Related
My galaxy nexus is getting noticeably slow. What are your guys thoughts of purchasing a Moto X as Gnex replacement?
I think it's a good change. Moto X has some nice features and the updates to the latest android versiones are coming
If you don't mind minimal development since it's locked down, everything else i've heard about the Moto X has been pretty good. Supposedly blows our Gnex out of the water in terms of speed and features. If you're on anything but Verizon, I just looked and you can unlock the bootloader through Moto, but I think only the Dev Edition doesn't get it's warranty voided if you unlock it.
both are great phones. i'd go to the store and see which one feels better in my hand.
Moto X is nice but way too pricey
I'm a current Galaxy Nexus user, but in the past month, my parents and 6 friends have all gotten Moto Xs and they love them. I've had the chance to play around with them myself, and the performance, feel, and features are really top notch. It feels like a very natural evolution of my Nexus, except with far better reception and battery life. Also, while AMOLED, the screen is brigher and clearer.
The regular black and white versions are very cheap on Amazon Wireless. The Moto Maker ones are more expensive, but there are a lot of sales, and honestly, the customized ones look amazing in person.
If you still want an unlocked bootloader, you can get a developer version. Motorola put warranties back on the unlockable versions of their phones this past week, so you won't be out in the cold if you bust your phone.
The Galaxy Nexus has been a great device, and will continue to be mine for a few more months. That being said, if you're ready to get something new, I think the Moto X is a really excellent choice.
Sonicmax2k2 said:
I'm a current Galaxy Nexus user, but in the past month, my parents and 6 friends have all gotten Moto Xs and they love them. I've had the chance to play around with them myself, and the performance, feel, and features are really top notch. It feels like a very natural evolution of my Nexus, except with far better reception and battery life. Also, while AMOLED, the screen is brigher and clearer.
The regular black and white versions are very cheap on Amazon Wireless. The Moto Maker ones are more expensive, but there are a lot of sales, and honestly, the customized ones look amazing in person.
If you still want an unlocked bootloader, you can get a developer version. Motorola put warranties back on the unlockable versions of their phones this past week, so you won't be out in the cold if you bust your phone.
The Galaxy Nexus has been a great device, and will continue to be mine for a few more months. That being said, if you're ready to get something new, I think the Moto X is a really excellent choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
some great thoughts here ^^^
I am either going to get the HTC one or moto x but I am really on the fence about which is better for me. I really care about battery and data connectivity moztly. I would like to root and use custom roms if either allows that. I did see the HTC one beats the moto x in display sharpness but the moto x beats in brightness which is important to me. What do you guys suggest?
Sent from my SM-N900V using xda app-developers app
TBH, I would take the MotoX right now. I like the size of the MotoX, the always on features, and the battery life on it. I think it'd be a better choice for me based on the fact that I do not game as much as I used to.
I was in your boat about a month ago and the real selling point to me was the design, speakers and the camera on the HTC one. And it's a powerhouse with impressive battery life. Plus the TV app is prett neat. Aside from all that, the features on the X seem much more practical and it's a great price.
That is such a toss up right now. I think I would go with the Moto X, I really like the active notifications.
But don't get me wrong,.I love my HTC One.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
I have the One on Verizon, and my girlfriend has the Moto X on Verizon.
I love the build quality, solid feel, front facing speakers, and Sense UI of the One. It is an awesome phone, my only real critiques are the camera, that it doesn't have a 3 soft-touch-button layout like my old DNA, and that ViperONE isn't officially supported yet
However, Motorola is on fire with the Moto X, I have to admit. It is an awesome "daily driver" phone, and Motorola is hitting a grand slam with their fast updates, the way they are updating some of the native apps through the Play Store, etc, they are just doing an awesome job with this phone. I've never really liked Motorola or their phones, but I have to acknowledge that I really like what I'm seeing from them and hope that other manufacturers catch on.
