New leaked marshmallow schedule - Galaxy S6 Edge+ General

http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-s6-...ollout-leaked-with-updated-schedule-25424189/

Oh good, will have to wait to February now. Samsung is getting much worse with it's updates!

Fake!

Maybe it's fake but it's 25 of January and still nothing from Samsung except the beta testing....

In my opinion, Samsung still developing the android 6.0 or probably will jump directly to 6.0.1.. Since the new version of android is very vital to the user, Samsung has to make sure the new one is better than the previous one. Remember a lot of issues when upgrading from KitKat to Lollipop such as overheat in Galaxy S5. It seems Samsung is avoid the same mistakes again. If the information is correct, we shall going to enjoy the update in couple weeks..

Santanazz said:
In my opinion, Samsung still developing the android 6.0 or probably will jump directly to 6.0.1.. Since the new version of android is very vital to the user, Samsung has to make sure the new one is better than the previous one. Remember a lot of issues when upgrading from KitKat to Lollipop such as overheat in Galaxy S5. It seems Samsung is avoid the same mistakes again. If the information is correct, we shall going to enjoy the update in couple weeks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you do realize s6/edge already have 6.0.1 beta right? So we don't need your opinion on what samsung is developing, because we already know that and as for the "new one is better than the previous one" statement I must say it's total bull**** and please stop defending samsung like they're some kind of a saint. Difference between lollipop and marshmallow is way to insignificant for them to need 5 months or more to release an update for their flagship line that costs an arm and a leg. And checking the 6.0.1 beta on s6/e, there's not much changed.. plus they had how much time if we count the release of marshmallow beta? Their competition already updated their flagships AND last gen flagships.. my dads LG G3 and moms HTC M8 both have marshmallow, and YES they BOTH perform much better than they did on lollipop. Especially the M8, which now runs much smoother than my s6e+.
Don't get me wrong, I love the hardware of the phone, but software wise samsung is still terrible, PLUS they suck with updates.
Right now it really just looks like that they will stall with the update until S7 is announced or maybe even released... beacuse business reasons I guess.

uristic said:
you do realize s6/edge already have 6.0.1 beta right? So we don't need your opinion on what samsung is developing, because we already know that and as for the "new one is better than the previous one" statement I must say it's total bull**** and please stop defending samsung like they're some kind of a saint. Difference between lollipop and marshmallow is way to insignificant for them to need 5 months or more to release an update for their flagship line that costs an arm and a leg. And checking the 6.0.1 beta on s6/e, there's not much changed.. plus they had how much time if we count the release of marshmallow beta? Their competition already updated their flagships AND last gen flagships.. my dads LG G3 and moms HTC M8 both have marshmallow, and YES they BOTH perform much better than they did on lollipop. Especially the M8, which now runs much smoother than my s6e+.
Don't get me wrong, I love the hardware of the phone, but software wise samsung is still terrible, PLUS they suck with updates.
Right now it really just looks like that they will stall with the update until S7 is announced or maybe even released... beacuse business reasons I guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because of lack of updates comparing with the others doesn't means it comes bad.. Don't you realize that a lot of manufactures also have not applied marshmallow in their handset.. If you really want a quick update in your phone, then you can switch to another manufacture that give it like you just said. I don't defend samsung like a saint, but I am trying to be more realistic with the condition.

Santanazz said:
Just because of lack of updates comparing with the others doesn't means it comes bad.. Don't you realize that a lot of manufactures also have not applied marshmallow in their handset.. If you really want a quick update in your phone, then you can switch to another manufacture that give it like you just said. I don't defend samsung like a saint, but I am trying to be more realistic with the condition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know a lot of manufactures didn't update yet, but the main competition did, and samsung is just not giving enough effort into updating their software. I also completely understand that the majority of users simply don't care about updates, but why wouldn't they also please advanced users. I mean they could totally have released a beta update for the s6e+ and note 5 when they released it for s6/e and it would please me and all the other eager users, but now I feel punished for paying 300+ € over the s6. Even the S5 had some marhmallow "leaks".

uristic said:
I know a lot of manufactures didn't update yet, but the main competition did, and samsung is just not giving enough effort into updating their software. I also completely understand that the majority of users simply don't care about updates, but why wouldn't they also please advanced users. I mean they could totally have released a beta update for the s6e+ and note 5 when they released it for s6/e and it would please me and all the other eager users, but now I feel punished for paying 300+ € over the s6. Even the S5 had some marhmallow "leaks".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you really want Fast updates then get Iphone or Nexus device next time. simple as that.

umbrokhan said:
If you really want Fast updates then get Iphone or Nexus device next time. simple as that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, i can't speak for everyone but I would like the update so my phone will work properly. I have poor reception on my phone, i cant really talk on my phone, get good internet connection, and have issues sending messages. I was advised by my wireless carrier and samsung, that the Marshmallow update would correct said problems. So maybe if they sold phones that worked properly out of the box, some of us wouldn't be crying for updates

umbrokhan said:
If you really want Fast updates then get Iphone or Nexus device next time. simple as that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would if nexus 6p would have been released by the time I was buying the phone. Actually it's still not available in Slovenia, only 5x is, 6p is coming end of January/early February, and yes, I am considering switching with someone 1 for 1 for a nexus 6p when they will be available, even if it's 250€ cheaper. And I don't really consider it being "fast updates" for expecting an update 5 months after the release of the software by google.
Funny thing is that I'm arguing about software updates on xda forums.. correct me, but no one is developing hardware on this forum or are they?

Its ready when it ready. Having seen the beta on the S6 I dont think we are missing much, its almost exactly the same.
Im never in a big hurry to get Android updates, a new version is always buggy for at least 3 to 4 months anyway, and as yet there has been no real bug fix for 6. After being burned by Googles own devices on every launch version since 4.2, I'm happy to wait for Google to fix its mess before Samsung jump on it.
Much of the reason why OEM devices are slower to update is that Android contains a lot of bugs, which the OEMs want to minimise before they release. Google dont care so much about the Nexus, if its buggy its buggy, the OEMs dont want that though.

it's all BS.... This is my last Samsung phone. They have no respect at all for their costumers. I hope hope the Dutch law suit against them , screws them where they deserve.

