Develop Bugs

Benchmark Results

Hey so anyone tried using the Antutu Benchmark test? I used it for the DT2 and there are like 10 other phones that blow this thing away. My highest result was just over 53K. I am using the 64bit version. Anyone else getting better results? I thought this device would be up there with GN5...
I'm still considering trading this in for maybe the LG v10 or Note 5

Lol the V10 certainly won't be faster. So your comment is kind of funny.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I seem to remember 55k

JasonJoel said:
Lol the V10 certainly won't be faster. So your comment is kind of funny.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know, but I like the look and feel of the V10..
I'm just puzzled why the DT2 is only getting around 53-55K and other phones are seemingly blowing this one out of the water???
I just got a test result of over 59K but I accepted a phone call during the test.

I just got a 59315 with a fully configured device.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

calash said:
I just got a 59315 with a fully configured device.
define fully configured????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Digital DJ said:
calash said:
I just got a 59315 with a fully configured device.
define fully configured????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Facebook, Twitter, Weather channel, 5 Email accounts. Various games and other apps. Desktop widgets on Google Now Launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Just ran mine got over 60000
Sent from my XT1585 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Mine just pulled in a 54436. Not particularly great, but whatever. Still more than passable for me.

What?
i got this on droid turbo 1 (moto maxx)

Pulled a 62081 this morning with no tweaking. Most of my mail is set to check every 15 minutes so I may have run the test in a slow time.

I just pulled 63000 on my 64GB Droid Turbo 2 this morning, obviously the gs6 and note 5 beat the SD 810.

Benchmarked one of the display models at Best Buy with the new Antutu v6.0 app, got 84,575. That was after I'd been using the device for about 10 minutes. Sorry I don't have pics. Got 76,242 after a second go around.

Running the most current antutu it don't seem to low.

bignazpwns said:
Running the most current antutu it don't seem to low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol definitely great score, even better than exynos 7420
---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 PM ----------
bignazpwns said:
Running the most current antutu it don't seem to low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick question, was that after you'd been using it or did you benchmark it right away as soon as you started the phone up?

TurboBot247 said:
Lol definitely great score, even better than exynos 7420
---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 PM ----------
Quick question, was that after you'd been using it or did you benchmark it right away as soon as you started the phone up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ran it after 1/2 a day of normal use . bone stock nothing disabled or changed. Would love to see how it does on 6.0

bignazpwns said:
Ran it after 1/2 a day of normal use . bone stock nothing disabled or changed. Would love to see how it does on 6.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that's pretty dang fast then. Other sd810 devices probably would've throttled their benchmark scores way down after that usage (not much). 6.0 is coming soon, I don't think Motorola will have a repeat of the last gen turbo, not getting the update until way after the Moro x 2014 got it. Especially since employee editions already have it. Performance should go up, and we just might see more geek bench results in the low 5000s. Speaking of which, I also ran geekbench on the display model, got 4,362. Again, no pics.

TurboBot247 said:
So that's pretty dang fast then. Other sd810 devices probably would've throttled their benchmark scores way down after that usage (not much). 6.0 is coming soon, I don't think Motorola will have a repeat of the last gen turbo, not getting the update until way after the Moro x 2014 got it. Especially since employee editions already have it. Performance should go up, and we just might see more geek bench results in the low 5000s. Speaking of which, I also ran geekbench on the display model, got 4,362. Again, no pics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it's not as fast as my s6 but the battery life kills my s6. And I like the phone so far. In terms of speed its fast enough.

bignazpwns said:
Yeah it's not as fast as my s6 but the battery life kills my s6. And I like the phone so far. In terms of speed its fast enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. Thats surprising, slower than an S6, of which lagged like crazy when I used one. The turbo 2 was literally the fastest device I have used in a while, X Pure aside. But Que sera, Que sera. Benhmarked above the samsungs tho. But hey, everybody's got a different boat to float, right? S6 battery life is abysmal, so not hard for turbo 2 to kill it off in that regard.

