Widespread camera "focus" issues with the Lumia 900 - Nokia Lumia 900

I've had my Lumia 900 since the pre-order availability date, so I've "kicked the tires" for a week and a half now. I love the phone, to be honest. The build-quality is great, the design is fabulous (in my opinion), it's the first phone I've owned that didn't require MAX volume to have a reasonable phone call, and the list goes on. I *really* like this phone. A lot.
That said, the camera has......issues -- and mainly with "focus", as far as I can tell -- perhaps also with white balance. Is everyone else seeing this? I returned to the AT&T store, tested an in-store phone (black, instead of cyan, which I have) and the issue was the same: open the built-in camera app, press on the screen to focus on something, snap the photo, and it comes out slightly out-of-focus. Strangely enough, the front-camera doesn't have this issue.
Wow.
Fortunately, it appears to be a "software issue", since I was able to grab another camera app -- SophieCam (which is pretty cool) -- and take *great* photos from the exact same phone. Here are two examples -- and in both cases I touched on the top of the shifter knob so that that would be the focus point.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(Taken with the built-in camera app. You'll notice that it appears to focus on everything *except* for the shifter knob, which is what I selected as the focal point.)
(Taken with the SophieCam camera app. You'll notice that the shifter knob is *very* much in-focus, and looks great -- aside from being grubby )
So...is everyone else seeing this issue? Any fixes for it, aside from waiting for Nokia to resolve it? Thankfully, I trust that Nokia *will* fix the problem...but I hope it doesn't take too long. It seems that others are reporting this on Nokia Support, but my photos are a far cry from the awesome ones posted on this page.
Please...hurry up and fix this, Nokia!

links aren't working for me

moorent said:
links aren't working for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry...fixed the images not showing up.
You'll also note the blue-ish tint in the first photo, and the more "natural" look in the second photo (taken with SophieCam). The second photo is more true to what it should be.

second pic is 1000x better. its amazing that universal software comes out better than the "finely tuned" nokia camera software...what a joke! can u snap some more pics with that sophiecam? I am on the edge of buying a 900 and the camera is my biggest concern at this point!

you do know there is a "macro" mode for taking close ups on the stock camera app....

To the OP: does SophieCam allow you take pics at 8mp?
Sent from my X10a using XDA

I absolutely agree that the camera appears to have issues on the Lumia 900. Compared to my Samsung Focus S, both the front and rear camera on the Lumia 900 are awful. I'm assuming that this is a software related issue as well. Comparing the built-in camera software between the Lumia 900 and the Focus S there are a lot of things that appear to be missing or that just don't work in the Lumia 900.
Here's one for you...
Open the camera and try changing the ISO setting... Does anything actually change for you? I see the phone blink for a second but the ISO level NEVER actually changes. The white balance also doesn't appear to be working quite right. Most of the test pictures I've taken appear to be more red then I think they should be.
I'd like to know what others see when they do the following...
Open the built-in camera app and zoom in all the way on an item and what do you see? I can tell you that when doing this on the Lumia 900 that I have the image is horrible blurred/pixelated (even after focusing). Now I know its digital zoom and I understand what that does but compared to the Samsung Focus S the image quality is horrendous. I'll post pics below for you to see the comparison of full zoomed between the two phones.
Nokia Lumia 900 - Full Digital Zoom 1
Samsung Focus S - Full Digital Zoom 1
I have uploaded more pictures comparing both full digital zoom and ISO levels between these two devices on my server at the link below.
http://www.noboundrees.com/FocusS_Lum900_Compare/

The built-in camera app is actually part of WP7. Nokia merely supply drivers.

foxbat121 said:
The built-in camera app is actually part of WP7. Nokia merely supply drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree and I would think the same thing, but apparently each vendor has the ability to "customize" the built-in app to some extent.

mercx said:
I agree and I would think the same thing, but apparently each vendor has the ability to "customize" the built-in app to some extent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera app is the one that has very little customization room for venders. In fact since the 3rd party app is working fine, it means the driver is ok and what's wrong is probably in the latest 8117 OS build.

Here are a few more photos...
(Normal mode, built-in camera app)
(Macro mode, built-in camera app)
(SophieCam camera app)
Strangely, the "normal mode" photo with the built-in camera app performed *fairly* well in this case, but the SophieCam snapshot is noticeably better.
To answer a couple of other questions:
1) YES, I know what macro mode is, and these pictures didn't require that. I would appreciate it if you'd give other forum members the benefit of the doubt that we're not complete idiots.
2) While SophieCam is free, it does not appear to take photos in full resolution. Bummer. That said, it's fun to use, and is really intended as an Instagram-type photo app -- quickly uploading "filtered" photos to Facebook, Twitter, or Flickr.
I do wish I'd done more testing before the latest update, since I don't know if things have gotten worse or better since. I'd also like to know how widespread this issue is. Everyone? Just some? Earlier phones only?

shea-bird said:
second pic is 1000x better. its amazing that universal software comes out better than the "finely tuned" nokia camera software...what a joke! can u snap some more pics with that sophiecam? I am on the edge of buying a 900 and the camera is my biggest concern at this point!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Yes", it's discouraging to see camera issues at this point, but I'm hopeful about two things: 1) it's only a software issue, since another camera app can take wonderful photos using the same hardware, and 2) Nokia *will* fix this problem. They actually care about supporting their phones, supporting the camera quality, and they know that the company is riding on a successful WP7 rollout. They WILL make this right. Question is...how quickly?

