[Q] Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming - T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989

Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+

ejsorto said:
Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do not worry too much about it. Quadrant doesnt support dual core.

Use antutu benchmark..
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Tnx guys...as far as antutu...what would be a good score?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

ejsorto said:
Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people who are getting 5000+ quadrant score are flashing it completely new, closing all programs, then running the quadrant test 3-4 times.

Yep...I got 5329 on antutu
sent from my T-mobile Galaxy S2 with Beastmod II v.4.2

reboot then try and run quadrant it runs best after a reboot when all the RAM and other services are refreshed.

Don't out too much stock into it. The scores can be made to look anyway someone wants with the right tweaks. I can show you a rom that scores over 9000 but lags like hell in real world use. Benchmark scores are pointless

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Just ran mine... 2764 on jug 4.1 ...just the fact that it's comparing it to a nexus one should tell you to maybe stop using quadrant?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

talltexan said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahahahahaha
Sent from my iPhone

accordex said:
Just ran mine... 2764 on jug 4.1 ...just the fact that it's comparing it to a nexus one should tell you to maybe stop using quadrant?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. The app maker doesn't seem to give a **** about their app anymore.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

talltexan said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Also, I used Antutu Benchmark and my phone is not rooted and still running stock TMO.....my score was 6246. Not sure is Antutu is accurate.

I just flashed the new paradox rom and hit 5930...i dont think antutu is accurate considering im oc to 1.8 with synergy...and your stock
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

Yeah, there is no way your rom can be doing worse then mine. Mine is not even rooted.

I tried to tell you guys. The scores can be affected by many things. The only real test is REAL world use.

hmmm...quadrant benchmark has always been a good ref for me.

synergeticink said:
hmmm...quadrant benchmark has always been a good ref for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant doesn't even support dual core so unfortunately its a **** reference.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

So why are people bragging about there benchmark speeds. Why does it matter if the quadrant scores ref dual core or not? Its still checking all the functions of your device and how your cpu performs those functions, so in away it does reflect the dual core but not specifically or completely. Until a better benchmark comes out this is what we have to work with, but using Quadrant I score around 3000 while the guys running the roms run about 5000....that makes alot more sense to me than this other bench mark app that says I am running at a faster benchmark than a completely rooted device with a rom.

Oh well...all i know is all is well...running silky smooth...i hate touch wiz...tnx for all the suggestions guys
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

Related

[Q] Benchmarks vs. Nexus One please

Since the two processors are different ...
G2: MSM7230 at 800 MHz
N1: QSD8250 at 1,000 MHz
... and I know you shouldn't compare MHz unless they're the exact same chip... which one is better overall?
Also, disregarding clock speed, what chip is newer / better? Meaning if you underclock the N1 to 800MHz which one would be better?
I know there are benchmark programs out there for Android.
Anybody run one on their G2? How do they compare to N1?
Thanks,
~Eric
Side note...
I tried posting this with 'at' symbols instead of the word "at" up by the clock speeds and I got this warning:
To prevent spam to the forums, new users are not permitted to post outside links in their messages. All new user accounts will be verified by moderators before this restriction is removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
G2 is faster in every way possible
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbMuuA2HjMw
Linpack scores are very similar <=34
Quadrant scores, The G2 wins by 5-10%
Neocore, The G2 is about twice as fast
On the latest benchmark my G2 scored 1683... Compared to ~1500 on my N1
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
\thread
My G2 and N1 both get 1590 on quadrant and then similar linpacks from 30 and up
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
Sweet... thanks.
From what I heard about the G2, before it came out was that it wasn't anything special and didn't offer anything over any other phone already out there.
So its up to par with N1 as far as speed goes.
It doesn't have a front facing camera like the Evo does.
How is the flash on the G2? I have seen the Droid's and the N1's flash and they're awesome.
I'll probably upgrade to G2 as soon as its rooted (permanently).
Jorsher said:
\thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the highest quad score I've gotten is 1654, how did u pull off that 1800???
fRom Snugs G2 ^.^
Lucky benchmark I guess.
Usually I get 1500-1600, though.
Here's my highest:
FunkyELF said:
Also, disregarding clock speed, what chip is newer / better? Meaning if you underclock the N1 to 800MHz which one would be better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the MSM7230 chipset is technologically superior due to it being manufactured with a 45nm process, versus the QSD8250 being manufactured with a 65nm process. It also contains the new Adreno 205 GPU, whereas the QSD8250 makes use of the Adreno 200 GPU.
Benchmarks
Take a look at this review.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3967/the-tmobile-g2-preview/4
mejorguille said:
Here's my highest:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wondering how can you take ss of quad?
fRom Snugs G2 ^.^
Jorsher said:
Lucky benchmark I guess.
Usually I get 1500-1600, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After multiple runs I got an 1825! Haha but I dnt know how to screen shot. So I has no prof =( only got 1800s once though rest were all 1600s-1700s.
fRom Snugs G2 ^.^
I got up to 2300.. I don't know how to take screen shots..
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
mftek said:
I got up to 2300.. I don't know how to take screen shots..
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the G2? That's a damn lie.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
TL24 said:
On the G2? That's a damn lie.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Serious.. I'm in the la area
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
I just ran it again right now and got 9556... but I just realized something. I'm using speedtest not quadrant. Sorry lol
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
mftek said:
I just ran it again right now and got 9556... but I just realized something. I'm using speedtest not quadrant. Sorry lol
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol you had everyone scratchin' their heads for a min. there!
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
mejorguille said:
Here's my highest:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whoa, how did u get quadrant to show the breackdown of each score bar in different colors?
ah figured it out

So I was using antutu bench and I saw this...

