Cyanogenmod 10.1 will support Galaxy W i8150 - Samsung Galaxy W I8150

Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

World be awesome
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

Oh f**k yes!!! but I'm pretty sure the device maintainers is arco
-sent from my awesome phone-

Hell yeah
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

doesn't have galaxy s plus in the list......
but i also have galaxy w,W cm rom can port to s plus?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

hell yeah finally we got official support from cyanogenmod! :good:

Hats off to Sir Arco and all other developers. It's due to them that we have grabbed some attention !!!
Galaxy W I8150 + DXLM2 + CM9 Beta 3

It's the best news for W and S+ users! Of course CM10.1 can be ported to S+. I am supporting arco for this, Galaxy W improves further than before!!!

Great news and i'm happy that the Galaxy W is still getting supported even if it has been long forgotten by Samsung.

this is very suprising news , only can think arco as the maintainers

at last:laugh:

Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.

arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it is a lie?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app

arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master

Hope it will be soon, but it's enough to have W with 3.x.x kernel and CM10 for now. When Samsung forgot the W, it's good to see arco and CM Team are working on this device. Keep working on that guys.

petafly said:
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the whole thread, and not. a. single. post ever mentioned the source of the list.
So, since there is no official news release from the Cyanogenmod team, I'd say that this is hearsay...

Yes, no trustable source. I'm asking myself, why would someone add our phone to the list of the new Cyanogenmod and imply a change of policy of CM?
Thanx arco for clearing things up.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

hotheabilly said:
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ye I'll see if I can do a build of CM10 with 3.x kernel soon. Things are a bit overwhelming at the moment, with 3 Android versions to work on, so it's hard to find enough time to spend on them. I'm beginning to feel that Google should slow down their release cycle a bit. As it is now, there's barely enough time for us devs to get a version stable, before they release a new Android version and we'll have to start all over again.

So it seems all we have to do is to wait for now

Posted in the wrong thread

Related

[Q] CM7 developement

hey guys, the last months i've seen almost 4 topics about developing (such as Maroc&Razor, Motafoca, Androhacker etc...) why doesn't anyone of those combine and form 1 single team. I think it will be much better than 4 seperate teams.
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
raolemo said:
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. if people having options they will try rather then using one......
I agree with OP.. unity is the strength here.. they would hv developed it faster if they worked together.. although there can be major clashes over the the concepts.. as some strongly support some issue some don't at all!
But the point is for the sake of the dev.. they might consider sharing what they hv achieved so far.. like so far the one by razor083 is very much working.. but with lot of bugs.. if they try they can make it work! instead they r building it again separately! They should only do dat if there is nothing to be done on this port by razor083!! in dat case they should proceed from source again! but atlst they should take a look at it!!
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Chucrute said:
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really from source?
he said
This is a port of CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC0, a community-based custom Android ROM based Gingerbread 2.3.7, for the Samsung Galaxy Y phone. The current development status inicial - most hardware is not working correctly !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now im confused
nope.. it is from the source.. He also said "Its from source
I built it"..
No 3G, no Wifi, and no audio. Now thats not something I would flash. Waiting for a stable bug free version with crossed fingers. xP
OP is right: We (developers/themers/porters) should work together to make a fully working cm7 and cm9. Not all the bad roms which all get discontinued.... PM me if you want me to work with you!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy s III baby

Is ParaAndroid rom porting for SGY

Hi devs is their any port of paraandroid for sgy.
Or in future it will bcoz they porting paraandroid rapidly for various devices..
Is any news for SGY
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
No way as there is atleast no cm7/cm9 to this yet. Paranoidandroid is based on cm9.
hitme987 said:
No way as there is atleast no cm7/cm9 to this yet. Paranoidandroid is based on cm9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:thumbup:Ohhh thanksss sir,but after cm9 release this may possible bcoz cm9 is under port devlopment for sgy by safariking
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
[email protected] said:
:thumbup:Ohhh thanksss sir,but after cm9 release this may possible bcoz cm9 is under port devlopment for sgy by safariking
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends. It's the devs interest. Basically it's made mostly for higher end phones, so I don't think this one can get that thing, but if it gets it would be awesome. It was the best rom on my s2
according to xda our device is in "Legacy & Low Activity Devices" criteria
so it could no be possible......until until cm9 fully out
by cm9 our dev's can do the same
..........so patient.......................
Our is screen is not capable for paranoid rom needs big screen
hitme987 said:
That depends. It's the devs interest. Basically it's made mostly for higher end phones, so I don't think this one can get that thing, but if it gets it would be awesome. It was the best rom on my s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhh nice sir.Devs trying if made then it be awesome:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
[email protected] said:
Ohhh nice sir.Devs trying if made then it be awesome:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya absolutely not possible
even cm9 is struggling to be ported to our phone
cm7 has just got some better releases now
How can anyone expect para android?
somkll said:
Our is screen is not capable for paranoid rom needs big screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy Mini has Paranoid Android
Ya though mini may hv, it cannot be ported to sgy
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
it depends on the specs not only the screen.. what's the use of big screen but low ram? higher version of Android OS needs more ram to make it smooth and stable without any lags.. expect the cm7 soon it will be fully fixed, just trust the dev.
Sent from my Android System using Busybox Command.
First let relase fully fixed cm7 for our device, then others will be released also.. I trust on our devs..