I like not only the ideas that Motorola is implementing with the Moto X, as mentioned above, but the actual product itself. It is a very nice quality feeling phone, with good build quality, the perfect size, and excellent performance. I haven't ever been tempted this much by a non-HTC phone..if I could snag one for <$300 on Craigslist, I would probably pick one up to flirt with.
I didn't buy into the Moto X hype until my girlfriend ordered a Motomaker Moto X, and I've got to toy around with it. I see what all the hype is about now.
I guess I can't believe I am saying this, as an HTC fan, but Moto X. I think it will offer the best day to day performance for the average user, with the least amount of bugs or hiccups. If you consider yourself a power user, grab the One.
Not sure how soon you're considering it, but at this point we might only be 2-4 months from the HTC M8 (successor to the One), and it could be worth the wait? Keep that in mind.. although who knows how long we'd have to get that phone on Verizon.
freddie813 said:
I have the One on Verizon, and my girlfriend has the Moto X on Verizon.
I love the build quality, solid feel, front facing speakers, and Sense UI of the One. It is an awesome phone, my only real critiques are the camera, that it doesn't have a 3 soft-touch-button layout like my old DNA, and that ViperONE isn't officially supported yet
However, Motorola is on fire with the Moto X, I have to admit. It is an awesome "daily driver" phone, and Motorola is hitting a grand slam with their fast updates, the way they are updating some of the native apps through the Play Store, etc, they are just doing an awesome job with this phone. I've never really liked Motorola or their phones, but I have to acknowledge that I really like what I'm seeing from them and hope that other manufacturers catch on.
I like not only the ideas that Motorola is implementing with the Moto X, as mentioned above, but the actual product itself. It is a very nice quality feeling phone, with good build quality, the perfect size, and excellent performance. I haven't ever been tempted this much by a non-HTC phone..if I could snag one for <$300 on Craigslist, I would probably pick one up to flirt with.
I didn't buy into the Moto X hype until my girlfriend ordered a Motomaker Moto X, and I've got to toy around with it. I see what all the hype is about now.
I guess I can't believe I am saying this, as an HTC fan, but Moto X. I think it will offer the best day to day performance for the average user, with the least amount of bugs or hiccups. If you consider yourself a power user, grab the One.
Not sure how soon you're considering it, but at this point we might only be 2-4 months from the HTC M8 (successor to the One), and it could be worth the wait? Keep that in mind.. although who knows how long we'd have to get that phone on Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great review and very fair.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Ah well I went with the moto x and then someone offered me a mint HTC one with cases 32gb for 370 after I paid 360 for a new moto x. Ug I think I would of taken the HTC one due to its nice metal construction but got the moto x otw so I will keep that. Do you guys recommend to root the moto x or keep it stock? Hopefully the moto x is better on battery than the HTC one
Sent from my SM-N900V using xda app-developers app
I almost rooted the girlfriend's Moto X, but it was slightly different terminology and and process, and I haven't bothered to learn it.
It is awesome without root.
What case are most moto x using
Sent from my SM-N900V using xda app-developers app
I got the Diztronic clear case for my lady.
The HTC one is my preference. I am VERY interested in the MotoX I wish I had one to play around with, if I had the extra cash I'd easily grab it for a "back-up"/bring to concerts so I don't hurt my htc one lol, but I have played with it and reallllly enjoyed it.
Also not a big moto guy, first (smart) phone was OG Moto, which i exchanged within the 30 days (the good old days before crApple) and got the HTC Eris, that started my HTC Love.
But I would honestly also highly suggest looking into both deeply and consider the options, I know Moto usually has boot strap which is pretty amazing, but HTC one is s-off (well unfortunately not anymore until the new OTA gets/if updated..)
so yea, this is a tough one
I also hate saying it, but I am interested in the Samsung Galaxy S5, if made from metal like the rumors, would be a much bigger competitor to HTC.