Who is this?!?
What's wrong but so right with this pic?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ICS, interesting. Let's see how the rumor mill explains this.
Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
The clock speed is also 1.9ghz
Ics and almost 2ghz clocks is crazy
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Somebody's not sharing ICS with us
Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Killbynature said:
Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
avarize said:
Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.
ntellegence said:
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't accusing but these days it has to be ruled out
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
jasontx said:
Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this, Never a fan of that since it led some people to believe ICS was available in our phone.
Someone should modify the build prop to 4.5 and benchmark their phone and time
how long for it to reach the rumor mill.
Killbynature said:
It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..
foreverloco said:
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?
AllGamer said:
probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Killbynature said:
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.
Remember Rev and his ics build and how much crap people gave him because his build prop was 4.0.3? It's gotta be that.
Message relayed from the dark side.
Longcat14 said:
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..
AznDud333 said:
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is also more of a system hog, which will drop the benchmarks, but will increase real world performance dramatically.

Highest E4GT quadrant scores?

In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
cknuth said:
In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pictures or it didn't happen...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
There's at least two other threads that show scores. I've seen quads in the 6k, but I forgot what the setups were. My personal highest was 4932.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sent from the near past
I can't get over 1.5GHz without freezing sadly. I get high 4000s
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
. Adjust your voltages maybe
sent from the near past
holy balls those are some high scores..... really dont look into the "epeen benchmarks" since last year... because all it takes to get a higher score is multiple runs and tweaks to the fps/ext4 system
but alot of you hope showing your quadrants/linpacs would get you laid...... lol just playing (i had to)
but damn man those SMOKE the evo 3d on its BEST day/kernel.... and to think... many have said (even my self) that they have the same performance.... (i owned a E4GT since launch and sold it a few weeks later) cant wait to get my white one tomorrow!!!!
blendz rom gunslinger kernel @1.6 set at performance but just started running really buggy after
Didn't do quite as good on this one. its fun to just play around and try and improve your score.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past
Danial723 said:
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same set up and all I could muster was:
Using the lazy governor gives me higher scores than ondemand or performance.
I'm not too far behind and I have a single core hahaha 1.5ghz
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.
SuperSwagSauce said:
I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Biggoron said:
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?
SuperSwagSauce said:
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt it, your thinking of smartbench 2010 and 2011 which '10 is for single cores because it doesn't do multithreads whereas '11 does .
I would think quadrant would use as much as there is. I don't think it only uses one core
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Blazer 3.8 odex hitman kernel
oc to 1504.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
globalninja said:
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, Im overclocked to 1.7, cleared ram, and still cant pull 6000.

Lets see some AnTuTu Benchmark test's

Not that the benchmarks matter but will see who can score the best.
This is on CM10 nightly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
But why do you care?
seksmeup said:
But why do you care?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you dont care, you dont need to answer.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Alarmmy said:
If you dont care, you dont need to answer.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.
seksmeup said:
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't the developer forum. And I am asking just for chitchat, See "general" forum at the top^^^.
sswb27 said:
This isn't the developer forum. And I am asking just for chitchat, See "general" forum at the top^^^.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said this subforum specifically was for development. Looks like you need to read better.
If you don't like op's thread than don't reply.
As much as you don't care for this thread their are many who don't care for your opinion.
couple of things...
seksmeup you are the epitome of whats wrong with these forums... stfu and don't post on here if you have issues with a subject...wtf do you do? troll around all day looking for things that annoy you? Clown!
my Antutu score was only 6700 on stock rom...which was very disappointing coming from my g2x which was rooted and i was getting 7200+
that being said I was interested in finding out what others are running at. I'm confused because in the comparison screen i see other s3's running 10k+ ...what gives?
majic12 said:
couple of things...
seksmeup you are the epitome of whats wrong with these forums... stfu and don't post on here if you have issues with a subject...wtf do you do? troll around all day looking for things that annoy you? Clown!
my Antutu score was only 6700 on stock rom...which was very disappointing coming from my g2x which was rooted and i was getting 7200+
that being said I was interested in finding out what others are running at. I'm confused because in the comparison screen i see other s3's running 10k+ ...what gives?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i believe the 10k+ scores are those with the quad core version, the i9300.
but my highest score was around 7250
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
I got 7700 running r6 and faux's kernel @1.83
Such benchmarks are useful from build to build for judging certain aspects of your rom ....not hardware but. ..I use antutu like crazy to find a sweet spot for say dirty cache settings and cache pressure. ...things like memory or database are not native. ..they go thru Linux and then the vm. ...this allows you to observe just that. ..the behavior of Linux young underlying the vm
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
seksmeup said:
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont see why a stupid guy like u was born in this Earth! Such a waste of oxygen!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
8000+ with no oc at 1.5
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Digging a bit dated thread. For those who might find it beneficial.
I had gotten lower 7000s on Stock everything.
My Score on AnTuTu is 11442. The SGH-T999 is running Liquidsmooth ROM JB v2.0 with its Stock Kernel (Lean Kernel) and TWRP Touch Recovery.
Screenshot attached.
how come i am getting like 16000 regularly with many roms, lowest was 10,000 but there was an issue with crap running in the background then, and i was playing with other stuff, mostly trying to check the cpu temp etc... but what gives? is no one else here using antutu 4?
asaqwert said:
how come i am getting like 16000 regularly with many roms, lowest was 10,000 but there was an issue with crap running in the background then, and i was playing with other stuff, mostly trying to check the cpu temp etc... but what gives? is no one else here using antutu 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really old thread mate
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Crisisx1 said:
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It varies with each ROMs