My wife has the S6, which she gets along with very well. But being that the S6 was mentioned earlier in this thread, I have to say that when it comes to updating/installing apps and checking Storage/Cached data, the S6 is much faster at processing all of that. I still prefer my Turbo 2 to her S6.

Overall speed

Would you say that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is "fast" in day-to-day use? A higher rating indicates that you think the Samsung Galaxy S7 exhibits fantastic performance. Like, is it as fast as your tears when you watch The Titanic?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Speed is just awesome ... it's a flagship ... not expecting anything else

Performance is good but i think there is a problem that lags the keyboard.

I Don't know its my phone or else, but in some games, its little bit lag when loading some scene. But one thing that I notice that my S7 signal is more weak than my previous phone (on LTE), it's very noticeable that sometime I have to restart my phone or change it to 3G first than switch it back.

I have had similar signal issues while my other gs7 had a good signal. Replaced the device now the signal is good..
As far as speed, it feels slower to me then my s6 and note5 games dont run as smooth, gear vr jitters or glitches quite a lot, something the note5 never did. And it doesnt register touches well. I have had these issues on 3 separate gs7. 2 mine and the one i returned and swapped mainly because the signal and i could see glue separations and striations in sunlight between the lcd and screen. I have really come to dislike this phone, a first for me with samsung.

My S7 doesn't seem much faster than the LG G2 it replaced. Might this have something to do with the higher resolution?

Much faster and snappier than lg g3 i have ownded previously.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Sometimes lags (barely visible)

This is my new account and was here since my galaxy s2 and I really looked deeply into the matter.
Improved to an S4 later and tuned the hell out of it. And now having an S7.
The Hardware and the processor improved really much since then, so it's not an hardware issue, it's allways a configuration and software issue, if the phone lags.
I can't understand why people are unhappy with their phones, that aren't "snappy" enought.
It's their fault, because they accept the default settings most of the time and don't care about improving their phone by themself, by optimizing settings, disable useless/unused features and remove all that bloatware and spyware crap.
Also with a good custom rom most of these problems are solved anyway, even by default if the developer did the optimization for you... lazy ass
Maybe start with something like that:
Activate Beast Mode on Galaxy S7
watch?v=nHEm50oRsNs
ps: can't post full links yet with this acc. lol

Excellent CPU ,OS,RAM optimization
superb performance,I am fully satisfied
-Device G930FD(Exynos)

The speed of galaxy s7 is awesome, you can say Much faster and snappier

speed is acceptable. Lags are experienced, but compared to S6 it is a bit better.

torr310 said:
speed is acceptable. Lags are experienced, but compared to S6 it is a bit better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running King rom with prometheus kernel with no lag and I mean absolutely no lag. Here is AnTuTu not that benchmarks mean anything right?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Delivered by my Silver S7.

mandroid717 said:
I am running King rom with prometheus kernel with no lag and I mean absolutely no lag. Here is AnTuTu not that benchmarks mean anything right?
Delivered by my Silver S7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be much happier if our Verizon varian could be on the custom ROM/kernel too! And... also has the Exynos on board!

torr310 said:
I would be much happier if our Verizon varian could be on the custom ROM/kernel too! And... also has the Exynos on board!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya that blows. : (
Delivered by my Silver S7.

arefin_sajib said:
Excellent CPU ,OS,RAM optimization
superb performance,I am fully satisfied
-Device G930FD(Exynos)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same phone and ditto. Then again coming from a Blackberry running 4.6 I would be very unhappy if I wasn't satisfied

mandroid717 said:
I am running King rom with prometheus kernel with no lag and I mean absolutely no lag. Here is AnTuTu not that benchmarks mean anything right?
Delivered by my Silver S7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still satisfied?

Everything is super fast. apps open up instantly, I really like double tapping home button for camera. overall speed is great. been using it for few months, never had any lag.

mandroid717 said:
I am running King rom with prometheus kernel with no lag and I mean absolutely no lag. Here is AnTuTu not that benchmarks mean anything right?
Delivered by my Silver S7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice...
Prometheus out of the Box or some tuning?
If it so can you share your settings?

agree speed is top notch.

CPU performance lower than expected.

