Galaxy s9/s9+ capable of 4k HDR recording but samsung not enabling the feature? - Samsung Galaxy S9 Questions & Answers

The galaxy s9/s9+ was supose to record HDR video and this was confirmed by snapdragon on their website on reveal day but it looks like samsung may not enable the feature. HDR video recording is way better by far than any feature samsung revealed about the s9. Other wise we just have basically a galaxy 8 with 6 seconds of slo-mo and 1.5 aperture. HDR recording was a feature in the snapdragon models U.S. consumers were looking forward to. In fact if samsung disables the feature, the galaxy s9 will be the only snapdragon 845 smartphone without HDR recording...i believe this would be a bad move in samsungs part. Its just that samsung didnt mention HDR recording at the reveal day...the most important video feature...no word from samsung yet.

Looks like they aren't doing themselves any favours by going with 2 different SoCs; no 4K 120fps and no 4K HDR video recording. They also need to adjust the performance so it's equal as well as for the battery life. Would just be so much easier if they released two separate models because this is getting ridiculous. Thinking about cancelling my pre-order especially after the whole "slow down the exynos variant thing". Doesn't seem like it's going to be much of an upgrade from the S8 so why then pay double the amount for one? Was really looking forward to it, but Samsung have somehow managed to make it a lot more crappy than it needs to be.

Related

Camera quality?

Hello!
I have a Sensation and had a sgs2 before, I wonder how does the Galaxy Nexus compare to them in both photo shots and video recording.
Do you think devs can emulate 8mp on the GN?
It's the only thing with the size of the phone that are stopping me of buying it
5 or 8 or 12 it doesn't really matter.
the camera quality of GN is really not so good (it is just OK but it could be better... more better) and it can't compete with sgs2 or iphone or other smartphones with nice camera but people bought GN not for camera, i think we all knew its quality from reviews.
vegetaleb said:
Hello!
I have a Sensation and had a sgs2 before, I wonder how does the Galaxy Nexus compare to them in both photo shots and video recording.
Do you think devs can emulate 8mp on the GN?
It's the only thing with the size of the phone that are stopping me of buying it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparing the GN photos and video to those phones is sure to disappoint. The Sensation offers some of the best video quality I've seen on a phone and the SGS2 takes wonderful photos (and great video!).
If photos and video are important to you, stick with what you have or wait for new phones to be available in April. The Sensation should be getting ICS next month and that will make it a better device over the GN, in my opinion. It has better battery life, a better camera, performs better,etc.
What is your reason for wanting the GN?
Simply the HD screen
But only the white version
As a former SGS2 owner, I can say that in comparison the GN camera sucks. However, it's a great phone and the camera is on par with last year's cameraphones.
the bad quality mainly is from the super poor photo format compression
i wonder why there have not been any expert user modifying some codes for it
I had a nexus one and someone modified a set-profile file and the compression of the photos improved so much...

How can I (or how did you) improve the Note 3's camera?

That's the main drawback of an N3 now, for me. The rest of the phone still works great even in late 2017, but the camera really falls short of newer models.
How do you improve camera performance on your Note 3? (Not just changing quality from 95 to 100 or whatever, but the actual picture-taking ability, like focus speed and minimizing blur or taking better low-light pictures). Do you use a different app? Is there a combination of stock settings that works for you?
More observations:
The Note 2 had a particular low-light mode (Candlelight?) that slowed shutter speed and made low-light pictures much better. I haven't seen anything similar on the Note 3. Am I just missing something?
The Note 2 seemed to have more control over blur-vs.-brightness. I didn't care if pictures were dark as long as they were mostly sharp. Note 3 seems to prioritize brightness over freezing fast motion, no matter how I change ISO, low-light detection, stabilization, etc. How do you capture fast motion?
I've tried practically every N3 ROM with an S7/N7/S8/N8 camera app and can't find a single one that does tap-focus at the same speed as N4 camera apps. If you use the S/N 7/8 cameras and tap on the screen, there's half-to-full-second delay before it finishes focusing. I've tried this on a bunch of ROMs on several different N3 handsets. Same delay with S7/N7/S8/N8 cameras. I guess it doesn't matter if the above observations still apply, but I'm sharing in case anyone's had the same headache.
Note3 Camera Improvements
Improvements to the camera are ROM/Kernel dependent. -- And unless it's a well hidden ROM, I think I've at least kicked the tires on anything I could successfully install and run on my N900T.
Are you looking for 'just' a camera improvement, or do you include video in your search? -- I believe the newer DarkLord ROM's boast 60fps with the Note3. Although dated, there are still some pretty good youtube videos out there that talk about camera and vid firmware.
As far as focus speed, blur, low-light, etc. goes, are you using the original OS app? -- (Not a sales pitch) I've found that CameraFX does a far better job querying the camera2 api than anything else out there, Modded or not.
Well, it looks like I'm still not able to upload images, being too new or something. If you're interested, leave me a PM, and I'll figure out a way to get you a few screenshots and more information on the camera. The Note3 still rocks the planet, and although I understand the reasons why, It's still sad to see so many great dev teams leaving the Note3 for the newer models that are essentially just retreading what the Note3 offers for right at $200.00
Good luck!
O's said:
That's the main drawback of an N3 now, for me. The rest of the phone still works great even in late 2017, but the camera really falls short of newer models.
How do you improve camera performance on your Note 3? (Not just changing quality from 95 to 100 or whatever, but the actual picture-taking ability, like focus speed and minimizing blur or taking better low-light pictures). Do you use a different app? Is there a combination of stock settings that works for you?
More observations:
The Note 2 had a particular low-light mode (Candlelight?) that slowed shutter speed and made low-light pictures much better. I haven't seen anything similar on the Note 3. Am I just missing something?
The Note 2 seemed to have more control over blur-vs.-brightness. I didn't care if pictures were dark as long as they were mostly sharp. Note 3 seems to prioritize brightness over freezing fast motion, no matter how I change ISO, low-light detection, stabilization, etc. How do you capture fast motion?
I've tried practically every N3 ROM with an S7/N7/S8/N8 camera app and can't find a single one that does tap-focus at the same speed as N4 camera apps. If you use the S/N 7/8 cameras and tap on the screen, there's half-to-full-second delay before it finishes focusing. I've tried this on a bunch of ROMs on several different N3 handsets. Same delay with S7/N7/S8/N8 cameras. I guess it doesn't matter if the above observations still apply, but I'm sharing in case anyone's had the same headache.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dangmouse said:
Improvements to the camera are ROM/Kernel dependent. -- And unless it's a well hidden ROM, I think I've at least kicked the tires on anything I could successfully install and run on my N900T.
Are you looking for 'just' a camera improvement, or do you include video in your search? -- I believe the newer DarkLord ROM's boast 60fps with the Note3. Although dated, there are still some pretty good youtube videos out there that talk about camera and vid firmware.
As far as focus speed, blur, low-light, etc. goes, are you using the original OS app? -- (Not a sales pitch) I've found that CameraFX does a far better job querying the camera2 api than anything else out there, Modded or not.
Well, it looks like I'm still not able to upload images, being too new or something. If you're interested, leave me a PM, and I'll figure out a way to get you a few screenshots and more information on the camera. The Note3 still rocks the planet, and although I understand the reasons why, It's still sad to see so many great dev teams leaving the Note3 for the newer models that are essentially just retreading what the Note3 offers for right at $200.00
Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks, and agreed on every point!
Mainly seeking camera improvement, but video's a nice bonus! I'm pretty loyal to MagMa, but I might check out DarkLord.
I've read about CameraFX. Might have to fork over the few bucks and buy it if it's really worth it. I'm on the N4 camera app (S7/N7/etc. cameras on N3 have too long of a focus delay when you tap the screen to focus). N4 camera app's fine, but I'd just like some better all-around performance, and I swear the N3 has the power. Like you said, it's still a great performer in every measure. I know a camera can only be improved so much, but I figured the right app might make it sing more. I'll look into CameraFX. Thank you!

Do You think that the camera in S9 will be minimum or much better than in S8?

Do You think that the camera in S9 will be minimum or much better than in S8?
Well I mean, the only details Samsung has officially released about the S9 itself is "The camera, reimagined," so uh yeah
Minimal change, with some new effect of a selfie or something like that.
Coolyou said:
Minimal change, with some new effect of a selfie or something like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if camera wise S9 (single)= Note8(double)
cause S9+(double) > Note8 (double)
It already revealed that is has super slow motion (f/1.5, 26mm, 1/2.5", 1.4 µm, Dual Pixel PDAF)
Considering I always put a custom AOSP-based ROM on my phones, I've sort of lost hope in having a decent camera. Because of... reasons... you lose out on the amazing camera capabilities if you don't run a stock ROM. It's quite depressing knowing the camera is far more-capable than what I'm getting out of it.
sremick said:
Considering I always put a custom AOSP-based ROM on my phones, I've sort of lost hope in having a decent camera. Because of... reasons... you lose out on the amazing camera capabilities if you don't run a stock ROM. It's quite depressing knowing the camera is far more-capable than what I'm getting out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That really suxx. But wasn't it always like that in Samsung phones? And in others?
androidbadboy said:
That really suxx. But wasn't it always like that in Samsung phones? And in others?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a former Sony user, I can say it's the same on there. Something related to DRM-Protected drivers.
R!n said:
As a former Sony user, I can say it's the same on there. Something related to DRM-Protected drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that happend since S8 or was always the problem in all Samsung phones?
androidbadboy said:
But that happend since S8 or was always the problem in all Samsung phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't really say, I never owned a Galaxy since the S2. Was looking to see if the S9+ ends up being better than the Mate 10, or at least drop the price of the Note 8.
R!n said:
I can't really say, I never owned a Galaxy since the S2. Was looking to see if the S9+ ends up being better than the Mate 10, or at least drop the price of the Note 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Mate 10 is better than S8/S8+ ?! In what may I ask? Seriously, no hard feelings and irony here.
androidbadboy said:
So Mate 10 is better than S8/S8+ ?! In what may I ask? Seriously, no hard feelings and irony here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mainly just the camera. Performance-wise the Mate 10 lacks in numbers, but it still feels just as snappy.
The monochrome cameras are great, and the camera app's pro mode is really nice to take some great pictures with. I especially fell in love with the 30s exposure.
R!n said:
Mainly just the camera. Performance-wise the Mate 10 lacks in numbers, but it still feels just as snappy.
The monochrome cameras are great, and the camera app's pro mode is really nice to take some great pictures with. I especially fell in love with the 30s exposure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude! Please help me out here. Is the camera pics and recording better in Mate 10 than in S8/S8+ are U 100% suer?
Cuz if that's true I may buy that phone,
androidbadboy said:
Dude! Please help me out here. Is the camera pics and recording better in Mate 10 than in S8/S8+ are U 100% suer?
Cuz if that's true I may buy that phone,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Photos yes, video recording not so much, not sure why.
Also be aware that the Mate 10 Pro does not have a 3.5mm jack or SD card slot, but 256GB internal memory instead.
R!n said:
Photos yes, video recording not so much, not sure why.
Also be aware that the Mate 10 Pro does not have a 3.5mm jack or SD card slot, but 256GB internal memory instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about Note8, are thie pics from Mate also better than Galaxy Note8?
Nope camera won't be good until they overcome the hardware limitation, 12 mega pixels are good, but when you see the pics on computer or zoom in then you see the blur and weakness of 12 mp camera but i know that in past 22 megapixels sonys have really bad image quality because it doesn't depend solely on increased mp, but for a real upgrade now they need to increase megapixels while still retaining same image quality, atleast 20 megapixel and still a large aperture size is the only thing that can push me to upgrade, other than that, front facing fingerprint scanner and atleast 3600+ mah battery is a must, but its still nice that they added stereo speakers, i would like to see fm radio and infrared back too. Btw both exynos 9810 and snapdragon 845 are still far behind from apple's A12 bionic chip, both in terms of processor and gpu performance. So a hard choice which to upgrade atm.
Sent from my S7 Edge using XDA Labs
shah22 said:
Nope camera won't be good until they overcome the hardware limitation, 12 mega pixels are good, but when you see the pics on computer or zoom in then you see the blur and weakness of 12 mp camera but i know that in past 22 megapixels sonys have really bad image quality because it doesn't depend solely on increased mp, but for a real upgrade now they need to increase megapixels while still retaining same image quality, atleast 20 megapixel and still a large aperture size is the only thing that can push me to upgrade, other than that, front facing fingerprint scanner and atleast 3600+ mah battery is a must, but its still nice that they added stereo speakers, i would like to see fm radio and infrared back too. Btw both exynos 9810 and snapdragon 845 are still far behind from apple's A12 bionic chip, both in terms of processor and gpu performance. So a hard choice which to upgrade atm.
Sent from my S7 Edge using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So You wouldnt upgrade to Mate 10 PRo, S9/s9+ and Apple X from S7 Edge?
How about if you have had S6EPlus ? would You upgrade then? If yes to which phone?
Some general points.
Megapixels has nothing to do with it really. It's the size of the sensor. I do have it on good authority though that at least one of the well known brands is working on a halo product with a 1" sensor. But expect it to cost the earth, if it sees the light of day, and to be much thicker than today's flagships.
Probably the P20 with its triple camera sensor (likely interpolated into single auto HDR images) and software collaboration with Leica is likely to be the best bet for photography this year. But expect to get *at best* dual camera support on custom ROMs (if OpenCamera / LineageCamera / GoogleCamera begin supporting dual configs).
S9 and S9+ will probably show quite a bit of improvement in low light, and autofocus.
I really wish Samsung would allow Samsung Camera to run on their phones that run AOSP / custom ROMs. I can see why Sony, and to some extent Huawei won't, as smaller players with niches. But Samsung are the market leader and could still attach function to hardware IDs, rather than allowing it to work on competitors' phones.
If Nokia / HMD keep improving sales, I'm pretty sure you'll see Pureview, or something similar resurrected. Protos / designs are certainly being looked at, but likely depend on them continuing to build momentum. If they have a good 2018, expect to see something from them in 2019 with 4-6+ rear camera sensors ... bit like a mini L16. But, again, expect them to lock the software to their stock ROM.
mudnightoil said:
Some general points.
Megapixels has nothing to do with it really. It's the size of the sensor. I do have it on good authority though that at least one of the well known brands is working on a halo product with a 1" sensor. But expect it to cost the earth, if it sees the light of day, and to be much thicker than today's flagships.
Probably the P20 with its triple camera sensor (likely interpolated into single auto HDR images) and software collaboration with Leica is likely to be the best bet for photography this year. But expect to get *at best* dual camera support on custom ROMs (if OpenCamera / LineageCamera / GoogleCamera begin supporting dual configs).
S9 and S9+ will probably show quite a bit of improvement in low light, and autofocus.
I really wish Samsung would allow Samsung Camera to run on their phones that run AOSP / custom ROMs. I can see why Sony, and to some extent Huawei won't, as smaller players with niches. But Samsung are the market leader and could still attach function to hardware IDs, rather than allowing it to work on competitors' phones.
If Nokia / HMD keep improving sales, I'm pretty sure you'll see Pureview, or something similar resurrected. Protos / designs are certainly being looked at, but likely depend on them continuing to build momentum. If they have a good 2018, expect to see something from them in 2019 with 4-6+ rear camera sensors ... bit like a mini L16. But, again, expect them to lock the software to their stock ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks and wow for that massive knowledge. I wonder what P20 will bring to the table with their 5 cams. 27th March is the premiere. How much will it cost in Your opinion. EUR or USD please if possible and add with or without tax.
I'm almost exclusively interested in the video camera capabilities of the S9+. I can manage with a mediocre photo camera but video needs to be class-leading in smartphones.
Ability to shoot UHD video in h.265 compression + much better low light performance than Note 4 = I'd be very happy.
Sadly LG put an undersized sensor in their V30 (not to mention the sucky POLED display) - otherwise I might grab a V30 right now for a good price. I wonder what LG has in store for the V40, given their focus on video shooting prowess.

Galaxy S9 (Exynos) or OnePlus 6T?

Hello all, having a dilemma here: I'm selling my Galaxy S8 on eBay and am now looking for a new phone.
I did some research and then found the S9 and OP6T and now cannot make up my mind, I simply don't know which one to get.
There's no comparisons on the internet really, so I thought I'd just ask you!
I know the S9 wouldn't be worth the upgrade coming from the S8 if it wasn't for Treble support.
At least that's what I think.
So the S9 is actually cheaper than the 6T atm, but I still need to have a few opinions on which device to get.
Are you guys enjoying your S9 or would you rather have the OnePlus now that it's out?
Would you recommend the S9 if you'd be using it for the next 4 years?
Thanks a lot in advance!
It really just depends on you. You want a better camera, IP68, no notch, headphone jack, much better speakers, better screen, a fingerprint scanner that actually works or maybe Samsung pay you get the S9. Since you've used an S8 already you already know what you're getting with TouchWiz so if you want a better software experience and value performance over all else than the 6T is your phone. But I'd honestly wait a bit before deciding since there have been a couple controversies surrounding the 6Ts touch latency
S9 6T
S9 the perfect phone.
6T the perfect gamer
I'd rather go with the SGS9 Exynos variant but that is just me. As I have heard nothing but bad things with regards to Qualcomm's Snapdragon series of SOCs.
James160103 said:
Hello all, having a dilemma here: I'm selling my Galaxy S8 on eBay and am now looking for a new phone.
I did some research and then found the S9 and OP6T and now cannot make up my mind, I simply don't know which one to get.
There's no comparisons on the internet really, so I thought I'd just ask you!
I know the S9 wouldn't be worth the upgrade coming from the S8 if it wasn't for Treble support.
At least that's what I think.
So the S9 is actually cheaper than the 6T atm, but I still need to have a few opinions on which device to get.
Are you guys enjoying your S9 or would you rather have the OnePlus now that it's out?
Would you recommend the S9 if you'd be using it for the next 4 years?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the s9+ and I would say don't get either. Get the s9 snapdragon 845. I have the Exynos 9810 it isn't good.
The Exynos 9810 has such bad optimization it literally performs like last year's snapdragon 835. Geekbench doesnt truly reflect the peformance since in every other benchmark it peforms worse than the 845 and in real life.
A lot of people on XDA on the screen on time section of real life review are getting below 5 hours of SOT with the regular s9 with the exynos 9810 that's how bad it is. I have the s9+ I have gotten over 7hrs but with a lot of changes and making sure to monitor apps. It isn't fun. People with the snapdragon equipped s9 are getting really good battery life that is even as good as the s9+ Exynos.
The One plus 6t has no headphone jack and it's cameras sensor size is only 1.22um compared to even the s7,s8, s9 which have been 1.4um for a while now. Software can only take you so far. 6T is a nice phone but it isn't an upgrade in terms of screen, camera, audio. The software and the 845 are better and even the battery is good. But it doesn't out weigh it's over faults.
If the Camera and screen and no headphone jack isn't important to you then get the 6T. Otherwise find a way to import the snapdragon 845 equipped s9.
if you care about the camera and edge screen and you like touch wiz then go with the 9 ( the battery is poor i am getting 1:46- screen on time) from 7 the morning until 2 o'clock the noon 40 percent left ) the max screen on time I got is 3:24
if you care about speed, battery, new technology like the fingerprint in the display if want stock android then go with the op6t
ps for whatever reason my s9 is lagging sometimes with normal use like opening the camera on unlocking it with fingerprint sometimes the text of lock screen stays for a few minutes
elliott2456 said:
I have the s9+ and I would say don't get either. Get the s9 snapdragon 845. I have the Exynos 9810 it isn't good.
The Exynos 9810 has such bad optimization it literally performs like last year's snapdragon 835. Geekbench doesnt truly reflect the peformance since in every other benchmark it peforms worse than the 845 and in real life.
A lot of people on XDA on the screen on time section of real life review are getting below 5 hours of SOT with the regular s9 with the exynos 9810 that's how bad it is. I have the s9+ I have gotten over 7hrs but with a lot of changes and making sure to monitor apps. It isn't fun. People with the snapdragon equipped s9 are getting really good battery life that is even as good as the s9+ Exynos.
The One plus 6t has no headphone jack and it's cameras sensor size is only 1.22um compared to even the s7,s8, s9 which have been 1.4um for a while now. Software can only take you so far. 6T is a nice phone but it isn't an upgrade in terms of screen, camera, audio. The software and the 845 are better and even the battery is good. But it doesn't out weigh it's over faults.
If the Camera and screen and no headphone jack isn't important to you then get the 6T. Otherwise find a way to import the snapdragon 845 equipped s9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your lengthy post! I agree, I would go for the Snapdragon if it was being sold here in Europe and had an unlockable boot loader. Not having the latter is a real deal breaker for me though.
I'm fine with TouchWiz but I want my phone to last for about 4 years which means installing a custom ROM later on.
I think I'll be getting the S9 now, thank you very much for your replies!
James160103 said:
Hello all, having a dilemma here: I'm selling my Galaxy S8 on eBay and am now looking for a new phone.
I did some research and then found the S9 and OP6T and now cannot make up my mind, I simply don't know which one to get.
There's no comparisons on the internet really, so I thought I'd just ask you!
I know the S9 wouldn't be worth the upgrade coming from the S8 if it wasn't for Treble support.
At least that's what I think.
So the S9 is actually cheaper than the 6T atm, but I still need to have a few opinions on which device to get.
Are you guys enjoying your S9 or would you rather have the OnePlus now that it's out?
Would you recommend the S9 if you'd be using it for the next 4 years?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd recommend you navigate in both forums and check how many complaints there are about every device. You'll certainly notice that Oneplus 6(T) forum is full of complaints of annoying bugs here and there about hardware and software.
I personally just returned to S9 for the third try of adopting an OP6... the S9 is just perfect and the stereo speakers are simply otherworldly ! The camera also is far far ahead.

S20+ 4G /S20+ 5G or S20 Ultra 5G

hi,
I have Galaxy S20 Ultra since the pre-orders, Exynos 990 variant.
I am pissed of about the S20Ultra camera which is worse than even S20+ ..
I am planing to ditch it and get a S20+ (still Exynos variant due to EU constraints).
And I am getting all kind of review over the internet /youtube regarding which one is better and which one is not.
From what I understand 5G is almost not exiting as network and therefore 5G variant now is pointless. But the 5G phone hardware is still consuming battery, though..
So even if S20+ Exynos has 4500mha battery less than Ultra, it has only 4G and thinking better SoT /battery life to be..
P40 Pro lacks Google Play Services and even though you can install them, Google Photos not working and some notifications not showing.
And also from the past days seems that camera suffers from focus and blurry OIS..
So any suggestions and reviews are welcomed.
Thank you in advance.
stefanz08 said:
hi,
I have Galaxy S20 Ultra since the pre-orders, Exynos 990 variant.
I am pissed of about the S20Ultra camera which is worse than even S20+ ..
I am planing to ditch it and get a S20+ (still Exynos variant due to EU constraints).
And I am getting all kind of review over the internet /youtube regarding which one is better and which one is not.
From what I understand 5G is almost not exiting as network and therefore 5G variant now is pointless. But the 5G phone hardware is still consuming battery, though..
So even if S20+ Exynos has 4500mha battery less than Ultra, it has only 4G and thinking better SoT /battery life to be..
P40 Pro lacks Google Play Services and even though you can install them, Google Photos not working and some notifications not showing.
And also from the past days seems that camera suffers from focus and blurry OIS..
So any suggestions and reviews are welcomed.
Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, the real question is : what do you want to do with your new phone that you can't do with your actual phone
filming for personal and business to be able to edit in final cut and take pictures for personal and business reasons at a proper quality.
oneplus 8 pro compared to s20ultra pictures at least were so sharp and clean.. and then i saw s20+ is better than oneplus 8 pro..
With the S20 ultra I find it hard at times to get proper focus on still objects, let alone moving objects or when taking videos. It's not hunting to focus, it's just not focusing on anything, just blurry until I tap on the screen a few times til it finally focuses. Doesn't happen all the time, but just enough that it's irritating. The S20+ may give you more consistent results.
chetly968 said:
With the S20 ultra I find it hard at times to get proper focus on still objects, let alone moving objects or when taking videos. It's not hunting to focus, it's just not focusing on anything, just blurry until I tap on the screen a few times til it finally focuses. Doesn't happen all the time, but just enough that it's irritating. The S20+ may give you more consistent results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't having issues like that with my ultra...
UNIK97122 said:
i don't having issues like that with my ultra...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great pictures, I can get those same results. But it's irritating that on my 3rd phone I still have situations where it just won't focus. A common issue that's been talked about everywhere. So at least I k ow I'm not the only one that has issues with this disaster of a camera.
chetly968 said:
Great pictures, I can get those same results. But it's irritating that on my 3rd phone I still have situations where it just won't focus. A common issue that's been talked about everywhere. So at least I k ow I'm not the only one that has issues with this disaster of a camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's looks the exynos version is better with focus, so far everything is perfect for me day or night 4K or 8K, as they say, my fingers crossed:la victoire:
To get 5G or not depends actually on your area and how frequent you travel or change phones.
If your area already has 5G, go ahead, get a 5G phone (If it is compatible. Samsung's 5G support seems to vary with region.. Some supports only low and mid-band waves, some mmwave... some both.. )
Even if your area already has 5G, the coverage may not be very good yet with gaps in coverage. when this occurs, the phone will drain your battery trying to search for 5G.
Personally, i would hold off getting a 5G phone until the roll out is stable enough with reasonable coverage. or just switch off 5G and use 4G.
Regarding the plus or ultra, it depends on you. If you need the zoom capabilities, get the ultra. But take note, due to the physical camera lens limitation on the s20+ and ultra, at certain zoom levels the s20+ can take better photos.
To make it easier to understand, from the camera app there will be 3 icons (well at least for the S20+). these icons represent each len. For the s20+, it is the wide angle, main, and telephoto zoom lens. Using these 3 selection will give u the best image. If you pinch your finger on the screen (to zoom in further), you are using the digital zoom, which in most cases, doesnt yield the best photo.
the S20+ zoom lens is more suited to casual shoots. the S20 Ultra telephoto zoom is a bit unusual for casual shooting. most of the time you will be using the zoom range of the S20+ telephoto lens, thus for casual photo taking folks, the S20+ usually yield better result than the S20 Ultra.
S20+ works great, no issues with focus etc - highly recommend as user myself
I have the S20+5G Exynos and have no issues what so ever. I highly recommend getting it. I have been a Samsung user from the start.
Import the Snapdragon model if you can. Exynos and Snapdragon have different image processing and from what I've read, the general consensus is the Snapdragon image processing is better overall. Furthermore, battery life is better on Snapdragon, so Snapdragon would be a win-win for you.

Categories

Resources