Performance governor - Samsung Epic 4G Touch

Anyone run this?

The only real reason to run performance governor is for benchmark testing. I wouldn't run it any more than that.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

g_ding84 said:
The only real reason to run performance governor is for benchmark testing. I wouldn't run it any more than that.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most use it that way, as for me i use to keep the high end freq set and to keep the cpu from cycling and wasting battery
Example.... i like to run at 800, i set to preformance so the phone will not cycle lower then 800 no matter what.

Unknown Zone said:
Most use it that way, as for me i use to keep the high end freq set and to keep the cpu from cycling and wasting battery
Example.... i like to run at 800, i set to preformance so the phone will not cycle lower then 800 no matter what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life difference?

donsh00tmesanta said:
Battery life difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it might be small but little things add up ........instead of bouncing/cycling up and down from low to high freqs cause it is monitoring the processes/work load even when the phone is not in use. Performance takes the cycling/monitoring of the processes out of the equation and just sets the cpu at the high end.

its weird in set CPU it shows it going to 800mhz instead of staying at 1200mhz
Bug? Glitch?

donsh00tmesanta said:
its weird in set CPU it shows it going to 800mhz instead of staying at 1200mhz
Bug? Glitch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It could be, I use "System Tuner Pro" and when I select "Performance" it stays at 800, since 800 is what I have my high end set at.
Btw I am running EL29 GB with Gunslinger so that is also something to consider.
Edit: I tried different high end freq on performance 1k/1.2k/1.4k and they all were setting and not fluxing to other fregs.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I running rh13

interesting try the free version of system tuner and see if it will stick

Done I'll check in a bit

Same thing

weird, r u running stock? since i only saw 1200 on your high end. btw i am waiting for work that is why I am up.... lol
---------- Post added at 05:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 AM ----------
i was going to say try a ics overclock kernel but is there any? maybe the stock kernel does not have a performance governor built in
---------- Post added at 05:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 AM ----------
maybe the stock kernel does not have a performance governor built in

Try agats 4.5 or the kuban kernel. They have the over clocking steps built in.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

I'm stock but tried others

donsh00tmesanta said:
I'm stock but tried others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try wiping the cache and dalvik before you try the kernels that g_ding stated.
agats or kuban should stick on performance if they still dont....I really dont know what to tell you any more to help.....
g_ding84 said:
Try agats 4.5 or the kuban kernel. They have the over clocking steps built in.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I knew there were some ICS overclock kernels , I am on GB so I dont look/have ICS stuff.

Unknown Zone said:
Try wiping the cache and dalvik before you try the kernels that g_ding stated.
agats or kuban should stick on performance if they still dont....I really dont know what to tell you any more to help.....
Thanks I knew there were some ICS overclock kernels , I am on GB so I dont look/have ICS stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200

donsh00tmesanta said:
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on voltage control. And both kernels show proper scaling and on performance I have it stick to 1200mhz. Do you have CPU spy?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

donsh00tmesanta said:
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've been using SetCPU and now apparently System Tuner Pro. It's possible you may have EX Tweaks installed as well, ROM Toolbox Pro, or Tegrak.
The thing you want to remember, is that any and all of these utilities can set CPU performance and governors, so you want to be sure that if you are testing with any of them, that ALL of the others are disabled (at least the functions that would control CPU).
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not a kernel issue. You might have Stock, but it may have been modified or not compatible w/OC/UC. Try one of Agat's kernels with confirmed working overclock/underclock (0.4.4) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1767421
I've been using that with SetCPU and it works well.
Oh - one last point -- do you have any Profiles set up in SetCPU? Because if you do, one of them might be overriding your Performance governor setting on the Main SetCPU screen.

Capp5050 said:
You've been using SetCPU and now apparently System Tuner Pro. It's possible you may have EX Tweaks installed as well, ROM Toolbox Pro, or Tegrak.
The thing you want to remember, is that any and all of these utilities can set CPU performance and governors, so you want to be sure that if you are testing with any of them, that ALL of the others are disabled (at least the functions that would control CPU).
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not a kernel issue. You might have Stock, but it may have been modified or not compatible w/OC/UC. Try one of Agat's kernels with confirmed working overclock/underclock (0.4.4) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1767421
I've been using that with SetCPU and it works well.
Oh - one last point -- do you have any Profiles set up in SetCPU? Because if you do, one of them might be overriding your Performance governor setting on the Main SetCPU screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i uninstalled set cpu before using system tuner
i have been using stock, kuban kernel and 4.0 to 4.4 of agats kernels all same issue
zero profiles

Related

[Q] Why is the newest Netarchy Kernel making my Stock Root Rom's FPS WORSE?!