Umm there was a post either here or in a review where they determined Macro is a must even when not taking close-ups, and had various other recommended settings. I entered those and my pics have been better since then. All pics seem to be more in focus with Macro on. I know it shouldn't be that way, but it seems to be at the moment.
I should mention I haven't yet taken any true Macro pics though, so I can't speak for those.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App

you guys should tweet Damian, he is head of imaging @ Nokia and he e a really cool guy.. always responds to camera problems. I am sure they are working on a some camera updates. The hardware in the L900 is capable of more, than what the software allows it to be right now.
http://twitter.com/#!/phonedaz
The problem for Nokia is that they have to switch from their own platform where they have full control, to a controlled OS where they don't have the access, nor the expertise to make a real difference, at least not yet. It will take a while.

foxbat121 said:
Camera app is the one that has very little customization room for venders. In fact since the 3rd party app is working fine, it means the driver is ok and what's wrong is probably in the latest 8117 OS build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never thought of that makes sense.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using Board Express

ragingclue said:
Umm there was a post either here or in a review where they determined Macro is a must even when not taking close-ups, and had various other recommended settings. I entered those and my pics have been better since then. All pics seem to be more in focus with Macro on. I know it shouldn't be that way, but it seems to be at the moment.
I should mention I haven't yet taken any true Macro pics though, so I can't speak for those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. I'd be interested to know what the "secret settings" are to make things look a bit better. Any chance you could find that thread and report back?
go0gle said:
you guys should tweet Damian, he is head of imaging @ Nokia and he e a really cool guy.. always responds to camera problems. I am sure they are working on a some camera updates. The hardware in the L900 is capable of more, than what the software allows it to be right now.
http://twitter.com/#!/phonedaz
The problem for Nokia is that they have to switch from their own platform where they have full control, to a controlled OS where they don't have the access, nor the expertise to make a real difference, at least not yet. It will take a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have a Twitter account -- and I'm not going to create one just for this -- but I'd certainly appreciate it if someone else could send him a tweet, maybe reference this thread, and then see what he says.
Yes... Nokia doesn't have the control they used to, but we're not talking about being BETTER WITH THE CAMERA than everyone else (like we know Nokia ought to be), we're talking about simply taking nice-quality photos without having things focused incorrectly. The Lumia 900 *ought* to be able to do that right now, and it just doesn't. Yes, they'll fix it, but it shouldn't be an issue at all.

Here is another related thread from Nokia Support. Specifically, they talk about the camera "trying to focus", and then bumping back to some sort of preset. I've seen this *exact* behavior, as the camera appears to focus properly, and then just before taking the photo it either bumps OUT OF FOCUS or decides to focus on something else entirely. Very strange.

yipcanjo said:
Here is another related thread from Nokia Support. Specifically, they talk about the camera "trying to focus", and then bumping back to some sort of preset. I've seen this *exact* behavior, as the camera appears to focus properly, and then just before taking the photo it either bumps OUT OF FOCUS or decides to focus on something else entirely. Very strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what I notice also. The picture looks great on the screen then when I go to take the picture it bumps out of focus. Frustrating...

yipcanjo said:
Hmm. I'd be interested to know what the "secret settings" are to make things look a bit better. Any chance you could find that thread and report back?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok the link was posted by XDA user shiftF7 in this thread here. Specifically this post.
The link goes to his review here.
Also, I've normally found if people figure out what ISO and Exposure do and how it relates to the photos they're unhappy with, they can make situational adjustments. That's not going to help the auto-unfocus issue and general graininess of Marco distance photos, but maybe it can help for the time being until Nokia comes out with a tweak in an update, which I'm sure won't be far away. My pictures generally do look better after reading that thread. YMMV

yipcanjo said:
I don't have a Twitter account -- and I'm not going to create one just for this -- but I'd certainly appreciate it if someone else could send him a tweet, maybe reference this thread, and then see what he says.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done. I will post here if he responds.
And ya, it sucks that the camera app/drivers are not doing a good job.. at least we know it isn't the hardware, which would be worse.
Here is GSMarena's take on it, they are usually pretty good when it comes to camera testing..
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_lumia_900_att-review-748p5.php
"The Lumia 900 captures decent photos with accurate colors and good contrast. The amount of resolved fine detail is not among the best we've seen and there's also lots of noise when viewing the photos at 100% zoom. Still, the Lumia 900 has accurate white balance and the dynamic range is as impressive as it was on the N9 and the Lumia 800. As a result, images from the camera look pretty well when not zoomed at 100% so if you are not pixel peeping as we are, you will be perfectly alright with what comes out of the camera"

Related

Why is Front Facing Camera a huge deal?