I still prefer HTC, but I thoroughly enjoyed both the SG3, and SG4. Both un-expectedly phones I loved and won't sell. Unless maybe to fund the MotoX, might be time to dump s4 for the MotoX, but the sg3 will be one of those phones like the HTC One, that just won't even get sold.
Keep in mind that another great option is the Droid Maxx--if you want great battery life. It is basically the same phone as the Moto X with a better battery and better build quality, but no motomaker.
But I think other than the battery the One is a much better phone. Best option now is to wait until the M8 or the galaxy s5 is out.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Both phones are awesome. I have preferred the moto x, because of size, active notifications, touchless control, and its closer to aosp.
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
I wish I'd have gone with the motox, but the camera issues put me off. But those are fixed and now I want one, lol. Any one up for trade?
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using xda app-developers app
I switched from the One to the X. Only things I really miss are the camera and sometimes the IR remote functions. Other than that, totally happy with the X. I bought the developer version.
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
karn101 said:
I switched from the One to the X. Only things I really miss are the camera and sometimes the IR remote functions. Other than that, totally happy with the X. I bought the developer version.
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also just made the switch from the One to the Moto X, and so far I'm quite happy. I bought the developer edition, since I like to tinker with custom roms and can't be bothered with safestrap.
I do miss the solid feel of the One, though.
HTC One 100%! But I'd still tell you to go to the store amd try them all out to see what you like best. Really depends on your needs.
hoa1 said:
You. Must go for HTC one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the Moto X didn't have an AMOLED screen, i'd probably go with that. The over-saturated colors and decreased visibility in outdoors really kills it for me. I do like the overall package though.
YouthSoccer said:
If the Moto X didn't have an AMOLED screen, i'd probably go with that. The over-saturated colors and decreased visibility in outdoors really kills it for me. I do like the overall package though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good for you then :good:
---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 PM ----------
hoa1 said:
good for you then :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and dont forget to share your experience of using new phone
I have been asking myself this question a lot lately.
I'm loving my One, but I've had to work really hard to get the battery to something even half way decent. I'd love to play with an X for an extended period to see how much different the ergonomics, speed and screen quality are for me.
But it sounds like all of the X converts are very pleased. Either way, I'm sure you can't go wrong.
___________________________
OP - I realize that last bit I wrote wasn't actually helpful in any fashion. My apologies.
However, you said you're mainly concerned with battery life and data connectivity. I think with that being the case, you'd be happier with the X. By most accounts, battery life is phenomenal with high screen times, and the Motorola Radio's are typically some of the best I've used for signal and speed.
Don't let the specs on paper fool you either. Even though the X has a 720p display, it's still a fantastic screen. Also, just from playing with a couple of the X's my friends own, it's one of the most comfortable devices I've held lately. And the X8 architecture seems to be about as responsive as my One in most every task.
The X definitely has things well figure out from what I have seen and with what seems to be substantially more longevity vs the One, it may be the route you want to go.
Hey all
I searched and found one thread similar to this but was hoping to revisit since the OP3 has been out a little longer.
I had an LG G3. Worst phone ever. Screen stopped working so I had to root my Amazon Fire Phone with CM. As much as I'm enjoying the small form factor of this phone, there are a number of issues. I can't take good photos, no mute, no updates, can't talk on speakerphone etc.
Tonight I went ahead and ordered the Moto X pure 32GB with moto care for $49 so thiats $399 total. I then came across the OP3 and it peaked my interest so wondering whether it's a good move. As much good as I read about the OP3 in terms of performance, I read a lot of negatives. Wifi/Bluetooth issues, colour issues, bad speaker, bad video, bad RAM management, slow updates etc.
I want a phone that works well and had good specs so, to those who know, who you recommend sticking with a slightly outdated moto that works well all round or go for the OP3 with its glitches and all?