Can anyone help me out?
I'm running stock rooted 2.2 (deodexed) and flahsed over the 4.0 zip... and the scrolling is choppier than all hell. I re flashed the stock kernel, and it was back to being fine again. So, I tried again, with wiping the caches first, and still choppier than all get out when I flashed the kernel.
It's definitely the right kernel, but what the hell am I doing wrong here? Any help would be appreciated.
And, I'll even throw in 5-10 dollrs for someone who can give me an answer that works.
This could be because of the new settings he just changed. Try the download that is 4.0.2 and not 4.0.3, or try overclocking your processor to 1.2GHZ with OC widget or SetCPU.
What kind of screen do you have? If you have a Nova panel, you may need to adjust T2 values to get the best performance. Just my 2 cents.
Ok, so I installed 4.0.2, and it seems to be running better, but still some choppiness on the menu up and down scrolling when "all apps" is opened.
I have no idea how to use SetCPU (noob yep... graphics guy... not a tech guy_, so I took a screen:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Wpould you mind just telling me where the sliders should be?
nukedukem said:
What kind of screen do you have? If you have a Nova panel, you may need to adjust T2 values to get the best performance. Just my 2 cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a Nova, but, I have no idea what T2 panels are and how to adjust them. If you could point me to the right app or direction, that'd be awesome. I'll donate to you as well if it helps.
There's an app floating around here called NovaFreq formerly evoswitch. It allows you to change the panel frequency to improve fps. Everyone gets different results. 450ish was usually the best for me. Basically trial and error. Most haven't needed it with recent kernels though. As for setcpu, the higher the max frequency the better fps performance, but overclocking comes with some risks. Im usually underclocked at 576max / 245min. You can also set profiles to run certain speeds when screen off, charging, etc. Helps a lot with battery life. I would move your max down to 998 or 1113 and min to 245. Ondemand is usually a good scaling setting. Hope this helps.
Sent from my FROYO'D EVO using xda app
dglowe343 said:
There's an app floating around here called NovaFreq formerly evoswitch. It allows you to change the panel frequency to improve fps. Everyone gets different results. 450ish was usually the best for me. Basically trial and error. Most haven't needed it with recent kernels though. As for setcpu, the higher the max frequency the better fps performance, but overclocking comes with some risks. Im usually underclocked at 576max / 245min. You can also set profiles to run certain speeds when screen off, charging, etc. Helps a lot with battery life. I would move your max down to 998 or 1113 and min to 245. Ondemand is usually a good scaling setting. Hope this helps.
Sent from my FROYO'D EVO using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks. I downloaded nova frequency, but just left it at default, and changed the setcpu, bc I was getting random reboots with the overclock. I also set profiles to way lower when the screen is off and the phone is at lower battery percents.
This phone officially runs like it's on crack now. Good stuff.
Guys, PM me ur paypals, and I dont' mind donating a few bucks tomorrow.
Glad to help. Feel free to send my donation to one of the developers on this forum. Without them I wouldn't have known any of that.
Sent from my FROYO'D EVO using xda app
dglowe343 said:
Glad to help. Feel free to send my donation to one of the developers on this forum. Without them I wouldn't have known any of that.
Sent from my FROYO'D EVO using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good ****
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
TJDuckett said:
Wow thanks. I downloaded nova frequency, but just left it at default, and changed the setcpu, bc I was getting random reboots with the overclock. I also set profiles to way lower when the screen is off and the phone is at lower battery percents.
This phone officially runs like it's on crack now. Good stuff.
Guys, PM me ur paypals, and I dont' mind donating a few bucks tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL bro. Not only did I tell you to use NovaFreq, but I also told you not to use SetCPU. You were getting reboots b/c it was set too high and you don't want to set it below 245 when screen is off. I don't think SetCPU is so great for *most* people. I could have helped you on GTalk and taken your money...gladly would have

Is there a standard setting for "setcpu"