To some people on the internet, Nokia's lack of a front-facing camera is a deal breaker. But tell me why? It has yet become common-use and people, for the most part only use it a few times for novelty purposes. I would understand not getting the lumia 800 because the screen is too small, but stop talking about FFC unless you can see a practical and consistent use for it.
Besides, Nokia compensates in other ways. It has Nokia Maps and its suppose to be the best built-in maps. No competition. Now that has a practical use. It's has a top-notch camera as well. Dual-LED with Carl Zeiss Tessar lens. However, I heard it's not on par with the Titan though.
It's a nice feature to have (e.g. seeing gf/wife/kids while on the road, etc) but yeah many people don't need it.
However, it's a check-the-box kind of feature. When your main competitors in the iPhone and the Android superphones have it, you better damn well make sure your flagship Windows Phone has it
Aerik said:
To some people on the internet, Nokia's lack of a front-facing camera is a deal breaker. But tell me why? It has yet become common-use and people, for the most part only use it a few times for novelty purposes. I would understand not getting the lumia 800 because the screen is too small, but stop talking about FFC unless you can see a practical and consistent use for it.
Besides, Nokia compensates in other ways. It has Nokia Maps and its suppose to be the best built-in maps. No competition. Now that has a practical use. It's has a top-notch camera as well. Dual-LED with Carl Zeiss Tessar lens. However, I heard it's not on par with the Titan though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that it's a nice feature to have. It's a must for video calling, though.
it all comes down to features that are important to the end user, while i'm in the FFC is not all that important camp, there are others who might use it a lot on their current phone, or have a need and use for it, and to them, the loss of the FFC is a deal breaker.
the part that perplexes me is that the N9 has one, which makes the virtually identical 800 not having one irritating.
personally, i'm pretty let down by the 800, aside from the great industrial design, the rest of the phone seems pretty mediocre to me, but again, it's the stuff that the focus s and titan have that more fall into line with what i care about in my next phone which makes them better.
as far as why FFC could be a big deal, common reasons are long distance relationships (apple exploits the armed forces in their iphone4 ads, but it could also be people who travel a lot for business, in which a phone might be a more convenient way to see your loved ones when a laptop can be unweildly) the here and there instances when you need to show someone something, and a call or text won't do, etc.
It's not a big deal. I'm sure most people have complained about the screen size and storage, not the FFC. It's a case of ok if it's there, doesn't really matter if it's not.
Because some people what to video chat with loved ones, or it could be anybody really.
My last phone had one but I never used it. my new phone doesn't have one and I want one now and im not buying another phone without one now that most of my family has them
Just because its not important to you doesnt mean it isnt to other people and really I dont see why they took the ffc out to begin with, even HTC is adding them to their phones.
I think it's because people like to hold Microsoft to a higher standard. Apple and Google can mess up all they want but as soon as Microsoft does all the haters jump at it. The lack of FFC and dual core situation is no different.
Sent from my T7575 using Board Express
JustinTV773 said:
I think it's because people like to hold Microsoft to a higher standard. Apple and Google can mess up all they want but as soon as Microsoft does all the haters jump at it. The lack of FFC and dual core situation is no different.
Sent from my T7575 using Board Express
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The attitude like this sparks the flame wars.
As for the OP: I am using ffc occasionally to gtalk with people when I am not near my laptop.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
lqaddict said:
The attitude like this sparks the flame wars.
As for the OP: I am using ffc occasionally to gtalk with people when I am not near my laptop.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who said I was getting an attitude?
Sent from my T7575 using Board Express
Features, quite simply. While you, and admittedly I, do not use it (I don't, at all) we just acknowledge that many see this as a necessary - and at this point standard feature - that from here on out it should be present on any legitimately "high-end" phone. No questions, it should just be there. When Android phones started using it (and I'm aware they were around long before) people questioned it and their overall usefulness. It's obviously a well requested feature and should be as standard as an opposite facing camera, given the greater leaps made in video conferencing / chatting as of recent time.
Its not so much that it's a huge deal, but something that should just be standard.
Sent from m-IUI
Aerik said:
To some people on the internet, Nokia's lack of a front-facing camera is a deal breaker. But tell me why? It has yet become common-use and people, for the most part only use it a few times for novelty purposes. I would understand not getting the lumia 800 because the screen is too small, but stop talking about FFC unless you can see a practical and consistent use for it.
Besides, Nokia compensates in other ways. It has Nokia Maps and its suppose to be the best built-in maps. No competition. Now that has a practical use. It's has a top-notch camera as well. Dual-LED with Carl Zeiss Tessar lens. However, I heard it's not on par with the Titan though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's mostly a gimmick IMO. People want it because it exists in other high end devices, so it makes their devices look worse without it.
I had 2 cell phones with front cameras and I only used that feature one time to test it for fun. I believe that not many people would want to hold their phone like a mirror and talk to their contacts with everyone around looking at their personal video calling.
It reminds me of personal assistants like Siri on the iPhone. Everybody likes them, but in the end they get used only inside the house for fun and sometimes away from other family members.
Front Cameras also raise the cost of a device without offering a great functionality.
Never-Ever used front Cam on mobiles i had..
Sent from my Cm7-I9000 using Tapatalk
3-d and thinness are seen in standard high-end Tvs but that doesnt mean it's a deal breaker. Sure, it's a great to have, but some things can easily compensate. I'd say, in the way I use my phones, that Nokia maps easily well and over compensates for the lack of FFC. However, I do wish the screen was 4inches ...
also a nice feature for checking your hair
those of you saying it's no big deal.. you are quite ignorant. again, i'm one who would not use it (currently). but i know many who video chat all the time on their phone. if they currently are used to always video chatting, why would they get a phone without one. its very simple to see why many wouldn't even consider a phone without a FFC. it's all opinion guys.. just because you don't see the point in something doesn't mean it's pointless.
Red Grenadine said:
It's a nice feature to have (e.g. seeing gf/wife/kids while on the road, etc) but yeah many people don't need it.
However, it's a check-the-box kind of feature. When your main competitors in the iPhone and the Android superphones have it, you better damn well make sure your flagship Windows Phone has it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best answer in the thread.
cgibsong002 said:
also a nice feature for checking your hair
those of you saying it's no big deal.. you are quite ignorant. again, i'm one who would not use it (currently). but i know many who video chat all the time on their phone. if they currently are used to always video chatting, why would they get a phone without one. its very simple to see why many wouldn't even consider a phone without a FFC. it's all opinion guys.. just because you don't see the point in something doesn't mean it's pointless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only that but MS just bought Skype video chat will be integrated at an OS level we want phones that will be ready for the inevitable.
I honestly only used the FFC for checking for boogers
Aerik said:
3-d and thinness are seen in standard high-end Tvs but that doesnt mean it's a deal breaker. Sure, it's a great to have, but some things can easily compensate. I'd say, in the way I use my phones, that Nokia maps easily well and over compensates for the lack of FFC. However, I do wish the screen was 4inches ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think comparing a camera to a display type is fair. I'm sure one could make the argument for both, why one is would seem of more use, but one is obviously a stronger mobile standard than the other and offers more legitimate use. One being directed more toward media intake, albeit in a smaller demographic, while the other appeals and offers to a larger demographic. I have rarely used mine, but it is entrely more productive than some display tech. Especially considering when you consider a form that doesn't fill a scale such as HD output does. That's exactly why 3D TVs haven't made that jump yet.
Sent from m-IUI
Aerik said:
3-d and thinness are seen in standard high-end Tvs but that doesnt mean it's a deal breaker. Sure, it's a great to have, but some things can easily compensate. I'd say, in the way I use my phones, that Nokia maps easily well and over compensates for the lack of FFC. However, I do wish the screen was 4inches ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't compensate that. Its a missing hardware component. Its not like using opera mobile because a stock browser is missing hardware acceleration. If its not there its not there.
All Tablets, higher iOS/WP/Android devices, high end Pmps (galaxy player/ITouch) have it. Most mid range phones are now shipping with vga front cams. Not putting it there is denying your users a whole means of communicating and making your phones less useful to business users who need stuff like WebEx.
However go ahead and downplay it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Beside video calling it is also great if you want to take pictures with yourself in the picture because you can actually see on the screen what you are shooting.
Anyway, right now I think it is not so important because there is no skype app available, but if Skype gets integrated like Facebook the FFC could really become a deal breaker on the Nokia 800.
In my own case, I would find FFC to be really useful. I may be in the minority, but I was using video-calling over 3g with my old Touch Diamond2. In addition to using it with a mobile, I quite often use Skype to stay in touch with family, both extended family and my own family when I'm working away.
I recently had to travel for work, and due to corporate software policy, was unable to have Skype on my work laptop. This mean I carried an additional (old and bulky) laptop with me on my travels. I personally would have found it so much more convenient to simply be able to make the call on my mobile.
I simply assumed that with MS purchasing Skype, and Nokia buying into WP7, there'd be no question of FFC missing from the latest batch of phones. I was about to go with Nokia for past history of good quality hardware, good cameras etc. And then I found out that the memory would still be limited (I didn't realise how much of the 8Gb on my current Omnia 7 is reserved for the OS/apps, etc) *and* FFC was missing.
Now, in the grand scheme of things, these might not matter to the majority of users. But I miss having my favourite albums on tap, and the ability to video call on those occasions I wish to do so. And sadly, I've not ordered the new Nokia phones and have decided to hang on to the Omnia 7 until next year, when Nokia are due to release more handsets.
Slightly off topic - but regarding the memory, I used to have a 2Gb SD card in my TD2. This was more than enough for me to carry around my albums, but now I have less albums on an 8Gb Omnia 7! (Mind you, I have far more photos due to the ease of use of taking pictures ) I don't fully understand why MS decided to control the use of expandable memory in such a way. I can see why, but in my mind, I keep asking why people aren't allowed to add memory to suit their own needs.
Nonetheless, apart from the two issues mentioned above, I'm really happy with my phone, quite often demonstrating it to my iPhone/Android-toting work buddies. I'd just really like to be able to tell them one day that it also has Flash player support, expandable memory and video calling built in