I have had my Pixel for 1 month, absolutely no Wifi nor touchscreen issues. But its cpu seems to perform worse than expected. Lately I'm getting laggy experiences and sometimes the app hangs, especially on Chrome, Android settings menu, ES file explorer and MX player.
I did some tests with geekbench 3 and it always gives between 1290-1350 single core score and 3600-4000 multicore score http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5646267 . It's way under the "official" scores in the internet: 1400 single and 4400 multi. This is how a proper score would look like
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
.
Why the low performance? I dont have rubbish apps installed.
By the way, I'm running 6.0.1 mxb48t version.
Enviado desde mi Pixel C mediante Tapatalk

i do not have access to the article but off the top of my head unless it stated absolute stock a rooted pixel c could have cpu states tweaked, such as all cores to run at max frequency all the time, prior to running the benchmark which if the case would certainly outperform your device.

gtaadicto92 said:
I have had my Pixel for 1 month, absolutely no Wifi nor touchscreen issues. But its cpu seems to perform worse than expected. Lately I'm getting laggy experiences and sometimes the app hangs, especially on Chrome, Android settings menu, ES file explorer and MX player.
I did some tests with geekbench 3 and it always gives between 1290-1350 single core score and 3600-4000 multicore score http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/5646267 . It's way under the "official" scores in the internet: 1400 single and 4400 multi. This is how a proper score would look like
.
Why the low performance? I dont have rubbish apps installed.
By the way, I'm running 6.0.1 mxb48t version.
Enviado desde mi Pixel C mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So setting mine to performance governor i get 1448 and 4386 so its just default interactive governor stuff really, that's getting lower result. i did the whole interactive governor tweaking like from 6p and 5x and got performance like ratings but as cheep5k8 pointed out on kernel thread that changing the governor break the powerHAL stuff and only be corrected with a reboot to no mods. so applying this is not recommended until bug is sorted in the kernel

Considering its only running on 4 cores it's doing all it can. A53 cores are disabled.

bill3508 said:
Considering its only running on 4 cores it's doing all it can. A53 cores are disabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but it still performs just as well as snapdragon 810 with 8 cores, so I think the A57 alone does a great job
What I would love to see what OC'ing does, at least up to the the shield TV level of 2.2Ghz

For some reason, the GPU performance on my Shield TV is about 2x faster than my Pixel C even though they have the same processor....
Sent from my Pixel C using Tapatalk

What are you using to define the GPU performance difference?

On Android N beta the multicore performance is worse(3000 points) although the single core performance has increased to 1400+. The lag is completely gone.
Enviado desde mi Pixel C mediante Tapatalk

brando56894 said:
For some reason, the GPU performance on my Shield TV is about 2x faster than my Pixel C even though they have the same processor....
Sent from my Pixel C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Much higher resolution on the Pix C probably doesnt help!
*thought you said Shield tablet! Not sure what the res is on the TV

beardymcgee said:
What are you using to define the GPU performance difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was running 3Dmark on my Pixel running Xceed kernel and even 3Dmark said that my performance was lower than all the other Pixels. I was just looking at the stats of the shield tv on their chart since I was watching something on mine. Yea, I know not exact, I just found it interesting.
tgyberg said:
Much higher resolution on the Pix C probably doesnt help!
*thought you said Shield tablet! Not sure what the res is on the TV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true! My TV is only 1080P.

So all settings stock with xceed I get the following
Slingshot 3.1 unlimited 3730
Icestorm unlimited 41544
Antutu 105600

Honor 6X Priced @ 12999 for 3GB+32GB and 15999 for 4GB+64GB - The SWAG Price in India

Honor launched its 6X today in India at an amazing price of 12,999 INR for 3GB model and 15,999 INR for 4GB+64 GB model. This is amazing and now they can have good competition with RN4 and Cool1.
3GB model will go on flash sale from 2nd Feb at 2 PM on Amazon and 4 GB model will go on sale in Feb (no date confirmed yet)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Same Price as Honor 5X for 3GB variant is a good one.
And a competitive price to Coolpad Cool 1 and Redmi Note 4.