Looking for a setting some of you made with your evos and setcpu.. something that will underclock when not using the phone ... or something.. I understand with the right settings .. setcpu can save a lot of battery power.. or am I wrong? Thanks
sent using my evoh
fastfed said:
Looking for a setting some of you made with your evos and setcpu.. something that will underclock when not using the phone ... or something.. I understand with the right settings .. setcpu can save a lot of battery power.. or am I wrong? Thanks
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep! SetCPU will really improve your battery life.
The biggest thing is to enable "profiles" in the second tab and create a "screen off" profile and set it to the lowest settings you can (clock it up a bit from that if you're noticing lag when you first turn on your screen).
Other than that, I also keep a profile that clocks my processor down to 800 when my battery's below 15%. The settings on the first tab are your main settings. If no other profile's conditions are met, this one will be the one the phone uses. It's useful to turn the profile notifications on for a little bit to make sure all your profiles are working properly at first.
Thanks... but isn't there a much more in depth settings? Could of sworn I've seen a post with a bunch of settings... I just don't know how to do it
sent using my evoh
fastfed said:
Thanks... but isn't there a much more in depth settings? Could of sworn I've seen a post with a bunch of settings... I just don't know how to do it
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah give me a sec. I'll post a screen shot. Are you looking to overclock?
You can also change the governor settings for all your profiles. For my main one I use "ondemand" but for the other ones I use "powersave."
Here's all my settings. If want more depth, there is a setcpu thread somewhere on here.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my monstrous superphone using the XDA app.
How do you get it to to to 1113 mine does not go that high
sent using my evoh
Also I only have, userspace, ondemand,performance..
sent using my evoh
fastfed said:
How do you get it to to to 1113 mine does not go that high
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fastfed said:
Also I only have, userspace, ondemand,performance..
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer's the same for the both: it requires a custom kernel.
If you do happen to have one installed, make sure setCPU is set to "autodetect." On the main screen hit the menu button and then click device selection, and then press "autodetect recommended speeds."
If you don't have a custom kernel....welllllll....that's a whole different dicussion.
I just have freshs rom and the radio for it... I set mine up like yours, except I don't have the names yours has for the profiles... is it worthless for me if I don't have a customer kernal? What do they do really? Will it hurt anything? Finally will I lose anything? Sorry for the questions, but you seem to know your stuff very well...
sent using my evoh
fastfed said:
I just have freshs rom and the radio for it... I set mine up like yours, except I don't have the names yours has for the profiles... is it worthless for me if I don't have a customer kernal? What do they do really? Will it hurt anything? Finally will I lose anything? Sorry for the questions, but you seem to know your stuff very well...
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No no no, it's no where near worthless without a custom kernel. It'll do almost everything without one. It just won't give you as many governor settings (honestly not even that useful) and it won't give you the ability to overclock (idk how important that is to you). Custom kernels won't hurt anything or make you lose anything. Check the HTC Evo 4G Android Development section to find some good ones if you want. Make sure you get a kernel for SENSE roms though and not AOSP, or you might have some issues. And of course, nand backup before you try a different kernel. Also, this is just a sidenote...a lot of custom ROMs do automatically install custom kernels with the ROM, Fresh just chooses to include the stock kernel with the ROM. Like for me, while I've tried a few different kernels, but my current one is just the one that came with Cyanogen Mod.
And hey, no worries man, I'm glad to answer, i'm pretty new to this myself, but XDA's been really good to me.
Aerodynamix said:
And hey, no worries man, I'm glad to answer, i'm pretty new to this myself, but XDA's been really good to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You deserve a high-five.
What's the difference between on F demand and performance?
Sent from my EVO4G using Tapatalk.
dahauss said:
What's the difference between on F demand and performance?
Sent from my EVO4G using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance will just keep it at the highest clocked speed. It's not something you want unless you're benchmarking or something. Ondemand will clock it up as apps, etc need.
So I should do all of my profiles ondemand??
sent using my evoh
fastfed said:
So I should do all of my profiles ondemand??
sent using my evoh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah. I probably confused you with my last post. All the governor options other than performance will scale the clock speed between your profile's min and max as the phone needs it. But "conservative" or "powersave" modes will tend to scale as little as they need to, whereas "ondemand" will scale enough + fast enough so that there's never any lag. So for like your screen off profile, etc, you'll want to go with "conservative" or "powersave"
OK guys.. Thanks for all your help so far..
I just got a kernel (custom)
Kings #11.
Here is what I have
Fresh's rom 3.3
The radio that came with it, same post..
And Kings #11 Kernel
I took 3 screen shots of my Setcpu settings.
I really want to get the most out of this program and make sure I have it all right..
Here are the screens
Looks good. One thing I'd do is change all your profiles except Charging/Full to "powersave" or "conservative" instead of ondemand.
Also, you'll get better battery life if you lower the min on your Charging/Full profile to 245. That way it'll scale it up as needed, instead of keeping it at 998.
Other than that, looks good. I think you can do some stuff with the advanced tab, but i honestly don't know what any of that means.
I have my MIN at 384 on the MAIN profile and the EVO just seemed to LAG at 245. is this OK??
dahauss said:
I have my MIN at 384 on the MAIN profile and the EVO just seemed to LAG at 245. is this OK??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's fine man. To decrease lag when waking up though, you'll wanna up the Screen Off max.
Just did a complete wipe and reinstall.
Curious as I have not reinstalled setcpu..
HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK IT REALLY INCREASED YOUR BATTERY??
I am starting to feel all this stuff is so minimal, and more a placebo effect..
Setcpu,juice defender, plugging it in at this time, and taking the battery out.. blah blah blah.. Not saying there is not a difference but its so small and we all go through a good amount of work to get things right, we WANT believe the battery is lasting that much longer.