Camera?

Has anyone found a good camera for the nexus? I can't seem to get the stock one to give me a good crisp picture.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Vignette.
If you don't it, you wont like any camera app.
djgdroid said:
Has anyone found a good camera for the nexus? I can't seem to get the stock one to give me a good crisp picture.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you tapping the screen on the focus point you want? if you dont, it wont focus on that target.
stock app is fine. you just need some practice on how to take pictures.
Yes i've found one - it's Nikon D3100. Now i'll try seriously. Google has damn good coders and if it was posible to simply write better camera app they've had it done already. No offence for other developers.
If camera is very important for you shall get some other phone with better camera, it isn't hard to find one. Or buy a proper DSLR camera (yes, i'd be fruity happy if they were as compact as mibile phones).
MS. said:
Yes i've found one - it's Nikon D3100. Now i'll try seriously. Google has damn good coders and if it was posible to simply write better camera app they've had it done already. No offence for other developers.
If camera is very important for you shall get some other phone with better camera, it isn't hard to find one. Or buy a proper DSLR camera (yes, i'd be fruity happy if they were as compact as mibile phones).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk about that; google can't even get gmail contact images to be above 96x96, despite us asking them since 2009.
google wouldn't have done anything with this camera, samsung would have. the camera hardware on the nexus just isn't good compared to the competition, as you alluded to
MS. said:
Yes i've found one - it's Nikon D3100. Now i'll try seriously. Google has damn good coders and if it was posible to simply write better camera app they've had it done already. No offence for other developers.
If camera is very important for you shall get some other phone with better camera, it isn't hard to find one. Or buy a proper DSLR camera (yes, i'd be fruity happy if they were as compact as mibile phones).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could hit the middle ground and get a Micro 4/3 camera. That's my choice.
But really, the GNex doesn't take awful photos. Compose properly and take 2sec and you'll get a good enough photo for things you're taking pictures of with a phone (posting to Facebook, G+, Twitter, etc.).
jayochs said:
idk about that; google can't even get gmail contact images to be above 96x96, despite us asking them since 2009.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sometimes it takes a lot of effort and time to convince a developer to add a simple button on a web site and once it's done, then everyone wonders how could they live without it so long. There's loooooong story behind this from my own experience
jayochs said:
google wouldn't have done anything with this camera, samsung would have. the camera hardware on the nexus just isn't good compared to the competition, as you alluded to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that GNex has bad camera. It's just not as good as some others. And those people who actually need a good camera on their smartphones, usually going trough few reviews before buying it.
Martonikaj> absolutely agree with you, but i'm not one of those who complaining about GNex camera. I saw sample pictures/videos before i bought this phone and even more to that - take a look at my signature (the last three owned phones)
From my experience with this camera so far.
1) If you have a good light source, your fine.
2) For indoor shots, they work best when the light source is coming from behind you. Cuts down the pixelation.
3) Tap the screen at the focus point you want.
4) For night shots, I find they work best when you disable the flash. Don't use night scene mode, never had much luck with that.
Outdoor this camera can take some great shots, but indoors you have to handle it a certain way.
I was pretty sure when I decided on the nexus that the camera was going to be the weak spot. I just loved that it was pure Android. I've tried camera fx and have noticed a slightly better quality picture but I'm just not loving the interface. I was hoping someone had tried a camera app that I hadn't and liked it. I really liked the camera on my old HTC incredible but that was the only thing better than my nexus.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

HTC One M8s - Support?