I would go with the OP3. It's an amazing phone. The new updated solved alot of problems. But you get that with every new phone. But other wise, it's a fantastic phone. I love it.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using XDA-Developers mobile app
I've owned both. Get the OP3. It's lighter, thinner, MUCH faster, has a better camera, the most recent specs, and better battery life.
Plus in 6 months the Moto x pure will be DIRT cheap.
the X Pure has a worse SOC, a worse camera and is significantly older. for equal money the OP3 is significantly better.
now if it was an x pure for $200 or a OP3, then you have a tougher choice.
As your asking in OP3 section,here everyone will suggest OP3.
My brother own a moto x pure and I used it sometimes and my impression are x pure is really a subpar phone.
I'm owner of OP3 since launch day.I don't have a single complain.
If you want top notch dev support then there is no choice other than OP3(do you know OP3 has early CM build on launch day even by that no one even handled device themselves.)
Though both have almost pure nexus like software but OP3 has SD820 (which is a beast), and most important is Dash charge(its extremely fast.65 min and you go from zero to hero)
=========
My recommendation - Go OP3 blindly(based on my last 25 day of experience with OP3)
JumboMan said:
As your asking in OP3 section,here everyone will suggest OP3.
My brother own a moto x pure and I used it sometimes and my impression are x pure is really a subpar phone.
I'm owner of OP3 since launch day.I don't have a single complain.
If you want top notch dev support then there is no choice other than OP3(do you know OP3 has early CM build on launch day even by that no one even handled device themselves.)
Though both have almost pure nexus like software but OP3 has SD820 (which is a beast), and most important is Dash charge(its extremely fast.65 min and you go from zero to hero)
=========
My recommendation - Go OP3 blindly(based on my last 25 day of experience with OP3)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, asking on an OP3 forum section is a little silly but what I'm trying to see is if the issues, which there seem to be many are sorted or continue. What I am trying to avoid is a spec monster that keeps dropping wifi signals, bluetooth disconnects etc that then needs to be rooted to fix. I'm not the most technically adept person so beyond root and flash, I'm useless.
I know it's a better phone performance/spec wise but I'm wondering about daily liveability. My LG G3 was terrible. Required restarts because it kept droppin network signal, battery was a shocker, phone was laggy at times, wifi signal was weak etc.
Whereas I assume from many positive reviews, the Moto X Pure might not be fastest or most glamouros phone, but it works with minimal issues.
Moto X sucks.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using XDA-Developers mobile app
@RandomGRK, May be I'm lucky owner of OP3 because I'm not facing any wifi or network signal problem .
And about rooting i think unlocking bootloader and rooting is very very simple process like sending one or two commands to your phone for unlocking bootloader and flashing twrp and then supersu. That's very simple.Naman Bhalla has written a very good article on rooting unlocking bootloader.
====
And don't call yourself useless.
Amazon Prime day just forced my decision. Moto X Pure 32Gb for $249. I couldn't say no, even as a short term phone. I'll be keeping my eye on the oneplus 3 though. Thanks for the responses all.
RandomGRK said:
Amazon Prime day just forced my decision. Moto X Pure 32Gb for $249. I couldn't say no, even as a short term phone. I'll be keeping my eye on the oneplus 3 though. Thanks for the responses all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@249 that's really a very good deal
Hi. I've complained and emailed Motorola at least two times after the disaster of my old Moto G4 (water damage) and have voiced out how can they improve things. Now, with planning on buying a G5 Plus I have three main concerns:
1. Having no compass or magnetometer means location services apps like Google Maps (which I use on a daily basis for walking navigation due to the nature of my work and during holiday looking for a nearby restaurant or a place of interest) may function and perform slower than a device with compass. True?
2. Advanced nano coating - I'm worried that when i use my phone in light rain or an accidental drop in the sink might damage the internals when water enter small holes such as mic, speakers, USB port and grooves in-between buttons. So, is it safe or not?