[KERNEL][GB] Pershoot-OC-UV-NEON-FP-SWAP-GOVS-1.708ghz

Admin Edit: Links removed at OP request. I believe they will be available elsewhere. I have always ben very anti-setcpu, but profiles with this kernel really are a must if you want a smooth experience without constant freezing.
This is pershoots source code as of 04/25/2011 with added overclocking patches, all governors available, swap (requested) with a max scaling frequency of 1.708ghz (1708800) YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THE USB MOUNT ISSUES present in flippy's kernel.
YMMV - Overclocking seems pretty unstable above 1.708 with the current state of the kernel (trust me i tried MANY different voltage variables, different schedulers etc..) that's why 1.8 and 1.9 are not supported, and will not be until they are stable for me again.
DO NOT SCALE ABOVE 1.516 without setting scaling governor to performance, or raising the min cpu frequency as you will experience lockups, setcpu profiles are useful in this situation. screen off profiles should have a MAX frequency of above 768 (this way when the screen goes back on it will ramp to the higher freqency THEN ramp back to the oc'd 1.708 without the jump from 245 causing a freeze) if you want to go with ondemand scaling and want the max at 1.708, you will have the most luck with min at 806 (even then it can and likely will freeze)
Edit: testing screen off profiles, it looks like you can pick whatever you want, currently mine us set to 245 min 368 max. No issues yet.
I have my device set for 368 min 1.708 max performance governor on boot and it hasnt frozen in the last two days. scaling through frequencies, or if the delta between min and max is too high, you may get a kernel panic and a battery pull will be required.
My particular setup (recommended):
on boot - 368 min, 1.708 max performance
screen off - 245 min 806 max ondemand (allows idle speed at 245)
battery < 50% 245 min 806 max ondemand
The same rules basically apply with this OC kernel that applied to flippy's. I'm not responsible for any damage that may result from your use of this kernel. yada yada yada.
you should retain wifi, gps, etc.. if not, flash it again, you did something wrong.
freezes? lockups? lower your clock speed, they shouldnt happen with any more frequency than with pershoots kernel if you stay at 1.516 and below. above that, if you experience a freeze, a last_kmsg wont help, the kernel failed to sync and panicked, there is nothing i can do about that. sorry.
wake-lag? i've gone over that, but here we go again:
generally with oc kernels:
oc+screen on/off animations+brightness > 50% = no wake lag
oc+screen on/off animations+brightness < 50% = wake lag
it isnt ideal, but get a program called screen filter from the market to apply a lesser brightness when above 50% so you dont experience the wake lag.
Enjoy.
There is weirdness with benchmarks, if you've oc'd and you know it should be higher, reset the scaling options in cm settings and try again. It's very weird and i havent put together a full list of what causes the behavior, more as it develops i guess.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Awesome thanks. Seems to be pretty stable for me at 1600 ondemand.
Sent from my HTC Desire Z/G2 using XDA App
The benchmark screenie is at 1.7 Ghz?
And thatnkyou for the kernel ..will be checking it out in a while
Works good using your recomended settings
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
It's a stable as I could get it. Been using for a couple days without issue to make sure before I posted it.
Any chance of adding the smartass governor ?
I've read many things about that and nobody never included it in a kernel.
