Develop Bugs

[DEV] Elephone P8000 dev talk

Is changed this thread to be a place to talk about development (CM, TWRP, ...) going on for P8000 as I'm happily seeing more and more people getting interested into this device.
Some rules:
1. You do not talk about this thread.
2. You DO NOT talk about this thread.
3. No ETA requests!
4. Only discussions about builds from source. ​
Useful resources:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=61938232
Hey everyone,
as some already noticed I've been spending as much time as possible within the last days to get Cyanogen Recovery fully working. The current situation is this:
* it boots and adb/internal sd are recognized
* formatting of all partitions works
* installing SuperSU.zip works
What is not working is the installation of other zips (e.g. FlyME OS) - those always quit after a while with the following error:
Code:
I:failed to verify against RSA key 0
I:failed to verify against RSA key 1
I:failed to verify against RSA key 2
E:failed to verify whole-file signature
I:verify_file returned 1
E:signature verification failed
Installation aborted.
You can find the compiled version here for testing purposes:
http://visi0nary.de/wp-content/misc/recovery_p8000_booting.img
MD5Sum: fd3f4111103634ae6c27025c18489160
It can be flashed via
Code:
fastboot flash recovery recovery_p8000_booting.img
Please note that this is neither intended for daily use nor am I responsable if it bricks your phone!
Cheers!
Update I: Okay, as far as I can see this is intended behaviour in Cyanogen Recovery which ships with CM12.1.

If I knew what to look for, I'd help.
Hope someone can and will help you

I'm a bit confused about the title. You are obviously talking about Cyanogen Recovery, but CWM is the acronym for ClockWorkMod Recovery (which Elephone already ported to the P8000).

shadowseed said:
I'm a bit confused about the title. You are obviously talking about Cyanogen Recovery, but CWM is the acronym for ClockWorkMod Recovery (which Elephone already ported to the P8000).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, that was my bad. I meant CR and not CWM but can't change the title anymore. Turns out I can. I didn't know CR was THAT minimalistic so I ported it without knowing that it even lacks a backup function. I'm now working on TWRP.
About the port of Elephone: I think it's always better to build it from scratch mostly because I love things to be open source.

Hi, BlueFlame4,
Thanks for sharing. When I tried to fastboot flash, an error appears:
FAILED (remote: download for partition 'recovery' is not allowed)
Any ideas?

laozhongyi said:
Hi, BlueFlame4,
Thanks for sharing. When I tried to fastboot flash, an error appears:
FAILED (remote: download for partition 'recovery' is not allowed)
Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, you have to unlock fastboot first.

BlueFlame4 said:
I think it's always better to build it from scratch mostly because I love things to be open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like your attitude, I'm really looking forward to your CM build.
Are you willing to share your TWRP build?

Actually I managed to port twrp from Umi Iron but I cant get touch to work

shadowseed said:
I like your attitude, I'm really looking forward to your CM build.
Are you willing to share your TWRP build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course I will!
eliaztheone said:
Actually I managed to port twrp from Umi Iron but I cant get touch to work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! Can you share your work here?

Ofcourse.
Note that the touch screen is not working so you need to reboot the phone by holding power + Vol up and Down
http://www.mediafire.com/download/73elby2d79z997v/Recovery.img

eliaztheone said:
Ofcourse.
Note that the touch screen is not working so you need to reboot the phone by holding power + Vol up and Down
http://www.mediafire.com/download/73elby2d79z997v/Recovery.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but I was referring to some source.
@ all: I'm still feeling sick and will go to bed again, so don't expect anything today or the upcoming week. Sorry!

Just extract the recovery.img and you have the source Get well

eliaztheone said:
Ofcourse.
Note that the touch screen is not working so you need to reboot the phone by holding power + Vol up and Down
http://www.mediafire.com/download/73elby2d79z997v/Recovery.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I just looked into it and the recovery you uploaded is the stock recovery that comes with the stock ROM. Have you perhaps uploaded the wrong one?