3. Updates - We all know when Lenovo took over Moto updates have been very slow with the current G5 lineup still stuck with 7.0. I'm not into rooting so I depend highly on updates straight from the OEM. But with a near-stock and seemingly optimised software is this a cause for concern? Or better to stick it out with Samsung or Sony which does faster updates?
Some minor concerns are:
1. G5 Plus speakers sound a bit tinnier than last year's model?
2. Camera seem bland and has no image stabilisation apart from a pseudo-EIS at 1080p 30fps but still better than last year?
3. Storage is UFS type or eMMC 5.1?
You sound like you are expecting a flagship level performance from a midranger.
You should be looking for a Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus.
Yes, gps should be a bit finicky for walking navigation for initial navigation, once you start walking it should be fine.
No, it's not gonna be safe for dropping in the sink.
Not even Galaxy S8 or LG G6 got any updates beyond 7.0. For a budget phone don't expect security update every month. I would expect a security update like every 3/4 months. And It's probably gonna jump to Android 8.0 directly at the beginning of next year. Assumption is based on the update of my Moto Z play.
You are right about the camera, but unless you purchase a next year's flagship, there is no better camera than this for less than 300$ price tag.
1) Software problems (i.e. slow updates and the like) are all eventually solved with custom roms
2) if you want hardware that the phone doesnt have, you need to pay more for a phone. this is a great mid level phone
Karlinski said:
1) Software problems (i.e. slow updates and the like) are all eventually solved with custom roms
2) if you want hardware that the phone doesnt have, you need to pay more for a phone. this is a great mid level phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a great mid-level phone that's $200 less than another great mid-level phone, OnePlus 3T !!
And the fingerpad control is life changing (I keep trying to swipe on my Tab S2 tablet's button now!)
I do not think things such as a compass is ONLY found on a high-end device. And things i considered "basic" for a mid-range such as USB Type-C (which has been around for a year now in mainstream devices), blue light filter (again present in Asus tablets since 3 years ago & iPhones as well). And a compass.
And a security update 4 months ago isn't good enough; Google has started to be "strict" in encouraging OEMs to at least patch security vulnerabilities (and maybe some minor bug fixes) every month which again to some is a deal breaker and a very important matter especially nowadays.
I'm not into custom ROMs so I would rather wait for OTA pushed directly by the phone manufacturer.
Saying that I need something more than a 5-inch screen real estate. And one under £250 / $250.
Compass - In the Phone
USB C - Not included for Cost (i'm sure)
blue light filter - Added in SW
Quick Security updates - Added by Custom Roms
If you wait for Moto, you may be waiting a while. There are really a few options..
Buy a nexus
- get the newest updates
- get all the high end features
Use a custom Rom
- get the newest Updates
Don't use nexus or Custom Rom
- Wait for slow manufactures
It's really about as simple as that.
Thanks for the insight.
Would you mind please installing CPU-Z and prove to me the G5 Plus has a compass.
As I have said I am not into rooting or custom ROMs. And besides I might invalidate the warranty of my phone or further damage the software as I still think ROMS are unstable anyway.
So, what you are saying a USB Type-C (a technology which is technically around for over a year now) would be expensive in terms of being incorporated in a device?
Is a blue light filter toggle being baked in the SW difficult to do by a devs?
And would 3GB of memory be enough? Really worried that apps are not kept on memory so apps reload and not load instantly.
Moto G5 Plus has a compass in USA, but not in Europe. Also, yes, 3 GB of RAM is fine. 2 GB is just enough, 3 GB is good, 4 GB is great
Well, that's the trouble right there. One country had slightly altered specs than the other. I wonder what made Motorola-Lenovo decide why us Brits/Europeans don't need a compass in our phones. Stupid really.
Gino76ph said:
Well, that's the trouble right there. One country had slightly altered specs than the other. I wonder what made Motorola-Lenovo decide why us Brits/Europeans don't need a compass in our phones. Stupid really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the same ones that decided the US version didn't need NFC. It's almost like they've decided to the penny what they are going to put into the phones and then they clip a coin to see which market gets what.