Only in roms.
Your kernel is really good so was wondering
This is awsome! Kernel is running fast and stable. Although i don't clock it all the way up to 1700 i love that i finally can use pershoot kernel with interactive governor.
Thanks very much!
will be adding to my rom on next version
xboarder56 said:
will be adding to my rom on next version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here if you don't mind
Don't mind at all, for the person who asked, there is source for the smartass governor, I just need to locate it and merge. I'll look into it today.
Will flash tonight with the latest CM nightly. Thanks
This show promise and potential. Love, love love. Did you ever find the source for the smartass governor?
Found the this on github. It's the smartass source from a kernel for the HTC Shift, should be the same mostly.
Also this governor look interesting, maybe give an alpha release with this one in it for testing? Scary just sounds like a bada$$ name for a governor. It's from Scaryghoul btw, just to give credit.
Thanks for this amazinglarry. I'm gonna test this out for a few days before I can give you some useful feedback.
In the meantime, can I refer you to a kernel in the MT4G section that seems to try to accomplish exactly what you are doing (all available kernels, high overclock, etc.). It has all the source readily available. The link is here. http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=2491887
I'll take a look. Gracias.
Please forgive my ignorance but what might this offer over pershoots kernal? His newest kernal fixed a huge headache I had with wifi and I don't want that headache back. Is it just the addition of higher oc and the added govenators or is there more added as well?
No, just, swap, governors, and overclocking a bit more.
I'm getting instability with the camera and gallery. It either locks up or saves pictures as a black square. Gallery FC's when I try to delete pictures. As far as I recall, this didn't happen with pershoots or stock CM. I'm running 7.0.2 with no profiles, clocked at 245-979 on demand with CM settings, no setcpu. When I can get in front of a computer with adb ill post some logs.
mejorguille said:
I'm getting instability with the camera and gallery. It either locks up or saves pictures as a black square. Gallery FC's when I try to delete pictures. As far as I recall, this didn't happen with pershoots or stock CM. I'm running 7.0.2 with no profiles, clocked at 245-979 on demand with CM settings, no setcpu. When I can get in front of a computer with adb ill post some logs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not able to reproduce, camera and gallery are working st 806 and 1.708 on my device, clear pictures, no force closes.
Grab some logs, there should be very little difference in functionality (if any) between this version and the official version of pershoot's kernel, unless he does some magic that isn't in his git, which I highly suspect, seeing as how quadrant scores are a little lower at the same clock speeds with my version and his.
But as far as functions and drivers, you shouldn't have issues.
I'm thinking its something wrong with my setup. I reflashed pershoots kernel, cleared caches, and ran a fix_permission. I no longer have force closes but my camera isn't saving? Ill have to look into it.
mejorguille said:
I'm thinking its something wrong with my setup. I reflashed pershoots kernel, cleared caches, and ran a fix_permission. I no longer have force closes but my camera isn't saving? Ill have to look into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know if you can pinpoint the issue, and need some possible help.