Low low Quadrant Scores, should I be worried?

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
After Jb update I got over 6000 now I only get over 3000 and I've noticed a lag pulling down the status bar since, I've already done a factory reset still same outcome, should I be worried? Power saving is off btw stock not rooted
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
horr1blek1tten said:
After Jb update I got over 6000 now I only get over 3000 and I've noticed a lag pulling down the status bar since, I've already done a factory reset still same outcome, should I be worried? Power saving is off btw stock not rooted
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure power save is not on
Sent from my Rooted Gameboy
osmosizzz said:
Make sure power save is not on
Sent from my Rooted Gameboy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I put in my post power saving is not on read before you post.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
I wouldn't worry. You're probably just testing your phone after using it a lot
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Android_Monsters said:
I wouldn't worry. You're probably just testing your phone after using it a lot
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shouldn't make a huge difference of 3k, though...
looking at the scores, your 2D and 3D rendering scores are absolutely awful. yikes. your 2D score should be over 1k and your 3D score should be in the low/mid 2k range. quadrant is a subjective benchmarking app because it takes all of your scores and kind of creates an average, this is why it is not hugely reliable sometimes and also why scores are plummeted
looking at your other scores, however, they are extremely low as well. your mem score should be around 11k, while your CPU score should be around 10K, and IO should be a little faster than what you are showing as well.
i would say your system is being bogged down by another process while you are running the test.
quick question, what ROM are you running?
also, a way to tell if this is indeed a performance issue, and not just quadrant being quadrant... is to download a graphically intense game and play it.. if it skips and lags and jitters a whole lot (which i know was happening during your rendering tests based on the terrible 2D and 3D scores), then there is some issue there. if it runs fine, then simply put, don't worry about it.
cobraboy85 said:
shouldn't make a huge difference of 3k, though...
looking at the scores, your 2D and 3D rendering scores are absolutely awful. yikes. your 2D score should be over 1k and your 3D score should be in the low/mid 2k range. quadrant is a subjective benchmarking app because it takes all of your scores and kind of creates an average, this is why it is not hugely reliable sometimes and also why scores are plummeted
looking at your other scores, however, they are extremely low as well. your mem score should be around 11k, while your CPU score should be around 10K, and IO should be a little faster than what you are showing as well.
i would say your system is being bogged down by another process while you are running the test.
quick question, what ROM are you running?
also, a way to tell if this is indeed a performance issue, and not just quadrant being quadrant... is to download a graphically intense game and play it.. if it skips and lags and jitters a whole lot (which i know was happening during your rendering tests based on the terrible 2D and 3D scores), then there is some issue there. if it runs fine, then simply put, don't worry about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running stock no root. I actually tried playing a game yesterday and it would lag a little. But this started happening when I let me phone go idle for so long.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
horr1blek1tten said:
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usage seems pretty normal.
are you using any cpu controlling apps?
also, just real quick, what ROM and kernel combo are you on bud?
Have you tried to re flash the stock rom? Other then that it has to be hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
cobraboy85 said:
usage seems pretty normal.
are you using any cpu controlling apps?
also, just real quick, what ROM and kernel combo are you on bud?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything Stock. And no CPU controlling apps I just upgraded from ICS everything was working fine .
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
vopezy said:
Have you tried to re flash the stock rom? Other then that it has to be hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I factory reset twice right after it updated to jb. If this continues, do I have to Odin the factory image?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
horr1blek1tten said:
I factory reset twice right after it updated to jb. If this continues, do I have to Odin the factory image?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is your phone hot when you test? If so thermal throttling may be in place.
But from what it seems it seems like some sort of throttling is in effect. I would recommend another ROM and if it's still horrible you have a bad chip and warranty may be your only option.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Categories

Resources