After the G4 I decided I'd never own another Lenovo product but I did look hard at the G5. Since my G4 is running ok for now, I've decided to hold off and see if the rumor mill holds true about the G5S later this year. I may take another look then.
Tel864 said:
Probably the same ones that decided the US version didn't need NFC. It's almost like they've decided to the penny what they are going to put into the phones and then they clip a coin to see which market gets what.
After the G4 I decided I'd never own another Lenovo product but I did look hard at the G5. Since my G4 is running ok for now, I've decided to hold off and see if the rumor mill holds true about the G5S later this year. I may take another look then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I had the G4 it developed some water damage (the worse I did with the phone was i quickly "washed" it with water under the sink but only for 1-2 seconds nothing more) hence I got disappointed. I held off for a new G5 simply because I was just underwhelmed somewhat and also disappointed because Lenovo decided on (what I view strongly as ) cost cutting exercises as I mentioned earlier such as having no compass, no USB Type-C, "advanced" nano coating and not some IP-rated protection, a measly 5MP front cam and no 7.1.1 on release.
I did saw news of an updated G5S phones but they may not come till late this year so I'm back on the drawing board i.e. getting another G4 by the meantime or buy an old flagship like S7 (which can be had for exactly the same price as a UK-spec G5) or an iPhone 6S or a much cheaper/older Nexus 6P. Lost faith in a Sony phone as battery life has been an issue for me since.
After using this phone
I regret not buying Lenovo p2 or lenovo zuk z2
Z2 has 820
It was being offered for $200
suhridkhan said:
You sound like you are expecting a flagship level performance from a midranger.
You should be looking for a Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus.
Yes, gps should be a bit finicky for walking navigation for initial navigation, once you start walking it should be fine.
No, it's not gonna be safe for dropping in the sink.
Not even Galaxy S8 or LG G6 got any updates beyond 7.0. For a budget phone don't expect security update every month. I would expect a security update like every 3/4 months. And It's probably gonna jump to Android 8.0 directly at the beginning of next year. Assumption is based on the update of my Moto Z play.
You are right about the camera, but unless you purchase a next year's flagship, there is no better camera than this for less than 300$ price tag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey you, expecting something from a company which previously did the same isn't "expecting flagship performance"
The major reason for people to buy Motog is because they have an impression that Moto provides regular updates, but now when things are changing and Lenovo just killing what Moto was known for than its a few more years in which people would know the reality. Why would have I bought Motog if I could have bought Lenovo P2 with the same price, it's having same specs + a 64bit os + an amoled screen + 5100mah battery + compass sensor. It's because of my expectation from Moto to provide me updates and if they don't then moto's uniqueness would be self destroyed and me and I believe many like me would find nothing which would differentiate Moto from other brands.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
So you think a Lenovo P2 is better choice than a Moto G5 Plus phone?
Gino76ph said:
So you think a Lenovo P2 is better choice than a Moto G5 Plus phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pros in Lenovo P2 but should u really care:
1. 64bit os - all apps that I use are supported by the 32bit Motog, and the performance isnt affected by any means running a 32bit os. Practically it's the same, I have had no issues running the 32bit os on my Moto g since I bought it, if it wasn't for this thread then I wouldn't have even noticed that it has a 32bit os [emoji28]
2. Amoled screen - amoled screen is good for viewing because of its punchy colors but it has its own issues like screen burning, LCD panel isn't bad by any means and if you are coming from a device that already had LCD screen than u would be happy by the display of Moto g. It's just good.