When to expect Paranoid Android on the Note 2?

Strangely i didn't found people asking about that while searching on google...
Soon enough
Imilka has signed up for Note 2 dev list so we can expect a PA
Atleast i can say it WILL come. :good:
As ParanoidAndroid is based on cyanogenmod afaik, i`am afraid it still will take a while mate
Like... Months..?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
kojinmalia said:
Like... Months..?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on Samsung, they have to publish the scource codes of the kernel and other hardware components or CM cannot go ahed and start coding.
gee2012 said:
It depends on Samsung, they have to publish the scource codes of the kernel and other hardware components or CM cannot go ahed and start coding.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have posted. But the people in the US can't get a note 2 in their hands until November. That's the troubke
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
argh,
really, if paranoid (or at least cm10/11) won't be available soon, that will make me buy these LG Nexus or whatever else Google may show us
Right now, there are no official porters for CM10 for the galaxy note.
Samsung, by not releasing exynos/framework documentation, basically has made it too difficult to develop CM10 for it.
The Note 1 developers basically got fed up and quit until Samsung makes it more practical.
So no CM10 means no PA.
We can hope that a new developer takes the reigns, but as the other poster said: we're in for a long wait.
- Frank
edwinpang said:
They have posted. But the people in the US can't get a note 2 in their hands until November. That's the troubke
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posted what? Where?
ipguy said:
Posted what? Where?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.google.com.hk/search?client=chrome-mobile&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8&q=note+2+source
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
ChodTheWacko said:
Right now, there are no official porters for CM10 for the galaxy note.
Samsung, by not releasing exynos/framework documentation, basically has made it too difficult to develop CM10 for it.
The Note 1 developers basically got fed up and quit until Samsung makes it more practical.
So no CM10 means no PA.
We can hope that a new developer takes the reigns, but as the other poster said: we're in for a long wait.
- Frank
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have no official CM porters? since when are porters official its either original CM or ported CM
Anyways , atleast im more than 100% sure we WILL get ported cyanogen mod, and most probably PA too.
now ive used ported CM 10 on around 3 of other devices, and take my word if you havent tried it yet, a port totally depends on which device CM it is ported from. E.g. If we get ported cm 10, it will atleast be as much performing as CM 10 on S 3, whose hardware is resembling, because the porters will take as much help as they can from CM10 of S3...
And if CM10 may be ported, why not PA? its not like first CM has to be ported in order to port a PA second
Thats kernel source, not hardware sources, they are two separate things the CM team need both to make a fully working CM rom for this device (and any other modern Samsung device)

Big THANKS for psyke83

So guys psyke83(Galaxy 5 developer) started to port kernel 3.0.8 and if he made it it will be ported to our gio ( i'm a Galaxy 5 user too) and belive me this man is awesome and he will soon finish the port and we will have kernel 3.0.8 so this is the thread http://madteam.co/forum/development...el-3-0-8-porting-for-samsung-msm7x27-devices/ please al least make an account and press thank to his thread
I can confirm the awesomeness of psyke, I once had a galaxy 5 he was such an epic developer you guys wont believe it. He makes the best releases possible, I can guarentee you guys he is in the top 10 developers in the world. 100%
dhalham said:
I can confirm the awesomeness of psyke, I once had a galaxy 5 he was such an epic developer you guys wont believe it. He makes the best releases possible, I can guarentee you guys he is in the top 10 developers in the world. 100%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hello dhalham long time no see you on madteam u don't have a Galaxy 5 any more?
has been tried by olddroid if im not wrong, but not usable yet.
keep us in touch
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
voetbalremco said:
has been tried by olddroid if im not wrong, but not usable yet.
keep us in touch
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry to say but if i'm not wrong the whisp ,psyke 83 are the first ,old droid just tried let the work be made by specialists
No one really wanted me to continue my ROMs, its why I left, do a petition or something if you want me to return
tcris45 said:
sorry to say but if i'm not wrong the whisp ,psyke 83 are the first ,old droid just tried let the work be made by specialists
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont follow rheir work, they may be first.
but that doesnt mean olddroid isnt a specialist.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
first i need to say, many users are working on it, atleast tilal6991, bytecode, antdking, AndroidMeda (LG Team), now we also got some samsung mentainers: Me, erikcas, Wayland_ACE and psyke83 [i personally dont think thats impossible because the lg mentainers got already the most things working, but its still not working because they need to backport the drivers from the old 2.38 kernel!]
OldDroid said:
first i need to say, many users are working on it, atleast tilal6991, bytecode, antdking, AndroidMeda (LG Team), now we also got some samsung mentainers: Me, erikcas, Wayland_ACE and psyke83 [i personally dont think thats impossible because the lg mentainers got already the most things working, but its still not working because they need to backport the drivers from the old 2.38 kernel!]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah lg maintaners fixed a lot of things to get it build and now what is needed is get it booting
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Well what do you know, psyke got the kernel 3.0.8 booting on galaxy5. Told you he is a legend.
Yep i can confirme he made it boot
Sent from my GT-5660 using xda app-developers app