vsriram92 said:
Same Price as Honor 5X for 3GB variant is a good one.
And a competitive price to Coolpad Cool 1 and Redmi Note 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Now they will have good open competition.

vsriram92 said:
Same Price as Honor 5X for 3GB variant is a good one.
And a competitive price to Coolpad Cool 1 and Redmi Note 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely bro....3gb, 32gb,volte,otg and dual cam...so much of upgrades from 5x with same price.

shashank1320 said:
Absolutely bro....3gb, 32gb,volte,otg and dual cam...so much of upgrades from 5x with same price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The One thing which is missing is Triple card support rather than the 6X's Hybrid.
If it was there, this would be a great phone like 5X for the next 1 year.

Also, The Gyroscope is missing in Indian variant.
I thought that 6X will have Gyro. But sadly, it is not having...

vsriram92 said:
Also, The Gyroscope is missing in Indian variant.
I thought that 6X will have Gyro. But sadly, it is not having...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plus dual tone led flash.
and another downgrade is snapdragon to kirin (development prospective)
upgrades for me are dual camera, 3gb ram, and emui5 before April.. that's cool
and what about nfc??

thilak devraj said:
plus dual tone led flash.
and another downgrade is snapdragon to kirin (development prospective)
upgrades for me are dual camera, 3gb ram, and emui5 before April.. that's cool
and what about nfc??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dual tone Flash- not making much difference here as camera is way better in 6X.
SD to Kirin- not a letdown apart from development, Kirin is working way better than my 5X SD. (battery efficient without compromising on performance)
NFC- didnt get chance to check this yet..

shashank1320 said:
dual tone Flash- not making much difference here as camera is way better in 6X.
SD to Kirin- not a letdown apart from development, Kirin is working way better than my 5X SD. (battery efficient without compromising on performance)
NFC- didnt get chance to check this yet..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also heard that kirin is good with its performance.but I have my doubts about NFC

thilak devraj said:
I also heard that kirin is good with its performance.but I have my doubts about NFC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do know that there is no NFC for BLN-L22.
So don't expect NFC in Indian Version.

vsriram92 said:
I do know that there is no NFC for BLN-L22.
So don't expect NFC in Indian Version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heard some news that only us variant has the nfc

VR wouldn't work without gyroscope?

thilak devraj said:
heard some news that only us variant has the nfc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes US version have it.EU, US, China, India version all have one or the other difference here, some have nfc other have gyro and some dont have either

shashank1320 said:
Yes US version have it.EU, US, China, India version all have one or the other difference here, some have nfc other have gyro and some dont have either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm afraid, we don't have either??

thilak devraj said:
I'm afraid, we don't have either??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. No Gyro , No NFC.
NFC is not much usable here. But in the VR world, they could have included Gyro.
I thought of buying the 64GB variant. But lack of Gyro made me to rethink.

vsriram92 said:
Yup. No Gyro , No NFC.
NFC is not much usable here. But in the VR world, they could have included Gyro.
I thought of buying the 64GB variant. But lack of Gyro made me to rethink.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've reconsidered .. have a look at redminote4 (black variant)it's absolutely stunning... 4+64 variant just for 12999.. ill probably go with that

thilak devraj said:
I've reconsidered .. have a look at redminote4 (black variant)it's absolutely stunning... 4+64 variant just for 12999.. ill probably go with that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since I have already suffered with the build quality of Redmi Note 3, My mind is not considering RN4.
So gonna drop my upgrade and stay with 5X.

vsriram92 said:
Since I have already suffered with the build quality of Redmi Note 3, My mind is not considering RN4.
So gonna drop my upgrade and stay with 5X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this time, it seems good

Exynos 9825 very disappointing compared to SD855

When you buy the top notch phone that retails more than $1000 you expect to get the best performance. Not only Samsung didn't equipt the Note 10+ with the new SD885+, the new Global version of the phone comes with the Exynos 9825 that lacks in performance against the old SD855. That's not acceptable. What do you think?