Hey Folks,
with the new upcoming HTC One M8s (basically just the M8 but with the 615 SoC), I was wondering how big the support would be.
Assuming HTC releases the Source Code for the Kernel, it should be rather easy porting ROM's from the M8 to the M8s, or not?
Thanks!
Richylitschy said:
Hey Folks,
with the new upcoming HTC One M8s (basically just the M8 but with the 615 SoC), I was wondering how big the support would be.
Assuming HTC releases the Source Code for the Kernel, it should be rather easy porting ROM's from the M8 to the M8s, or not?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope there will be tons of custom roms. It nearly seems that almost noone has noticed that the phone has been released. I'm receiving it tomorrow and there are still no reviews available of any kind. Just a commercial picture from the front side in GSMarena, wrong colors in Anandtech and one unpacking video in youtube. I think that this tends to change, since M9 does not bring that much on the table. M8s has barometer, dual camera and lots of cheaper price. It has also a lot of cores to bump up and will have tons of customers for its 2/3 price, compared to M9. So I really hope there will be some unlocking and rooting threads here and also some cool ROM-s to bump it up to speeds that htc won't bother themselves.
Faulty soft or faulty specs
I now discovered that no app can find the barometer from the phone. Also, irda sensor. So either the specs, the initial software or my phone is faulty. Please report if your phone misses these features also.
Also for reference, I am attaching screenshot from HTC homepage with the specs:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Why isn't there dedicated device thread for the M8s?
I would also like a dedicated M8s thread. Interested in purchasing one but want to know how the camera compares to standard M8 with 13mp, seems to be very little info on this handset. If anyone has the phone could you let me have your thoughts. Searched the Internet and nothing as per previous user mentioned, very low key release.
kelsusit said:
I would also like a dedicated M8s thread. Interested in purchasing one but want to know how the camera compares to standard M8 with 13mp, seems to be very little info on this handset. If anyone has the phone could you let me have your thoughts. Searched the Internet and nothing as per previous user mentioned, very low key release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a review on phonearena, I'll just copy it here and modify a bit :
I ordered this phone after a long taught, over should i order M9 or M8s. The cost difference was 1/3.What could we get for the 1/3? I was disappointed, that M9 only had one back camera, also it doesnt have a barometer. The camera is not important to me, except the slow motion. M8s and M9 both shoot 720p 120FPS slow motion, so no difference there. Add dual camera and barometer to find out the winner.
It seems that I am the only one in the world that got one. There are no real reviews or review videos. There are next to nothing forum posts available. I haven't seen any promotions even on htc facebook page. There are plenty for different Desire models and M9 for sure though. Even GSMArena tells that this phone will be released in may. Well I boguht it 2 weeks earlier.
The phone itself feels new. Its not like an Apple watch that does everything you expect that a smartphone does. There are a lot extraordinary. Forinstance the dual camera. Its something that gives you so much different device tha a standard smartphone. I like to have depth information in my photos. I can select the person in the photo with one touch to make their background like a drawing, or the other way around, to make the person as drawing and the background real. And this is just one feature. There are tons of things one can play around with such cameras. Also there is the slow motion feature with 120fps 720p recording. The slow motion videos are vivid and smooth. Just like proffessional, highly expensive slow motion shots you can see on Discovery. Just type in "slow motion htc one" to Youtube search box and see for yourself. You can play around with slow motion videos all day and never get bored for years.
I like seamless features. HTC was the first who introduced putting phone into silent mode when you placed the ringing phone face down on table. It also understands, when its taken out of pocket and rings quietly, for there is no need to scream anymore and you can have your dignity when in public spaces, in the worst case, hospital or cinema.
The phone itself feels very solid, like a future Star Trek device. It feels like it could never break (unlike the iBreak ). And the screen, ofcourse you can't distinguish pixels. Its like curves are curves. Amazing. It has FullHD resolution.
There are some downsides though. I don't know if it is a software issue or the phone is faulty, I cannot get one main feature to work, that was one of the reasons that i actually got the phone instead of M9. M9, as we know, lacks the barometer. This is not the case for M8s. I cannot get mine to work. The same issue goes for infrared. Whatever app I try, they do not see my IRDA.
I contacted htc support with the issue, they contacted me back and told me that there is no such hardware on the phone as IRDA or barometer. The specs are faulty and if I want, they could change it to the M8.
I'm not sure I want a M8. I mean I carried my Sensation Xe around for one extra year just because of the underpowered camera of it. So I'll be discussing other options on monday. Discount forinstance. I have fell in love with the tremendous battery capacity of the phone. The phone is blazing fast (I don't game, except for some Heroes of Might & Magic II port) and It seems like the battery is infinite. So I think I'll keep it. Its just that I feel a bit conned by the missing hardware. I was hoping to play around with it.
If you like any more information then Just ask, I can test anything. Here is a little camera sample:
Some 3D effects you can do, when you use duo-cam to make photos:
Slow motion movie sample (re-encoded to 360p by youtube, ofcourse. I don't know why I cannot get it to 720p in youtube. Maybe it is because the video is 768x432 pixels)
(Note that there is even more slowed-down part in the end that is made by youtube video editor and the slow motion clip)
The highest quality FullHD video that I have made was about this young cat we foud and is looking for a new home, anyone?
Don't be shy with the thanks, if you found anything helpful.
Thank you very much for comprehensive reply :good:. More real user experience information than I've managed to find anywhere else! Sounds promising although concerning about issues you highlighted.
Is the general interface fast, is there any slow down with snapdragon 615 chipset?
If you could share some low light pictures with and without flash that would also be appreciated.
Codeplayer said:
I posted a review on phonearena, I'll just copy it here and modify a bit :
I ordered this phone after a long taught, over should i order M9 or M8s. The cost difference was 1/3.What could we get for the 1/3? I was disappointed, that M9 only had one back camera, also it doesnt have a barometer. The camera is not important to me, except the slow motion. M8s and M9 both shoot 720p 120FPS slow motion, so no difference there. Add dual camera and barometer to find out the winner.
It seems that I am the only one in the world that got one. There are no real reviews or review videos. There are next to nothing forum posts available. I haven't seen any promotions even on htc facebook page. There are plenty for different Desire models and M9 for sure though. Even GSMArena tells that this phone will be released in may. Well I boguht it 2 weeks earlier.
The phone itself feels new. Its not like an Apple watch that does everything you expect that a smartphone does. There are a lot extraordinary. Forinstance the dual camera. Its something that gives you so much different device tha a standard smartphone. I like to have depth information in my photos. I can select the person in the photo with one touch to make their background like a drawing, or the other way around, to make the person as drawing and the background real. And this is just one feature. There are tons of things one can play around with such cameras. Also there is the slow motion feature with 120fps 720p recording. The slow motion videos are vivid and smooth. Just like proffessional, highly expensive slow motion shots you can see on Discovery. Just type in "slow motion htc one" to Youtube search box and see for yourself. You can play around with slow motion videos all day and never get bored for years.
I like seamless features. HTC was the first who introduced putting phone into silent mode when you placed the ringing phone face down on table. It also understands, when its taken out of pocket and rings quietly, for there is no need to scream anymore and you can have your dignity when in public spaces, in the worst case, hospital or cinema.
The phone itself feels very solid, like a future Star Trek device. It feels like it could never break (unlike the iBreak ). And the screen, ofcourse you can't distinguish pixels. Its like curves are curves. Amazing. It has FullHD resolution.
There are some downsides though. I don't know if it is a software issue or the phone is faulty, I cannot get one main feature to work, that was one of the reasons that i actually got the phone instead of M9. M9, as we know, lacks the barometer. This is not the case for M8s. I cannot get mine to work. The same issue goes for infrared. Whatever app I try, they do not see my IRDA.
I contacted htc support with the issue, they contacted me back and told me that there is no such hardware on the phone as IRDA or barometer. The specs are faulty and if I want, they could change it to the M8.
I'm not sure I want a M8. I mean I carried my Sensation Xe around for one extra year just because of the underpowered camera of it. So I'll be discussing other options on monday. Discount forinstance. I have fell in love with the tremendous battery capacity of the phone. The phone is blazing fast (I don't game, except for some Heroes of Might & Magic II port) and It seems like the battery is infinite. So I think I'll keep it. Its just that I feel a bit conned by the missing hardware. I was hoping to play around with it.
If you like any more information then Just ask, I can test anything. Here is a little camera sample:
Some 3D effects you can do, when you use duo-cam to make photos:
Slow motion movie sample (re-encoded to 360p by youtube, ofcourse. I don't know why I cannot get it to 720p in youtube. Maybe it is because the video is 768x432 pixels)
(Note that there is even more slowed-down part in the end that is made by youtube video editor and the slow motion clip)
The highest quality FullHD video that I have made was about this young cat we foud and is looking for a new home, anyone?
Don't be shy with the thanks, if you found anything helpful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Codeplayer said:
I now discovered that no app can find the barometer from the phone. Also, irda sensor. So either the specs, the initial software or my phone is faulty. Please report if your phone misses these features also.
Also for reference, I am attaching screenshot from HTC homepage with the specs:
Why isn't there dedicated device thread for the M8s?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I own it since one week(no rom change) and i cannot use the Ir beam too.
Like other apps, anymote smart remote doesn't work and cannot reord ir code.
IR remote says that it doesn't support HTC IR interface...
The US HTC support confirmed me that the m8s contains an ir beam, but i think that we have to wait for a radio update...
I also have power issu with the radio, since the last sense update it seems to be better, but it's strange. Too be verified....
I hope that we will have a dedicated thread too, this phone is well hidden in google search
Christophe
tof421 said:
Hi, I own it since one week(no rom change) and i cannot use the Ir beam too.
Like other apps, anymote smart remote doesn't work and cannot reord ir code.
IR remote says that it doesn't support HTC IR interface...
The US HTC support confirmed me that the m8s contains an ir beam, but i think that we have to wait for a radio update...
I also have power issu with the radio, since the last sense update it seems to be better, but it's strange. Too be verified....
I hope that we will have a dedicated thread too, this phone is well hidden in google search
Christophe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure that's because it doesn't have an ir blaster.
Saleen28 said:
I'm pretty sure that's because it doesn't have an ir blaster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope it have one.
Ir is on website specifications, and the top of the phone use black plastic design like an ir remote.
I just hope that something is mising in the rom...
The Ir function help me to buy this phone , not having it would be bad HTC image.
tof421 said:
I hope it have one.
Ir is on website specifications, and the top of the phone use black plastic design like an ir remote.
I just hope that something is mising in the rom...
The Ir function help me to buy this phone , not having it would be bad HTC image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
M8 has the same black plastic on top, but interestingly the IR is in the power button.
Some sites say it has it, some say it doesn't. Once htc support says it has one, once that it doesn't. Some users say it doesn't have ir though.(for example look above) - Not only this gives htc a bad image, they don't even know their own phone specs.
Codeplayer said:
I now discovered that no app can find the barometer from the phone. Also, irda sensor. So either the specs, the initial software or my phone is faulty. Please report if your phone misses these features also.
Also for reference, I am attaching screenshot from HTC homepage with the specs:
Why isn't there dedicated device thread for the M8s?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There should be I have this phone and would say it's not a downgrade on the m8 ,camera is better bigger battery two important factors in a phone for me and the soc 615 is only a fraction slower in some day to day use
Hello Guys, anyone knows a good case for M8s ? I am thinking for the Spigen Armor for M8 but because m8s is a little bit thicker I don't know if it fits . any solutions please?
Didnt knew there was m8s >.>
That was a very informative post! Thank you. I have a request for you and or those who have an M8S. I am working on replacing my M8 4MP camera with an M8S 13MP camera. In order to get it to work, I'll need the "lib" folder from the M8S. This folder is located at /system/ of your device. If one of you could copy the "lib" folder, paste it elsewhere, then upload it for me, I would be wildly appreciative!
Yes wait
https://mega.nz/#!09gCAZQY!Ll6o0eoIS8pXrqHK8vV2e5qsgfcU_q4CmRsabKF2YWs
Much thanks!
wurstherpes said:
Yes wait
https://mega.nz/#!09gCAZQY!Ll6o0eoIS8pXrqHK8vV2e5qsgfcU_q4CmRsabKF2YWs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much! I'll keep an updated post of the progress. This is a huge help!
badboy47 said:
Didnt knew there was m8s >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a dev project planned for M8s device ? there is still a Rom Version .. but it seems that no further support is running for this rom and M8s is a nice device..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one-m8/help/make-custom-recovery-htc-one-m8s-t3114245
There is an unofficial Cyanogenmod development going on at http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one-m8/general/htc-m8s-cyanogenmod-t3142668
So if you are interested go and show your support.
M8s
Hello. I know this may be an outdated thread, but i'm having an issue with my M8s. After a period of, about, 7 to 10 days of using the device, the ui starts lagging and it's really annoying.. The only solution i've found is to restart the phone when the lag gets worse. Is anyone able to help me?
tmw97 said:
Hello. I know this may be an outdated thread, but i'm having an issue with my M8s. After a period of, about, 7 to 10 days of using the device, the ui starts lagging and it's really annoying.. The only solution i've found is to restart the phone when the lag gets worse. Is anyone able to help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should go do a factory resset