[Q] Check CPU speeds

I'm kinda new at the whole flashing kernel thing. i just downloaded and flashed the Tiamat_Evo (v4.0.6) on my GB 2.3.3 with CyanogenMad-7.0.3.1.
What are the ways to check the max/min speeds now and what are recommend ranges for long battery life and or fast performance on the EVO
+1 in advance
There's an app called CPU Spy Beta out...I couldn't find it in the market. Try Google...they seem to have everything. I'm underclocked with interactiveX 128/768. Runs great on battery with freedom kernal
HTC EVO 4G running MIKG 2.45
slimno19 said:
There's an app called CPU Spy Beta out...I couldn't find it in the market. Try Google...they seem to have everything. I'm underclocked with interactiveX 128/768. Runs great on battery with freedom kernal
HTC EVO 4G running MIKG 2.45
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this it?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bvalosek.cpuspy
If you use Setcpu to set frequencies it also has a feature that does the same thing. Go to the info tab then select time in state. Tells you everything that app does and more.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Cm7 has a built in CPU setting.
Settings - cyanogenmod settings - performance - CPU settings
I run min 128 Max 614, still speedy no reboots (unless I undervolt too much)
Also check out vipermod, it was designed around the tiamat kernel to allow you to change the voltages to your CPU. This also helps battery life!
Sent by Supersonic!
imheroldman said:
Cm7 has a built in CPU setting.
Settings - cyanogenmod settings - performance - CPU settings
I run min 128 Max 614, still speedy no reboots (unless I undervolt too much)
Also check out vipermod, it was designed around the tiamat kernel to allow you to change the voltages to your CPU. This also helps battery life!
Sent by Supersonic!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm undervolted by 100 and I get get more and more battery life the longer I condition my battery. I'm also set at min 691 and max 921
The more that your phone spends time that it's switching clock speeds (drastic changes) seems like a waste of power.
imheroldman said:
Cm7 has a built in CPU setting.
Settings - cyanogenmod settings - performance - CPU settings
I run min 128 Max 614, still speedy no reboots (unless I undervolt too much)
Also check out vipermod, it was designed around the tiamat kernel to allow you to change the voltages to your CPU. This also helps battery life!
Sent by Supersonic!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, ill try that. is it best to reboot after applying the new settings?
If you just changed clock frequencies then no need to reboot as It's done on the fly. If you change voltages then you need to reboot. Vipermod is an excellent script. I have used it on sense kernels even though it wasn't made for them.
After looking closer at the vipermod script it doesn't say a reboot is required unless going back to factory defaults.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
@civicboy, no real need to reboot, make sure the settings don't cause your phone to reboot on its own before checking set at boot. Same goes for undervolting, and, you are more likely to get reboots with undervolting. I have seen peoples phones that wont accept any undervolting... be cautious... do it in 25mv increments to find what your phone can handle... have the reset file on your sdcard at all times. Sounds scary but its really not that bad once you figure it out.
Check back with your results or if you need more info.
Sent by Supersonic!
imheroldman said:
@civicboy, no real need to reboot, make sure the settings don't cause your phone to reboot on its own before checking set at boot. Same goes for undervolting, and, you are more likely to get reboots with undervolting. I have seen peoples phones that wont accept any undervolting... be cautious... do it in 25mv increments to find what your phone can handle... have the reset file on your sdcard at all times. Sounds scary but its really not that bad once you figure it out.
Check back with your results or if you need more info.
Sent by Supersonic!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here are my values. i went down to 100, however, i dont know what the factory values are so I cant confirm that it worked, or that the values stuck after reboot
Can anyone confirm by looking at these numbers?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
those numbers look too high. after you changed the value, did you enter "10" to save the changes and re-write to the init.d file?
alaman68 said:
those numbers look too high. after you changed the value, did you enter "10" to save the changes and re-write to the init.d file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
probably not, since i cant say yes right away lol
EDIT: I am just going to reset to factory, do the reboot, and start over.... making sure i save changes
Why am I getting this error at the bottom of the screen?
[/IMG]
Are you typing SU before you start vipermod? You have to give TU root for vipermod to work.
I think i got it figured out. i reflashed and restarted process and works great now, keeping all values. i went down -50. dont want to push my luck. Thanks for all the help!
Be sure to get vipers zip for reseting to default. This allows you to push the voltages and if you get boot looping you can just flash the reset from recovery.
And I gave you a "thanks" for actually thanking those that help out.
BuddaBelly said:
Be sure to get vipers zip for reseting to default. This allows you to push the voltages and if you get boot looping you can just flash the reset from recovery.
And I gave you a "thanks" for actually thanking those that help out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol awesome. thanks man.
You are talking about the original zip file right? can i just creat a folder called vipermod and store it in that incase of emergency?
ha, i was going to pop his "thanks" cherry too.
there is restore defaults .zip you can flash. Put it on your sd for safe keeping wherever you like and remember.
Terminal emulator is fun to learn too
alaman68 said:
ha, i was going to pop his "thanks" cherry too.
there is restore defaults .zip you can flash. Put it on your sd for safe keeping wherever you like and remember.
Terminal emulator is fun to learn too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can i get that?
http://bit.ly/nNN1P6
That's the file you need. Just put it on the root of the sdcard or wherever you know it's at and if you get into trouble going to crazy on voltages just flash it from recovery. It will reset your voltages back to defaults.

Kernels Overclocking/Voltages/Governors

Morning guys. I think I've clogged up Agats kernel thread enough with this so figured I should hop on over here and ask about what's going on.
First of all a big thanks to the few kernel devs we have over here. I understand that we did just recently get source so I'm not blaming anyone for the issues I'm encountering.
All I've been trying to do these past few days is see how far I can max out this phones performance. I'm not concerned right now with battery life. I live in a God awful data/signal area... but since source has dropped I have noticed without even touching a single setting improvements in performance.
So all I've been trying to do these last few days is overclock to 1.4 and KEEP it at 1.4 while my screen is on. I've mostly been using Tegrak Ultimate and Voltage Control and staying at Performance gov. From what Voltage Control is telling me though is the majority of the time I'm stuck at 800 MHZ. Very rarely am I at 1.4 and not only that the phone is barley ever at 500MHZ or 200MHZ. I've tried overvolting up to +75 across the board but that hasn't changed anything. I've tried different Schedulers and have seen a little improvement using CFQ. I've kept my governor at Performance.
I've never really been a big overclock guy. This just started as me seeing how far I can push this phones performance without it melting in my hands. LOL. Now though I'm just trying to learn and or understand why 96% of the time I'm sitting at 800mhz.
Thanks in advance for any feedback and especially thanks to Sleshepic, Agat, and RJ for the work they've put into these source kernels.
I've included a number of screenies..... sorry they are kind of random but it's what I've been posting in Agats thread..... but it gives you the general idea of what I'm getting at.
Thanks.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
what ROM are you running? it would seem like you have conflicting scripts running. like a script which is preventing you from using certian steps. And even capping you at 800MHZ. Have you tried a full wipe then flash your rom and agat's kernel again? just wondering if there is a left over script from a perivous rom or battery saver mod. I have been following you on the kernel thread. hell, Ive been using google this to see if i can come up with something. thats I have right now.
link for reading: http://www.setcpu.com/documentation.html
g_ding84 said:
what ROM are you running? it would seem like you have conflicting scripts running. like a script which is preventing you from using certian steps. And even capping you at 800MHZ. Have you tried a full wipe then flash your rom and agat's kernel again? just wondering if there is a left over script from a perivous rom or battery saver mod. I have been following you on the kernel thread. hell, Ive been using google this to see if i can come up with something. thats I have right now.
link for reading: http://www.setcpu.com/documentation.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man. You might be on to something there. I'm going to look further into scripts and how they may conflict with Tegrak/Setcpu/Voltages.
This could very well be the issue...... I can't think of anything else it could be.
Thanks again.
caspersfi said:
Thanks man. You might be on to something there. I'm going to look further into scripts and how they may conflict with Tegrak/Setcpu/Voltages.
This could very well be the issue...... I can't think of anything else it could be.
Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. im also checking it out as well. I'll keep ya informed as what else i could find.
Go team venum! lol
Well I'm not getting anywhere on this. A few days ago I was testing Manufan's Hooligan ROM(awesome ROM by the way) then did a fresh install over to Mijjah's Goodness ROM. I just asked in his thread and Rwilco12 said there isn't a script in the ROM. He thinks there may be some apps conflicting.
The only thing I have left to do is another fresh install. Judging by the lack of responses in this thread I may be the only one having this issue.
do you have multiple OC apps? like i had to delet Rom tool box when I started using voltage control. same way when I had tagraz. I beleive you can only have on OC app at a time as they will conflict by trying to gain control over the CPU.
Yeah I'm running 0.2.3 and here's mine.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
g_ding84 said:
do you have multiple OC apps? like i had to delet Rom tool box when I started using voltage control. same way when I had tagraz. I beleive you can only have on OC app at a time as they will conflict by trying to gain control over the CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I have Rom Toolbox Pro but I'm just using that to change my font. I have Setcpu frozen thru TB and just using Tegrak Ultimate.
When I get home from work later I'm going to do a fresh install. Use Rom Toolbox Pro to change my font then freeze it. Then just use Tegrak and not install Setcpu.
See if that does it. Thanks again for your feedback.
caspersfi said:
Well I have Rom Toolbox Pro but I'm just using that to change my font. I have Setcpu frozen thru TB and just using Tegrak Ultimate.
When I get home from work later I'm going to do a fresh install. Use Rom Toolbox Pro to change my font then freeze it. Then just use Tegrak and not install Setcpu.
See if that does it. Thanks again for your feedback.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no problem. just something i was thinking about.

Categories

Resources