The Exynos wins in single core performance and app launch time, they have comparable battery life and the SD wins in multi threaded workloads and GPU. But if you look at the 9820 vs sd855 anandtech review, the gpu is actually almost on par with the SD version and while the 9825 is very slightly overclocked it shouldnt lose this hard. Looks like an optimization issue to me rather than a raw power one. At the end of the day they perform similar in everyday use, but since more people use sd devices than exynos once they will be more optimized for games and such. Dont worry about it too much imo, yes it sucks that we got a worse version globally but its not a huge deal and definitely not a dealbreaker.

I would of thought more people used the Exynos version considering it's pretty much the entire world, while SD is mainly just north america or are samsung's sales outside America really that bad?

Pretty much to be expected as always.

I guess that optimization will improve the 9825 but not sure if it will make it to the SD855 performance. AFAIK Samsung can't use the Exynos chip in the USA because of patent protections so they using SD's. At least they should sell the Exynos version cheaper...

I Think that it's about time I stop buying an exynos note. It performs way worse than the snapdragon variant 3rd year in a row.
For me it is a deal breaker.
A phone asking 1000+ $ and flagged as flagship must have the latest soc, fact.
But....they wouldn't dare putting 855+ in comparison with the exynos9825 that maybe can compete with the almost 2 years old 845 soc. Really a shame.
No upgrading for me, sticking to my note9 and waiting for a proper flagship with flagship specs, means 855+ soc.

I already bought the Note 10+ Exynos before I knew it was inferior to the SD version. But if the next samsung flagship will not fix this, it will be the last Exynos device I'm buying maybe the last Samsung device altogether.

liamR said:
I already bought the Note 10+ Exynos before I knew it was inferior to the SD version. But if the next samsung flagship will not fix this, it will be the last Exynos device I'm buying maybe the last Samsung device altogether.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, aside from performance, if you are into rooting your device, the SD is pretty much not a choice unless you get the Hong Kong version. AFAIK, the only fully rootable version is the Exynos. I personally, would never consider the locked down version of the SD just based on principle. If I own the device and pay over $1000, I want to be the judge of what I can and can't do to it. It's like buying a Ferrari and being told the insurance company has disabled parts of it and it won't drive more than 60 mph. Weather you actually root or not becomes irrelevant. It's the principle.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL

I have no issues with the Exynos, it runs smoothly, performance is perfectly acceptable, yes the 855 might be slightly better in certain areas, but I think its marginal.....

Eudeferrer said:
Well, aside from performance, if you are into rooting your device, the SD is pretty much not a choice unless you get the Hong Kong version. AFAIK, the only fully rootable version is the Exynos. I personally, would never consider the locked down version of the SD just based on principle. If I own the device and pay over $1000, I want to be the judge of what I can and can't do to it. It's like buying a Ferrari and being told the insurance company has disabled parts of it and it won't drive more than 60 mph. Weather you actually root or not becomes irrelevant. It's the principle.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my last 3 phones from Samsung I didn't feel the need to root so that not a deal breaker for me. If you pay for Ferrari you don't want to end up with Maserati

Have you seen the battery on exynos version. https://youtu.be/RTezwqJgo5M
7 h and 47 min on gaming and rec 4k 60fp. Beat all competitors flagship without p30 pro Exynos is awesome even if is surpass in performance. Lets be real. Exynos will manage anything we drop at him no matter what.Battery is important. And so far by youre complains on xda compare to exynos sd is a failure.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

smentoma said:
Have you seen the battery on exynos version. https://youtu.be/RTezwqJgo5M
7 h and 47 min on gaming and rec 4k 60fp. Beat all competitors flagship without p30 pro Exynos is awesome even if is surpass in performance. Lets be real. Exynos will manage anything we drop at him no matter what.Battery is important. And so far by youre complains on xda compare to exynos sd is a failure.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw this test, but I didn't see the SD version tested. Also I have no problem to sacrifice some battery time for more performance (within reason).

I backup my opinion with my eperience. 1 day with note 10+ exynos version. Litle bit waze, 1h talk, 7 h youtube, 1/2 4g 1/2 wifi, some 3d attemp, heavy usage. Phenomenal battery. Exynos from s10+ and note 10+ is a win.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk