Develop Bugs

[Q] CM7 developement

hey guys, the last months i've seen almost 4 topics about developing (such as Maroc&Razor, Motafoca, Androhacker etc...) why doesn't anyone of those combine and form 1 single team. I think it will be much better than 4 seperate teams.

And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.

raolemo said:
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. if people having options they will try rather then using one......

I agree with OP.. unity is the strength here.. they would hv developed it faster if they worked together.. although there can be major clashes over the the concepts.. as some strongly support some issue some don't at all!
But the point is for the sake of the dev.. they might consider sharing what they hv achieved so far.. like so far the one by razor083 is very much working.. but with lot of bugs.. if they try they can make it work! instead they r building it again separately! They should only do dat if there is nothing to be done on this port by razor083!! in dat case they should proceed from source again! but atlst they should take a look at it!!

Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA

Chucrute said:
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really from source?
he said
This is a port of CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC0, a community-based custom Android ROM based Gingerbread 2.3.7, for the Samsung Galaxy Y phone. The current development status inicial - most hardware is not working correctly !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now im confused

nope.. it is from the source.. He also said "Its from source
I built it"..

No 3G, no Wifi, and no audio. Now thats not something I would flash. Waiting for a stable bug free version with crossed fingers. xP

OP is right: We (developers/themers/porters) should work together to make a fully working cm7 and cm9. Not all the bad roms which all get discontinued.... PM me if you want me to work with you!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy s III baby

[Q]Could anyone port this?

Is it possible to port Jelly Bean to Wonder?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739561

RadBFD said:
Is it possible to port Jelly Bean to Wonder?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739561
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are already two ports of CM9 (with inherited problems), I might work on JB but not now.

How about porting some of the features ?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

RadBFD said:
How about porting some of the features ?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think MIUI and AOKP ports should remain original, mixing things will neither be JB or MIUI,AOKP.

alidsd said:
I think MIUI and AOKP ports should remain original, mixing things will neither be JB or MIUI,AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree but 60fps instead of 30fps would be really cool.

RadBFD said:
I agree but 60fps instead of 30fps would be really cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah sure, someone can try to mixup things from different roms and give it a new name.

Here we go again. People trying to port new Android versions from completely incompatible phones, hardware wise. Or worse yet, from an emulator image.
It will run like **** no matter what, so I'd rather wait for sources, thank you very much.

arco68 said:
Here we go again. People trying to port new Android versions from completely incompatible phones, hardware wise. Or worse yet, from an emulator image.
It will run like **** no matter what, so I'd rather wait for sources, thank you very much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Wonder will not ported Jilly Bean?

Well cm9 is being ported right now. Right now it works pretty well so why won't cm10 work? The only thing i think won't work is the camera and some other bugs
Sent from my bananaphone.

Fujin.Suzukaze said:
On Wonder will not ported Jilly Bean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means that better port from compiled from sources, not from another phone or emulator image.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

I can see that mostly phones which have in-built ICS can get JB. Are you sure it is possible for our Wonder?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

possible

hope somebody can port it successfully

[Q] What about JellyBean

Will JellyBean ever be available to Gio? What is your opinion? Do you think it is possible? And what will CM name it?

erikcas said:
Will JellyBean ever be available to Gio? What is your opinion? Do you think it is possible? And what will CM name it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't have sources - no one knows if it would run on Gio.

wojtek267 said:
We don't have sources - no one knows if it would run on Gio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See latest post on Maclaws website.

erikcas said:
See latest post on Maclaws website.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I saw it already...

1. sources will be aviable in 1,5 week ...
2. jellybean runs with some more kernel execute and with the most libs from ics 4.0.4 (cm9) so it will work on gio
3. only a few libs must be rebuilded from source like audio libs, wifi binaries and the buttter libs ....
4. cm10/cm9
explaination: jb are not much modifications.
only butter project and some improvements from google and thats why i think that it falls under cm9
thats all in all for jb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.1

DQiB said:
1. sources will be aviable in 1,5 week ...
2. jellybean runs with some more kernel execute and with the most libs from ics 4.0.4 (cm9) so it will work on gio
3. only a few libs must be rebuilded from source like audio libs, wifi binaries and the buttter libs ....
4. cm10/cm9
explaination: jb are not much modifications.
only butter project and some improvements from google and thats why i think that it falls under cm9
thats all in all for jb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquidroms already have jb repo. Maybe I will try something later this week.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

I just found this while randomly browsing:
miroslav_mm said:
Hardware LG GT540 (msm7227) - dont support triple buffer and vsync. This components need for Project Butter UI which using in 4.1, so I dont sure if 4.1 will work on our phone, maybe CM will make dirty-hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And as gio sports a msm7227 this doesn't look good for jelly bean for gio....
Sent from my HTC Sensation

iok1 said:
I just found this while randomly browsing:
And as gio sports a msm7227 this doesn't look good for jelly bean for gio....
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Macław said JB would run on Gio. I trust in his words

wojtek267 said:
Macław said JB would run on Gio. I trust in his words
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the least it will have the same performance as ics, no butter for gio.
Sent from my HTC Sensation

iok1 said:
At the least it will have the same performance as ics, no butter for gio.
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When maclaw's ICS project is yet not done , then why are we thinking about JB ?
Feel of ICS is still left
RuCk
FulEs!