[discussion] aosp and cm

why dont u people try to build an AOSP rom instead ofa CM....coz probably cm is sumthing that is modifications made to AOSP....and even the touchwiz ui is modified AOSP so if we can have a AOSP build itll probably be easier for us to build these roms..
...if sum one is ready to help me learn about building roms from source ill sure try making CM's and AOKP and paranoid and what not
is better but its based on AOSP.....its like imagine AOSP as a stock rom and CM as a custom rom...wait why imagine..its actually like that....so the basic idea is to improve performance...where CM show up...but whats the base CM uses??...its AOSP....so if we have a perfect AOSP which is obv possible...coz Samsung wouldn't be able to build TouchWiz withouta base...for obv reasons...so why not try building an AOSP first and then continuing with CM
do u even know whatcha sayin?
tl;dr
Here's some math:
No sources = no base
No base = no sources
No sources = no cm
No cm = no aosp
So unless you try to find a way to make those proprietary sources available then I'd suggest doing some research.
Also even if you tried you'll fail, we have the best devs for sgy working hard for that goal and we're honestly not making good progress. Well except for percy and his cm9 and psycho's cm7 but still a long way from "stable as stock".
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Naman...we haven't tried making AOSP yet so we cant just confirm this and it cant be that it was made for nexus only coz its an open source project so they must have probably kept in mind that many dev's will try to have it on different devices ..... the Gingerbread that our SGY uses is nothing but a custom rom of the aosp which we call as stock....
for obv reasons...samsung would not have made their own android os right...they have used google sources....the point is...the time dev's have spent on making CM if would have been focused on AOSP we might just have a build close enough to psycho's work!
and what ive learned or i might be wrong in this that psycho used aosp's sources for the fixes....Maybe wrong about this...i just read it somewhere here!.....and as our device has the largest community of awesome dev's why not we try the AOSP thing out??
we cant just conclude without trying...can we??......some months back people were like we wont have a CM....we have a working CM7 and CM9 which are working pretty fine except for the driver bugs....same way,we might just end up having an AOSP...
another hope to Young GT-S6310. need a great developers to make it true
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you should see this. www.cyanogenmod.org/about
And also about android opensource project. Google gives aosp source to all manufacturers as part of aosp allience/programme which they further modify. And first phone running android was not nexus to say that they don't give damn about other devices. And the number of devices running CM is still very low.
Like I said, a friend told me about it.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
If we get a set of experienced Devs who want to help out we might get aosp
Also if stock is like a custom aosp
That means our phone must support AOSP!!
Only need some experience Devs :sly:
As i said its all about aosp....just need sum1 to teach me these sources and setup stuff....i would like to start working on it as soon as possible!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
SSSidGGG said:
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
prototype-U said:
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know...thats the reason ive been looking around google for sumthing that could get me some help .........its hard i guess ill have to take percy's help :?
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Veru funny dude! ( --..-- )
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really bro?._.
Sent from my SGY using XDA
I am new here.......
Don't be rude and hit thanks
Device : Samsung Galaxy Y
ROM : Hyperion 8 pre gm alsa build 0.2
KERNEL : Savie's
I say start saving money for a new phone.
prototype-U said:
I say start saving money for a new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
SaketJoshi said:
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man.. they are just stock based roms.. everyone is upgrading these days, android 4.3 has been released and you are still on 2.3.6. Which makes you guys really outdated..
Kernel? yeah there are huge number of kernels here but if you notice that most of em have same features See other phones like nexus 4. They have whats called "real" kernel development.
Pico which is 1k more expensive is 100 times better than this phone and you also know it. Why not buy that? I sold my Y for 3.5k and another 3k can buy you a arm7 phone. Which wont get outdated for another year atleast..

Categories

Resources