at some users who seem to have a habit of walking into every single thread that's about a modification of Doc's rom and telling the developer to basically stop whatever him/her is doing. Argue, yes, discuss yes, but don't just drop a line or two telling the developer to stop.
No need for sorry mate, basically no one wants anyone to have spent few hundred of whatever currency on a super dupa SGS, and just end up bricking there bundle of joy because of someones error, ignorance or whatever..
Hi, I have read and follow al the steps in the thread "How to replace Windows Mobile with Android (Guide)", including the step by step "HowToInstallWithAtoolsNand" in SourceForge.net but I'm sure I'm doing something wrong.
I have my TyTN II with 3.34 HardSPL and the latest Radio ROM that I use to load alll the Windows ROM without any problem. But when I flash my ROM with and Android build what it happens is that afterward it installs it, when the device is booting it appears a message saying "Intall module for this kernel" and the boot process stops there.
Y tried putting inside /andboot folder directly the "androidinstall.tar" that I downloaded from the thread's build (for example the "Incubus26Jc's Super E Cmod 5.0.8 T4 Beta 3". Also I tried to open that "androidinstall.tar" in atools, mix it with 2.6.32 modules and generating a new androidinstall.tar and putting it together with install-seq.sh inside /andboot following all the steps explained in "HowToInstallWithAtoolsNand" but always happens the same.
Can anybody know what could be happening?
Thanks in advanced.
Guido.
Common problem answered here 10.000 times... just try to search...
Perhaps you need http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=848921
To start, use a newer build. Then you won't need any updates. The latest builds from thoughtless kyle,clemsyn,scoot and I all have the necessary fix needed. If you want Cyanogen Mod then use scoot or mine. Our builds are based on CM 6.1 which is much newer with more features.
When you participate in a forum, you always have the posibibility to not replying or do it. If you are gonna do it, try to reply something clever. Nobody is putting a gun against your head to reply. If you don't feel like replying, just don't do it.
I have a problem, I do a quick search and if I don't find what I'm looking for, I just open a new thread. I don't have all my life to look for the answer of the problem. If you like to spend all your time indise this forum, go ahead, nobody is gonna stop you. I don't like to do it. I look for answers, no foolishness.
guido_7701 said:
When you participate in a forum, you always have the posibibility to not replying or do it. If you are gonna do it, try to reply something clever. Nobody is putting a gun against your head to reply. If you don't feel like replying, just don't do it.
I have a problem, I do a quick search and if I don't find what I'm looking for, I just open a new thread. I don't have all my life to look for the answer of the problem. If you like to spend all your time indese this forum, go ahead, nobody is gonna stop you. I don't like to do it. I look for answers, no foolishness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You you get all your answers from quick searches, you start to become lazy and unable to search properly. This is a BB, where all forums, threads, and posts are permanent. Available always. They are, so that others can come, read, SEARCH, and if, and only if they don't find the answer, open a thread.
Now, if we didn't wanted this... perhaps the dev's would have opened a chatroom on IRC and we could all be there to answer THE SAME ANSWERS over and over again.
Oh by the way, please explain how can you participate in a forum... without ever replying ? And he did answer something... as you putted it yourself... clever.
Listen...why don't you spend your time answering my question instead of bla bla bla about forum uses.
Do you like to spend all your time making searches, searches, searches and more searches?? Go ahead...Let others do what they want. If you don't agree, just keep your mouth closed and go to another thread more important than mine.
guido_7701 said:
Listen...why don't you spend your time answering my question instead of bla bla bla about forum uses.
Do you like to spend all your time making searches, searches, searches and more searches?? Go ahead...Let others do what they want. If you don't agree, just keep your mouth closed and go to another thread more important than mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't like to read
Your question has already been answered
I like to solve the problems on my own
If i can't, i like to read. I don't want to solve it, i want to understand it
This is XDA devs. We develop, and help to develop and test. You wan't answers ? Call microsoft, htc, or whatever.
this is NOT your support forum. No one, owes you nothing here, except for respect.
Respect, you showed NO ONE when you don't even try to read the posts others have put here for you.
Now, stop being like that, go to the sugested thread, and learn how to fix your problem and to have some humility and respect.
daedric said:
You don't like to read
Your question has already been answered
I like to solve the problems on my own
If i can't, i like to read. I don't want to solve it, i want to understand it
This is XDA devs. We develop, and help to develop and test. You wan't answers ? Call microsoft, htc, or whatever.
this is NOT your support forum. No one, owes you nothing here, except for respect.
Respect, you showed NO ONE when you don't even try to read the posts others have put here for you.
Now, stop being like that, go to the sugested thread, and learn how to fix your problem and to have some humility and respect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand why your "thanksmeter" is in cero.
Please...shut up and don't write any more in this thread...From now you are not allow to write a word in this thread.
Go to c++ forums if you like to develop.
guido_7701 said:
I understand why your "thanksmeter" is in cero.
Please...shut up and don't write any more in this thread...From now you are not allow to write a word in this thread.
Go to c++ forums if you like to develop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well... if a mod/admin forbids me, i will. You have no authority here.
As for the thanks meter, i have no comments.
lol now its not zero.
aceoyame said:
lol now its not zero.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cause that is what the real community is ment to be or not?