ChrisM75 said:
Its ready when it ready. Having seen the beta on the S6 I dont think we are missing much, its almost exactly the same.
Im never in a big hurry to get Android updates, a new version is always buggy for at least 3 to 4 months anyway, and as yet there has been no real bug fix for 6. After being burned by Googles own devices on every launch version since 4.2, I'm happy to wait for Google to fix its mess before Samsung jump on it.
Much of the reason why OEM devices are slower to update is that Android contains a lot of bugs, which the OEMs want to minimise before they release. Google dont care so much about the Nexus, if its buggy its buggy, the OEMs dont want that though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said... People are always complaining about the delayed updates but if an update cames out with bugs they complain also... This makes me laugh... Aren't your phones working?
Before Lollipop was released everyone was complaining and when it cames out i saw a lot of them returning to KK... if you all say the difference is minimal so what's the hurry?

They need to slim down the touchwiz stuff which may speed up the update times
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk

It's a fake. Don't believe in Ss. I buy an s6e+ for 1000$ in my country and still now there's no update. I think i'm gonna go back to iphone for the ip 6+ @@

people going to be really upset when they find out theres not much different between 5.11 and 6.

jowett69 said:
people going to be really upset when they find out theres not much different between 5.11 and 6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only want Doze to save battery life, am not bothered about the other Android 6 features.
if samsung make there UI skin more like iOS then am happy to.

on my nexus 7 with marshmallow battery on standby is brill but screen time just normal

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Funny...

Related

Report says galaxy s2 will get ICS on march 15, wheres at least 4.0.3 for Nexus?

Hi, So as many of you have heard/read, it looks like the GS2 will be getting ICS soon (possibly in a couple of weeks). That version will probably by 4.0.3 or .4 My question is where is the nexus update? At this rate the GS2 will have a better version of ICS.
I am day one Nexus purchaser. I have owned the G1, N One, Nexus S, And Now GN.
But out of all the phones I have bought, this phone is by far the worst experience. Frankly its because of all the things google said would be fixed with ICS and the fact that the other phones did not have glaring issues at launch. The browser lags, battery life is just OK, this app switch button lags really badly (yes 1-3 sec is bad Lag in this case) and so on and so on.
It bugs me that 4.0.3 and .4 fix this and the GS2 might have it before, but we haven't gotten it yet. I feel like I am using beta software cause there are so many things that need to be fixed in 4.0.2.
I never recall Apple releasing a software this messed up. And they usually have updates out relatively quick. Also Do not tell me to flash some rom, I do not feel comfortable doing so with a $600 phone nor should I be fixing the problems with this device.
I just feel like google needs to come out and say when they will update their phones. Give a timeline and if it needs to take longer to finish,then there is nothing you can do about it, but do not release software that has some glaring issues with it. Trust me if the nexus release in January as opposed to NOV-DEC. I think almost everyone would have still bought it.
Thats the end of my rant
Thanks!
P.S. I am ready for any and all flaming.
The SGS2's ICS will blow, it will be the same old TW garbage. Most of the leaked alphas/betas have been 4.0.3 fwiw. Each of them had pretty large issues of their own and if the final release is bug free I'll be really, really....really shocked.
I heard it was coming out tomorrow, since I already have 4.0.4 I won't get the update to share though. You know why Apple doesn't have to update so much? When they release, it's already outdated hardware and software (but it's thoroughly tested).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
if you want 4.0.3 download a custom ROM. You buy a 'developer' phone then complain that it has issues... The Galaxy Nexus will be updated in due time.
Being a custom ROM is always nicer than stock especially since our phones only run AOSP. Anything added over what Google only makes our device better.
Didn't we just have this thread? *eyeroll*
If the best thing you can find to troll about is the fact that the S2 is *finally* getting ICS when us Gnex owners have had it since last November, and the S2 *might possibly* have a newer version for a few weeks, after which you probably won't see even bug fix updates for six months or more... I think you're scraping the bottom of the barrel, mate.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Come on....just sell the GNex buy SGSII if it makes you happy
Powered by Galaxy Nexus™
Last time I checked, I've been running 4.0.3 for a while now....how about you? Lol
Touchwiz + ICS is a ugly experience. At least on the leak builds I've used on my Epic 4g Touch. Plus what Samsung does and what Google does is too different things.
Your talking about a phone that been out for almost 2 years n comparing it to a phone that only been out since Nov of last year. The GS2 deserves it update since its been on the market longer .
Like I said Touchwiz just don't look right on ICS. Matter of fact any skin don't look right on ICS
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
4.0.3 for the Gnex is here
You're welcome.
I think he's damn right. Don't tell me to flash a ROM on my GN made by some "dude" because that ROM is better then the one provided by Google engineers lol
I've bought the GN for the same reason most of us have - Timely Updates . Not to say I didn't think there would be a version updated by Samsung and one updated by Google...:|
Not to say the Nexus S users (most of them) are waiting for their updates too.
P.S. See this thread here about the custom roms http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1532793
Last I checked I am running 4.0.4. WORD UP
MFire said:
I think he's damn right. Don't tell me to flash a ROM on my GN made by some "dude" because that ROM is better then the one provided by Google engineers lol
I've bought the GN for the same reason most of us have - Timely Updates . Not to say I didn't think there would be a version updated by Samsung and one updated by Google...:|
Not to say the Nexus S users (most of them) are waiting for their updates too.
P.S. See this thread here about the custom roms http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1532793
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea because 4.0.3 is made by "some dude". If he is unable or too afraid to flash 4.0.3 then he can wait until Google officially releases it as OTA. 4.0.3 is available for flashing, if he chooses not to flash it then I don't want to hear any complaining.
The sgs2 is a joke BTW.
stupidslow02gt said:
Yea because 4.0.3 is made by "some dude". If he is unable or too afraid to flash 4.0.3 then he can wait until Google officially releases it as OTA. 4.0.3 is available for flashing, if he chooses not to flash it then I don't want to hear any complaining.
The sgs2 is a joke BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the source for 4.0.3 has been out for ages, you can compile and flash it yourself. pure google and unmodified.
Omfg its the end of humanity. Run run run. Gs2 getting ics 4.9.9 and galaxy still on 4.0.0 lol. BIG DEAL ..LOL like 99% of guys here their gnex not rooted ! I'm on 4.0.4. Big deal lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Lmao. Have you seen ics on the SGSII it has tw over it. Nothing will be a major upgrade. It will still look like this but have 4.0.x on the about screen. Big deal. The development over in that section is dead anyway. They pick up one new dev and boot 2.
I went from 4.0.2 to 4.0.4. Back to 4.0.3 we are still winning
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium App
stupidslow02gt said:
Yea because 4.0.3 is made by "some dude". If he is unable or too afraid to flash 4.0.3 then he can wait until Google officially releases it as OTA. 4.0.3 is available for flashing, if he chooses not to flash it then I don't want to hear any complaining.
The sgs2 is a joke BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coming from an SGS2 I can tell you the only thing which is good on this phone is the 720p screen, but it can't playback 720p movies.
The camera of the s2 was much better but I don't take a lot of pictures so I don't care.
And I don't know why but this phone lags a lot, but it doesn't have freezes nor random reboots
And last but not least, battery life was excellent on the SGSII, I could easily make it through a day, the battery life of the GN is much worse!
So please think twice before saying the SGSII is a joke because at some points it is even superior to the Galaxy Nexus! But I love this 720p screen so much that's why I keep it!
Does the numerical value of the OS you're using really mean that much to you? What major features are you desperately missing in going from .2 to .3? If someone repackaged a 4.0.2 update and renamed it 4.0.5, I guarantee you wouldn't know the difference. In fact you would probably brag how much smoother and more battery efficient it is.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
So many Nexus apologists in here.
shoman24v said:
You buy a 'developer' phone then complain that it has issues... The Galaxy Nexus will be updated in due time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy Nexus isn't a 'developer' phone, that's exactly why you put developer in quotes. Technically it might have been made with developers in mind but you can buy a Galaxy Nexus in a brick and mortar store right alongside every other Android device with no special membership, card or secret handshake required. So the Galaxy Nexus cannot be forgiven any faults because it's a developer phone - I didn't get this thing for free at Google I/O did I?
Anyway, I agree with the OP so much. Even though the main reason I sold my SGS2 was to get ICS, I don't really care if the SGS2 is getting ICS 3 months later. I just want my Nexus to get OTA updates when they are supposed to be out, I don't want to be discriminated because I bought my phone in country X or from carrier Y and be stuck in the past while more special Nexus' are getting updates.
vennstrom said:
Come on....just sell the GNex buy SGSII if it makes you happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? You can't handle someone not sharing your opinion on a device and then sharing those views online?
We aren't slaves to these corporations. We don't sell a device we own at a loss, pick up a new device, find out it's not exactly as advertised so then we can go back tail between our legs. We pay good money and we have the right to be critical.
YoungAceAtlanta said:
Your talking about a phone that been out for almost 2 years n comparing it to a phone that only been out since Nov of last year. The GS2 deserves it update since its been on the market longer .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy S2 was not even announced yet one year ago to this day. It didn't even come out in the US until 6 months ago give or take... 2 years is way off, just saying.
bootsie99 said:
Last I checked I am running 4.0.4. WORD UP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And if still owned my HD2 I'd be running 4.0.4 as well...
That's not the point of this thread, I'm sure most people buy a Nexus device specifically because they are not interested in unofficial/custom ROMs.
That's not the point of this thread, I'm sure most people buy a Nexus device specifically because they are not interested in unofficial/custom ROMs.
Yes,yes 100% ++++++++++
hiraj_panosian said:
Coming from an SGS2 I can tell you the only thing which is good on this phone is the 720p screen, but it can't playback 720p movies.
The camera of the s2 was much better but I don't take a lot of pictures so I don't care.
And I don't know why but this phone lags a lot, but it doesn't have freezes nor random reboots
And last but not least, battery life was excellent on the SGSII, I could easily make it through a day, the battery life of the GN is much worse!
So please think twice before saying the SGSII is a joke because at some points it is even superior to the Galaxy Nexus! But I love this 720p screen so much that's why I keep it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This phone plys 720p movies fine and if it doesn't for you, then check your user manual. You are doing something wrong.

Dammit HTC and Verizon!

OK everybody this thread has gotten way off topic while waiting for our OTA update which is supposed to be "tomorrow" (if you're confused just read a few pages) This thread now is a place for us to joke around, slander Verizon and talk about DIX
Triscuit said:
I just noticed that HTC released OTA ICS for the rezound and a couple others, I'm really hoping this means we will be next in line for OTA cause we all know what that means!!! Figured I'd give you guys a heads up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or they'll announce that we don't get it... But hopefully what you said.
gtdtm said:
Or they'll announce that we don't get it... But hopefully what you said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well HTC claimed we would get it june-july but obviously that didn't happen...so yes hopefully what I said lol
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Also this was posted about a week ago
Triscuit said:
Also this was posted about a week ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this just shows the pessimist in me (or what I feel about VZW's track record, because I think it would be more them than HTC), but also from that blog:
"For more background, due to how storage on the HTC Desire HD is partitioned – and the larger size of Android 4.0 – it would require re-partitioning device storage and overwriting user data in order to install this update. While technically advanced users might find this solution acceptable, the majority of customers would not. We also considered ways to reduce the overall size of the software package, but this would impact features and functionality that customers are currently using. Even after installing the update, there were other technical limitations which we felt negatively impacted the user experience."
Is Verizon willing to lose some stupid bundled apps to make sure it can fit on our Dinc2? I imagine they could save plenty of space by not bundling NFL Mobile, etc...
My 2 cents.
gtdtm said:
I know this just shows the pessimist in me (or what I feel about VZW's track record, because I think it would be more them than HTC), but also from that blog:
"For more background, due to how storage on the HTC Desire HD is partitioned – and the larger size of Android 4.0 – it would require re-partitioning device storage and overwriting user data in order to install this update. While technically advanced users might find this solution acceptable, the majority of customers would not. We also considered ways to reduce the overall size of the software package, but this would impact features and functionality that customers are currently using. Even after installing the update, there were other technical limitations which we felt negatively impacted the user experience."
Is Verizon willing to lose some stupid bundled apps to make sure it can fit on our Dinc2? I imagine they could save plenty of space by not bundling NFL Mobile, etc...
My 2 cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously? Show me one damn person that uses that bloatware that comes bundled, I know I don't. Silly Verizon. :banghead:
Thanks?
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda app-developers app
Triscuit said:
Well HTC claimed we would get it june-july but obviously that didn't happen...so yes hopefully what I said lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a link to when they said June or July?
The only eta I ever read was August... I don't think we have anything to worry about personally, but only time will tell. I don't really care as long as they release kernel source for at least one of the other variations of the dinc2 that already has official ics. I have given up on sense roms anyways since I switched to ics.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
cstone1991 said:
Do you have a link to when they said June or July?
The only eta I ever read was August... I don't think we have anything to worry about personally, but only time will tell. I don't really care as long as they release kernel source for at least one of the other variations of the dinc2 that already has official ics. I have given up on sense roms anyways since I switched to ics.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.htc.com/www/help/android4faq/?cid=android4blog
And you are correct as well as they have both "june-july" and August lol
is it august yet? go go go go
We still need 3.0 kernel source.
Sent from Inc 2 using Tapatalk 2
xHoLyx said:
We still need 3.0 kernel source.
Sent from Inc 2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bah! This is the same old speculation that we are doing... Just wait it out, and see... Hopefully good news. Let's rant/rage if and when VZW screws us over... but till then just chill gang!
litetaker said:
Bah! This is the same old speculation that we are doing... Just wait it out, and see... Hopefully good news. Let's rant/rage if and when VZW screws us over... but till then just chill gang!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^Exactly^^ I'm willing to wait it out, I've got jelly bean on my phone already and its awesome.
They've already released ics for the Chinese or whatever it was version, so don't they need to give kernel source for that even if we don't get it?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk 2
prototype7 said:
They've already released ics for the Chinese or whatever it was version, so don't they need to give kernel source for that even if we don't get it?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.....eventually
prototype7 said:
They've already released ics for the Chinese or whatever it was version, so don't they need to give kernel source for that even if we don't get it?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel source from oem's is a murky proposition at best....ideally source would be available as soon as an update is out, but htc hides behind their typical (90-120 days after release) window....though (thunderbolt gb update) they have released source on the same day as an update
i have no idea why they pull this, since theres nothing to change/add to the kernel since its already released, but there isnt much to do on our end...short of suing them
so idk
gtdtm said:
I know this just shows the pessimist in me (or what I feel about VZW's track record, because I think it would be more them than HTC), but also from that blog:
"For more background, due to how storage on the HTC Desire HD is partitioned – and the larger size of Android 4.0 – it would require re-partitioning device storage and overwriting user data in order to install this update. While technically advanced users might find this solution acceptable, the majority of customers would not. We also considered ways to reduce the overall size of the software package, but this would impact features and functionality that customers are currently using. Even after installing the update, there were other technical limitations which we felt negatively impacted the user experience."
Is Verizon willing to lose some stupid bundled apps to make sure it can fit on our Dinc2? I imagine they could save plenty of space by not bundling NFL Mobile, etc...
My 2 cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well for one DesireHD is not the Incredible S/2. Second, it's not about your or me or this site it's about the larger customer base so HTC is acting in best interest of their own company to not release something that could make a lot (more than here, rootz, ac, etc) of people pissed off. Always keep in mind we are the smaller,much smaller, segment of a larger industry.
frankspin said:
Well for one DesireHD is not the Incredible S/2. Second, it's not about your or me or this site it's about the larger customer base so HTC is acting in best interest of their own company to not release something that could make a lot (more than here, rootz, ac, etc) of people pissed off. Always keep in mind we are the smaller,much smaller, segment of a larger industry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also keep on mind that that larger user base usually doesn't know what software version their phone has and they probably think GB is the latest since their phone says up to date if they check under software updates. It's true that we're a smaller segment of a larger group, but we're the ones that keep up with this kind of stuff and actually care about updates on time. Other users could care less as long as their phone gets the job done.
Sent from my vivow using Tapatalk
frankspin said:
Well for one DesireHD is not the Incredible S/2. Second, it's not about your or me or this site it's about the larger customer base so HTC is acting in best interest of their own company to not release something that could make a lot (more than here, rootz, ac, etc) of people pissed off. Always keep in mind we are the smaller,much smaller, segment of a larger industry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get that, but don't promise something you can't deliver... It turns me off of both HTC and vzw more than if they would have said, "we'll research it and see if we can."
gtdtm said:
I get that, but don't promise something you can't deliver... It turns me off of both HTC and vzw more than if they would have said, "we'll research it and see if we can."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Verizon or HTC haven't said anything about the Inc2 since the initial memo. Again going by e DesireHD is wrong since its not the same phone. Verizon or HTC saying "well research and see" would still cause you to be mad. If the IncS got it the Inc2 should be getting it they're identical phones for the most part.

Note 4 getting another over-the-air update, Will AT&T get this one?

I know we didn't get the first firmware update, that supposedly increased battery usage, performance etc, but maybe we get this one?
http://www.sammobile.com/2014/11/21/samsung-galaxy-note-4-getting-another-over-the-air-update/
That's for international phones and since we are not rooted and don't have custom recovery for AT&T we can't use it
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A
I'm sure you will see one shortly anyways for the gear vr . It was stated during oculus connect that a ota will have to roll out in front of the release. Which the release is scheduled for beginning of December. That is unless the update will only push if you have it connected to the VR. I guess only time will tell.
AT&T (who should have no involvement in device updates, but in this great country of ours, does) could do 1 of 3 things
1) Release the first update, then the second, then lollipop (least likely)
2) Release a combined update with both the first and second updates (possible, though unlikely, maybe this is why the didn't bother with the first one)
3) Don't release anything ecept Lollipop. Logically, it would contain any previous updates in the 5.0 build (most likely what will happen)
#3 seems to be the main choice. I can't understand why AT&T or any other carrier would spend a single cent on software and development. It doesn't seem to fit what they do. They can push in their bloatware without holding back on everything. Maybe they do stability testing, and ensuring it doesn't effect the network stability, which I would understand, but minor updates are way toooooo hard to trickle down from the manufacturer to the end user.
I was in bestbuy , all there phones are international. They all had a software update waiting. You couldn't stop it or force quit it, it was awesome. But with that said, the demo software security policy was making the update fall. Just about everyone of there note 4 was in endless full boot, try upgrade, restart.
I think I should asking, when does the AT&T Note 4 get Lollipop? Next Christmas in 2015?
sandman7793 said:
I was in bestbuy , all there phones are international. They all had a software update waiting. You couldn't stop it or force quit it, it was awesome. But with that said, the demo software security policy was making the update fall. Just about everyone of there note 4 was in endless full boot, try upgrade, restart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That IS awesome :laugh:
Yea I can't believe that situation with the gear vr needing a firmware update to work. If it's left to the carriers, a lot of early adopters may be stuck waiting. It doesn't work on any retail version of the phone right now, according to the oculus forums.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
boufa said:
AT&T (who should have no involvement in device updates, but in this great country of ours, does)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, they like to test and quality the updates to make sure they don't enable features they don't allow or break their network. It's their network, so that's their right - as a free enterprise business in this great country we live in.
When you start your own billion dollar wireless network, you can approve updates however you see fit. Until then...
JasonJoel said:
Well, they like to test and quality the updates to make sure they don't enable features they don't allow or break their network. It's their network, so that's their right - as a free enterprise business in this great country we live in.
When you start your own billion dollar wireless network, you can approve updates however you see fit. Until then...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow... a bit aggressive of a response (but thats the internet for ya). Not many people here defending the carriers.
The international devices are not managed in the same way. I certainly understand testing for their network, but I am sure that the international networks are not crashing from lack of testing. The system in the US is out of date. Few, would argue it. Google certainly seems to thing so, they are unbundling much of their software to avoid dealing with the carriers on updates. Other companies like HTC have also begun releasing their included software as separate apps that can be updated via google play. There are many threads throughout XDA that call for eliminating the carriers from the updates system. I see it happening at some point, though not soon.
I for one am not against their blocking root. I like root, I have rooted many devices, but hacking a device to put on their network that can break their network, or exploit their resources, is an understandable precaution, however, withholding a firmware update issued by the manufacturer that provides either improved usability of a device, or fixes for discovered flaws seems extremely anti consumer and wrong.
I am very pro business, I don't hate the carriers, I understand what they do, and why they do it. I just don't like this 1 thing about them. Simple. I still want to know why they waste any of their resources on holding back and doing whatever to the updates before rolling them out, if they roll them out at all. If I had a GPE device or a Nexus device, they don't block the upgrades. iPhone either. (and I seriously doubt much advanced testing gets done on them by the carriers)
That is a great point at the end. IPhone. For as big as they've gotten, they don't block updates. I know people will say there aren't as many device variants etc. But most times the updates are available and carriers or specific manufactures hold them back or never release them.
AT&T blocking carrier firmware updates? Do we have any proof of this, or are we only assuming? I have heard in times past, this is what Google did to market the Android OS to the major carriers to get leaway on Apple. To make this "new" OS very appealing. To gain leverage.
1: to the device manufacturers - a free OS (or very cheep) that can be skinned to their hearts content.
2: to the carriers - to have any software installed, and not removed by customers. To have any form of limitations implemented for the sake of their business model.
arjun90 said:
I think I should asking, when does the AT&T Note 4 get Lollipop? Next Christmas in 2015?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is being tested as we speak. Lollipop is a drastic code revision so they unfortunately have to make sure the "added" apps function properly. I'd be very surprised if it wasn't being released before Christmas.
What do we have here on this new update. Hi gear VR.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ReggieSmith said:
It is being tested as we speak. Lollipop is a drastic code revision so they unfortunately have to make sure the "added" apps function properly. I'd be very surprised if it wasn't being released before Christmas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone, somewhere (sorry, I don't remember exactly where) had a photo of the actual (allegedly) working document with time tables and status updates from Samsung for Lollipop. It listed the Note 4, but NOT the AT&T version as "Final Testing" due in "January 15"
However, the point of this conversation is that it won't be rolled out to the carriers at the same time as the Samsung responsibility models are. So that date means very little. Well, if history serves, I seriously doubt that AT&T will release it before Samsung releases the international versions.
JasonJoel said:
Well, they like to test and quality the updates to make sure they don't enable features they don't allow or break their network. It's their network, so that's their right - as a free enterprise business in this great country we live in.
When you start your own billion dollar wireless network, you can approve updates however you see fit. Until then...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@JasonJoel I just have to say, after reading your posts on this thread and another, I am pretty sure you are an AT&T Corp spy sent to XDA to get info and spin positive feedback for the company lol Kidding #notkidding
Lol. I can see how one might think that. But, no.
I'm not saying I like any of AT&T policies, my only point is that they have every right to do it and run their company however they want. I get annoyed when people say a business should / shouldn't be allowed to do things - too socialist for my tastes.
JasonJoel said:
Lol. I can see how one might think that. But, no.
I'm not saying I like any of AT&T policies, my only point is that they have every right to do it and run their company however they want. I get annoyed when people say a business should / shouldn't be allowed to do things - too socialist for my tastes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said sir well said I agree with you overall on that.
This VR services **** better not be always running.
God damned ****ing bull**** censor. **** is the only word that's appropriate for VR.
raduque said:
This VR services **** better not be always running.
God damned ****ing bull**** censor. **** is the only word that's appropriate for VR.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Delete that ****e.

Lollipop update for Galaxy Tab PRO 8.4

Since this is first samsung device which i own, i dont know which sites to follow for informations.
So i would be thankfull if anyone can say, will this tablet get lollipop treatment.
I dont want to be dissapointed because its new, 3-4 months old tablet.
electrash said:
will this tablet get lollipop treatment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who knows? We don't even know if our devices will get an official 4.4.4 let alone 5.0.
Samsung won't ever give you confirmation of something like an upcoming update as usually their support desks seem to know so little that you may as well ask the man in the moon.
CM12 will bring AOSP Lollipop, but it's still work in progress
hundred_miles_high said:
Who knows? We don't even know if our devices will get an official 4.4.4 let alone 5.0.
Samsung won't ever give you confirmation of something like an upcoming update as usually their support desks seem to know so little that you may as well ask the man in the moon.
CM12 will bring AOSP Lollipop, but it's still work in progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that means no high hope for update. I guess this will be my first and last device from them. Thank you for answer
electrash said:
So that means no high hope for update. I guess this will be my first and last device from them. Thank you for answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't give up hope just yet (Lollipop hasn't been out for long), but neither would I be holding my breath for an update either.....
Samsung has to integrate TouchWiz and do a lot of quality testing , if they released an unstable or unsecured release of Lollipop it would cause more problems and customers as they have a reputation to keep, if you look at Samsungs line of products maybe only one or two products actually have Lollipop, as they are probably slowly testing feedback and bugreports, if they just recklessly just throw an update to every-device it would cause havoc
If I had to guess I would say sometime next year (probably within the first 3-4 months) this tablet will get a update.
otyg said:
Samsung has to integrate TouchWiz and do a lot of quality testing , if they released an unstable or unsecured release of Lollipop it would cause more problems and customers as they have a reputation to keep,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what they should be doing, but if you look at this years 4.3 Jellybean release for Galaxy S3 they appeared to have done none of it. Also, just read this morning that the Note 4 will skip straight to 5.0.1 - so they're probably not going to waste much time porting many more snapdragon devices to 5.0, which could mean an even longer delay.
Please excuse my cynicism, I've been a Samsung customer for too long....
electrash said:
Since this is first samsung device which i own, i dont know which sites to follow for informations.
So i would be thankfull if anyone can say, will this tablet get lollipop treatment.
I dont want to be dissapointed because its new, 3-4 months old tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing May or June of 2015 for Android 5.x and that will be the last update. I really hope they get Lollipop on the Note 10.1 2014, which is more important to me than my tab pro 8.4.
hundred_miles_high said:
Who knows? We don't even know if our devices will get an official 4.4.4 let alone 5.0.
Samsung won't ever give you confirmation of something like an upcoming update as usually their support desks seem to know so little that you may as well ask the man in the moon.
CM12 will bring AOSP Lollipop, but it's still work in progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
by using your logic, the galaxy s5 hasnt got 5.0, because it hasnt got 4.4.4 too
timuralaskara said:
by using your logic, the galaxy s5 hasnt got 5.0, because it hasnt got 4.4.4 too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Say what?
Where did i say that one was dependent on getting the other?
By my logic Samsung haven't confirmed one or the other - not the next incremental revision, let alone the next version.
From past experience they are unlikely to respond fully to enquiries about what updates are due and remain very non commital at the best of times.
pretty straight forward to understand......
Lollipop 5.0.2. just started rolling out to the Tab S series:
http://www.sammobile.com/2015/04/23/samsung-galaxy-tab-s-8-4-gets-the-lollipop-update/
Hopefully it's not that big a leap to get out the Tab Pro series as well. I don't think the differences were anything radical....
d99x said:
Lollipop 5.0.2. just started rolling out to the Tab S series:
http://www.sammobile.com/2015/04/23/samsung-galaxy-tab-s-8-4-gets-the-lollipop-update/
Hopefully it's not that big a leap to get out the Tab Pro series as well. I don't think the differences were anything radical....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw on one site that whole pro line will get lollipop 5.0.2 very soon.
Sent from my D6603 using XDA Free mobile app
Samsung Lollipop update uncertainties
I was about to buy a Galaxy Tab Pro (3 actually) but this whole Lollipop update thing has given me cold feet. I'm going to stick with iPads. I just don't like the feeling they're withholding OS updates in order to drive new (Galaxy Tab S2) hardware sales. I always felt that was happening with Windows and PC hardware vendors and I ended up buying a Mac because of it (and never looked back).
Good luck guys and may all your Lollipops be as fruity as an Apple.
simty said:
I was about to buy a Galaxy Tab Pro (3 actually) but this whole Lollipop update thing has given me cold feet. I'm going to stick with iPads. I just don't like the feeling they're withholding OS updates in order to drive new (Galaxy Tab S2) hardware sales. I always felt that was happening with Windows and PC hardware vendors and I ended up buying a Mac because of it (and never looked back).
Good luck guys and may all your Lollipops be as fruity as an Apple.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well hello mr apple troll. You do realise ios updates can take ages also? having owned 5 ios devices from iphone 1 to ipad 1 to ipad air 2 etc. Apple also hold update releases until the next new product generally "the best thing yet since.." enjoy your limited ios device. For me it's Android
Definitely not a troll !
Sayid_Jarah said:
Well hello mr apple troll. You do realise ios updates can take ages also? having owned 5 ios devices from iphone 1 to ipad 1 to ipad air 2 etc. Apple also hold update releases until the next new product generally "the best thing yet since.." enjoy your limited ios device. For me it's Android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I work for a Google school and I think that's just about the biggest vote of platform confidence anyone can give. We do need at least one new Android tablet to test Appinventor Apps and we will buy. However, KitKat has been a frustration. Not being able to capture direct to MicroSD for example is unforgivable in the modern OS era. Lollipop promises to fix a great many KitKat issues and I think the HARDWARE partners like Samsung have a responsibility to get the customer base past KitKat ASAP.
I do not know what you mean when you say: "Apple holds update releases". But if you are suggesting that Apple only applies software updates to ONE generation of hardware you are totally wrong. I have an iPad 2 which has now had 5 different iOS iterations from iOS4 to iOS8 and is now possibly 3x better than the already excellent device I originally purchased. I've never had to even wait extra time because it's an older device. I want this for Android as well! and I reserve the right to put as much pressure as I can to make the hardware vendors give it to us. Let's not forget the damage platform fragmentation does to the Android developer community. It's in the best long-term interests of all hardware partners to keep as many of us as possible on the newest version of Android but they are not walking the walk. We need to encourage them.
My intentions are good, peace out.
simty said:
I was about to buy a Galaxy Tab Pro (3 actually) but this whole Lollipop update thing has given me cold feet. I'm going to stick with iPads. I just don't like the feeling they're withholding OS updates in order to drive new (Galaxy Tab S2) hardware sales. I always felt that was happening with Windows and PC hardware vendors and I ended up buying a Mac because of it (and never looked back).
Good luck guys and may all your Lollipops be as fruity as an Apple.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny that I can't update my GFs macbook past osx 10.7 because 'it's too old' when it more than meets requirements.
No need to shill here.
Give me a break!
Swizzy88 said:
Funny that I can't update my GFs macbook past osx 10.7 because 'it's too old' when it more than meets requirements.
No need to shill here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the youngest that MacBook could possibly be is October 2008! Unfortunately it's a 32bit machine which is just a different technology generation. It is a bit of bad luck though. I have a MacBook Pro from Mid 2007 that's running the very latest Yosemite OS just fine. It's pretty amazing when an 8 year old computer just keeps getting better and better for free. AND THAT'S EXACTLY THE WAY IT SHOULD BE. Screenshots of the system profile can be posted if you have doubts.
I don't know why people are trying to argue this, it's a simple fact that Apple are just better in updates than Samsung will ever be. The main reason for it is that it's easy for Apple to support since they make their own hardware and software that doesn't run on thousands of devices like Android. Samsung should still try to do a better job at updating. I don't like how they didn't even say whether the Tab Pros will get Lollipop or not, even though they were released only a few months before the Tab Ss (which did get Lollipop) and are just as powerful (they use the same chips).
Regardless I myself am gonna flash CM12 on my Pro 8.4 because I don't know if Samsung ever intend on giving us the update we deserve and regardless I am tired of TouchWiz.
Well one thing Android will have that Apple never will, is Android IS OPEN SOURCE and also Samsung is pretty good in releasing the source code for its products and kernels, meaning even if they don't release an update for a specific device it can still be supported by 3rd party firmwares or if you want to compile it yourself. - let's see someone do that with Apple.
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception.do
You don't think Apple has IOS 8 or 9 in the works? if it was Open Source like Android then Apple users would be doing the same thing begging for the update, but since Apple is closed source you don't hear about it until they tell you.
2 Cents
Also I still think the Tab Pro series will still get an update , I think Samsung owes at least one major version update being it was released at nearly the same time as the Tab S - I am suspecting it will be next in line for the lollipop update - considering its the Pro series line it might need more security and testing then the S series does.
lollipop update for tab pro.
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...-1-Lollipop-Update-is-coming-by-Early-Q3-2015
simty said:
I Not being able to capture direct to MicroSD for example is unforgivable in the modern OS era. Lollipop promises to fix a great many KitKat issues and I think the HARDWARE partners like Samsung have a responsibility to get the customer base past KitKat ASAP.
t.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3rd party apps not being able to write to the SD card is a deliberate security decision. However, it is easily overridden by an app from the Play Store. Search for "sdfix". BTW, it is also needed in lollipop so waiting for 5.1.1 won't help.

No updates since purchase in December - left in the wild?

So since buying the PD I've had no updates. No monthly security patch. Nothing, nada, zilch.
Is this what life with a Huawei device is like? Buy it then bugger off? I've not owned a Huawei before.
The Mate 9 has on the other hand received a couple of updates so far.
Is it tied into to Pro and therefore until sales ramp up not much will be incoming?
I'm looking forward the S8 if this is the cases! And it'll be my last Huawei device.:silly:
bonerp said:
So since buying the PD I've had no updates. No monthly security patch. Nothing, nada, zilch.
Is this what life with a Huawei device is like? Buy it then bugger off? I've not owned a Huawei before.
The Mate 9 has on the other hand received a couple of updates so far.
Is it tied into to Pro and therefore until sales ramp up not much will be incoming?
I'm looking forward the S8 if this is the cases! And it'll be my last Huawei device.:silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha!
I was thinking exactly the same thing!!
It's a beautiful phone though!
I'm hoping the next update gets the Barclays Bank apps working soon. It's a pain not being able to do mobile banking
I got an update as soon as I first started it...this was on Dec 15th and it was the B138, then nothing more.
Different release schedules are irritating as well. European users are still waiting for the B156 firmware which was released in some countries more than a month ago. These countries are even getting a newer B16x release already, which I suppose will reach Europe by April if we get lucky.
I got my first update to pro version this week. I like the device also but if this is how the software updates to I will also leave Huawei for good after this
Sent from my SM-T815 using Tapatalk
CandyAndy said:
I got my first update to pro version this week. I like the device also but if this is how the software updates to I will also leave Huawei for good after this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing Scandinavia? Samsung isn't any better, neither is LG - the best bet would actually be Google Pixel, which might also be left in the dark. When it comes to software updates, the Android ecosystem sucks BADLY.
puttitat said:
I'm guessing Scandinavia? Samsung isn't any better, neither is LG - the best bet would actually be Google Pixel, which might also be left in the dark. When it comes to software updates, the Android ecosystem sucks BADLY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least Samsung provided monthly security patches (later than google) for its latest devices.
Same thing here, no updates since December.
Can't really complain about any serious bugs though, wish they would fine tune the auto rightness a bit better but oh well.
No update on the pro either (even though I know it available in some regions )
Sent from my PORSCHE DESIGN HUAWEI Mate 9
Hi,
same here and cam really pissed for a device with 1400 EUR.
Also having a Mate 9 with several updates between Dec. and now.
Ihm missing mostly volTE and Wifi Calling. So much needed here.
I askes several times Huawei and get no feedback. What happen at Huawei?
I sent an email to huawei complaining about this:
"Bought my PD Mate 9 in december and firmware version is stil B138. No security patches since then, although on asian models there has been several updates. It is a miserable policy of your company. This is my third and last huawei phone"
and their reply was:
"The updating of our equipment is carried out in accordance with the specificities that our models present in terms of software and even in terms of hardware (equipment capacities), depending on the region to which they are destined to commercialization. Given this fact, there may be models available in other regions for which a certain update has already been made available in the sense of a security patch, and making this update available for other models may be made later. However we remember that the equipment model that indicates us already operates with the latest operating system version and user interface and it will be a matter of time until the equipment receives updates of this version, namely of security patches"
A politically correct reply but meaning nothing!!
pasil.pt said:
I sent an email to huawei complaining about this:
"Bought my PD Mate 9 in december and firmware version is stil B138. No security patches since then, although on asian models there has been several updates. It is a miserable policy of your company. This is my third and last huawei phone"
and their reply was:
"The updating of our equipment is carried out in accordance with the specificities that our models present in terms of software and even in terms of hardware (equipment capacities), depending on the region to which they are destined to commercialization. Given this fact, there may be models available in other regions for which a certain update has already been made available in the sense of a security patch, and making this update available for other models may be made later. However we remember that the equipment model that indicates us already operates with the latest operating system version and user interface and it will be a matter of time until the equipment receives updates of this version, namely of security patches"
A politically correct reply but meaning nothing!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello
this is not political correct and you should answer here urgently back:
Porsche Mate 9 / Pro or Mate 9 are similar based and Mate 9 gots a lot of updates in security area.
So what is the problem to get the security fixes here?
Android 7.0.1 is not save without monthly fixes.
So Huawei talks bull****.
You should feedback them
For me:
I will sell my PD and go back to Samsung or Apple. Here you get proper updates / fixes. Very important for us in a world, where Wikileaks is telling you, how many phones will be hacked on security based things.
uhscale said:
Hello
this is not political correct and you should answer here urgently back:
Porsche Mate 9 / Pro or Mate 9 are similar based and Mate 9 gots a lot of updates in security area.
So what is the problem to get the security fixes here?
Android 7.0.1 is not save without monthly fixes.
So Huawei talks bull****.
You should feedback them
For me:
I will sell my PD and go back to Samsung or Apple. Here you get proper updates / fixes. Very important for us in a world, where Wikileaks is telling you, how many phones will be hacked on security based things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are absolutelly right. But I contacted Huawei international and the reply comes from office in Portugal. They can do nothing but wait for instructions from Huawei Headquarters.
But I will reply and let you know here any feedback
pasil.pt said:
You are absolutelly right. But I contacted Huawei international and the reply comes from office in Portugal. They can do nothing but wait for instructions from Huawei Headquarters.
But I will reply and let you know here any feedback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great!
I did the same in Germany.
Meanwhile going back to iPhone 7
In a new reply they say that updates are out of their competence and so i should wait. But iphone or samsung are not options as do not take 2 sim's
I've just had a thought..
Are we going about this the wrong way?
The brand is Porsche Design, and surely they wouldn't want their customers being let down, it looks bad on them...
Maybe we should all complain to them?
I've sent them a message on Facebook, might be worth a try if everyone makes a point of contacting them then they might put some pressure for some updates to be released?
Clearly Huawei has made this phone, then left it and is looking after its own brand.
charmz2k2 said:
I've just had a thought..
Are we going about this the wrong way?
The brand is Porsche Design, and surely they wouldn't want their customers being let down, it looks bad on them...
Maybe we should all complain to them?
I've sent them a message on Facebook, might be worth a try if everyone makes a point of contacting them then they might put some pressure for some updates to be released?
Clearly Huawei has made this phone, then left it and is looking after its own brand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you suggest can be done but I don't think it will be any worth. First, PD is a luxury ralated company and I believe most of their customers buy the phone and don´t worry abou updates and even less about freelance developers. But most important is that huawei also sells mate 9 PRO, which only differs from PD on memory (125 Gb instead of 250) and colour/stylistic finnishing.
So much more people who buy mate 9 PRO are left without updates.
I think that key pouit is about International models Vs Asian ones (these are updated more often).
But even about this, I remember that when I bought my Mate 8 from wondamobile they adviced me to wait for the international version, as they told that asian versions were not so reliable.I have no idea if this is true, but it is what I was told. But if it is true maybe that explains why asian models get more updates
pasil.pt said:
What you suggest can be done but I don't think it will be any worth. First, PD is a luxury ralated company and I believe most of their customers buy the phone and don´t worry abou updates and even less about freelance developers. But most important is that huawei also sells mate 9 PRO, which only differs from PD on memory (125 Gb instead of 250) and colour/stylistic finnishing.
So much more people who buy mate 9 PRO are left without updates.
I think that key pouit is about International models Vs Asian ones (these are updated more often).
But even about this, I remember that when I bought my Mate 8 from wondamobile they adviced me to wait for the international version, as they told that asian versions were not so reliable.I have no idea if this is true, but it is what I was told. But if it is true maybe that explains why asian models get more updates
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like you PD buyers have a raw deal here.. I bought a Mate 9 Pro and I have had 1 OTA update from B139 (my base when i bought it) to B156 since I purchased it back in Feb. And looks like today theyve started to roll out B172 for Mate 9 Pro too.
I check the following site to see when new OTA's are in the wild: (dont bother trying to download these files and apply them yourself, it doesnt work).
http://hwmt.ru/oth/HWFF/info/view.php?find_model=LON-L29
Then usually within a week or two (depends), they usually either show up in my phone or if I want them sooner Firmware Finder can download and push them to the Huawei Updater for me.
Leighm0 said:
Sounds like you PD buyers have a raw deal here.. I bought a Mate 9 Pro and I have had 1 OTA update from B139 (my base when i bought it) to B156 since I purchased it back in Feb. And looks like today theyve started to roll out B172 for Mate 9 Pro too.
I check the following site to see when new OTA's are in the wild: (dont bother trying to download these files and apply them yourself, it doesnt work).
http://hwmt.ru/oth/HWFF/info/view.php?find_model=LON-L29
Then usually within a week or two (depends), they usually either show up in my phone or if I want them sooner Firmware Finder can download and push them to the Huawei Updater for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So i guess charmz2k2 was right and we, PD owners, are left alone. I can mail PD shop but I think they will reply me that has nothing to do with them
I totally think we've been screwed over. The phone cost twice the price of Pro (over twice the price of Mate 9) yet the warranty isn't as good and no updates.
I certainly won't be hooked by designer branding on phones again. Porsche should know better (how to treat its customers) whereas Huawei is like any chinese phone manufacturer and be out for itself. Disappointing. Waste of £600 in 3 months.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Will try to update using firmware finder. Post results
Sent from my PORSCHE DESIGN HUAWEI Mate 9
bonerp said:
I totally think we've been screwed over. The phone cost twice the price of Pro (over twice the price of Mate 9) yet the warranty isn't as good and no updates.
I certainly won't be hooked by designer branding on phones again. Porsche should know better (how to treat its customers) whereas Huawei is like any chinese phone manufacturer and be out for itself. Disappointing. Waste of £600 in 3 months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.facebook.com/porschedesigngroup/
That's the group i sent the message to...
Let's all give it a go then..
Surely PD will have more pressure on them than us??
---------- Post added at 02:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:09 PM ----------
aslan93 said:
Will try to update using firmware finder. Post results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so that shows that there are a few updates for March...
Maybe it's on its way then?
I also mentioned about the crappy screen protection.. given the price, we should get at least gg5 surely??

Categories

Resources