3. 5100mah battery- it's hard to defend this but I prefer a device with 3000mah over 5100mah as sd625 with 3000mah easily gives me 6+ hours of sot by heavy usage and it's the practical amount anyone would use a smartphone is a day, so this makes me charge my device everyday at the end of the day with which I am familiar, having a 5100mah battery would disbalance my stats and would give me 1.5days of usage, but still I would charge my device everyday as I can't charge my device in the afternoon due to life/job/education, so having a 5100mah is good but not practical, not for me, especially with that sweetttt sd625 chip inside, it's the best chipset in the budget market right now, awesome battery life and no heating issues.
Compass sensor- it's good to have as many sensors as possible, the most practical use of the compass sensor is for navigation, and navigation works really fine even without it *with a constant internet connection of course [emoji28] *, until u are used to offline maps and use them for navigation u won't notice any major difference.
Pros with Motog that u can't ignore:
1. The brand value: even if we geeks know that Lenovo owns Motorola but the world in general loves Moto g and is familiar with this brand for decades, Moto demands respect which a fone branded with Lenovo(f*** china [emoji36] ) don't, and that matters.
2. Better updates - even though Lenovo bought Moto the staff of Moto is still there, and I think they will not let us down as they know what we expect from them, Lenovo P2 got nougat update but it's so buggy that some users can't even watch YouTube videos with peace (audio syncing issues), you can see YouTube videos of users telling how to get back to marshmallow also, that's what I mean by "better" updates, that Chinese company can't compete with the technical staff in term of updates. It's 90% sure that we would get android o and it's 100% sure Lenovo P2 won't, coz it's just isn't their thing [emoji23]
3. Better camera- no need to explain on that, it's just the way it is. Best in class
4. That plain screen- Moto g has a plain Gorilla glass while Lenovo P2 has a 2.5d curved glass, it's so hard to find a good tempered glass protector for a 2.5d glass, I own a 2.5d glass device for months now and I am sick of it, with Moto g I can easily get a good tempered glass anywhere, literally anywhere.
5. Stock android- again nothing to explain u about this, just enjoy stock android in its full glory with Motog [emoji4]
That's the reason why I choose Moto g over lenovo P2, Moto g according to me is the most balanced smartphone in the budget segment right now, it don't really excells in anything, it's just a solid allrounder, i have been using it for weeks now and there's nothing to complain about. I was getting Lenovo P2 for ₹11750 ($175.37) and still I choose Moto g(4/32gb) which I got at ₹12750 ($190.29), and I know I would never regret my decision,
thanks for patiently reading this [emoji23]
Peace [emoji111]
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Hi all,
i'm contemplating a change of phones. From LG G4 to Motorola Moto Z2 Play because i could get a pretty nice deal on it. I would like to ask the community here for their opinions. I already saw that is has an overall good rating. Questions are, is there anything i should be aware of if i switch? How's the ROM, bloatware wise? Heat issues, battery issues, GPS issues, known problems and so on. LG G4 has a lot of them and im kinda tired of them, although i love the camera and the GPS precision. Any input is welcomed
Thanks!
The ROM is virtually stock Android. There is no bloatware. Just a couple Moto apps that I think are quite useful.
I ahev experienced no heat issues. My previous DD was a Moto X Pure and that joker got hot.
The battery is awesome. I've not ever experienced this kind of life.
I have not had any GPS or other issues.
Some say the camera is not wonderful, but it functions well enough for me. Afterall, I'm more interested in the radio, since it is a phone with a camera, as opposed to a camera with a phone.
Below is my review, stacking it against the Moto X4. I've had it 5 months now and still feel the same. I love it.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=75005756&postcount=5
I just downgraded (so to speak) from the S8 to the Z2 Play. No regret whatsoever. The only thing I have to get used to is the lower resolution. Other than that, it's a solid mid-range phone (physically as opposed to glass, and as a device) that feels like a flagship (bar the aforementioned screen resolution).
If you like stock Android I doubt you'll regret it.
Prosis said:
I just downgraded (so to speak) from the S8 to the Z Play. No regret whatsoever. The only thing I have to get used to is the lower resolution. Other than that, it's a solid mid-range phone (physically as opposed to glass, and as a device) that feels like a flagship (bar the aforementioned screen resolution).
If you like stock Android I doubt you'll regret it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is for the Z2 Play
Yeah that's what I meant sorry. I have the Z2 Play.
thanks for your replies!
I had a handful of g4s. They all went bad and a 5x too. Camera on the g4 was stunning. Low light with the ois was amazing. The hardware was otherwise garbage but looked gorgeous. The LG software was fabulous if you use it in a work environment where you need solid MS exchange services. Asop exchange sucks. Motorola also has solid exchange support. I'm going to say Motorola builds the most durable hardware of any smartphone except the really old blackberries. Moto has been my choice for years. The problem with Moto had always been the cameras. They were horrible. I had the z play and it was barely adequate. Every Moto phone before that was bad too but everything else was so solid that I was willing to look past it.
The Z2 play has a decent camera and you likely will be happy with it. The sd626 is fast for a low power processor. On par with the 808. I would look for an unlockable bl version vs the Verizon one. Custom covers and Moto mods give a bit of the g4 style. Battery life will be similar to the g4. USB c support means super fast charging and you can plug flash drives in, with an adapter. You can merge the internal storage with an SD card for one huge partition as well. The finger print sensor can double as nav keys for more screen space.
I've owned also a G4 long time ago. I will say battery it's way better on the Z2P and the stock Android experience you don't experience any lag. You will ensure many updates on time.
Now regarding back camera, Z2P it's above average but not comparable with G4 which has very good performance. For front camera Z2P it's better.
Fingerprint works great.
Unfortunately i probably wont get the z2 play anymore. Turns out im not eligible for the promotion due to the fact that im not employed for at least 6months at my current employer. Now i hope this promotion will last for another 2-3 months. By then nokia 7 plus will be out and i cant decide between this 2...
magiQx said:
Unfortunately i probably wont get the z2 play anymore. Turns out im not eligible for the promotion due to the fact that im not employed for at least 6months at my current employer. Now i hope this promotion will last for another 2-3 months. By then nokia 7 plus will be out and i cant decide between this 2...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a shame!
I came here to add another point. If you're someone who enjoys running the latest software then don't go with Motorola. Oreo came out 6 months ago and it's not even on the horizon right now. Motorola's gone down Samsung level of suck with updates but Samsung at least has the excuse of having a complex version. I don't know what Lenovo's doing honestly. That would be my main gripe.
Prosis said:
That's a shame!
I came here to add another point. If you're someone who enjoys running the latest software then don't go with Motorola. Oreo came out 6 months ago and it's not even on the horizon right now. Motorola's gone down Samsung level of suck with updates but Samsung at least has the excuse of having a complex version. I don't know what Lenovo's doing honestly. That would be my main gripe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was one reason why i wanted this phone. Near stock OS and i thought they are better with delivering updates. Guess Nokia would be a better compromise then?
magiQx said:
That was one reason why i wanted this phone. Near stock OS and i thought they are better with delivering updates. Guess Nokia would be a better compromise then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I can tell it's not really a compromise. They seem to be pretty solid devices. If Nokia sold them in my country I'd get one of them. Stock Android, good updates and a great camera. Motorola has good competition there.
Since Lenovo bought Motorola they've been bad at updates. When Moto was owned by Google up until late 2015 they were way better. They have near stock Android, it shouldn't be that long.
Prosis said:
From what I can tell it's not really a compromise. They seem to be pretty solid devices. If Nokia sold them in my country I'd get one of them. Stock Android, good updates and a great camera. Motorola has good competition there.
Since Lenovo bought Motorola they've been bad at updates. When Moto was owned by Google up until late 2015 they were way better. They have near stock Android, it shouldn't be that long.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guess ill have to wait and see, since i have to forcefully wait another 3 months... Then I'll check the market again.