[Q] New software for M9 - 1.32.531.33 (Camera Fix)

Hi. I was just browsing through and found some articles commending the newly releases update saying it fixes the camera to an arm's length.
Can anyone confirm is this update is indeed good.?
http://phandroid.com/2015/04/09/htc-one-m9-camera-update-comparison/
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2908091/htc-one-m9-camera-software-update.html
hymnz said:
Hi. I was just browsing through and found some articles commending the newly releases update saying it fixes the camera to an arm's length.
Can anyone confirm is this update is indeed good.?
http://phandroid.com/2015/04/09/htc-one-m9-camera-update-comparison/
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2908091/htc-one-m9-camera-software-update.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the comparison on the site, I think that's a decent update, the pictures do look better. However the quality to me is still nowhere near how a flagship device should take pictures.
mr1029x said:
According to the comparison on the site, I think that's a decent update, the pictures do look better. However the quality to me is still nowhere near how a flagship device should take pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed! Its improving but no where near it should be. I can't believe it had to take all the bad reviews for HTC to finally start working on this. +1
badboy47 said:
Agreed! Its improving but no where near it should be. I can't believe it had to take all the bad reviews for HTC to finally start working on this. +1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel sorry for HTC actually, I think that they have been working hard to address the camera issue for many years now, but the customers' demand kinda make it really hard for them to follow
In 2013 they started their focus on picture quality, especially low light performance with the M7. The results weren't great, but it showed potential. The M8's camera to me focused more on features rather than quality with that gimmicky Dual-Camera system (which nobody really liked). But again, it was a very good idea for them stay away from the Megapixel and actually focus on what really matters rather than just give customers specs.
We should've encouraged them to stay on that path, but so many users seemed upset with the lack of picture details. So HTC has to give them what they want with a 20 MP camera which shows detail, yes. However, the image processing ability is such a letdown. And I think that this is not just a software issue, but also a sensor issue, I have never seen a flagship phone with a weird Toshiba sensor. But hey, what do you expect from a company which has been staying away from the MP war for awhile and now is forced to get back in?
Does anyone know when this will be released on the unlocked model from HTC, if it hasn't been already?
mr1029x said:
Feel sorry for HTC actually, I think that they have been working hard to address the camera issue for many years now, but the customers' demand kinda make it really hard for them to follow
In 2013 they started their focus on picture quality, especially low light performance with the M7. The results weren't great, but it showed potential. The M8's camera to me focused more on features rather than quality with that gimmicky Dual-Camera system (which nobody really liked). But again, it was a very good idea for them stay away from the Megapixel and actually focus on what really matters rather than just give customers specs.
We should've encouraged them to stay on that path, but so many users seemed upset with the lack of picture details. So HTC has to give them what they want with a 20 MP camera which shows detail, yes. However, the image processing ability is such a letdown. And I think that this is not just a software issue, but also a sensor issue, I have never seen a flagship phone with a weird Toshiba sensor. But hey, what do you expect from a company which has been staying away from the MP war for awhile and now is forced to get back in?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Toshiba sensor has plenty of potential ..HTC just need's to get it tuned in
From the review of the Nokia 830 with the same Toshiba sensor
In testing by the PureView Club, Sony's 20.7 megapixel EXMOR sensor was compared extensively to the previous generation 20.1 megapixel Toshiba sensor. The overall finding was that the Toshiba sensor produced a slightly underexposed image, while Sony's sensor tended to overexpose (wash out). Generally, underexposure is more desirable as it can be more accurately post-processed to a neutral exposure. - See more at: http://www.dailytech.com/Lumia+830+...+Sensor/article36406.htm#sthash.JhEioRm7.dpuf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
btw based on android central this update is only coming to the us models the international already recieved there update earlier last month
clsA said:
The Toshiba sensor has plenty of potential ..HTC just need's to get it tuned in
From the review of the Nokia 830 with the same Toshiba sensor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't mean it that way. What I meant was that I think HTC Devs isn't fully familiar with how the Toshiba sensor captures and gathers pictures' info, especially after 2 years working with the "Ultrapixel" camera. Therefore the image processing software isn't optimized to get the best out of it and HTC released the phone a bit too early, they should've waited for a couple more weeks or even a month, look at the G4, LG sure take their time. I wouldn't mind waiting either.
mr1029x said:
I didn't mean it that way. What I meant was that I think HTC Devs isn't fully familiar with how the Toshiba sensor captures and gathers pictures' info, especially after 2 years working with the "Ultrapixel" camera. Therefore the image processing software isn't optimized to get the best out of it and HTC released the phone a bit too early, they should've waited for a couple more weeks or even a month, look at the G4, LG sure take their time. I wouldn't mind waiting either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah your right their, after 15 crappy reviews I'm sure they wish they would have waited and got it perfect first now
mr1029x said:
Feel sorry for HTC actually, I think that they have been working hard to address the camera issue for many years now, but the customers' demand kinda make it really hard for them to follow
In 2013 they started their focus on picture quality, especially low light performance with the M7. The results weren't great, but it showed potential. The M8's camera to me focused more on features rather than quality with that gimmicky Dual-Camera system (which nobody really liked). But again, it was a very good idea for them stay away from the Megapixel and actually focus on what really matters rather than just give customers specs.
We should've encouraged them to stay on that path, but so many users seemed upset with the lack of picture details. So HTC has to give them what they want with a 20 MP camera which shows detail, yes. However, the image processing ability is such a letdown. And I think that this is not just a software issue, but also a sensor issue, I have never seen a flagship phone with a weird Toshiba sensor. But hey, what do you expect from a company which has been staying away from the MP war for awhile and now is forced to get back in?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heard about Nokia? Finnish company bought by micro, known 4 having great cameras? It's about htc not very good at optimization of the software I think. Let's see.
Hi, I just got my Developers Edition today and I did get an update right away, only it is different that the one on this post. This one is 1.32.617.30, did anyone else got this?
Thanks
Chingonazo
Chingonazo said:
Hi, I just got my Developers Edition today and I did get an update right away, only it is different that the one on this post. This one is 1.32.617.30, did anyone else got this?
Thanks
Chingonazo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is the version I have as well
I got an update as soon as I turned on my M9 last week, but forgot to check what fixes were included it was the 1.32.206.15 not sure if the Camera fix was included (I assume it was).
Chingonazo said:
Hi, I just got my Developers Edition today and I did get an update right away, only it is different that the one on this post. This one is 1.32.617.30, did anyone else got this?
Thanks
Chingonazo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the unlocked version and had this update right away too. I wonder if it is the same camera update.
Just wondering if you guys could give your thoughts on the camera with the update compared to before and compared to the M8 or the m7.
I am on 1.33.605.15 and there is no update available. You guys think this includes the camera update? I would assume so because it is a higher number but I haven't seen that build mentioned anywhere.
I am on AT&T in the US running stock and have Android version 5.0.2. HTC Sense 7.0, and Software Number 1.32.502.9.
Kernel version 3.10.49-gcea571a [email protected]#1 SMP PREEMPT
xgerryx said:
I am on 1.33.605.15 and there is no update available. You guys think this includes the camera update? I would assume so because it is a higher number but I haven't seen that build mentioned anywhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