So this guy thinks devs are forced to solve his problem? Have some selfesteem and try to solve it by urself, even my toddler could do it... Im starting to realize one of my college proffesors is right.... Windows stupifies people! (look at win7 logo: your PC simplified) Its like a black box when you cant see whats going on inside, you only have to now the input and output part of the system, ubuntu in the other hand forces users to learn some basic commands... the world would be a better place to live if we all had linux on our computers...
I just love it when people think that every site that offers something is required to offer support.
Not true, infact in the real world almost EVERY company in the U.S. of A does NOT have their own support, in fact it comes from 3rd party.
Same concept here, infact on this site, the userbase is filled with hardware tinkerers, software programmers, developers, IT professionals, etc, etc. They provide this stuff to you at no cost, and without warranty, meaning NO support unless it's something on their end (ex. programming error, etc), and then they provide fixes, which in case they did provide a fix in terms of a update package for android to fix the modules error.
I was the unfortunate one to run into this problem as well, and tried frantically to search for a reason why until I made a post explaining I couldn't find the source of the problem, and then they pointed me in the right direction and I went from there. Granted I ran into a second problem of my device running out of memory trying to apply the update, but that was an entirely un-related issue that I solved myself.
I myself am a hardware tinkerer, I love to break things, then fix them. I repair PCs, Laptops, hell even TVs in my spare time.
In retrospec. Things don't always work 100%, but for 95% of the people here, they go out of their way to try and fix it themselves and solve it themselves.
Everyone's right, there is a search button on these forums, and it takes probably 2 clicks to run a search, very simpl..... oh wait, Windows 7 can do it in 1 click, so I'm guessing 2 clicks is too complicated for you....
Hello dear Rom Cooks
Its just annoying that every ROM cook use different location for (as example) the bootanimation
So i want to make an appeal, that we make a standard for some things!
For bootanimation, why we don't use simply:
System/media/bootloader
So, please, use this Thread as a meeting place to make a standard. If anyone got more Ideas, just Post it.
i gonna make an answer, where i put in the results from the "meetings"
AND:
Please don't miss understand me: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=27689705&postcount=5
Greetings
aivilon
reserved
Reserved for the standards
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
by the way htc's standard for boot animation is system/customize/resource.
so, that should be the standard. but I believe the user should just ask the dev what folder things are in in their forum if they cannot figure it out on their own.
kish3n said:
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to bind them on a standard. Just think it would be easyer. I agree that they have much other problems and i don't want to critizise their work.
Seems Like a Good Idea.Why don’t we give this a try?
maybe a cook find some other things, which would be able to standardize
toolhas4degrees said:
by the way htc's standard for boot animation is system/customize/resource.
so, that should be the standard. but I believe the user should just ask the dev what folder things are in in their forum if they cannot figure it out on their own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course this is a possible variant. BUT:
I think every one would agree, that in a thread which is about 8000 sites, no one would read anything and find the correct path. And much people don't use the thread search bar. So with one ROM, many people would ask the same. And when it works, and we could create "a standard" for things like this, its possible to make a sticky, so everyone can go there and watch, where which datas are.
And by the way: i tried this phath wigh ARHD but the zip file (the bootanimation) don't works... i had to take a app.
There are just 2 place where you can find bootanimation.zip in HTC ROMs
/data/local/bootanimation.zip
/system/customize/resources/bootanimation.zip
So...2 places, not much I think. First place is common for custom ROMs, 2nd place is common for stock ROMs.
kish3n said:
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I would rather the Devs focus more on increasing the performance etc... on our phones as they do already rather than messing around standardising the location of bootanimations. All Devs produce different work and if they were all the same it would be pointless much like this thread is.
EDIT: Also I understand the thinking behind posting this in the Development section however a discussion like this really belongs in General
mike1986. said:
There are just 2 place where you can find bootanimation.zip in HTC ROMs
/data/local/bootanimation.zip
/system/customize/resources/bootanimation.zip
So...2 places, not much I think. First place is common for custom ROMs, 2nd place is common for stock ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
If you previously had a HTC device and prefer running custom Sense ROMs, you would know what Mike has pointed out.
All you need do to find the bootanimation.zip is just open the ROM zip with your choice of archiver 7Zip or WinRAR and search the folders and replace it with your choice of bootanimation, that is if you wana change the animation.
As for your suggestion regarding where to place the bootanimation, why do you want to re-invent the wheel, if that is where you would prefer it, cook a ROM and put it there.
I'm happy where it is and know where to find it if i wana change it, i prefer to have my phone in a booted state, i mean c'mon how many times a day are you gona boot and reboot your phone?
dr9722 said:
standardising the location of bootanimations
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think just about that!
dr9722 said:
EDIT: Also I understand the thinking behind posting this in the Development section however a discussion like this really belongs in General
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea to post it here was, because i reach here the devs more than in the genaral
dr9722 said:
All Devs produce different work and if they were all the same it would be pointless much like this thread is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nopa. I dont write about that all devs must make the same. a work is characterized by tweaks, gui, perfomance etc etc etc. not by the folders. so i I have to disagree with you
Moved to general, since the dev forum is not the right place for this.