Avilove.Cullen said:
When maclaw's ICS project is yet not done , then why are we thinking about JB ?
Feel of ICS is still left
RuCk
FulEs!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree on that. It is the reason why I started this topic. So it can be referred to whenever someone starts about it again in the dev section
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

erikcas said:
Totally agree on that. It is the reason why I started this topic. So it can be referred to whenever someone starts about it again in the dev section
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ics is now outdated but still we are waiting for it..

Avilove.Cullen said:
Ics is now outdated but still we are waiting for it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. ICS was before world war II

erikcas said:
You're right. ICS was before world war II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You dont say?
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium

erikcas said:
You're right. ICS was before world war II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good joke
I mean now every where, in each forum we will see ics but still we have not got bug free version .. So how can we think of jb? May be our children will get jb

Avilove.Cullen said:
Good joke
I mean now every where, in each forum we will see ics but still we have not got bug free version .. So how can we think of jb? May be our children will get jb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about galaxy nexus? It isnt bug-free there?

iok1 said:
What about galaxy nexus? It isnt bug-free there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they have not bug free ics but still they can get as per there hardware specifications ..
Galaxy nexus developer are now moving to jelly bean

Avilove.Cullen said:
I think they have not bug free ics but still they can get as per there hardware specifications ..
Galaxy nexus developer are now moving to jelly bean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uhm galaxy nexus has bug free ics as far as stable as google rolled it out.?

voetbalremco said:
uhm galaxy nexus has bug free ics as far as stable as google rolled it out.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you telling me or interrogating me? ?
I don't know about galaxy nexus
Si usted le da sentido a continuación, obtener el respeto .. Mi mente joven que

voetbalremco said:
You dont say?
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did say say that
Whwn someone says ICS is outdated that can be the only (cynical) reaction one can give in my opinion
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

Is ParaAndroid rom porting for SGY

Hi devs is their any port of paraandroid for sgy.
Or in future it will bcoz they porting paraandroid rapidly for various devices..
Is any news for SGY
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

No way as there is atleast no cm7/cm9 to this yet. Paranoidandroid is based on cm9.

hitme987 said:
No way as there is atleast no cm7/cm9 to this yet. Paranoidandroid is based on cm9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:thumbup:Ohhh thanksss sir,but after cm9 release this may possible bcoz cm9 is under port devlopment for sgy by safariking
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

[email protected] said:
:thumbup:Ohhh thanksss sir,but after cm9 release this may possible bcoz cm9 is under port devlopment for sgy by safariking
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends. It's the devs interest. Basically it's made mostly for higher end phones, so I don't think this one can get that thing, but if it gets it would be awesome. It was the best rom on my s2

according to xda our device is in "Legacy & Low Activity Devices" criteria
so it could no be possible......until until cm9 fully out
by cm9 our dev's can do the same
..........so patient.......................

Our is screen is not capable for paranoid rom needs big screen

hitme987 said:
That depends. It's the devs interest. Basically it's made mostly for higher end phones, so I don't think this one can get that thing, but if it gets it would be awesome. It was the best rom on my s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhh nice sir.Devs trying if made then it be awesome:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

[email protected] said:
Ohhh nice sir.Devs trying if made then it be awesome:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya absolutely not possible
even cm9 is struggling to be ported to our phone
cm7 has just got some better releases now
How can anyone expect para android?

somkll said:
Our is screen is not capable for paranoid rom needs big screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy Mini has Paranoid Android

Ya though mini may hv, it cannot be ported to sgy
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

it depends on the specs not only the screen.. what's the use of big screen but low ram? higher version of Android OS needs more ram to make it smooth and stable without any lags.. expect the cm7 soon it will be fully fixed, just trust the dev.
Sent from my Android System using Busybox Command.

First let relase fully fixed cm7 for our device, then others will be released also.. I trust on our devs..

Cyanogenmod 10.1 will support Galaxy W i8150

Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

World be awesome
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

Oh f**k yes!!! but I'm pretty sure the device maintainers is arco
-sent from my awesome phone-

Hell yeah
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

doesn't have galaxy s plus in the list......
but i also have galaxy w,W cm rom can port to s plus?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

hell yeah finally we got official support from cyanogenmod! :good:

Hats off to Sir Arco and all other developers. It's due to them that we have grabbed some attention !!!
Galaxy W I8150 + DXLM2 + CM9 Beta 3

It's the best news for W and S+ users! Of course CM10.1 can be ported to S+. I am supporting arco for this, Galaxy W improves further than before!!!

Great news and i'm happy that the Galaxy W is still getting supported even if it has been long forgotten by Samsung.

this is very suprising news , only can think arco as the maintainers

at last:laugh:

Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.

arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it is a lie?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app

arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master

Hope it will be soon, but it's enough to have W with 3.x.x kernel and CM10 for now. When Samsung forgot the W, it's good to see arco and CM Team are working on this device. Keep working on that guys.

petafly said:
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the whole thread, and not. a. single. post ever mentioned the source of the list.
So, since there is no official news release from the Cyanogenmod team, I'd say that this is hearsay...

Yes, no trustable source. I'm asking myself, why would someone add our phone to the list of the new Cyanogenmod and imply a change of policy of CM?
Thanx arco for clearing things up.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

hotheabilly said:
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ye I'll see if I can do a build of CM10 with 3.x kernel soon. Things are a bit overwhelming at the moment, with 3 Android versions to work on, so it's hard to find enough time to spend on them. I'm beginning to feel that Google should slow down their release cycle a bit. As it is now, there's barely enough time for us devs to get a version stable, before they release a new Android version and we'll have to start all over again.

So it seems all we have to do is to wait for now

Posted in the wrong thread