Sorry my bad I was in a hurry. Here is the correct one + source Code
http://www.mediafire.com/download/h66zkhqlxy3d7uu/twrp_p8000_touchscreen_not_working.zip

eliaztheone said:
Sorry my bad I was in a hurry. Here is the correct one + source Code
http://www.mediafire.com/download/h66zkhqlxy3d7uu/twrp_p8000_touchscreen_not_working.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad, at least it boots without kernel panics Gonna look into the init.*.rc files now. Thanks for that!
By the way, as a quick feedback I'm trying to get CM12.1 running (at least compiling and booting for now) in parallel to TWRP. I'll be quite busy the upcoming days so I won't be too active here but will rather spend my spare time developing instead of posting.

BlueFlame4 said:
Not bad, at least it boots without kernel panics Gonna look into the init.*.rc files now. Thanks for that!
By the way, as a quick feedback I'm trying to get CM12.1 running (at least compiling and booting for now) in parallel to TWRP. I'll be quite busy the upcoming days so I won't be too active here but will rather spend my spare time developing instead of posting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good ? I'm also trying to compile a bootable cm12.1 build, just trying to work out some aarch64 compiling issues and device specific BoardConfig.mk parameters.
Best of luck to us [emoji4]
Skickat från min Elephone P8000 via Tapatalk

pitrus- said:
That's good I'm also trying to compile a bootable cm12.1 build, just trying to work out some aarch64 compiling issues and device specific BoardConfig.mk parameters.
Best of luck to us [emoji4]
Skickat från min Elephone P8000 via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! What are the issues? I just pushed a commit that fixes the BoardConfig in regards of linker errors. Unfortunately my machine stopped building after 3 1/2 hours due to insufficient disk space so I guess I have to restart the compilation process after cleaning up. 128 GB SSDs are just too small these days...
Do you have time for an IRC talk the upcoming weekend?

Yeah good luck to you both. Its my first time working with recoveries. I have only done som portings. Im trying to extract meizu m2 note kernel I am trying to get gesture working on our Elephone with flyme rom.

eliaztheone said:
Yeah good luck to you both. Its my first time working with recoveries. I have only done som portings. Im trying to extract meizu m2 note kernel I am trying to get gesture working on our Elephone with flyme rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Argh... Meizu... Locked Bootloaders suck Good Luck anyways!

Regarding elephone p8000 / MTK6753 CM12.1
Dears,
If you have info or resources about CM12.1 development on MT6753 / MT6735 or any device based on these SoCs plz share as I'm trying to build CM12.1 for P8000 K05tS_A .
I've more than 10 yrs experience in Linux (sysAdm) and I did build Linux Kernel and distros from source lots of time before with fair understanding of Linux kernel Arch. and hardware.
It's my first time to build android but I'm sure it will not be hard to do.
I would like to help and get helped .
Regards,

[KERNEL] -> tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_11_v201218 (DISCONTINUED)

Due to several reasons I have stopped the deployment of the "monthly Update.Zip packages" !
Thanks for your understanding.
This thread will be used for the unified tegra-3.18 kernel only.
Twelve:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_12_v211213.zip
Eleven:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_11_v201218.zip
Ten:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_10_v201010.zip
Pie:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_p_v200310.zip
Oreo:
tegra-3.18_unified_dragon_kernel_o_v200310.zip
Changes/Features:
- Upstream to kernel version 3.18.140
- Various patches and security updates
- Added Wireguard support
- Added/Enabled various file systems (exFat, NTFS, Network Filesystems .. etc.)
- Changed kernel config to enable/improve support for varioius services (tethering .. etc.)
- Added "fix cpu frequency limitation"
- etc.
Installation:
1. Boot into TWRP
2. Install the Kernel Update.Zip file
3. Reboot into system .. no need for SuperSU / Magisk !
The package contains an Image.fit kernel binary only - and no ramdisk part !
This way the kernel should run on all available Android Oreo/Pie/Ten ROMs for the dragon device.
And there is no need for a new SuperSu/Magisk installation afterwards, unlike to "full boot.img" installation.
Sources:
https://github.com/followmsi/android_kernel_tegra
https://github.com/followmsi/lazyflasher/tree/followmsi-dragon
https://github.com/followmsi/AnyKernel2/tree/dragon
Download:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18cqluw7lp1S720QdV0p-OtHfY9MNpSwn
Big thanks to @NYCHitman1 (Dirty Unicorn), @cheep5k8 (xceed), @Vartom and updateing from Team Mokee for the nice kernel sources !
Big thanks to @osm0sis (Anykernel2) and @jcadduono (lazyflasher) for the nice tools !
Enjoy

flashed your system image
devices does not boot
flashed back to stock
boots
edit: further details
every boot just dumps me into recovery.

dmitrygr said:
flashed your system image
devices does not boot
flashed back to stock
boots
edit: further details
every boot just dumps me into recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for feedback .. no good news.
Sorry, I can not reproduce your problem.
Tested the system_vendor udapte.zip several times on my Pixel C.
No problem so far ...
You flashed the complete .zip via TWRP ?
What was your previous firmware level ?
Did you upgrade bootloader as well ?
What kernel do you have in use ?
EDIT:
Which Version of TWRP ?
Pls use xceed version for now.
The NYChitman1 version seems to have problems.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/pix...ock-bootloader-install-custom-t3307183/page14

followmsi said:
The NYChitman1 version seems to have problems.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/pix...ock-bootloader-install-custom-t3307183/page14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the latest one I released because I didn't put the proper flag in place -- the previous one works perfectly fine as indicated by myself and others.
Also, I find it interesting that you've created a development thread while you aren't actually developing anything.

Thanks for the update.
Still like to test your version.
Ok, the version from here is recommended .. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=66557703&postcount=101
In the one from yesterday you fixed vendor image flashing via TWRP.. sounds nice.
When do you re-release this version ?
You may open a new thread for your TWRP releases ..
Thanks a lot for all your work!

New kernel released ... pls test
Update.ZIP_Nexus_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_v160519_followmsi.zip
There are lot of changes in compare to latest stock kernel .. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+log/chromeos-3.18/
Cheers

followmsi said:
New kernel released ... pls test
Update.ZIP_Nexus_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_v160519_followmsi.zip
There are lot of changes in compare to latest stock kernel .. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+log/chromeos-3.18/
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks for your work The kernel is for stock / AOSP roms? Running Dirty Unicorns and I think it´s not compatible :/

redukt said:
Many thanks for your work The kernel is for stock / AOSP roms? Running Dirty Unicorns and I think it´s not compatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are so many fixes since MXC89F kernel .. which was commited on Arpil 5th .. even it's the May release. Ok, was tagged on May, 4th.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/MXC89F
Last changes .. 6 weeks ..
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...+log/9c052efad6e651d33334b84c8f1feaf8945e8e7a
I am running the new kernel on latest M stock release .. MXC89F.
No problems so far .. really stable.
The kernel should run on all stock M releases for PixelC.
Used latest stock ramdisk to build the kernel .. maybe the dirty unicorn ramdisk is different.
But the actual kernel should work as well ..it's a dragon kernel.
Repack DU ramdisk with my kernel and it will most probably work as well .. maybe even with the same ramdisk, without repacking. Needs to be tested ..
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers

Any chance of getting a port of multirom? Let me know if there's any interest, and what I can do to help.

nic. said:
Any chance of getting a port of multirom? Let me know if there's any interest, and what I can do to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good .. have it running on Nexus 7 flo .. really like it.
MultiROM for PixelC would be really nice .. the chromeos is part is maybe tricky.
But like SuperSU .. automatic chromeos image unpack and repack, if required at all.
It seems Tassadar is not around anymore .. not sure if he will come back.
Some new guys have taken over .. they just made a new update release for TWRP and MultiROM..
Works fine
Are you able to port it to Pixel C ?
Thanks

followmsi said:
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bootloop
Restored my Nandroid and device is up
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/

followmsi said:
Sounds good .. have it running on Nexus 7 flo .. really like it.
MultiROM for PixelC would be really nice .. the chromeos is part is maybe tricky.
But like SuperSU .. automatic chromeos image unpack and repack, if required at all.
It seems Tassadar is not around anymore .. not sure if he will come back.
Some new guys have taken over .. they just made a new update release for TWRP and MultiROM..
Works fine
Are you able to port it to Pixel C ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am wanting to dig into the Linux4Tegra side of this, and was hoping that some of the work for multirom could or had been done. I don't know anything about the chromeos bootloader. Looking into it, Chrubuntu might be a viable path for this. I feel like this device is gimped with Android.

redukt said:
Bootloop
Restored my Nandroid and device is up
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the test ..
Restore DU boot.img and you are back to normal ..yep
I will unpack the DU boot.img and have short look .. just to check it.

nic. said:
I am wanting to dig into the Linux4Tegra side of this, and was hoping that some of the work for multirom could or had been done. I don't know anything about the chromeos bootloader. Looking into it, Chrubuntu might be a viable path for this. I feel like this device is gimped with Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a lot of work .. but if you have the right people involved ..
Maybe xceed or nychitman will know better how to "manage" the bootloader ..
As I know, until today, "nobody" knows how to remove the 30 second warning time beep sound ****.
Right now I am happy to "manage" the layer above .. boot.img and recovery.img

redukt said:
DU is CM based and unfortunately incompatible :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
followmsi said:
There are so many fixes since MXC89F kernel .. which was commited on Arpil 5th .. even it's the May release. Ok, was tagged on May, 4th.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/MXC89F
Last changes .. 6 weeks ..
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...+log/9c052efad6e651d33334b84c8f1feaf8945e8e7a
I am running the new kernel on latest M stock release .. MXC89F.
No problems so far .. really stable.
The kernel should run on all stock M releases for PixelC.
Used latest stock ramdisk to build the kernel .. maybe the dirty unicorn ramdisk is different.
But the actual kernel should work as well ..it's a dragon kernel.
Repack DU ramdisk with my kernel and it will most probably work as well .. maybe even with the same ramdisk, without repacking. Needs to be tested ..
Give it a try .. it will not hurt.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had been keeping up with the chromeos-3.18 branch upstream, but I realized that a majority of the commits do not even apply to Dragon -- so it wasn't all that worthwhile to have in the majority of cases. With that said, I decided to go back to the MXC89F source until the next batch of source is released in June.

NYCHitman1 said:
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well my bad...DU is AOSP based. I get mixed up with all several custom roms on my devices :silly:

NYCHitman1 said:
What are you talking about? We're not CM based.
I had been keeping up with the chromeos-3.18 branch upstream, but I realized that a majority of the commits do not even apply to Dragon -- so it wasn't all that worthwhile to have in the majority of cases. With that said, I decided to go back to the MXC89F source until the next batch of source is released in June.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right .. there also many fixed not relevant for dragon at all.
But it´s a fresh kernel .. upstream
I was so free .. and made a new DU kernel now .. used your ramdisk and my fresh chomeos-3.18 build from today.
@redukt, please test this kernel again .. on DU
Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks .. still bootloop ?

redukt said:
Well my bad...DU is AOSP based. I get mixed up with all several custom roms on my devices :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please test this one ... Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks !

followmsi said:
Please test this one ... Update.ZIP_PixelC_Ryu_chromeos-3.18-kernel_DU_v160519_followmsi.zip
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=!ABLdSOKIeXgg_XU&id=479EB75F5DD9DA59!117&cid=479EB75F5DD9DA59
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
!!! Device is booting!!!
Meh... forget to install SU lol.... Will have a look in kernel auditor
Many thanks
edit: I have to flash the latest supersu (beta v2.74-2) to get root again. Will test your kernel til the next DU weeklie as dd. I´ll have a look at the frequency overview and kept stock settings / governor. System runs fluid with no hickups or so. Great work!

Looks also very interessting ..stabilize-smaug-7897.B-chromeos-3.18
https://chromium.googlesource.com/c...kernel/+/stabilize-smaug-7897.B-chromeos-3.18
Will see .. today they released the 3rd N preview ... maybe it´s time for some N testing.
As I understand correct .. using N ramdisk and the same kernel from today should work on N as well.
We will see ...
Cheers

[CLOSED][SHARE] Lineage 18, Android 11 for Pixel 4a Sunfish

This is not my build. Credit ny-hardcore for all the hard work on this. I'm just posting it.
Screen call is broken.
This is Lineage 18, Android 11 custom rom for the Pixel 4a Sunfish
If you do not want root, you can stop after step 6
1. Reboot to bootloader
2. fastboot flash --slot all boot recovery.img https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Hh7D_UbnnoTRr1XbC9i0-dvtFgbuFqrP/view?usp=sharing
3. Reboot to recovery
4. factory reset
5. adb sideload lineage-18.0-20201209-UNOFFICIAL-sunfish.zip
https://mega.nz/file/cUlVXApI#NbzUJ6UlyQvyPTitKnW7uJG_tHrsfYor9O0dH4yIiWc
6. Reboot to system
7. Install Magisk Manager https://raw.githubusercontent.com/topjohnwu/magisk_files/canary/app-debug.apk
8. Reboot to bootloader
9. fastboot flash boot magisk_patched.img https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cONN9Ev0jdAHaRSeOeYyeRTONJ-yO_8-/view?usp=sharing
10. Reboot to system

Could you please provide a kernel and device source tree for this? I have an in-progress diff which I am working to get 18 running fully on the device. It doesn't boot yet, and I would like to know what I messed up.

liamwhite said:
Could you please provide a kernel and device source tree for this? I have an in-progress diff which I am working to get 18 running fully on the device. It doesn't boot yet, and I would like to know what I messed up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Based on the fact that this is NOT my work as stated above, I'm NOT at liberty to tell you. No offense. I would contact xda member edmontonchef and ask him. He's the one who sent it to me. I would like to think this wouldn't be a issue because if it was mine, I wouldn't care, but it's not.

This is my build.
Device tree is based of DU trees (r11x branch) and vendor (also r11x)
Kernel is flar2 kernel with wifi merged in.

ny-hardcore said:
This is my build.
Device tree is based of DU trees (r11x branch) and vendor (also r11x)
Kernel is flar2 kernel with wifi merged in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using it right now. Great Rom. Thank you!!! Hope you don't mind I shared it.

Does this support signature spoofing?

Espio419 said:
Does this support signature spoofing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would doubt it, if it's just vanilla LOS

ny-hardcore said:
This is my build.
Device tree is based of DU trees (r11x branch) and vendor (also r11x)
Kernel is flar2 kernel with wifi merged in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are Gapps included. Looking for a non gapps rom

EggZenBeanz said:
Are Gapps included. Looking for a non gapps rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No gapps. Minimal Google play service function are included in build.

Espio419 said:
Does this support signature spoofing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No

TheSayaMan said:
No gapps. Minimal Google play service function are included in build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it contains gapps/Google play.

ny-hardcore said:
Actually it contains gapps/Google play.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I assumed wrong. I thought he was referring to having to flash a seperate gapps zip.

Espio419 said:
Does this support signature spoofing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm working on a microg edition using the notes from the guy who made the microG build for 4a 5G

ny-hardcore said:
i'm working on a microg edition using the notes from the guy who made the microG build for 4a 5G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah! Would love to see that. I'm ready to hop from my pixel 3xl once there's a non gapps ROM available

New build updated in OP. Thank Senior Member ny-hardcore for this.
Changes: Lineage sources and kernel updated with latest google update. The boot.img was updated in the payload to eliminate a second boot flash after sideloading rom for working WiFi. Please report any bugs that I may have missed. Also, I never dirty flash over anything. They more than likely cause problems. I did a clean install of this. If you are on the previous build of this, I DO NOT recommend dirty flashing it.

TheSayaMan said:
New build updated in OP. Thank Senior Member ny-hardcore for this.
Changes: Lineage sources and kernel updated with latest google update. The boot.img was updated in the payload to eliminate a second boot flash after sideloading rom for working WiFi. Please report any bugs that I may have missed. Also, I never dirty flash over anything. They more than likely cause problems. I did a clean install of this. If you are on the previous build of this, I DO NOT recommend dirty flashing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flashed and running well. WiFi worked right away. I noticed the boot.IMG in the op has stock recovery so I used the derpfest boot.IMG for flashing instead.
Also it's still November ASB?

Edmontonchef said:
Flashed and running well. WiFi worked right away. I noticed the boot.IMG in the op has stock recovery so I used the derpfest boot.IMG for flashing instead.
Also it's still November ASB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't been able to check everything out. One thing I just noticed is that I am unable to pass safetynet with it but not a big deal for me.

Edmontonchef said:
Flashed and running well. WiFi worked right away. I noticed the boot.IMG in the op has stock recovery so I used the derpfest boot.IMG for flashing instead.
Also it's still November ASB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The boot in OP will work as well so take your pick and yes I did notice its still November. He's working on another build though.

TheSayaMan said:
The boot in OP will work as well so take your pick and yes I did notice its still November. He's working on another build though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
december hasnt been merged in lineage sources

Is the boot.img a twrp recovery or? I am coming from stock, so would i need to touch twrp at all for this?

Question Has Anyone Compiled AOSP 13 and Booted It?

I'm just curious whether anyone has already compiled the AOSP for A13 and booted it. I noticed it had already been done/tested on OP5/5T, but wasn't sure if it had been done for P6P. I plan on trying my hand at it, but wanting to know what others may have experienced before I commit my slower internet connection to downloading the Repo.

GrapheneOS has test builds up for A13, which should be buildable using the normal approach. Also hardened with some extra security features.

Yes, on ArrowOS, temp issues however that was same day arrow started updating to 13, have not run a build since. Evolution X reboot a few seconds after setup screen loads, does not boot without gapps either.

I have tried for several days, but I'm missing something
It's a custom rom for personal use. A12.1 booted and worked perfectly but 13 reboots to bootloader
RealSchnedi - Repositories
RealSchnedi has 15 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
github.com

Schnedi said:
I have tried for several days, but I'm missing something
It's a custom rom for personal use. A12.1 booted and worked perfectly but 13 reboots to bootloader
RealSchnedi - Repositories
RealSchnedi has 15 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
github.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stupid question have you flashed both slots with 13 as I know boot loader won't load of you have 12 version and not updated to 13 but also it has an anti roll back in it sorry not much help

liggerz87 said:
Stupid question have you flashed both slots with 13 as I know boot loader won't load of you have 12 version and not updated to 13 but also it has an anti roll back in it sorry not much help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed the bootloader and radio on both slots but haven't tried to change the current slot and flash the rom
But if I flash the official 13 release (only in the current slot) it boots, so, not sure if that's the problem. Anyway, I'll try it

Schnedi said:
I flashed the bootloader and radio on both slots but haven't tried to change the current slot and flash the rom
But if I flash the official 13 release (only in the current slot) it boots, so, not sure if that's the problem. Anyway, I'll try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been looking at our github, you are using anayw2001 repo for your vendor files, remove the below from Android.bp. I had Restless nights with a poop load of testing thinking it was something with a missing lib file or so when i test anay's vendor files with lots of comparison to lineage extract tools that worked. Well if your getting bootonce-bootloader error that is as reason for bootloader load.
prebuilt_apex {
name: "com.google.android.compos",
owner: "google_devices",
src: "system_ext/apex/com.google.android.compos.apex",
prefer: true,
system_ext_specific: true,
}
prebuilt_apex {
name: "com.google.android.virt",
owner: "google_devices",
src: "system_ext/apex/com.google.android.virt.apex",
prefer: true,
system_ext_specific: true,
}

alvin14 said:
Yes, on ArrowOS, temp issues however that was same day arrow started updating to 13, have not run a build since. Evolution X reboot a few seconds after setup screen loads, does not boot without gapps either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Update on this for ArrowOS. After removing connectivitythernmalmanager that fixed the issue as i am getting selinux denials with it, everything works, been testing for a few days.

alvin14 said:
Been looking at our github, you are using anayw2001 repo for your vendor files, remove the below from Android.bp. I had Restless nights with a poop load of testing thinking it was something with a missing lib file or so when i test anay's vendor files with lots of comparison to lineage extract tools that worked. Well if your getting bootonce-bootloader error that is as reason for bootloader load.
prebuilt_apex {
name: "com.google.android.compos",
owner: "google_devices",
src: "system_ext/apex/com.google.android.compos.apex",
prefer: true,
system_ext_specific: true,
}
prebuilt_apex {
name: "com.google.android.virt",
owner: "google_devices",
src: "system_ext/apex/com.google.android.virt.apex",
prefer: true,
system_ext_specific: true,
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was already using your vendor from gitlab (arrow branch). It did the trick, bootloader not triggered anymore
Still not booting but it must be related to rom sources, will take a look
Thanks a lot

Schnedi said:
I was already using your vendor from gitlab (arrow branch). It did the trick, bootloader not triggered anymore
Still not booting but it must be related to rom sources, will take a look
Thanks a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a logcat during boot, will definitely help with that.

card13 said:
I'm just curious whether anyone has already compiled the AOSP for A13 and booted it. I noticed it had already been done/tested on OP5/5T, but wasn't sure if it had been done for P6P. I plan on trying my hand at it, but wanting to know what others may have experienced before I commit my slower internet connection to downloading the Repo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a build of Hentai which is very good. You can even dirty flash from stock

alvin14 said:
Do a logcat during boot, will definitely help with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'm making some tests, not so sure it's the rom sources
Question, to build Evo and Arrow, are you using your adevtool vendor or the other one?

Schnedi said:
Thanks, I'm making some tests, not so sure it's the rom sources
Question, to build Evo and Arrow, are you using your adevtool vendor or the other one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adevtool. The other one works as well however i need to clean it up a bit.

hi guys,
@Schnedi what gapps package are you using for prime?
And does udfps work on your raven with your prime base?

Well, after a dozen of test builds, I finally made it work
Still have to fix things tho

Schnedi said:
Well, after a dozen of test builds, I finally made it work
Still have to fix things tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. I got oriole too boot prime yesterday too. Nice work!
What gapps package do you use? Is it on gitlab somewhere?

ny-hardcore said:
Cool. I got oriole too boot prime yesterday too. Nice work!
What gapps package do you use? Is it on gitlab somewhere?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using this one: https://gitlab.com/spkal01/android_vendor_gms/-/tree/pyro
But removed some apps that can be installed from the store (drive, youtube, gmail, photos...)
Also, latest commit from fw/b fixes udfps
There's just a few features, I just pick the ones I use, didn't build prime to share it, so I'm not picking all of them. You can always fork the project and pick some features you use, PM me if you need any help with it

Schnedi said:
I'm using this one: https://gitlab.com/spkal01/android_vendor_gms/-/tree/pyro
But removed some apps that can be installed from the store (drive, youtube, gmail, photos...)
Also, latest commit from fw/b fixes udfps
There's just a few features, I just pick the ones I use, didn't build prime to share it, so I'm not picking all of them. You can always fork the project and pick some features you use, PM me if you need any help with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply, i spark gapps too by the way haha
i picked udfps myself so had it working already
i like your vendor /vendor/extras very clean setup.
i know how to fork, but no need for now

Development [TWRP Recovery] TWRP recovery for SM-F926B based on CVCA

Hi folks
Since some of you asked me to make another thread for my TWRP build, here you go, the kernel is based on EWB5 (A13) but is compatible with all currenlty released Android versions.
WARNING/DISCLAIMER: Since the outer display isn't shut down this build can cause irreversible screen burns if used extensively. As such I take no responsabilities if you damage your device while using my TWRP build (and/or) other projects that may suffer from the same issues.
Edit: after some time the "screen burn" disappeared, so it seems that it's just a remanent image. In doubt stick to the warning.
TWRP Image
Sources:
Kernel
Device Tree (Forked from @shadow-of-leaf Z Flip 3 DT)

So just push it as the recovery to the active slot via adb?

Breaks dex? If Not its kompatible with latest one ui?

It doesn't break dex, you can backup your recovery partition, it should be compatible with latest Android, since recovery is contained

Mikowitsch said:
So just push it as the recovery to the active slot via adb?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the usual way works fine

is the link down.. i cant download it

miman04 said:
is the link down.. i cant download it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed !

Azkali said:
Fixed !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tq sir .. can i get a simple guide on how to get the TWRP works on my fold 3. im currently on a rooted fold 3 Android 13.
Should i use odin and put in AP then flash rite away or i use fastboot?

miman04 said:
Tq sir .. can i get a simple guide on how to get the TWRP works on my fold 3. im currently on a rooted fold 3 Android 13.
Should i use odin and put in AP then flash rite away or i use fastboot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes in Odin putting recovery.tar in AP will work fine ^^

i cant download recovery and vbmeta

Azkali said:
Hi folks
Since some of you asked me to make another thread for my TWRP build, here you go, the kernel is based on EWB5 (A13) but is compatible with all currenlty released Android versions.
WARNING/DISCLAIMER: Since the outer display isn't shut down this build can cause irreversible screen burns if used extensively. As such I take no responsabilities if you damage your device while using my TWRP build (and/or) other projects that may suffer from the same issues.
Edit: after some time the "screen burn" disappeared, so it seems that it's just a remanent image. In doubt stick to the warning.
TWRP Image
Sources:
Kernel
Device Tree (Forked from @shadow-of-leaf Z Flip 3 DT)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
404 page on TWRP and VBMETA

Using the DT from Azkali to build a new Release of TWRP, i'll make a new Thread for that
Thanks so much @Azkali for your Device Tree, i hope to help you soon

ROM-PacMe said:
Using the DT from Azkali to build a new Release of TWRP, i'll make a new Thread for that
Thanks so much @Azkali for your Device Tree, i hope to help you soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a newer TWRP, maybe instead of a new build we could figure something out together
Join the discord and ping me there, I'll be available later

Release q2q-5337227142 · bm0x/twrp-actions-compiler
Recovery for q2q
github.com
based on minimal-twrp branch 12.1
and uses the DT from @Azkali
enjoy!

ROM-PacMe said:
Release q2q-5337227142 · bm0x/twrp-actions-compiler
Recovery for q2q
github.com
based on minimal-twrp branch 12.1
and uses the DT from @Azkali
enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it compatible with SM-926B?
q2q is SM-926B?
google didnt know anything about "q2q samsung"

Can you try, If not working, only re install the recovery stock and vbmeta too

The other thread cites CVCA as a basis, but all I can find in the TWRP revision q2q-5337227142 in each. Is there an older build out that works better w/ BL 1, not 3?

thewayofwright said:
The other thread cites CVCA as a basis, but all I can find in the TWRP revision q2q-5337227142 in each. Is there an older build out that works better w/ BL 1, not 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the revision is a random number gived from Github Actions, nothing more my friend

thewayofwright said:
The other thread cites CVCA as a basis, but all I can find in the TWRP revision q2q-5337227142 in each. Is there an older build out that works better w/ BL 1, not 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only use the vbmeta and recovery tar of my own github releases, let me any update, ok?
i see soon any bug to help to fix