XZP Camera distortion sadly also present with XZ1 Compact - fixed in 47.1.A.5.51

UPDATE: Sony has announced a fix in a future firmware update, release ETA is end of November. See post in thread with links
UPDATE 2: Firmware version 47.1.A.5.51 has the fix! Note that you'll have to manually enable distortion correction in the camera app settings, it's disabled by default for some unknown reason.
Just replaced my Z5C today with a brand new XZ1 Compact. It's a mixed bag for sure, with some improvements and some steps backwards (no FM radio, double tap to sleep/wake...), but the worst thing I feared is the same camera distortion issue first reported by XZP users, and unfortunately it's bad news.
The XZ1C main camera takes distorted pictures as well. Boo!!!!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
FW ver: 47.1.A.2.324
mhaha said:
The XZ1C main camera takes distorted pictures as well. Boo!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you taken the same picture with different settings to see if it gets any better and is the Album rendering time still an issue?
Really bad news as my z3c takes excellent pictures only problem with the camera i have is the stupid auto mode that i have to change every time when i started the camera, before i shoot a pic. Hope they disabled this presistent crap.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
Assimilator_X said:
Really bad news as my z3c takes excellent pictures only problem with the camera i have is the stupid auto mode that i have to change every time when i started the camera, before i shoot a pic. Hope they disabled this presistent crap.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do know that if you launch the camera from the lock screen (by holding down the physical shutter button), it defaults to Auto mode. If you launch the camera app manually after you've unlocked the phone, it defaults to your last used setting.
Yes, it's annoying. That said, I've read a review somewhere that claims the auto mode has improved a lot since then.
SXUsr said:
Have you taken the same picture with different settings to see if it gets any better and is the Album rendering time still an issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the same distortion using the manual camera.
And yes, the Album still takes an awful long time to render a sharp image. I thought it would be solved with the newer chip and UFS storage, but I guess not.
I also wasn't able to find Photo Analyzer to disable in the system apps, which some say were causing delays in earlier models.
If it makes any difference, I've disabled Movie Creator.
Can you take a photo from a checkerboard grid from straight above to analyze how bad the distortion really is?
Thats no surprise. All imx400 sensor from Sony has this lense issue. There won't be a fix. Sony already told there is no problem. Take your money back or accept it. Good luck to us all lol
I've read several reviews and the distortion is not mentioned anywhere. It's this affecting all phones or is it just that some have the issue and others don't?
Probably all phones affected that fitted with the 19mp sensors i am working in the phone repair industry we had same years ago with htc m7 and m8 models but after a while htc declared a camera recall and we replaced them in warranty. Doubt it will happen with sony xz, xz1, xz1c too many units involved and cost to high. Finally we got another compact flagship that "faulty by design".
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
charliebigpot said:
I've read several reviews and the distortion is not mentioned anywhere. It's this affecting all phones or is it just that some have the issue and others don't?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its mostly visible in close up photos and straight lines. Thats why you dont see it in reviews because they dont take photos of straight buildings all the time even thou you can see the distortion is the fotos from serveral reviews.
mhaha said:
Just replaced my Z5C today with a brand new XZ1 Compact. It's a mixed bag for sure, with some improvements and some steps backwards (no FM radio, double tap to sleep/wake...), but the worst thing I feared is the same camera distortion issue first reported by XZP users, and unfortunately it's bad news.
The XZ1C main camera takes distorted pictures as well. Boo!!!!!
View attachment 4285132
FW ver: 47.1.A.2.324
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's bad news.. Can't it be easily fixed with snapseed or the default photo editor?
Also, if you're kind enough, I would like to find out if we can FINALLY take raw photos with the XZ1 compact. Could you try with a 3rd party app and let us know?
That's the reason I left sony after Z3 compact, and I would love to return but this is holding me back
4rz0 said:
Can you take a photo from a checkerboard grid from straight above to analyze how bad the distortion really is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, don't have such a thing lying around the house. I picked the closest thing I have to a checkerboard-like item - my keyboard.
mariosx said:
That's bad news.. Can't it be easily fixed with snapseed or the default photo editor?
Also, if you're kind enough, I would like to find out if we can FINALLY take raw photos with the XZ1 compact. Could you try with a 3rd party app and let us know?
That's the reason I left sony after Z3 compact, and I would love to return but this is holding me back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: RAW support: that's a big negative.
Besides, if they supported it, I'll bet they'd emphasize it their marketing.
Don't think the distortion is something that can be easily fixed post editing, the photo is already "damaged". Sony needs to fix the algorithm at the source.
mhaha said:
Sorry, don't have such a thing lying around the house. I picked the closest thing I have to a checkerboard-like item - my keyboard.
Re: RAW support: that's a big negative.
View attachment 4286120
Besides, if they supported it, I'll bet they'd emphasize it their marketing.
Don't think the distortion is something that can be easily fixed post editing, the photo is already "damaged". Sony needs to fix the algorithm at the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many MANY thanks, and what a shame... I guess I'm stuck with the SE until .... well... forever
Well i might just sell mine after all. Yes they are happy with our preorder and im exchange we getting broken devices. Great.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
can you post more examples?
https://talk.sonymobile.com/t5/Xper...-serious-distortion-issue/td-p/1232765/page/2
check this tread guys really is a joke and we paying for the crap camera? I should get my XZ1C tomorrow and throw it back to the shop and cancel the contract immediately if is turns out the same. I still using my older Z3C no camera issues no distorted pics, ok low light is different cake. But really if is that bad i rather keep my z3c instead of a again faulty flagship unit. Unfortunately nobody else manufacturing small form factor devices like the sony compact line with 4.6" display. Will see tomorrow might just getting a new or a second hand z5c after all.
Assimilator_X said:
might just getting a new or a second hand z5c after all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a previous owner of Z1C > Z3C > Z5C, I strongly advise against that idea. If your Z3C is functional, DO NOT exchange it for a Z5C, it's a worse phone overall due to the horrid Snapdragon 810 chip that plagues all flagship phones of that era.
You will lose the great battery life you're enjoying with the Z3C, and encounter slowdowns and lags all over the place due to the throttling. Even when throttled, the phone still gets crazy hot.
Not worth it.
Thanks for the info mhaha. Yes my z3c still works and looks prestine. Battery lasts 3 days on normal usage no facebook or other social media app installed also rooted with locked bl.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
So how noticable/bad is this issue? If i'm primarily taking shots of the family will this be badly noticeable? Is it easily fixed in editors on the phone?
The specs of the XZ1 compact are perfect for me but the camera is a big issue if its truly bad. I'm due to go and upgrade tomorrow so need to know really or if its a case of try it and then return in the 14 days if its bad.
I will have mine today is already in store but i need to collect it. I will xheck it oob before i sign anything.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources